Almost all gains in history have been made through all-out warfare, by which any gains are protected by an establishment anyway. It doesn’t matter how well the Industrial revolution profits, how well capitalism, or any hypothetical marxist-socialist market profits, if you can’t protect those profits by a standing army. You seem to have a philosophical blindspot in this area. The historic ‘high’ classes are aligned with military might. The upper-classes dictate the order of the armies. Any hypothetical “redistribution of wealth” presumes a military uprising. The 20th Century was most dangerous because the world’s wealth was still being held in Swiss Banks, which Europeans will go to war to protect. In fact World War 1 and 2 were both about protecting Central European banks and power, represented by the political powers (Austria-Hapsburg and then Nazi-Germany). Wealth was transferred West, to America, which is the primary reason the world became polarized as it is today.
Ah yes, soooo complex, use small words so I can understand… eye-roll
Your perspective is not mine. I view social-policies as extension of genetic tribalism. Power is what really matters, and boiling everything down, especially political philosophy.
If you can’t enforce your ideas by Reason, then you must use (Physical) Force, which means, a military.
Communist-Marxist ideals are Eastern European and do not reflect the idealism of Western European elitism. The social policies do not mesh.
And it doesn’t matter, because if you have no Kin, then you have no greater motivation to begin with. All social upheaval comes from Kin-Selection.