If I can’t have happiness, why should they? 
There’s nothing more pleasurable than seeing others fall from grace losing everything especially since many acquired their economically privileged means through inheritance, corruption, or utilizing an unfair system.
I just want to be there when they begin their sad swan dance into oblivion and destruction, bring them down a few notches watching them despair.
Oh was it all unfair to you?
Life is will to power, you faggot.
Pardon my French.
I should leave this thread to you guys. No one gives a fuck about reality here anyway.
Right, so when the nation economically collapses the disenfranchised will have gathered together with their grievances in the formation of a fascist government body undoubtedly through violent civil war and anybody that opposes them will be lined up against the wall to be shot in the head faggot… 
You’re right, you can remove yourself any time of your own choosing. 
Okay tough guy.
Im now expecting the incel government to establish itself with you as its head.
That’s all you got Fixed? Weak.
Go back to taking hits off your bong man, it’s what you’re good at. Toke it up buddy.
Damn. I so hoped you were going to accept my challenge.
Its frustrating for an audience wanting to see a good gorefest that it occurs to none of the disenfranchised revolutionaries to place themselves in the equation.
It will apparently just happen, like a miracle.
I bet.
Except I’ve had twenty long miserable years to think through my plans.
So you’re only 20 years old?
No that cant be.
What was the origin of this lengthy depression, if you don’t mind my asking?
So your leader, the dictator, he is preparing in hiding somewhere now, or is he riling up beer-halls as we speak?
Okay okay you won’t tell. You’re strategic.
You’re not telling me the whole truth.
:-"
I never suggested that everything that benefits or doesn’t detriment the elite detriments or doesn’t benefit the poor.
That’s why I’m a social democrat and social corporatist, not a democratic socialist.
I believe in balancing the needs of capital with the need for the state or the mob to empower labor and consumers.
Trump was in favor of the Wall Street bailout.
Trump does nothing to challenge the private Federal Reserve.
Trump didn’t pay his taxes and hired illegals.
Trump leaves the border wide open.
Trump does nothing to end the unnecessary and costly war for Greater Israel, the military industrial complex, big oil and opium in West Asia.
All he’s done is slash taxes for the rich and cut spending on the poor.
But he’s not even a capitalist, he’s a crony capitalist.
Ron Paul and his son Rand are real capitalists, real republicans.
Trump is a neocon, a Zio-con, almost if not all of them are.
I thought right, you believe all social democracy is synonymous with elitism, and all capitalism and republicanism is synonymous with populism.
That’s how you define populism, but that’s not how I define it.
For me populism is that, what you said (intersubjective), but it’s also what’s actually good for the people, somewhat irrespective of what they think is good for them (objective).
It’s also a concrete ideology (democratic republicanism, economically center-left, culturally and socially center-right).
For me it’s multiple things.
Agreed, Athens and Rome were partly founded on populist principles, but every government has to at least feign to care about the general will from time to time, if they want to keep their head for very long.
Right
I’d say culturally and socially there’s a strong anti-conservative white male bias but economically there’s a strong crony capitalist bias.
For me, what’s popular is partly inherently good, but what’s inherently good is partly unnecessarily popular.
I’m an ethical pluralist, there’re multiple intrinsic goods.
Liberty is a good, but so is life, the ego, fraternity, equality, equity, health and happiness In the real world, intrinsic goods sometimes come into conflict with each other.
We define what’s good individually, popularly and expertly.
In order to maximize the overall good, sometimes particular goods must be sacrificed.
Did I say that? I’m almost 33.
Since a young adolescent I’ve always knew this nation was doomed where it was destroying itself. Over the past two decades it took me awhile to figure out why.
Would take way too long to explain and I don’t think you would listen anyways.
A strong charismatic leader always rises to the occasion in chaotic portions of history where whole societies are on the brink of ruin or collapse, who will rise to the occasion this time around we don’t know yet…
We’re at the point of being way past or beyond negotiations and reasonable dialogue where we’re at the point of eliminating opposition instead. At the very least neutralizing opposition.
Violent revolution is the only thing left on the table as all other non-violent means of negotiations or diplomacy has failed.
I understand different conflict of interests all too easily Promethean and yes, people moralize as a way of justifying their self interests, I understand this also. 
Also, I think you underestimate human nature where people knowingly conspire against, undermine, and go out of their way intentionally to hurt others for their own benefit. I have a different understanding of human nature than most and I do not view it with rose colored glasses. I’ve spent decades studying the more darker aspects of human nature which I view makes up the majority bulk of it, with that is also the reason human nature must be contained because if its not human beings will destroy each other or the entire planet. Human nature needs an iron rod placed over it to smash and mold it into something better towards a general aspiring guiding principle, I’m a firm believer in this.
Even if this seems unfair, its going to be a gigantic anarchic mix breed mayhem, a synthesis under the eye of the will to power. Under this prospect there will be endless more and less successful attempts to preserve racial purity and of course nations like China will be quite successful but I contend that this will bring them in trouble, and that as they begin to experiment with allowing good Han stock or whatever to breed with different races, they will quickly realize the immense potential their gene pool has when different patterns activate it. Then Chinese will really come to rule the world, but as a slow synthesis over thousands of years. It is inevitable, especially if the decline of the West is as drastic as predicted here, but in general its not really thinkable that China will not have to make use of its full potential to fulfill its destiny. As organizer of the world - here will be a legit “green” regime, let me coin it then, Chinamen, please make your government into a green dragon. You had the Yellow Emperor of the Dragon which is China, and Yellow is Earth, foundation, whereas Green is the colour of anger. But anyway the west, America, what comes of it - military loyalties must always decide. You have basically always hardline nationalists and geostrategists, as directions of thought, always in the history of war. Im not talking about tactics but as mindsets. So your military personnel is always going to fall in either of these two command chains no matter what grunts will feel in their hearts.
You’ve just ousted yourself with this terrible disgusting post.
“After white western civilization dies the Asians civilizations are next and getting rid of their own racial or ethnic purity through dilution is a good thing too.”
That’s all I need to know where your philosophy or thinking stands.