Have you read Heisman’s Suicide Note?
It explains it thoroughly, over 1500 pages.
The short answer can be found in Anglo history and how the Norse dominated and destroyed their culture, producing resentment.
This resentment produced the American Civil War where the Anglo-Puritan Yankees defeated the Norse, elitist, aristocratic southerners.
The history of the Protestant and Anglican Church is another example.
Protestants rejected the last remnants of Pagan Rome, as it had been corrupted and integrated into the Holy Roman Empire - later the Catholic Church - and Byzantium - later Christian Orthodox Church.
It was a rebellion against earthly representatives of divine order. The absolute one-god.
This produced a commonality with the Jews that had been rejected by every tribe they had come in contact with, and had invented the narrative of being ‘chosen by god’ to bring-on the end of times (Armageddon) - essentially they chose themselves as divine missionaries, working on behalf of the one-god.
A shared victim psychology.
You can still see it in the U.S. with its Messianic mission (American exceptionalism & manifest destiny) to ‘liberate mankind’ from itself, and how it explains the world’s animosity toward its dominion as a product of envy. This is typical among victim psychologies.
They are never responsible. They are always pure, good and innocent. Condemned by evil to suffer for their good intentions - Messianism.
Heisman goes into it in more detail. It’s worth reading.
I think you can only find it on-line, and it’s free.
He blew his brains out in front of the university he was a professor in.
He wanted to remain true to his own people’s nihilism and returned to the nil.
Hitler was a dictator so did what dictators do which is to take what is not theirs
Stalin was also a dictator but he did not take because he already had an empire
He was far more concerned with consolidating his power base through the purges
When two million had been already executed in I937 / 38 Beria had to stop because they both realised that there would be no bureaucracy left to run the country
Beria himself was subsequently executed - Stalin was incredibly paranoid and trusted no one - he even had his own son who was a fighter pilot shot for cowardice
He lived a particular life filled with particular experiences. He acquired and then sustained particular relationships. He gained access to particular points of view.
Not unlike the manner in which your own narrative regarding the Jews is embedded in an existential framework.
Otherwise the argument of the objectivists goes, it is possible to “think through” questions like this and using the tools of philosophy, political science, sociology and the like, you are able to deduce into existence the most rational understanding of the Jews. Meaning the most natural.
Easily the most simplistic assesments of them all. You know, if I do say so myself.
Because of the nature of Judaism and Christianity.
Judaism : A good Jew is a rich Jew. He has the favor of God.
Christianity : A good Christian is a poor Christian. Rich Christians are going to hell.
Christianity put in place rules which discourage making a profit, lending and borrowing money.
However, profit and borrowing money is essential for expansion and prosperity.
Christians, the merchants, could not make profit to the same degree that Jewish merchants could.
Christians, the aristocracy, had to borrow money and they had to borrow it from Jews. As a result, Jews became wealthy and powerful - disproportionately so.
Christians resented, and still resent, the wealth and power of the Jews.
Hitler felt that resentment personally but he also saw it as a way to unite Germans and to ascend to a leadership position.
That’s the economic context.
To understand further one must delve into the existential context, and how survival strategies emerge and become ingrained as memes.
Money is a Jewish Messiah - salvation from genetic limitations and inferiorities.
They rejected Jesus because they already ha an abstraction that measures truth through how it appeals to a majority.
Communism could not have been invented by any other psychology.
Money measures popular appeal - herd dynamics. If you are willing to do anything to gain it, you have no higher principle other than popularity and market value.
Most people on any board have a superficial understanding of the world they live in.
the fundamental aspect of usury is the callousness of the practitioners. They care not about the other’s need, ro his state, and are willing to exploit it, because they do not identify with him.
This is the core. Its psychology can be traced back to identity, and to nihilism as a defensive psychology.
To a certain point, the lender is providing a product/service which the borrower can use for his needs and to his advantage. Past that point, you get into the area of exploitation.
It need not be callous and exploitative in itself.
Only if you feel no kinship with the one in need. A minimal interest can be charged to compensate for the loss of using the money, but not anything exceeding it.
The exploitation of need, and the degree of this exploitation, is what exposes a motive and a psychology.
Would you charge a price for lending a family member money?, and if you did, how high would it be?
I know supply-demand.
Money as messiah for the salvation of your own kin, serving the king as tax-collector because you felt nothing for the people you threatened and stripped of their wealth.
Gypsies never farm the land; never produce anything tangible. They only sell, and use superstition to fleece the population they ‘harvest’; exploiting the weakest and most desperate ni the tribe they do not belong to.
See the comparison?
Have you heard of potlatch?
Displaying wealth by giving it away?
It survives to this day, in some Indo-European societies as ‘hospitality’.
Compare this to the psychology of hoarding, amassing, collecting.
I never use the word “evil”…only opportunistic; indifferent to the plight of the other because there is no kinship.
They do not relate to the people they exploit.
Have you heard of Singer, the multi-billionaire and how he makes his wealth?
Tucker Carlson had a report on him recently.
See what callous exploitation is. Would he do this to an Israeli town? Never.
Suppose you were able to acquire the political power necessary to actually act on your views regarding the Jews.
What laws would you enact/enforce so as to prescribe or proscribe particular behaviors of particular Jews in particular contexts. Banking or otherwise.
If you controlled the government in an actual nation what might be the fate of Jews there?
