Again plausible, all too plausible.
Infinity is just as difficult to conceive as the idea of a curve, a perfect circle , as well as the idea of progressive spaced out diminishing rates of , or , increasing rates of change, of awareness.
Relativity, is an idea, but so far, a proven idea, related to the linear slowly, very slowly become awareness, that the perfectly appearing line, is really PART of an extremely straight appearing arc, which has an ever slight curvature, based on being part of a huge circle, or bubble.(whose measurements always ebb or increase)
The bubble is part of a foam of many spheres which pop up & burst. at the limit periodically.
If the idea of the absolute straight line is conceived, then there must be a universe which has no dimension other than pure extension. But can You, or anyone conceive a single universe which includes all space and time while, it merely describes a non spatial extensive idea?
That is equally absurd, and that is what has been described as the characteristic, the primacy, of god.
So you see, both conceptions involve mind games, and as any game, the predominant one that tries to solve this is the mind game concerning the philosophy of mind as central in the ontological games of trying not to ask whether the God game is pre eminent or not, but what that game entails by or education of what it means, by virtue of it’s manifestation.
That game has been played almost since the question was asked about what universals mean next to particulars, and whether, a universal, as a pure idea, missed some thing in it’s self, or whether consciousness or the idea of it are different in succession, and if so does the idea of god, generate the ideas of evolving consciousness, as anthropomorphical or not.
But all these games, always go back to the circular, and the calculus which determine the idea of the near circular meaning of many universes .
Or, that the curvature can generate as many new realities as is conceivably needed to signify even a single scope of forming relationships between the possible ‘human’ limits of recognizing as many possible universes as required , based on a number of similar ones.
This is how I see it, and it leads to the game, the recognition of which, like a turtle like apprehension, just slightly different from the preceding one which rests on it, making just enough difference to note it, to prevent if from falling into identity. The game of being sufficient to form enough of a difference ,to become aware that is different enough to form a subsequent foundation.
Why? What function is there to derive such a difference? The idea ‘turtle’ tried to resolve this puzzling - mind game. It is the catch all - of all of the differently appearing animals that conceivably belong into that set, class.
But again, sets do have to belong to awareness of how they appear to function, and the ideal set forms a sphere, and the sphere has an infinite spatially extended sets of diminishing or increasing rates of change, which coincidentally do contain both, the extremely slight, and the overwhelming sets of relationships between various variables; between Mass, Energy, Limits (C), …
The increasing rate of linear change, can be played as an infinite number of derivable circles, again to return to the basic idea, of the infinite number (-+1) functionally necessary universes. As is approached functionally .
Where, the absolute is the pure form of the idea that is necessary, to have the other turtles underneath, because if that was not so, then how would even a child’s play get started?
You can not conceive of a universal set which contains even it’s self without figuring even any two things which may look similar enough to form a basic identity.
The diminishing and the accelerating rates of change then, once it becomes both: integral and differential in this context, (as it can be broken down into more strangeness, peculiarity, individuality, of ‘things’, ~or less,~ depend on the ability and the need arising out of applications of memory, or pretension , as the mind can apprehend the codex, within which such apprehension can be set, SET, and recalled.
.Eventually the problems become connected to investigation of the human mind’s limits, of being able to store into memory, giving rise to the need to code them ; forming more and more general sets, and so on.
.
Back to the circle, again and again. The maximised and minimized number of sets, imply an actual graphic representation, eternally recurring, to traverse the reason, and the meaning and the function of a field, that makes possible such relation, simulating it(and harmonics invented this input, output, feed back process);and it best works visually, as such:
And this is not nutso, it works best as a game everybody plays, the game of I’m ok, with it and you the same:
The very straight appearing line, is an arc, which becomes curved, if incorporated into a possible set of an increasing number of conceivable sets.- Where the area of the circle increases to be able to approximate the straightened of the linear segment. Not the other way around, that is, to take the circle first, then derive, or differentiate the segment!
As the simulation game progresses, we end up to an approach to a critical point, where a hyper or a hypo(Thetical) feed back is established, the hypothetical sequentially creating required forms of lesser and lesser redundant sets of codes, into which the brain dumps categories of memory bits.
The number and the need for these sets diminish in accordance with the mind-limit of storage, directly tied to recall, the rate at which they require recall.
Categorization into more general types of information will correlate with longer recall times, as the rate of change if the time it takes to get to the more specific -lengthens. Such lengthening in time is observed in preception, first in the actual sense of hearing it as such-when the tone and pitch of the sound a moving train makes, and how it is perceived. The same occurs with light, in the study which changes through awareness of infrared teloscopy, as the measure of distance effects - distances of astronomical distances of events in the universe are studied.
Finally, our awareness is changed by seeing these effects, and again can only interpret them in terms of relative consciously manifested events, as the changes, are set into our awareness, while our awareness is set within the process of the change, which the always were, but now( in the instant EUREKA can be uttered, that the game can never end.
It has no end , and, alas such, it always becomes while it is both ending and becoming of as many forms of awareness, as there are requirements to play the games, while the question is asked, whether a maturity is ever reached.Where games need not be played, the resounding answer is : no, we never really ever grow up, we really never appear to want to, because then we would kill the god who created us, and we really can not do it, because if we tried that the gods would destroy us by driving us mad. ( angry gods must get mad at least some times)
