A wooden chair or chairs in general are made for the sole purpose of someone to sit on it in order to rest as its more comfortable for the body than standing.
Now if someone violates the use of the chair by using it as a weapon by swinging it and using momentum to damage something or someone.
Does this change the meaning of the chair as it can be used both as (sitting on it) and a (weapon)?
Why is it that we are capable of using the chair in different ways than the (meaning) of it?
If we compare this to morality. People can use morality as it (fit) themselves but does morality have a (true value) just like the true use of a chair is to sit on it?