You know, the continuity may be reestablished by my review of that, but if that supposition stands, there may still be a point of agency of arguability, wether the credible justification of that is sufficient.
But assuming that is justified, can there remain a difference that overcomes absolute ideas of reference?
So may I grant you as much?
If not, then is there sense to a view which succeeds in the jump from belief to truth? Or like the condemned of Althea , is there an wywrnal Faustian doubt as to , whether Odessyus learned from that experience of primary vision?
I am not as idiotic to resign my self to remaining in a self constrained residence to a depth that can not bear the it’s own recogniscence.
That would be placed in the grayish shadow world of the unrecognizable.
By matter of the principle of the power of the will, that is out of the question.