time travel?

Time travel as a concept already exists but it is not something we have any control over which is why it fascinates us so much

However when this question comes up it helps to define as rigorously as possible what time actually is
Is it therefore a physical entity like space or is it merely a construct of our apparently temporal minds

Time is usually defined as the distance between any two points but is that time itself or merely the measurement of the distance
Is it possible that it does not truly objectively exist but we still had to invent it in order to separate different points of reference

Is time more accurately an effect rather than a dimension
Is it merely a property of anything that cannot travel at c

Remember when Newton and therefore everyone else thought that it was absolute and that that false wisdom then remained unquestioned for over two centuries
Is it possible that Einstein simply brought us closer to the reality but we still have to make yet another leap across the ontological abyss to get to the actual truth

Is the concept of timelessness something that needs to be seriously considered simply because we know so little about the reality we perceive
As we currently cannot account for 96 per cent of the observable Universe which is predicated up on the model of four dimensional spacetime
And so does time itself need a complete rehaul as well or are we truly satisfied that our mathematical model of it is what it is in actual reality

Should we therefore not be very wary indeed of equating the map with the territory when the map in question currently only has a miserable 4 per cent accuracy
Remember at the end of the nineteenth century when physics was declared virtually complete since it had no more serious questions that needed to be answered

And then this thing called Quantum Mechanics was suddenly discovered followed a bit later on by this other thing called General Relativity
And over I00 years later we still have absolutely no idea how to join these two incompatibles together no matter how hard we actually try

I have no definitive answers to these questions but there are interesting ones to ask even if only from a philosopical perspective
Although I still think that they are just as much scientific ones as they are anything else

Say my watch has stopped … does anyone happen to have the correct time on them …

They don’t mean exactly the same, and their similarity can be discovered, as they had been. Quantum Magi came after I intuited the difference, and intuition may very well have a pretty fair batting average.

I am still waiting for an answer to a question posed to the Oracle of Delphi

?

Merely a pun, and a hidden allusion to psychic phenomenon.

Incidentelly, the Delphic Oracle was pretty accurate in prediction, and it’s method could claim a special conduit to a synchronistic tie in between various time bits,

The idea of time bits spliced together rather than a flow , appears at least equally readable even without an intended pun.
Recall, telepathy, and psychic phenomena generally, even subconscious travel during sleep, can indicate a deeper level of condciousness.
There is a religion based on soul travel. Ekankar, which is predicated on that, and I personally had only one clear experience of that, after my mother died, and my brother in law had one as well.
William James wrote about psychic phenomenon extensively, and both in this country, but more in Russia, academic interest is very interested in it.
Time travel , viewed this way puts s different spin on the idea that contemporaneous events are proof positive of an imminent gestalt of all events, rather then a reposition of the past and the future, as if the occupied a position of differing objective travel of subjects-as if time was such an entity.

The subject travels through a conscious differentiation of the varitable levels realization .
That becomes the basis of.determinists who claim things happen because they were meant to.happen.
The.Delphic.Oracle became an ancient.institution because of its reliable , tested ability to.grasp prophecy.

Theoretically I can imagine something like a “block-time”, where one block can be rearranged inside and still have the same net result,

Also I can conceive an elaborate parallel universe explanation which would make for a very psychedelic omniverse.

Neither idea seems very plausible.

What I do know for a logically derived fact is that the future already works on us, pushes itself on us.
Many consequences have already been calculated in matter into very distant futures and the implications of this already form a tunnel for us.
This is not an endorsement of determinism, as I see the arche of being as unadaptedness.

Wherever all is adapted to all there is a “nanogoo” which cant perceive or be perceived, a flatlined ontos.

Removed

Aliens are … I mean, they’re cool.

It’s like, time travel comes in handy to being cool.

Acting cool.
Always a bit flashy and on the dank side

That’s a Alien.

Garden of Eden is fam

Atlantis is the name

We are here.

Time is illusion
Time is collusion
Time is preclusion; exclusion,
It is a passage to nowhere,
Coming from everywhere,
It breaks amup to be put together
It refuses it reuses it remembers, relates, resembles,
It reforms & returns
It reminisces and relocates,
but returns always recognizes
It’t returns and and retreats
Recreates forgets and returns
Daily

The room:

There for Right?

Quite a mind boggling text you produced on the subject.

May be more later, when I am not so fixated.

Splice humans with genes that have the ability to survive being frozen solid.
Freeze tons of human2s. If things get much better in the future, thaw them.

Time is a perspective.
For the human2s, it will be an instant change.
In fact there are many moments within a second.
How fast you move and live determines your own time.

Well, I don’t think that counts as time travel.

But this might:

youtu.be/LJefPaBsSug

Very nice.

There is, perhaps, a much simpler objection, one that does not depend on causality.

Either X (e.g. Corona virus outbreak) happened in the past or it did not. If one accepts that it did, and goes back in time in order to to make sure that X does not happen, then that would mean that X did not actually happen.

If you made a mistake in the past, you can’t go back in time and fix it without denying that you made it.

What this means is that, in this particular sense, it is logically impossible to change the past.

What’s possible is to repeat the past in the present so as to influence the development of the future. This, however, isn’t “changing the past” in the literal sense of the word – the past remains unchanged. It is “repeating the past in the present” which is configuring a good chunk of the future state of the world to look like an earlier one which is a quite expensive process. The Boys from Brazil kind of thing.

This type of argument would/could be questioned sans the parallel universe supposition, which could probably account for the idea of infinite recurrence.( ecce homo)

Still, you are not changing the past. You are merely jumping from one branch onto another.

True. But relativity is a toss up between phenomenal and epistemological certainties. So even if You jump between quantum and quality, it is merely a simulation of space time effects.

The jump changes both, the temporal and spatial matrix, where one can literally jump into a universe where the jump off point may already ceased to exist.

Hypothetically this ’ existential jump’ could be effected, and displacing the dasein boxed in stasis of the apprehension of of ego reduction. >>>>>>>>>>

Reverse dialectical ant-synthesis.