Says the person who says I only win debates in my head against him, who hasn’t even approached ever having a debate with me EVER.
And his sycophant troll ex moderator friend, who has so many issues with objective truth (being labelled). She’s non-binary, as a 40 year old male who walks into women’s bathrooms telling them that she’s a 15 year ond asain girl (your savior on these boards)
You and said moderator are a joke.
Iambiguous, why don’t you get it over with and debate me in the debate forums?
You look like a coward to the entire boards. And said troll ex-moderator, your mindless and clueless sycophant.
DEBATE ME. Your ex troll moderator won’t, why don’t you try? Seriously. DEBATE ME
It’s a metaphor. But actually the post that you banned for for a day for, stating “Ecmandu needs to evaluate his meaning for posting here, ban for 24 hours” was because of a post in the rant section. So you are fake news.
The person thinks that I don’t know the metaphor is a metaphor… I’d call that attempting to think, or pre-empt, for me… which leaves the remainder of their post as questionable, on the aspects I mentioned.
Conjecture is a boring angle for one to be expected to debate from, and also stagnating of mind… an abhorable ask… this, and any further interaction, is over.
Yes of course. You know… this almost makes me long for the days of uccisore (who was an ass)… but he’d at least debate me. I’ve grown a lot since my debate with uccisore… I can beat him in that debate now (that assertions are arguments)… fuck that was like 6 years ago.
You and iambiguous bit off more than both of you could chew… so you both sprint away …
Very aristocratic of you two (which seems to be your only defense as you both run)
Lets understand what said moderator says is conjecture:
Nobody wants their consent violated. So obviously said moderator is sending a signal to existence that they only want their consent violated!!!, Just to stubbornly refute ecmandu!!
GO said moderator!!! What a way to make a splash in existence!!
Said moderator says that it’s only conjecture that men are more threatening to women than women are to men!! Wow! you mean women can actually rape men easier than men can rape women… Yeah, said moderator… way to stick up for the feminists, you’re a hero!! Of course women can do anything better than a man can!!
1.) Your IQ is higher than 85. That’s like 20 points above mental retardation…
[/quote]
That’s hearsay.
.
[/quote]
2.) You haven’t been following me for months
The reason I state number 2, is because, I’ve refuted this argument several times in my posting history, and I’ve done so recently:
The argument is this: “It violated all of our consents to be born”
[/quote]
Primordial sin…check.
Born into sin…check.
Another Messiah…check.
Come to save mankind from itself…check.
[/quote]
Ecmandu replied:
I’m going to put this to you very simply. I have no interest in saving anyone but myself. This is what comes up though, if you can’t figure out how to save everyone, you can’t save yourself. So I"m like “FUCK!” “I have to save all that shit too, for ME to be saved?” “FUCK!”
The objective establishes the standard by which an action a choice can be evaluated.
What is your objective, in regards to abortion or paedophilia, or consuming fasces as a solution to world poverty?
The objective determined good and bad.
I bet your objective is to reduce all to nil and then force all to negotiate and compromise to bring about the utopian future world of peace on earth.
Anything that diverts or challenges this goal is dismissed or negated.
No other anser will do. They’ve wasted their time taking you seriously for months. I will not make the same mistake.
Another clown in this circus.
