Pedro's Corner

This is taking longer than it should but antisemitism has been a trigger for me since I joined the Nietzsche forum in 2001, and now it seems the complex is completely resolved. By proving he most virulent antisemites to be Jews and Christians of very stereotypical ilk - proving it to them - I realize my kind of Jews also had fucking issues with these goddamn liberal plainsclothes Jews and profane Christians - its sort of fucked up but this is the internet. This is also how they prove shit in The Science.

We had the clean science, now we have the dirty science, VO; experiments are much more thorough and conclusions much less objective; they are themselves objectives.

because the beginning board is in a state of being undeveloped, the logic behind the first five or six moves is very limited. meaning, there’s only a few very general principles to consider when deciding what to do. and based further on what generally doesn’t happen during this initial stage, the few things one should do become all the more logically obvious. a couple things to remember; rarely will an opponent cross the center line with a minor or major piece in the first few moves because he will be harassed by pawns. this limits development to the first four ranks. That being the case, the most logical thing to do, nay, the only thing to do, is to clear your minor pieces for movement and to support advancing pawns. And if that’s the case, controlling the most active squares makes the most sense. The center.

No plans can be made before the fifth move, because there is nothing to target, and too many unexpected moves by the opponent that will ruin those plans, are still possible. To make plans you must have a footing, and your opponent must have already set many pieces in motion. Guerrilla warfare and extravagant movement should not happen prior to this established order.

A promethean demonstration of these basic principles:

streamable.com/x26tn

Zoot - did you stop to consider what he says about having played thousands of game and anticipating on opponents?

Fair enough to say antisemitism was a part of the reason why I got hooked online - it was clear from the outset that Nietzsche was being abused in some way here, and my deciphering of that abuse, mostly in extremely filthy debates with Sauwelios, was my guarantee of operating completely beyond good and evil.

Now Ive finally, come to the conclusion: not all Jews are my friends. All Zionists are definitely my allies. But my own line of rabbinical ice eaters has nothing to do with fecking Epstein or Joker or the owner of CNN.

I mostly like Hawks.

People are idiots, man. And some conditions are propitious for the propagation of idiot people.

That’s all it is.

I got hooked because I met a mega genius, Capable, and wanted to understand him better. His crew turned out to be far out. And so here we are. Since you had all that shit going on with the Nazis, I guess I was forced to face what I already knew was no nore than idiocy, even Nietzsche knew, even he saw it happen before his eyes, and predicted he would be used that way. There is no misteries here. I think Capable was known as Aletheia here. And so I had to go down all those fucking dirty rabbit holes which held no misteries with you, because it was apparantly the only way to have a conversation. You being the lightning rod that keeps Capable and the others and me together as a group.

Upcoming video response to Zoot. It ended up 19 mins, but only the first 5 aree really relevant. Then I just get sucked into narrating a game.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FYFjVtryht4[/youtube]

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJT-ovum3wU[/youtube]

Bro you gettin me back into this shit. I had an outburst there in the middle somewhere and B Block came outta me. Felt like I was arguing with Killaroo again (B block grand master). Got so excited I couldn’t even talk straight:

“For every one of your two pieces imma… for every two of my pieces imma take four of yours!”

streamable.com/uxzcr (1)

streamable.com/ukaz4 (2)

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0QpZZ0FQ-k[/youtube]

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KzG-mJgj-E4[/youtube]

Black to play.

Gonna be a draw. It’s logically impossible to get a mate with a king and bishop, and none of those pawns will get queened.

Send him a PM and propose a draw or you guys is wasting your time.

This game did not end in a draw.

Black to move.

Because somebody screwed up. now who was it!

Goddamnit where the fuck does black move.

youtu.be/IYWPxnMIgvI

Bill, the only intelligent neo-nahzoid I ever met, was aware that nahzism functions as a stimulant, he accepted it as his fetish, bragged facetiously about his priapism in the context, etc. It is porn for in the closet. Hence all the leather and Hugo Boss clothes and hatred of the purely masculine (and therefore somewhat “dry” Hebrews - who indeed historically, since the exodus, have lacked their “Shekinah”). And this is the reason why it is still somewhat offensive - I don’t like to see men kissing. I don’t mind that they do it but something in me cringes at it.
Its a veritable leatherfetish parade on ILP now. Sign of the times.

The fight against the phagemony online (I mean faggot not as a general term designating homo’s, but it refers to homo-ideologues such as our garden gnome with the moustache and his Knechtlein here) has of course been quite successful and it has forged a truly masculine spirit of philosophy, more warrior like and battle ready than philosophy has ever been. Large factor in this is my instinctive understanding of nuclear physics which eluded the classics and Schopenhauer and Nietzsche as well. But as large a factor is the fact that we have seen the loss of western masculinity through the fetishization of a garden-gnome and the weaklings idolization of said gnome as a symbol of strength - in short, we have seen the actual humiliation of nihilism as it wrought itself on the willing - we have our own sweet-voiced example of willingness in our midst - therefore we did not have a choice but to establish masculinity anew, fresh.
Fresh men - this is how we are perceived, and how we will go down in history. The only question is how much of the triumph we provide mankind we will claim for ourselves.

I very much appreciate these videos. Zoots video, though I disagree with his bookish and inexperienced method of approaching chess - it is too reverent, like I felt two years ago, before I played some thousands of 5 minute games and learned of the chaos which is implicit in good chess - is still pretty cool to watch.

I posted the weaving Frigg as a commentary on your honouring of my binding efforts (ironically, “fascism” comes from “fascere” which means “binding”) to give credit is where it is due. Valuator logic and Odins logic, these are the same thing - the grounded Will to Power, the Will which has taken root.

I did not know why at the time, but I was once called Hwergelmir.

The correct answer is F3.

The irony though is that book learning means nothing. Only doing has any meaning.

This is why the greatest philosopher of all time wrote all of his work in the form of commentary.

There is no irony in that.

Book learning is useful once one is approaching mastership. To give context to ones own genius.
Same with philosophy.

When I first read Nietzsche I had already ripened, and found only things I already knew.

Truth was there but then there was decisiveness.
Same way I suppose Carlsen reads his chess books.

He’s making points.

Making points is decidedly not the same as teaching.