For you Promethean.
Okay, you got me there.
I need to post it so others can see this.
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gUan6sdGvWo[/youtube]
A reasonable argument and stance, thank you. =D>
All that has achieved is alienating white Europeans away from Marxism and communism just as neo-liberalism has as well. No sane rational white man or woman other than the degenerate idiots is going to flock to a political ideology that tells them they’re the boogie man and that they’re the root of evil in this world. No sane white man or woman is going to join a political movement that insists that they have no culture, history, or identity that is theirs.
Moreover, modern communism or neo-liberalism has essentially been take over by non-whites and a whole host of ‘victim’ groups that it has essentially purged all of its white members already. I agree that half this shit that is tolerated by the radical left today in the west wouldn’t be accepted in Stalin’s Soviet Russia. Gays or homosexuality for instance was not tolerated in Soviet Russia just as it isn’t tolerated in North Korea and China, all of those being communist nations.
It should however be noted that modern western Marxism or communism is very different from traditional variations as it is very unorthodox especially concerning its anti-whiteness agenda of which the neo-liberals similarly have adopted. They’re for the white working class, really? Within the last twenty five years it is clear that nobody gives a shit about the white working class, in fact no politician ever dares to mention the white working class by name publicly.
Of course the more both the political right and left ignores the plight of white European people the more white European people are going to look inward into themselves for solutions to their own collective plight which is why right now there is a national socialist revival that is growing in ranks yearly which is of course fine by me.
I will agree with you however that crony capitalism has created many social problems in society, I’ll give you that.
One may see this and its partner neo-conservatism in light of some of Adam Curtis’ documentaries, like The Century of the Self, The Power of Nightmares, and HyperNormalisation.
One may see this and its partner neo-conservatism in light of some of Adam Curtis’ documentaries, like The Century of the Self, The Power of Nightmares, and HyperNormalisation.
You’ve peaked my interest, tell us more.
K: nice… so what am I, am I “white, self hating anti-white reject” or am I
a “naïve idealist” or perhaps I am a “humanist”. It is very hard to keep track of
insults and what they mean to me? let us start with the last set of insults…
A Naïve idealist… um, idealist ok, I can live with that but Naïve, explain to
us exactly what I am naïve about? or is insults the best you can do?
and the second part is “humanist” so put these two together, we have
you playing the opposite role of a “naïve idealist” and the opposite of a
“humanist”…you believe yourself to be a pragmatist, a realist… the second part
is you consider yourself anti-humanist"… that means you are anti-human…
to be a humanist means to stand with humans, to stand with humanity…
and you consider yourself the opposite, so you consider yourself to
be anti-human…a pragmatic anti-humanist…sounds about right…you consider me to be a “hating white reject” and yet you clearly hate
human beings… and I clearly don’t hate whites, why I married one
why some of my best friends are white…why even my family is “gasp”
white… (mental note, will my sarcasm be noted or simply lost on
another way too serious very young person… only time will tell)anyway, as far as I am concerned if you hate human beings, you have
far, far more problems then you know what to do with…hate to break it to you sparky, but hating human beings is a bad mental
place to be…whereas I am alright with the world… and why? because I don’t hate unlike
you…have a nice day…despite your cynical anti-human hatred…Kropotkin
I don’t hate human beings at all. [Well, maybe I hate Jews as an exception to the rule. Those are probably the only people I genuinely hate.]
I do hate what has become of this world or what has become of a majority of people, I find it sad and a tragedy actually.
I’m actually more of a humanist than you are in that I would want a world where every race, ethnicity, and culture is preserved instead of your world where everybody is mixed up being bred out of existence because that’s exactly where your ideology leads to. So yes, you’re the naive humanist whereas I’m the human realist.
Truthfully Roman civilization collapsed because of the importation of slaves where there were more slaves than actual Roman aristocrats and Roman citizens themselves which caused civil unrest along with bankrupting the entire empire trying to conquer the rest of the known world at the time.
In some ways it’s much like the United States today where the American working class has become the new slaves but because today’s modern culture is all about illusion, false appearances, facades, and denial the political establishment bypasses modern slavery saying everybody is ‘free’ even though for many people freedom means nothing at all. If only the Romans back then could master political propaganda like the extent we have today when they went around enslaving others gleefully looking down upon them and saying, “You’re not slaves, you are free people!”
The United States today would make the ancient Roman blush if they could see how things are done now, we go around bombing other countries, organizing political coups, and overthrowing governments around the world. When their nations or societies collapse we tell them how great Americanism, democracy, and freedom is getting them to immigrate to the United States in mass right after we’ve destroyed their nation of origin so they can work at Wal-Mart for $8.25 an hour upon arrival through a local temp agency. That’s how Americanism, American freedom, and American democracy really works.
The Roman empire existed purely on utilizing slaves through foreign immigration along with enslaving its own domestic citizens through military imperialism or expansion and the modern United States is practically the same.
You hit the nail on the head.
It’s funny how all whites get blamed for slavery, but only a tiny minority of whites actually owned slaves, almost all of them upperclass.
The cheap labor slaves provided their white, upperclass masters with hurt working class whites almost as much as it hurt blacks.
Zero_Sum:Truthfully Roman civilization collapsed because of the importation of slaves where there were more slaves than actual Roman aristocrats and Roman citizens themselves which caused civil unrest along with bankrupting the entire empire trying to conquer the rest of the known world at the time.
In some ways it’s much like the United States today where the American working class has become the new slaves but because today’s modern culture is all about illusion, false appearances, facades, and denial the political establishment bypasses modern slavery saying everybody is ‘free’ even though for many people freedom means nothing at all. If only the Romans back then could master political propaganda like the extent we have today when they went around enslaving others gleefully looking down upon them and saying, “You’re not slaves, you are free people!”
The United States today would make the ancient Roman blush if they could see how things are done now, we go around bombing other countries, organizing political coups, and overthrowing governments around the world. When their nations or societies collapse we tell them how great Americanism, democracy, and freedom is getting them to immigrate to the United States in mass right after we’ve destroyed their nation of origin so they can work at Wal-Mart for $8.25 an hour upon arrival through a local temp agency. That’s how Americanism, American freedom, and American democracy really works.
The Roman empire existed purely on utilizing slaves through foreign immigration along with enslaving its own domestic citizens through military imperialism or expansion and the modern United States is practically the same.
You hit the nail on the head.
It’s funny all whites get blamed for slavery, but only a tiny minority of whites owned slaves, almost all of them upperclass.
The cheap labor slaves provided their white, upperclass masters with hurt working class whites almost as much as it hurt blacks.
The slavery of blacks for instance in Europe and the Americas only lasted a few hundred years compared to the thousands of years whites enslaved each other. For all the idiots watching this thread I don’t condone the slavery of blacks historically, I’m against slavery of any kind whoever it involves.
Really though, they outlawed slavery in name only throughout the west. Who looks at the extremely poor, low income, and destitute these days thinking they’re not slaves? What charlatan would dare call them free, independent, autonomous, or sovereign? They’re just as much slaves compared to those of past historical eras. The only difference is that they have I-phones which the NSA can monitor them with and that they pay for their own slavery concerning the financial expenses involved from their meager wages. The so called abolition of black slavery in the 18th century was merely a mandate that everybody of every race could be enslaved equally thereafter, slavery has never went away, it merely evolved into something much more sinister.
Also, don’t forget all those slave shipping naval fleets or vessels owned by a variety of Jewish nationalities. Few black historians talk about this anymore which is a shame, I wish black Americans would have that talked about more in public discourse.
K: ah, we reach the part where we discover why Zero hates everyone… he was homeless
and blames everyone for his being homeless… especially those terrible liberals who despite
their rhetoric, left poor old Zero homeless… I think a group cry will make you feel better
Zero… but to be fair, I was homeless for a stretch myself and I didn’t wind up
hating the human race or the liberals or anyone else for that matter…we all have
stories, I was born handicap with a severe hearing loss… and I could easily blame
everyone I ever met for being handicap… but I don’t… sorry, in the end, we
can only blame ourselves and we are the only ones who can pick ourselves up…hate takes way too much energy to hold and maintain… so I shall stay
being a naïve idealist and a humanist… for I see what is possible and
you see what is impossible…Kropotkin
It’s interesting Peter being the neo-liberal here is so dismissive of another’s hardships, struggles, or suffering, then again neo-liberals are infamous for supposedly caring about the poor while ignoring them at the same time.
Neo-liberal California for instance having one of the highest homeless populations in the entire United States.
What great upstanding humanitarians neo-liberals are…
“Modern Marxists and communists everywhere: White proletarians bad, non-white proletarians good.”
that’s just tactical propaganda, dude. genuine marxists don’t discriminate between, or put the interests of one race of working class over another. it just so happens that in order for the left to gain momentum, they have to pull the heart strings of people and get them on board. this is purely strategic. the logical thing to do, then, would be to take all the examples that the right rallies against (gays, foreigners, feminists, etc) and present them as victims of conservatism to draw voter sympathy.
now the wonderful irony here is that western capitalism has created these freaks (you might check out ‘capitalism and schizophrenia’ by deleuze and guattari), and that they are ‘desiring machines’ manufactured by a series of social and market machinations that have divided class and culture so much, muthafuckers are going bananas trying to keep their orientations intact under this maelstrom of forces. when you have so many competing cultures, sub-cultures evolve as alternatives, and produce even more social disarray.
so the absolute disaster that capitalism creates in social discourse is responsible for the freaks that will be later used in an advance against it by the left. foreigners crossing boarders because the countries they are from are so underdeveloped. capitalism. alienated dudes turning gay because they can’t get no play from the ladies. capitalism. bitches becoming militant feminists because they can’t get equal pay. capitalism.
so look, if the leftist platform was only about the ‘white working classes’, they wouldn’t get as much support. but they are ultimately for the white working class… every working class for that matter. this is a very dirty war, mang, and a lot of bullshit is gonna go down… because that’s what the left has to work with; bullshit created by capitalism.
Most whites want universal healthcare, education and wage increases, including most working and lower middle class whites living in the South and Midwest, most of them just aren’t willing to pay carbon taxers, higher taxes in general or trade in their borders, free speech, guns, national sovereignty and so on to get them, whereas most nonwhites will.
They won’t go for racial, religious and sexual discrimination against whites, Christians and men the way nonwhites or middle class whites living in California or New York will.
Non-Hispanic whites are still the majority, they make up about 60% of the population and probably something like 80% of the people who vote.
The white vote is still the most important vote, it should be top priority for both parties.
If they softened their stance on the aforementioned issues, if they promised to deliver universal healthcare and education while lowering or at least not raising taxes for working and lower middle class Americans, and then began delivering on those promises, democrats could win far more often than they do, but they won’t, because the economy is no longer their top priority, instead war, cheap labor, the subjugation and extermination of whites and their culture is the top priority for both parties.
While not all socialists are anti-white, Marxists overwhelmingly are.
The socialist movement was founded by whites, but it’s been hijacked by Jews and other antiwhites.
Identity politics has taken center stage with these people.
promethean75:“Modern Marxists and communists everywhere: White proletarians bad, non-white proletarians good.”
that’s just tactical propaganda, dude. genuine marxists don’t discriminate between, or put the interests of one race of working class over another. it just so happens that in order for the left to gain momentum, they have to pull the heart strings of people and get them on board. this is purely strategic. the logical thing to do, then, would be to take all the examples that the right rallies against (gays, foreigners, feminists, etc) and present them as victims of conservatism to draw voter sympathy.
now the wonderful irony here is that western capitalism has created these freaks (you might check out ‘capitalism and schizophrenia’ by deleuze and guattari), and that they are ‘desiring machines’ manufactured by a series of social and market machinations that have divided class and culture so much, muthafuckers are going bananas trying to keep their orientations intact under this maelstrom of forces. when you have so many competing cultures, sub-cultures evolve as alternatives, and produce even more social disarray.
so the absolute disaster that capitalism creates in social discourse is responsible for the freaks that will be later used in an advance against it by the left. foreigners crossing boarders because the countries they are from are so underdeveloped. capitalism. alienated dudes turning gay because they can’t get no play from the ladies. capitalism. bitches becoming militant feminists because they can’t get equal pay. capitalism.
so look, if the leftist platform was only about the ‘white working classes’, they wouldn’t get as much support. but they are ultimately for the white working class… every working class for that matter. this is a very dirty war, mang, and a lot of bullshit is gonna go down… because that’s what the left has to work with; bullshit created by capitalism.
Most whites want universal healthcare, education and wage increases, including most working and lower middle class whites living in the south and Midwest, most of them just aren’t willing to pay carbon taxers, higher taxes in general or trade in their borders, free speech, guns, national sovereignty and so on to get them, whereas most nonwhites will.
They won’t go for ethnic, racial, religious and sexual discrimination against whites, Christians and men the way nonwhites or middle class whites living in California will.Non-Hispanic whites are still the majority, they make up about 60% of the population and probably something like 80% of the people who vote.
The white vote is still the most important vote, it ought to be the top priority for both parties.If they softened their stance on the aforementioned issues, if they promised to deliver universal healthcare and education while lowering our taxes by getting the rich to pay for them, and then began delivering on that promise, democrats could win far more often than they do, but they won’t, because the economy is no longer their priority, instead war, cheap labor, the subjugation and extermination of whites and their culture is the top priority for both parties.
While not all socialists are anti-white, Marxists overwhelmingly are.
The socialist movement was founded by whites, but it’s been mostly hijacked by Jews and others who’re antiwhite.
Identity politics has taken center stage with these people.
Promethean is a lone wolf Marxist, given that he’s mostly white with some minor Mediterranean Lebanese in him it would be interesting if he joined the American Communist Party only to find out that they’ll tell his cracka ass to check his white male privilege where he doesn’t deserve a voice on anything for being an ‘oppressor’.
Promethean, if you’re looking at this I double dare you to do that and film it on video to post on the forum so me along with Gloominary can laugh at the results. Afterwards I will try to convert you to fascism and national socialism in philosophical rehabilitation, we can do this together man. I know that I can exorcise the Marxism out of you eventually with time.
Gloominary:For me, with the exception of healthcare, Obama was far right on economic, and foreign policy, and with the exception of the war-on-drugs, which he continued, far left on social policy.
Under Obama, the working and middle classes continued to get poorer, and foreigners, minorities and women continued to be propped up at the expense of citizens, the majority and men.
Republicrats aren’t right or left, they’re anti-populist and misandrist, the real opposition is populism and meninism.I will always remember Obama as the president that financially bailed out banks or corporations on Wallstreet at everybody’s expense and a president who claimed to have created a post-racial United States where only instead it backfired causing everyone to become even more racist especially since the radical left went around savagely attacking white people every chance they could get. [Especially white men.]
Finally, I’ll remember the Obama administration for the nine years straight I was homeless off and on. [More homeless than not.]
Yup, republicrats don’t care about the poor, like you said, as long you’re at war, as long as the border stays open, as long as wall street gets a bail out, as long as the anti-white male agenda is in full swing, that’s what matters.
Gloominary: Zero_Sum:Truthfully Roman civilization collapsed because of the importation of slaves where there were more slaves than actual Roman aristocrats and Roman citizens themselves which caused civil unrest along with bankrupting the entire empire trying to conquer the rest of the known world at the time.
In some ways it’s much like the United States today where the American working class has become the new slaves but because today’s modern culture is all about illusion, false appearances, facades, and denial the political establishment bypasses modern slavery saying everybody is ‘free’ even though for many people freedom means nothing at all. If only the Romans back then could master political propaganda like the extent we have today when they went around enslaving others gleefully looking down upon them and saying, “You’re not slaves, you are free people!”
The United States today would make the ancient Roman blush if they could see how things are done now, we go around bombing other countries, organizing political coups, and overthrowing governments around the world. When their nations or societies collapse we tell them how great Americanism, democracy, and freedom is getting them to immigrate to the United States in mass right after we’ve destroyed their nation of origin so they can work at Wal-Mart for $8.25 an hour upon arrival through a local temp agency. That’s how Americanism, American freedom, and American democracy really works.
The Roman empire existed purely on utilizing slaves through foreign immigration along with enslaving its own domestic citizens through military imperialism or expansion and the modern United States is practically the same.
You hit the nail on the head.
It’s funny all whites get blamed for slavery, but only a tiny minority of whites owned slaves, almost all of them upperclass.
The cheap labor slaves provided their white, upperclass masters with hurt working class whites almost as much as it hurt blacks.The slavery of blacks for instance in Europe and the Americas only lasted a few hundred years compared to the thousands of years whites enslaved each other. For all the idiots watching this thread I don’t condone the slavery of blacks historically, I’m against slavery of any kind whoever it involves.
Really though, they outlawed slavery in name only throughout the west. Who looks at the extremely poor, low income, and destitute these days thinking they’re not slaves? What charlatan would dare call them free, independent, autonomous, or sovereign? They’re just as much slaves compared to those of past historical eras. The only difference is that they have I-phones which the NSA can monitor them with and that they pay for their own slavery concerning the financial expenses involved from their meager wages. The so called abolition of black slavery in the 18th century was merely a mandate that everybody of every race could be enslaved equally thereafter, slavery has never went away, it merely evolved into something much more sinister.
Also, don’t forget all those slave shipping naval fleets or vessels owned by a variety of Jewish nationalities. Few black historians talk about this anymore which is a shame, I wish black Americans would have that talked about more in public discourse.
Yup, increasing the supply of cheap worker drones, that’s always what it’s been about.
Here are my conditions, zero. If you can sing Sofa No. 2 in perfect key, I’ll become a national socialist.
“Modern Marxists and communists everywhere: White proletarians bad, non-white proletarians good.”
that’s just tactical propaganda, dude. genuine marxists don’t discriminate between, or put the interests of one race of working class over another. it just so happens that in order for the left to gain momentum, they have to pull the heart strings of people and get them on board. this is purely strategic. the logical thing to do, then, would be to take all the examples that the right rallies against (gays, foreigners, feminists, etc) and present them as victims of conservatism to draw voter sympathy.
now the wonderful irony here is that western capitalism has created these freaks (you might check out ‘capitalism and schizophrenia’ by deleuze and guattari), and that they are ‘desiring machines’ manufactured by a series of social and market machinations that have divided class and culture so much, muthafuckers are going bananas trying to keep their orientations intact under this maelstrom of forces. when you have so many competing cultures, sub-cultures evolve as alternatives, and produce even more social disarray.
so the absolute disaster that capitalism creates in social discourse is responsible for the freaks that will be later used in an advance against it by the left. foreigners crossing boarders because the countries they are from are so underdeveloped. capitalism. alienated dudes turning gay because they can’t get no play from the ladies. capitalism. bitches becoming militant feminists because they can’t get equal pay. capitalism.
so look, if the leftist platform was only about the ‘white working classes’, they wouldn’t get as much support. but they are ultimately for the white working class… every working class for that matter. this is a very dirty war, mang, and a lot of bullshit is gonna go down… because that’s what the left has to work with; bullshit created by capitalism.
Most whites want universal healthcare, education and wage increases, including most working and lower middle class whites living in the South and Midwest, most of them just aren’t willing to pay carbon taxers, higher taxes in general or trade in their borders, free speech, guns, national sovereignty and so on to get them, whereas most nonwhites will.
They won’t go for racial, religious and sexual discrimination against whites, Christians and men the way nonwhites or middle class whites living in California or New York will.Non-Hispanic whites are still the majority, they make up about 60% of the population and probably something like 80% of the people who vote.
The white vote is still the most important vote, it should be top priority for both parties.If they softened their stance on the aforementioned issues, if they promised to deliver universal healthcare and education while lowering or at least not raising taxes for working and lower middle class Americans, and then began delivering on those promises, democrats could win far more often than they do, but they won’t, because the economy is no longer their top priority, instead war, cheap labor, the subjugation and extermination of whites and their culture is the top priority for both parties.
While not all socialists are anti-white, Marxists overwhelmingly are.
The socialist movement was founded by whites, but it’s been hijacked by Jews and other antiwhites.
Identity politics has taken center stage with these people.
Promethean is a lone wolf Marxist, given that he’s mostly white with some minor Mediterranean Lebanese in him it would be interesting if he joined the American Communist Party only to find out that they’ll tell his cracka ass to check his white male privilege where he doesn’t deserve a voice on anything for being an ‘oppressor’.
Promethean, if you’re looking at this I double dare you to do that and film it on video to post on the forum so me along with Gloominary can laugh at the results. Afterwards I will try to convert you to fascism and national socialism in philosophical rehabilitation, we can do this together man. I know that I can exorcise the Marxism out of you eventually with time.
Socialism began as a pro or at least not anti-white movement, but it was taken over by Marxist Jews who were covertly anti-white.
Of course Mussolini and Hitler tried to put a stop to that, but failed.
Social democracy increasingly became less about workers rights and more about overtly hating white males over time.
People don’t understand what the left has become.
The left used to be economically socialist and socially conservative or libertarian, now it’s economically crony capitalist and socially anticonservative, not just not conservative, but anticonservative, where the freaks are given a platform and propped up at the expense of normies who’re de-platformed, it’s bizarre.
People are sick of it but unfortunately the right is pretty much the same thing.
Here are my conditions, zero. If you can sing Sofa No. 2 in perfect key, I’ll become a national socialist.
Well that doesn’t seem fair at all.
Zero_Sum: Gloominary:For me, with the exception of healthcare, Obama was far right on economic, and foreign policy, and with the exception of the war-on-drugs, which he continued, far left on social policy.
Under Obama, the working and middle classes continued to get poorer, and foreigners, minorities and women continued to be propped up at the expense of citizens, the majority and men.
Republicrats aren’t right or left, they’re anti-populist and misandrist, the real opposition is populism and meninism.I will always remember Obama as the president that financially bailed out banks or corporations on Wallstreet at everybody’s expense and a president who claimed to have created a post-racial United States where only instead it backfired causing everyone to become even more racist especially since the radical left went around savagely attacking white people every chance they could get. [Especially white men.]
Finally, I’ll remember the Obama administration for the nine years straight I was homeless off and on. [More homeless than not.]
Yup, republicrats don’t care about the poor, like you said, as long you’re at war, as long as the border stays open, as long as wall street gets a bail out, as long as the anti-white male agenda is in full swing, that’s what matters.
Until the entire nation collapses as a result.
Zero_Sum:“Modern Marxists and communists everywhere: White proletarians bad, non-white proletarians good.”
promethean75:that’s just tactical propaganda, dude. genuine marxists don’t discriminate between, or put the interests of one race of working class over another. it just so happens that in order for the left to gain momentum, they have to pull the heart strings of people and get them on board. this is purely strategic. the logical thing to do, then, would be to take all the examples that the right rallies against (gays, foreigners, feminists, etc) and present them as victims of conservatism to draw voter sympathy.
now the wonderful irony here is that western capitalism has created these freaks (you might check out ‘capitalism and schizophrenia’ by deleuze and guattari), and that they are ‘desiring machines’ manufactured by a series of social and market machinations that have divided class and culture so much, muthafuckers are going bananas trying to keep their orientations intact under this maelstrom of forces. when you have so many competing cultures, sub-cultures evolve as alternatives, and produce even more social disarray.
so the absolute disaster that capitalism creates in social discourse is responsible for the freaks that will be later used in an advance against it by the left. foreigners crossing boarders because the countries they are from are so underdeveloped. capitalism. alienated dudes turning gay because they can’t get no play from the ladies. capitalism. bitches becoming militant feminists because they can’t get equal pay. capitalism.
so look, if the leftist platform was only about the ‘white working classes’, they wouldn’t get as much support. but they are ultimately for the white working class… every working class for that matter. this is a very dirty war, mang, and a lot of bullshit is gonna go down… because that’s what the left has to work with; bullshit created by capitalism.
Gloominary:Most whites want universal healthcare, education and wage increases, including most working and lower middle class whites living in the South and Midwest, most of them just aren’t willing to pay carbon taxers, higher taxes in general or trade in their borders, free speech, guns, national sovereignty and so on to get them, whereas most nonwhites will.
They won’t go for racial, religious and sexual discrimination against whites, Christians and men the way nonwhites or middle class whites living in California or New York will.Non-Hispanic whites are still the majority, they make up about 60% of the population and probably something like 80% of the people who vote.
The white vote is still the most important vote, it should be top priority for both parties.If they softened their stance on the aforementioned issues, if they promised to deliver universal healthcare and education while lowering or at least not raising taxes for working and lower middle class Americans, and then began delivering on those promises, democrats could win far more often than they do, but they won’t, because the economy is no longer their top priority, instead war, cheap labor, the subjugation and extermination of whites and their culture is the top priority for both parties.
While not all socialists are anti-white, Marxists overwhelmingly are.
The socialist movement was founded by whites, but it’s been hijacked by Jews and other antiwhites.
Identity politics has taken center stage with these people. Zero_Sum:Promethean is a lone wolf Marxist, given that he’s mostly white with some minor Mediterranean Lebanese in him it would be interesting if he joined the American Communist Party only to find out that they’ll tell his cracka ass to check his white male privilege where he doesn’t deserve a voice on anything for being an ‘oppressor’.
Promethean, if you’re looking at this I double dare you to do that and film it on video to post on the forum so me along with Gloominary can laugh at the results. Afterwards I will try to convert you to fascism and national socialism in philosophical rehabilitation, we can do this together man. I know that I can exorcise the Marxism out of you eventually with time.
Socialism began as a pro or at least not anti-white movement, but it was taken over by Marxist Jews who were covertly anti-white.
Of course Mussolini and Hitler tried to put a stop to that, but failed.
Social democracy increasingly became less about workers rights and more about overtly hating white males over time.People don’t understand what the left has become.
The left used to be economically socialist and socially conservative or libertarian, now it’s economically crony capitalist and socially anticonservative, not just not conservative, but anticonservative, where the freaks are given a platform and propped up at the expense of normies who’re de-platformed, it’s bizarre.
People are sick of it but unfortunately the right is pretty much the same thing.
There’s a difference between historically classical socialism and communism, the later is a perversion of socialism.
Original historical socialism cared about the well being of an individual nation state whereas communism extended out of that regarding internationalism. Any time you try to internationalize something you’re going to corrupt it in my opinion, it becomes more about international power or dominance rather than the welfare of people.
The original welfare of people becomes lost overtime in the aims of creating an international body.
It’s time we get rid of the left and right paradigm altogether where in synthesis of the two we create an entirely new body politic or economic system.