On the defense. Ya really wanna show offense?
Good night. Peace on earth and good will toward all. Get me give you.
Fuck me fuck yourself. Metaphorically speaking.
Removed for reasonable doubt of merit.
There is no ground to doubt, except that which still remains assailable, the thought that such recollection may prove very probable.
(That organizing dissenting strains-of thought- may prove essential in unifying for an objective purpose)
A purpose that will ultimately become understood , proceeding through familiar conduits of experience.
Grounded thought.
But alas, such purpose is simple, to be me. No one can do that better. Small angst, and a modicum of joy and I get to play an Uke.
But what action does that purpose require? That’s the question, yes?
The identity of relevance. The living have a body, so it is unlikely anyone living could be a nobody. The world counts you on a census, one of several billion. Identity may be of little relevance but it is not non-existent. I am a some body. It has a mass, and size, It is a unique body, with it’s own strengths and weaknesses. This body can be broken, it has encountered a singular set of experiences, several broken bones, ulcers, a hernia, a heart murmur, a particular pattern of swirls on my fingers and toes. A specific pair of parents and a unique genetic make-up. A some body is all I am.
What I don’t have is a mind, or intelligence, I have a brain and a heart, but a mind and intelligence is something bequeathed by a social and cultural fabric, some level of ranking placed on me like a tattoo, like some mark of measure relative to every body else. Similar in some ways and different in others. Unique is not special, it’s just singular. The words are unimportant. The music is unimportant, the art is unimportant. The life is unimportant. It is just another of many. There are not important bodies, there are just bodies. Isolate any body “thought of as important” and they loose that importance, they loose that relevance.
I just don’t buy into the idea of some body being no body. What I buy into is a little faith that every body is here for some reason, within a balance, similar to the balance in nature. Nothing should be wasted and no one is a waste. Important only to the degree of being no more important that any thing else. To not wish to be anything but what you are, innately, intrinsically, and that is no more or less important then anything or anyone else. A part of it and apart from it. Just be a some body living intrinsically. If we could just be what we are, it would all work out. In any given moment we have all We need, don’t take any more. We are all no more or less important, we are all just some body.
Pollution is more then just of few discarded candy wrappers.
All knowledge is relative because any justification is relative to extent conditions.
What is the space between the parts of an atom comprised of?
Spatial temporal constructs of variable functional entities , from minimal toward maximal values are derived and their anthropic and redundant evolution.
Their being and nothingness dependent on their formations.
Happy New Year
The singularity acts upon such matrix of varience to form an immediacy which holds it into a relative duration of Preception. This produces the complexity of conscious manifestation.
Happy New Year, Mowk!
The above is attempt at an evolving series of codes, whereby the intrinsic essential element is hidden.
It is a universal dance, and it presents an absolutely crack in the cosmic egg, that coincidentally and repeatedly seals it right up.
Hence no observable crack in that supposed instant.
The need to code, nevertheless is the the seed within that egg.
Will try to open and expunge immediately in the coming future time.
The need and it’s censure may designate something real, measurable and significant.
I do hope for a happy new year. Thanks for the well wishes. It would be so nice if my constitution defaulted to see it so in all ways. Attachment to far too many ideas.
Maybe I’ve been listening to NPR’s ‘all things considered’ too long.
I wish I could help. It is troubling when someone I respect goes through pain. If I thought being “at your side” could help.
It (what ever a god is) doesn’t forget, but It isn’t going to solve our problems either, we must do that ourselves. We have the tools. Every one of us plays a part, until a part is no longer required, the good, the bad and the ugly in perfect balance as long as required to maintain balance. Man oh man, I can agree it looks at times so out of balance. The sun also rises.
I respect quite of few members here but why do we have to be such dicks. The line runs over there, for the most part, even those on the right are mostly on this side.
I feel more a citizen of earth then a member of the USA, but… if I flew a World flag above the Stars and Stripes?
Because of the relative anomaly between national, personal and international compressed/compromised sets of identification.
Rouaseau’s well intended native has turned subliminally on his prior colonial exploital , the greatest of whom belong in the schism: those who have money that can buy power to determine the fate of the vast majority ofnthe underclass.
This is becoming the new colonialism, the with the sum total of the minorities becoming the new majority.
Sad, but true.
Dickheads are.becoming more confused and consequently able to identify only by projecting .
They are be coming less sure whether somebody is buying.
Oh, Mowk, it’s always easier to throw epithets around by throwing sock puppets around , as if, referentially insolvent, however the modus operandi of enlightened people assumes otherwise.
Could you explain this. Specifically the part about the ease of thrown epithets by throwing sock puppets, and it’s reference to an inability to pay a debt?
Let me count the ways!
It’s like Codec, or attempting a hike into Kafka’s Castle, let me mull this over the next couple of days .
The simplest things are the most complicated, but reversely, to go back blinds even the imagination.
Will do promise. The next couple of days.
Tomorrow has got to be a better day than today. Well, I guess it doesn’t have to be.
Some members here change names here like they would shoes. You really cam register with multiple names, and start talking as if it was someone else.
Then they talk about each other, but really referring to someone else, as if everyone could assume simultaneous identities.
I have myself stopped writing and registered under a different name. but not concealing my previous name as if it held some bad news that I thought better of it not to publish.
Some guy a few months ago found one of my other names, as it was easy to find. References are vastly more complicated the first way, and although I think it is ingenious, but at the same time it can be deceptive .
That goes to the heart of distraction, and if it is done by a professed trained person it works. Otherwise it only sheds a hidden aspect on the person, and can result in confusing referentiality.
There is more.psychology to this, as this distinction separates the actor in a certain context of reality versus one who generally used identifiable characteristics in all contexts. It may make much more.then a stylistic difference, much to it’s discredit.
In the present context of separating truth from falsehoods, it’s particularly fitting.
Thanks for taking the time to add clarity on my behalf. I guess I don’t agree with Carleas’ decision to allow for such puppetry for similar reasons either.
I’ve said some shitty things, and I own them. They are me on bad days and too many bad days come my way.