No, as a matter of fact, it doesn’t even come close. More to the point, that you are actually able to think yourself into believing that it does?!
From my frame of mind, you come at me with things like this:
[size=85]They are often preemptively fabricated to distract from problematic experience but often enough spontaneous misapprehension of the case at hand.[/size]
How is this not just intellectual gibberish? What does it denote regarding the points I raise above pertaining to “the relationship between describing what some construe to be universal truths in regard to human interactions in conflict over value judgments, statements about them, and how to differentiate them technically…”
Choose a context and we can exchange our current understanding of “objective truth” and “universal truth”. Then in that actual substantive exchange if a straw man pops up you can pounce on him. Expose to everyone here exactly what you mean by the accusation itself.
Or, instead, are observations of this sort all just tongue in cheek?
Also, how do you suppose astrology fits into all of this? If that’s an appropriate point to being up.
Right now the Sun is on the last degree of Scorpio. I don’t know what you are asking.
Well, why don’t we start with what you construe to be the most epistemologically sound statement that can be made about “universal truth”; and then the most epistemologically sound statement that can be made about astrology.
And then bring both statements out into the world and, contextually, examine their relevance relating to that which is of most interest to me here: the nature of truth in regard to conflicting goods as the embodiment of daseins intertwined in any particular political economy out in a particular world.