Dutch Divorce Rate Skyrockets In Response To Alimony Reform

Mr_J · December 17, 2019, 4:03pm

Gloominary:

Gloominary:

Alimony and no-fault divorce make things really easy for women.
A lot of women will marry or cohabit with a working or lower middle class guy for a while.
They may even have a kid or two of, his (we hope).
Then, if he’s failing to move up the socioeconomic ladder or if he’s just not physically attractive or charming enough and she’s got looks and charm, she’ll dump him, take much or most of what he has, raising her socioeconomic status in the process, and try to go after a middle or upperclass guy.
She may even date the middle or upperclass guy while she’s still with the working or lower middle class guy before moving in with and marrying him.
The working or lower middle class shmuck will pay spousal (and child) support for years while she gets to enjoy a higher standard of living on top of it.
She may even try to raise her status in this way a third or fourth time, why not?
Let’s face it, the system is rigged in favor of women, caters to their most ignoble instincts, and they wouldn’t be able to rig it without the gullibility and naivete of men, and the twin ideologies of feminism and chivalry.

And to top it off, women have the audacity and nerve to call this, oppression.

And millions of soy boys and white knights believe it.

Unbelievable

Of course some of them are just playing along, and that’s part of how men play women.

Women and men play each other, but men don’t have the system behind them.

In the history of humanity men will say or do anything to acquire pussy, a known fact. Hence all the soyboys and white knights nowadays. I just can’t stoop myself to that level, when I eventually do acquire myself a trophy wife [fulltime professional hired prostitute for cash money] to breed with it will be on my terms, not theirs.

Mr_J · December 17, 2019, 4:10pm

I normally don’t like colored people’s music, however in the eternal words of Tina Turner, “What’s love got to do with it”?!

She knew…

Today’s music doesn’t convey that type of honesty anymore.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1avX1lX7gSs[/youtube]

Gloominary · December 17, 2019, 4:14pm

Zero_Sum:

Gloominary:

Alimony and no-fault divorce make things really easy for women.
A lot of women will marry or cohabit with a lower middle class guy for a while.
They may even have a kid or two of, his (we hope).
Then, if he’s failing to move up the socioeconomic ladder or if he’s just not physically attractive or charming enough and she’s got looks and charm, she’ll dump him, take much or most of what he has, raising her socioeconomic status in the process, and try to go after a middle or upperclass guy.
She may even date the middle or upperclass guy while she’s still with the lower middle class guy before moving in with and marrying him.
The lower middle class shmuck will pay spousal (and child) support for years while she gets to enjoy a higher standard of living on top of it.
She may even try to raise her status in this way a third or fourth time, why not?
Let’s face it, the system is rigged in favor of women, caters to their most ignoble instincts, and they wouldn’t be able to rig it without the gullibility and naivete of men, and the twin ideologies of feminism and chivalry.

There’s only one way to change things and your democracy isn’t the answer Gloominary.

One of these days you’ll see things my way, that I’m certain of. Give it time

You’re probably right, but I hope you’re wrong, because a rightwing dictatorship would disempower us in many ways, but of course empower us in others.
It’s a trade off.
If we can’t have illiberal democracy, then I’ll go for autocracy.

Mr_J · December 17, 2019, 4:20pm

Gloominary:

Zero_Sum:

Gloominary:

Alimony and no-fault divorce make things really easy for women.
A lot of women will marry or cohabit with a lower middle class guy for a while.
They may even have a kid or two of, his (we hope).
Then, if he’s failing to move up the socioeconomic ladder or if he’s just not physically attractive or charming enough and she’s got looks and charm, she’ll dump him, take much or most of what he has, raising her socioeconomic status in the process, and try to go after a middle or upperclass guy.
She may even date the middle or upperclass guy while she’s still with the lower middle class guy before moving in with and marrying him.
The lower middle class shmuck will pay spousal (and child) support for years while she gets to enjoy a higher standard of living on top of it.
She may even try to raise her status in this way a third or fourth time, why not?
Let’s face it, the system is rigged in favor of women, caters to their most ignoble instincts, and they wouldn’t be able to rig it without the gullibility and naivete of men, and the twin ideologies of feminism and chivalry.

There’s only one way to change things and your democracy isn’t the answer Gloominary.

One of these days you’ll see things my way, that I’m certain of. Give it time

You’re probably right, but I hope you’re wrong, because a rightwing dictatorship would disempower us in many ways, but of course empower us in others.
It’s a trade off.
If we can’t have illiberal democracy, then I’ll go for autocracy.

You will come to see my way of things soon enough my dark sith apprentice.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dATuq8O3920[/youtube]

Gloominary · December 17, 2019, 4:20pm

Zero_Sum:

Gloominary:

Gloominary:

Alimony and no-fault divorce make things really easy for women.
A lot of women will marry or cohabit with a working or lower middle class guy for a while.
They may even have a kid or two of, his (we hope).
Then, if he’s failing to move up the socioeconomic ladder or if he’s just not physically attractive or charming enough and she’s got looks and charm, she’ll dump him, take much or most of what he has, raising her socioeconomic status in the process, and try to go after a middle or upperclass guy.
She may even date the middle or upperclass guy while she’s still with the working or lower middle class guy before moving in with and marrying him.
The working or lower middle class shmuck will pay spousal (and child) support for years while she gets to enjoy a higher standard of living on top of it.
She may even try to raise her status in this way a third or fourth time, why not?
Let’s face it, the system is rigged in favor of women, caters to their most ignoble instincts, and they wouldn’t be able to rig it without the gullibility and naivete of men, and the twin ideologies of feminism and chivalry.

And to top it off, women have the audacity and nerve to call this, oppression.

And millions of soy boys and white knights believe it.

Unbelievable

Of course some of them are just playing along, and that’s part of how men play women.

Women and men play each other, but men don’t have the system behind them.

In the history of humanity men will say or do anything to acquire pussy, a known fact. Hence all the soyboys and white knights nowadays. I just can’t stoop myself to that level, when I eventually do acquire myself a trophy wife [fulltime professional hired prostitute for cash money] to breed with it will be on my terms, not theirs.

It’s unfortunate men would rather compete than organize for their interests.
Everyone else is organized for their interests except white men, but sooner or later that’ll change.

Mr_J · December 17, 2019, 4:26pm

The inevitable collapse of nations, societies, and civilizations throughout the west basically will achieve that.

Gloominary · December 17, 2019, 4:37pm

Gloominary · December 17, 2019, 4:40pm

I agree, within every tragedy lies some opportunity.
White men had it pretty good for a while.
Things will have to get pretty bad before there’s a backlash.

Gloominary · December 17, 2019, 4:50pm

The feminists, plutocrats and progressives won’t stop, they just keep pushing and pushing.
Something’s gotta give sooner or later.

Mr_J · December 17, 2019, 4:57pm

Very soon it will arrive.

Mr_J · December 17, 2019, 4:58pm

Their insane ideology and rhetoric will be swept away with total economic collapse.

Kriswest · December 17, 2019, 7:23pm

You two sound like crybabies supporting each other. Stop watching the media lies about females. I am not a feminist nor do I belong to any political party or religion. I am just an average female. Average women do not behave or manipulate like you think they do. We only want true partners in life that will stand side by side through all times. Yes there are slimy scum females out there, there are subservient ignorant females and egotistical pain in the ass manipulative females out there. There are equal number of male counterparts to those.
The media focuses on those above females. They are “news worthy”. “News worthy” is gossip. And you two believe what they want you to see.
Have you ever been friends with a true honorable female? Or do you just see females as something to stick your penis in and only look for the slut or hot babe?

Ecmandu · December 17, 2019, 7:26pm

Kriswest,

You just admitted to hypergamy. Not doing well for your cause - just sayin’

Kriswest · December 17, 2019, 8:42pm

Dude did you read what I wrote fully or did you just see what appeals to you? I do recall you have that habit.

Ecmandu · December 17, 2019, 8:48pm

Kriswest: we only want true partners in life that will stand side by side through all times

Ecmandu: cough hypergamy

If you’re being a shithead, you should expect shit… no woman is a fucking princess…

But you, as a stereotype embodied, actually think you are.

Why do the men post so much better than the women on these boards … it’s actually really sad, because even the men have really low bars here

Kriswest · December 17, 2019, 9:37pm

Do you even understand the definition of that word??

Ecmandu · December 17, 2019, 9:39pm

Yes. It means that I hate you unless you sell your soul to me no matter what I say or do

Do you?

Kriswest · December 18, 2019, 9:52am

Webster dictionary:
Definition of hypergamy
: marriage into an equal or higher caste or social group

Now how do you get the specific quote that you pointed out into that definition? I do hope you don’t hurt yourself by twisting too much.

Ecmandu · December 18, 2019, 1:49pm

Hmm… I’ll admit I was wrong.

Gamy is obviously marriage and hyper is “pinnacle of intensity”

I simply assumed when reading the word that it meant “super-monogamous inclinations and demands”

I actually think the dictionary definition doesn’t explain the root at all. You can see how it’s confusing, because in my definition, though different than the dictionary, actually also fits contextually how people use it. The mistake is easy to make I suppose.

Kriswest · December 18, 2019, 9:57pm

Ain’t English fun? I appreciate what you said. Humans are more and more partnering for love. Yes there are still too many that bond for other reasons. Religion, politics, status and of course the most corrupt, sexual lust.