Seriously we’re a that level, at that utterly pre-Nietzschean, Platonic bullshit, we have to work through all of that? Don’t do this to me dude.
Anything that exists makes an effort to exist.
If there is a God who gives, then thus, what the gives has to make an effort to be given.
Thats what Heidegger talks about.
You and Parodites both hate Heidegger. But neither of you have there fainted clue what he says.
And also that is just the fucking point.
Will to power
IS NOT
A prescription.
It is not a choice.
It is a description. It is all there is. The choice is seeing it.
Did you acquire knowledge of the reason?
You cant read me as lightly as you read a sculpture in the sand.
What I say has been produced from enormous efforts in the worlds most powerful philosophic forge
I say it concisely too, but this makes me even less understood, most of the time, than Parodites.
I will concede that the seeing of it itself prescribes.
Jeeez.
The will to power PRESCRIBES.
Itself, to itself, first of all.
And the description of the world as will to power is obviously a prescription - as it is part of the world, which is will to power.
How could will to power describe something without prescribing?
Listen man.
That was re this.
Well thats where it all starts.
Why ontology and epistemology cant be separate.
Naw man Im done being told to listen.
Its time for me to speak.
Its time for me to accept, I mean, that either people take the trouble to think, or they’re trash.
I am not a Trump denier.
That phrase makes no sense.
You got saved by the bell.
See you in a sec.
Don’t be fresh with me young man.
I know that what Ive proposed in this thread is the end-all of political theory.
It is the final merger of Nietzsche and the foundational thought of the USA.
It is what is hinted at in the beginning pages of this thread.
beforethelight.forumotion.com/t7 … as-all-law
It is the completion.
Now the next questions are all practical, physical, organizatorial, thus psychological, sociological.
It all comes down to an idea every peasant can understand. Though college educated masses have been shaped so as to not understand precisely this.
You want something? Then be worthy of it.
This is how nature works, so it is how all parts of nature work. And natural rights, would be part of nature.
Man has been very lazy up to this point. Not natural at all. Metaphysics. Thinks things are just given to him by an automaton.
There is no automaton. There is φύσις.
Look Pedro, you wouldn’t tell Napoleon he was saved because you had to do another thing. Ive never had any match in philosophy. 8 years after I revealed it even my smartest friends are still struggling with the beginnings of VO. Put yourself in my position for a second.
Well, all I can do is hope that some day you will come to see things more clearly.
I just realize that you need to read everything Sauwelios has written. If you understand something of his logics you may be able to approach mine, and Nietzsche.
Honestly you don’t have a clue what the will to power is, if you think it is not prescriptive.
Sauwelios made that part of it his specialty.
A little on the obvious side for me, but then I am what I am.
Yeah, Sauwelios… he isn’t a revolutionary thinker but he is definitely thorough.
To me back then this was always half of a joke, as its just obvious how absurd it seems to other people, but… Ive always loved it too, this honest to god approach of the problem of language. Compared to what one encounters nowadays it is brilliant.
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4WM-0ZlgDo[/youtube]
What Heidegger does is extend the notion of will to power beyond the obvious and meaningless semantics of it, he pushes the logic of it to amount to actual ontology, that is, to working knowledge, predictive and such.
Not that any of that goes on in this video, this is just… a careful and cheerful archaeologo-philologist at work with his brushes.
A thinker.