True that.
They do not know the depth of my hate for their type of evil.
They would fear me more than god if they knew.
Regards
DL
Greatest I Am,
Evil is a very strong word. What evil are you speaking of, pointing to here?
When you speak of the “depth of my hate” one might conjure up the word “evil” within those words.
You are a part of the problem if you are not a part of the solution. How has hating solved your problem?
Given that hate is born from love, love has served me well as it has made me hate all that would jeopardize that which I love.
I am speaking of the evils in having a genocidal and infanticidal god and belonging to a misogynous and homophobic religion that is not a universalist religion.
If you do not hate those evils and religions, you are not showing your love of justice and sanity.
Regards
DL
Well if I may, DL, I’d say the object of your disgust is not the silly crap of the Bible that was written and believed by the people of that period… nor that those people practiced those conventions and institutions mentioned in the Bible you so loathe. It was, after all, what seemed normal to them.
Rather what disgusts you is that people today still use the Bible for something other than a pack of rolling papers (ever rolled a joint with a Bible page? bro) or to prop up the back leg of an unsteady washing machine.
That’s what’s got you all heated, I think. How long it is taking homo-dumbass to evolve intellectually and grow up. 'course you gotta also keep in mind that this slow evolution isn’t totally natural. There are forces that are intentionally trying to sabotage it so everybody remains a dumbass willing to work an eight hour day for some other dipshit.
We have been civilized for a long time now. Just not enough of us.
Religions like Christianity and Islam have been able to silence the brightest but those days are gone and that is why the supernaturally based religions are slowly dying.
Regards
DL
P.S.
Telling the ugly truth does not have me heated up.
It just shows my hate of evil.
Better yet, why do so many Jews hate Christians?
If it wasn’t for Christian Zionists, Israel almost certainly wouldn’t exist.
Sure, some Christians persecuted Jews, but some Christians put Jews on a pedestal.
The Babylonians, Egyptians, Greeks and Romans were pagan at one time, but that didn’t stop them from persecuting Jews,
Modern (20th century onward) white nationalism has very little to do with Christianity.
The 3rd Reich was steeped in occult paganism and Social Darwinism.
Christianity was at best a necessary evil for them they ultimately wanted to destroy, because of its Semitic thinking and roots, and yet so many Jews still insist on hating Christians.
Why?
Why do they bite the hand that feeds them?
Why do so many Christians continue to put Jews on pedestal when so many Jews are doing everything they can to undermine Christianity and flood majority Christian nations with nonChristians, Muslims in many cases?
It’s a paradoxical relationship, the Christian Zionist and the Jew.
The paradox is not a duality , it is a triumvirate, You are missing the most lecherous third: Islam.
It is fear of the third that subsumed the dual, totally yet merely through inference.
That is the key, that has to be.
Otherwise Jesus could not redeem.
Remeber the fall of Rome and the birth of Constantinople?
From Turkey with love, i fly to you.
Turkey …it’s hard to fly like eagles when bound down with tur keys.
This last is merely an intrusive thought . I don’t trust it , as well.
It is a symbolic flow, that is all.
At this late hour, understanding closes , as 3 am approaches. (Pacific Standard Time)
'Mr Trump has been accused of abandoning the Kurdish fighters, who were Washington’s main allies in the battle to defeat Islamic State’s self-declared caliphate in Syria.
This is because Washington withdrew US troops from the border as Turkey launched its offensive on October 9.’
Oh, perhaps because of 2,000 years of persecution, kidnapping, murder, theft, etc.
Yet few Jews show their deserved contempt for the religion that usurped their god and changed him from a decent sort to the genocidal prick that Christians now favor.
Regards
DL
Maybe, that is because they were too busy to search for safe haven, even back in Anatolia in the Ottoman empire, to think of ways to worsen the situation.
Weakness? Possibly. Sticks and stones ? Perhaps the negated formation of anti-Christ. That may be an early form of moral justification via reversal, or negative thinking , now reverse psychology.
Worsen?
You think Jews are into S & M?
Regards
DL
Very definitely. Victimhood of Jesus up there, front and center. You do not think for a minute that reverse psychology was formed literally? A very large percentage loved Him, and sacrifice was in a sense holy and derivitive to group survival.
In fact everyone was convinced by then of his immortal kingdom.
They would have seen Jesus as a deluded fool who was ff the mark in thinking he was to be the anointed one.
Let his blood be on us they screamed, because Jesus was trying to be their savior, but failed miserably. He just ended as just another wasted sacrifice.
Regards
DL
Yes the mob.The rabbis saw him as more a political liability, though.
And the disciples did spread some believable word.
He may have been completely insane also, but how about delusive incidents such as the burning Bush?
I think delusion was collusive with normality, as it is today as well.
Jacob’s sacrificial love for god , of his son is not just. coincidental either.
A literalist would see the burning bush as a miracle.
An esoteric and mystical thinker like Jesus would just see it as Moses reaching his Father Complex, as called by Yung and Freud, by activating his pineal gland and entering a full meditative state.
Most of the O.T. is depicting what is to go on inside our own minds.
That is why the Genesis painting shows god laid upon a representation of our right hemisphere. It also shows Jesus in a womb.
Regards
DL
Or reversely.
The security of our minds if, it is descriptive of that necessity, vis; that such was necessary for literal pieces to integrate with/in the symbolic, than the answer is paradoxically correct.
And that further indicates the intra subjective requirement to/for an interconnected partiality within the whole.
See the middle is a hard way!
Ouch.
The language thrown at this Frenchman.
I think I agree, mon ami.
Regards
DL
Merci, / mercy.
Bien venu.
Regards
DL