Except the idea that there is primal re cognition of displacement of irresovable pre reflective elements of what supposed to be a recog is able set of elements in rcogmatipn of the primal gaps of a quisituon of knowledge.
The k knowledge of primary identification of primary motives under lying the procedure to recognize the comparative phase of
identification via the program of
unacquired sets of inherited characteristics, whereby the original intent is established.
The evidence for that lays the structural indifference between what model of reified requirement or conditions which arguably can be entailed.
The fight or flight mechanism was pre eminent within the domain of a reducible flow of even a re instruction of available knowledge. based on the evidentiary de instruction of available data.
Can a judicious modern person use this with an analogous set of pro n.a.?bilities ?
It is not at all above the convolution of what is in ‘evidence’ as a probable conviction.