That the article which you complain about doesn’t have anything to do with what you complain it doesn’t do for you. That’s one example. Another was that you asked people to answer
to answer
what their responses and opinions would be if they had complete knowledge of Buddhism
or
Western philosophy.
I pointed out the absurdity of this question.
It’s trolling or a loss of rationality in the post as a whole.
That’s a couple of things I said in the first post and then again in the second.
And yet you cannot find what you did not respond, despite having responded to NO points I made and some of them being repeated twice.
And then that you don’t take these questions where experts might actually be.
So you throw up your hands to the gallery. Poor you dealing with the crazy person (whose posts you are unable to actually read).
[/quote]
Exactly. In a thread someone else started about Buddhism, one of your criticisms of my post is that it does not do what you want. What my post did was critique your use of a Buddhist text, point out assumptions in your post in the thread and a number of other practical and philosopical lines. But because of your in practice solipsism here, a post is problematic if it doesn’t demonstrate the afterlife is X or conflicting goods are resolved as Y.
YOu are a functional narcissist.
And that is precisely what you did to the randomly picked Buddhist article about logic in Buddhism and how this is being reevaluated, now, in Western philosophy.
You took some random post out of Buddhism and critiqued it for not doing what you wanted it to.
And the reason seem to be so you can keep posting in the thread without merely repeating yourself completely, when you have nothing new to say, so perhaps some non-expert Buddhist fan, here, might come and fail to do what you want them to do
rather than actually trying Buddhism or whatever.
You’re a troll. How could you possibly have read those two posts and not noticed things that were central to them that you did not respond to. If you are dyslexic or nearly blind, let us know. But you actually played to the gallery after failing to read or deciding to pretend.
This is a basic reading comprehension failure, repeatedly, or worse just plain lying.
It is utterly amazing how much you say you might be wrong, but never once admit to having been wrong.
Back on ignore until I notice you seem to be luring in others.