Is the Darwinistic Selection Principle False?

Of course, the second suggestion, of a continuous progression from amoeba to man, is problematic. Elegant though.
Do you think man came from ape?
And if so from what did ape come to your knowledge?

In terms of which species humans most act like (and this is well known) it’s actually drumroll ants !!!

Apes act less like ants than humans do, even though apes are genetically our closest relatives!

we don’t act at all like ants

medium.com/handwaving-freakoute … b3074ec92f

well if bj campbell says so

We are too individualistic to be like ants who work together as a single collective to achieve a common goal
And other species like bees or wasps but we value our independence too much to be like these social insects

No one here actually read Origin of Species, eh?

I was waiting for someone to nuance my statements.

WHO HAS READ DARWIN?

Anyone read Dawkins’ The Selfish Gene? High quality work.
He argues that it is not the organism but the genes themselves which must be seen as the agent. So you have to look at individual survival and procreation and group survival at once, which changes the logics, and gives another way of looking at “fitness”.

So, the group is its own primary environment.

all ants in a colony are sterile female clones
the whole colony is one individual

I remember at your compound, taking a walk around it, studying this enormous ant trail, with very strong ants carrying whole flower petals by themselves. It was like 50 yards long at least. Beautiful.

i’ve read those two
among another thing or two
i published a microbiology paper once, too
if that helps

I doubt it will help. But good job.

I have read them both but I prefer the Dawkins because it is the more contemporary of the two
It is one of the truly seminal scientific books anyone remotely interested in science should read

saúva ants
atta subfam
they are beautiful, indeed
they’ll also wipe your crop clean in 24h

Read and learn:

animals.mom.me/ants-female-vs-male-7766.html

Ants unlike apes have division of labor, just like humans.

well I mean, to get to the point where you are able to put something you wrote in a credible scientific publication, surely you’ve studied a good deal of the foundational work on the subject

whatever
i hate it when creds start getting thrown around

y’all can just go ahead and assume that i’m an idiot and you’re better than me
to me it makes no difference

why dontcha keep googling until you get it right

hahaha alright I’ll do more than talk shit

in sum…

reading the mentioning of ants and dawkins in the same page is nice, since ants exemplify the idea of the selfish gene pretty well
an ant’s only purpose in life is to serve the colony because the colony is them
every single one of them is the exact same genetically

except for the males of course, but not because they are something else, but because they are a reduced version of them
they’re fertile, but they hatch from unfertilized eggs
they’re the genetic half of what a worker ant is

they’re referred to as “flying sperm” sometimes, because that’s all they do
they don’t even have jaws for eating
they hatch, fly out, mate, and die

it’s all controlled by the queen
she deliberately withholds sperm from a small fraction of the eggs she lays so that they remain unfertilized
since they are unfertilized, these eggs contain only her gene

so basically, you get to be fertile, but only because you’ll fly out and spread MY gene

anyway, that’s why I say we don’t act at all like ants
we’re not built the same

edit: double post

Alright phoneutria,

I’ll give you 1/2 of the debate.

Ants have division of labor. Apes don’t. Ants do farming, apes don’t, ants build cities, apes don’t etc…