This holds for many secular traditions if not all in one way or others. We learn by doing and what makes sense to the expert will often make no sense to the layperson and certain field of expertise words will not be understood or understood in the same way by each group. Nonexperts can literally not even see things the experts can see. And this is all within scientifically documented secular fields. And, of course, even when experiments or long tradition seem to indicate something is the truth, even in secular fields (and even in science) it can turn out to be false. Also things can be excluded on poor grounds or because experiences differ radically.
And just to be clear, I am not disagreeing, just extending. This is a not a quality of just religious and spiritual knowledge and experience.
And one needs to view knowledge, I think, as an active apprenticeship. Something one does, hands on. You can collect information through a computer screen, but that generally has little to do with real learning, even less so knowledge, and is far away from expertise and wisdom.
You have to get your hands dirty to learn things, especially important ones.