[b]Murray Gell-Mann
All of modern physics is governed by that magnificent and thoroughly confusing discipline called quantum mechanics … It has survived all tests and there is no reason to believe that there is any flaw in it. We all know how to use it and how to apply it to problems; and so we have learned to live with the fact that nobody can understand it. [/b]
Next up: Is 1 = 0.999?
I would recommend that skeptics devote even more effort than they do now to understanding the reasons why so many people want or need to believe.
You all know my pitch.
Superstitions typically involve seeing order where in fact there is none, and denial amounts to rejecting evidence of regularities, sometimes even ones that are staring us in the face.
But not you, right, Mr Objectivist?
My colleagues in elementary particle theory in many lands and I are driven by the usual insatiable curiosity of the scientist, and our work is a delightful game. I am frequently astonished that it so often results in correct predictions of experimental results. How can it be that writing down a few simple and elegant formulae, like short poems governed by strict rules such as those of the sonnet or the waka, can predict universal regularities of Nature?
No equivalent of that here, is there?
In our work, we are always between Scylla and Charybdis; we may fail to abstract enough, and miss important physics, or we may abstract too much and end up with fictitious objects in our models turning into real monsters that devour us.
Next up: the work of philosophers.
Modern language must be older than the cave paintings and cave engravings and cave sculptures and dance steps in the soft clay in the caves in Western Europe, in the Aurignacian Period some 35,000 years ago, or earlier. I can’t believe they did all those things and didn’t also have a modern language.
Maybe it goes back to the Garden of Eden.