You can see it as an evolutionary test. An obstacle put in front, before us, by the unintegrated portions of our own nature, which we project our subconscious powers onto, which is what governments are.
They are here to fuck with us, to teach us to rise above reptile level mind, by representing the consequences of the reptile mind and the forces it packs.
What we can do is conjure the spirits that lie dormant as the four elements in our primordial cortex, and begin the alchemy of drawing primal powers away from politics and into our own perspective.
What we get then is the demiurgic dolphin, so to speak.
Jesus Christ. Leave some of the kool-aid for everyone else whydontcha.
Means of governance I think are linked to the population capacity they can reasonably govern and maintain social stability. What we see today are the limits of our current system(s) being surpassed.
So being humanitarian backfired, in over-populating the world through humanitarianism, and now?
A one-world government would have to be elected and accountable to the planet, in being transparent… is that a possible reality within a moderne society GIA?
One of the impediments to people voting for global governance is giving the citizens a feeling of being able to change laws and maintain control of their economies.
Changing laws should not be a huge problem or hard to overcome as signatories to the U.N. already have a mandate to follow those new laws.
As to the economy, all countries would have to have faith in whatever equalization of economies, if any are required, to insure no particular loss for any country.
Mobility of the work force always seems to be seen as a plus and I have my own views on a better socio economic demographic pyramid, that would be based on worker’s and professional guilds instead of just on one’s wealth the way most are today.
More and more governments today rule by statistic and advice from demographers. This will increase in the future regardless of what the larger world does.
We are moving into an era that would have Socrates smiling in his grave as he thought that the best form of governments would be manned by professionals and not just whoever the population happened to fancy.
That form of governance is what my view of a one world government would look like.
Managers who hold their position by competence as judged by their peers or guild members as much as, if not more than, an election based on how much a candidate is liked or his military record. Heroes make poor leaders.
But to be fair, do you think you had people in a state of sufficient chemistry as for there to be a sinkable ship at play for my storm of mud to acquire a name?
