There isn't really a muse thread.

Spatial temporal constructs of variable functional entities , from minimal toward maximal values are derived and their anthropic and redundant evolution.

Their being and nothingness dependent on their formations.

Happy New Year

The singularity acts upon such matrix of varience to form an immediacy which holds it into a relative duration of Preception. This produces the complexity of conscious manifestation.

Happy New Year, Mowk!

The above is attempt at an evolving series of codes, whereby the intrinsic essential element is hidden.

It is a universal dance, and it presents an absolutely crack in the cosmic egg, that coincidentally and repeatedly seals it right up.

Hence no observable crack in that supposed instant.

The need to code, nevertheless is the the seed within that egg.

Will try to open and expunge immediately in the coming future time.

The need and it’s censure may designate something real, measurable and significant.

I do hope for a happy new year. Thanks for the well wishes. It would be so nice if my constitution defaulted to see it so in all ways. Attachment to far too many ideas.

Maybe I’ve been listening to NPR’s ‘all things considered’ too long.

I wish I could help. It is troubling when someone I respect goes through pain. If I thought being “at your side” could help.

It (what ever a god is) doesn’t forget, but It isn’t going to solve our problems either, we must do that ourselves. We have the tools. Every one of us plays a part, until a part is no longer required, the good, the bad and the ugly in perfect balance as long as required to maintain balance. Man oh man, I can agree it looks at times so out of balance. The sun also rises.

I respect quite of few members here but why do we have to be such dicks. The line runs over there, for the most part, even those on the right are mostly on this side.

I feel more a citizen of earth then a member of the USA, but… if I flew a World flag above the Stars and Stripes?

Because of the relative anomaly between national, personal and international compressed/compromised sets of identification.

Rouaseau’s well intended native has turned subliminally on his prior colonial exploital , the greatest of whom belong in the schism: those who have money that can buy power to determine the fate of the vast majority ofnthe underclass.

This is becoming the new colonialism, the with the sum total of the minorities becoming the new majority.

Sad, but true.

Dickheads are.becoming more confused and consequently able to identify only by projecting .

They are be coming less sure whether somebody is buying.

Oh, Mowk, it’s always easier to throw epithets around by throwing sock puppets around , as if, referentially insolvent, however the modus operandi of enlightened people assumes otherwise.

Could you explain this. Specifically the part about the ease of thrown epithets by throwing sock puppets, and it’s reference to an inability to pay a debt?

Let me count the ways!

It’s like Codec, or attempting a hike into Kafka’s Castle, let me mull this over the next couple of days .

The simplest things are the most complicated, but reversely, to go back blinds even the imagination.

Will do promise. The next couple of days.

Tomorrow has got to be a better day than today. Well, I guess it doesn’t have to be.

Some members here change names here like they would shoes. You really cam register with multiple names, and start talking as if it was someone else.

Then they talk about each other, but really referring to someone else, as if everyone could assume simultaneous identities.

I have myself stopped writing and registered under a different name. but not concealing my previous name as if it held some bad news that I thought better of it not to publish.

Some guy a few months ago found one of my other names, as it was easy to find. References are vastly more complicated the first way, and although I think it is ingenious, but at the same time it can be deceptive .
That goes to the heart of distraction, and if it is done by a professed trained person it works. Otherwise it only sheds a hidden aspect on the person, and can result in confusing referentiality.

There is more.psychology to this, as this distinction separates the actor in a certain context of reality versus one who generally used identifiable characteristics in all contexts. It may make much more.then a stylistic difference, much to it’s discredit.
In the present context of separating truth from falsehoods, it’s particularly fitting.

Thanks for taking the time to add clarity on my behalf. I guess I don’t agree with Carleas’ decision to allow for such puppetry for similar reasons either.

I’ve said some shitty things, and I own them. They are me on bad days and too many bad days come my way.

The weight of one’s thoughts. Are they light as a feather or heavier then lead? How much wear do they entail? How much effort is required of them? It seems as if thinking should be much easier.

BUT IT IS!

WHENEVER LIFE GETS SO COMPLICATED THAT IT BECOMES ALMOST UNTANABLE, there is a very easy device.

Simplify it to the minimum to an unimaginable depth, where lost spirits merge on a level of mist and elemental vapour.

What happens then, and it only happens when You had all prerequisites down , such as bereavement , loss of companionship, loss of mobility, all loss of hope for a better tomorrow, loss of afterlife, then , then , a chasm opens up , a gigantic abyss, a frothy bewilderment, of total negation aeterna, followed by a union of harmony.

Thought be one traces in ancient sand markings and the sky descends to cover all failing.

The texture of time covers where you were the one who watched them pass before you an army of shuffling ghosts remembering when it will be you they are saying farewell to.

Gravity.

Tell me about it.

An apple just hit me on the head, hope this time not for real, not that it ever literally did.

But not to trivialize it, imagine the energy when using it for matters that can successfully utilize it’s astounding force of will!

Someone once warned me that the unitiniated better be very careful, for fear of being crushed.

Well it sort of has to do more with the notion of grave thoughts, added to the notion of the weight (gravity) of those thoughts, and what it might do to one’s psyche carrying them around for a long while, and includes the two meanings for the word gravity.

And let’s not forget about the third which tries to uplift the weight of the attempt to placate two into one.

The lightness of the heart, lest it appears to trivialize it becomes it’s own burdensome load, and hurl it down with Sysyphys into myth.

Then, it forms a sort of religious icon of accepted refrain from anything but humble tolerance of the waste of energy involved.

Ouch!

Got a reference for that definition? I have not attempted, through placation(?), to turn two, into one. Both meanings are relevant in context and distinct.