There is no such thing as love or romance.

Yeah, I’m talking about the trigger. Men act, Women react, then the display, the “real-thing” is a product of two halves.

Love is an emotion felt by men so much so that they’ll kill others or themselves for it, women only respond to financial incentives by comparison. :wink:

Yup, plenty of women lining up to fall in love with men working at low wage Mcjobs everyday, has nothing to do with money or economic success at all. Nothing at all… :sunglasses: :laughing:

It’s all sunshine, lollipops, unicorns, cut up shaped hearts, roses, and rainbows as far as the eye can see. :sunglasses: :laughing:

Women only react to deep pockets and then they get on all fours naked like a dog waiting for you to slide that credit card down their vaginal lining. “Would you like a receipt for today’s deposited financial transaction sir?” :laughing:

“Let’s not look at it as a financial transaction honey, let’s call it love or romance instead because it sounds more childishly innocent and because it makes me sound like much less of a whore.” " My love of myself that I give to you sweet cheeks I give to you freely without any strings or prices attached. wink’wink fingers-crossed "

:laughing: :sunglasses:

It’s interesting to note that sexual egalitarianism the hallmark of feminism was rooted in early Marxism at the turn of the nineteenth century, it was suppose to be a new era of sexual equality between men and women with women’s rights or general sexual emancipation. The evil patriarchy is dead, long live sexual equality became the motto. So women for all their rights, privileges, and entitlements passed onto their gender where the sexual traditional role of woman had effectively become abolished over a period of time along with all its social responsibilities it once had in history.

You know who’s traditional sexual imposed responsibilities or roles was never abolished? That of men.

Now just think about this for moment here, women are emancipated from all traditional sexual roles of responsibilities but when it concerns men we have to shoulder everything by ourselves, seems fair right?

If you look at some of the hardcore feminist socialists or even Marxists they would say that male patriarchy is the equivalence of the horrible social oppression of capitalism. Isn’t that interesting? You see, sexual equality or the egalitarianism that was promised was never delivered where instead overtime it just became a female apparatus of social retribution against men we still see play out today. What’s interesting about modern feminists of all political persuasions is that they still have that mindset of sexual capital, erotic capital, sexual market, or hypergamy where let’s face it is a kinda of social sexual capitalism on the part of women. Even more audacious it stems from the same established patriarchal culture that they publicly resent, ridicule, or hate. So on the one hand you have feminists complaining about the evils of capitalism or male patriarchy and on the other hand judging men on a criteria of a sexual market in a very hypergamic manner that has always been very capitalistic and patriarchally rooted historically. It seems even the most radical and rigid of feminists deep down inside like the male patriarchy otherwise, why would they judge men sexually in terms of finding a sexual partner, mate, or somebody to reproduce with under the same exact judging system? This is what I like to call females wanting their cake and eating it too. It’s of course blatant hypocrisy but of course goes unchallenged.

I always like pointing this out to even the most radical of feminists and of course I can never get a rational response or reply to this matter other than the very hatred of me bringing it up to begin with. :laughing:

You see, the emancipation of women never ever had to do anything with sexual equality or even egalitarianism, those were just false fronts, the real aim of feminism was to emancipate themselves from the lower classes and lower economic ranks of men to expand upon female hypergamy that was always prevalent since the beginning of time. By emancipating themselves from the lower ranks of men, social responsibilities, and traditional sexual roles of being females they now have all the time in the world to pursue the minority top percentage of men to their hearts content fulfilling the hypergamic female strategy of sexual selection unregulated. That was the real motivation behind feminism and still is to this day.

Although overtime women are finding this new existence of free unregulated hypergamy to be lonely as the minority top percentage of men are very few in number and shrinking with every year as they sexually compete amongst themselves in reproductive access to them. There’s a minority of those men within an endless sea [larger population] of women chasing after them within constant sexual competition against each other amongst other females.

The top wealthy men know this of course and then tell themselves there is no reason for them to get married or settle down because essentially a majority of women are offering themselves for free where they can have a different woman everyday of the week especially with threatening problems of divorce. If the wealthy men know they can get whatever woman they want, why just settle for one an entire lifetime? So they simply just don’t.

So there stands our modern emancipated women free of sexual roles or responsibilities, free to indulge their unregulated hypergamy at will, free to reject the lower ranks of men, free to condemn male patriarchy while enjoying the hypergamic capitalistic sexual market fruits of it, and at the end of the day remains perfectly single, childless, unmarried, and having the Bukake face of their bachelor wealthy male peers like a semen drenched public urinal crown befitting of modern entitled princesses everywhere. Amongst all of that you have a global fertility crisis ever encroaching around the world and a large growing number of angry chronically single men. [But fuck those incel losers anyways as they’re just a bunch of lower social caste men, right? It’s not like anything bad happens when a large group of angry men get together and socially organized, am I right?]

This is modern feminism explained.

Yeah… two sexy halves, to make a sexy whole.

What do you mean, when you keep saying ‘the display’? a display of…?

This isn’t a bad idea except it would involve some rather uncomfortable invasive surgery to work right. You’d have to install a chip and/or strip reader on the inner labia… and there would need to be a keypad for pin numbers.

Also, how would the card user know if the card was accepted or rejected? There would have to be an LED screen or at least some lights.

I mean that authentic love/respect/affection between a man and woman, of noble and rare quality, is not widely displayed, and most people simply pretend they have something they don’t. But that doesn’t stop people for looking for it, and for inspiration, from those who can achieve it.

I see your view on women hasn’t changed, in comparison to your other world views, which seem to have, as you have mentioned it here.

Most couples I know, both contribute to funding their lifestyle and lives in general, and usually meet through mutual friends or through/at work, which obviously greatly diminishes the chance of a non-genuine money-oriented union.

I guess Professionals do tend to stick together… socialise together… procreate together… do everything together, but there are always exceptions to every rule, so they don’t always do these things within their career type/tier.

I never have, and wouldn’t want, to rely on a man to fund my lifestyle and life… though many have offered to, in offering to hole me up in an apartment that they have bought for me and in which only they can visit lol, and that is the dullest/deadest existence I can think of or contemplate ever having. I rarely get asked to be a wife, but mostly a mistress, so it is not only women that seek the superficial and money-oriented relationship option.

Perhaps because such displays of such feelings, can, will, and does, stir a reaction in others… for all manner of reasons, but not always good ones with good intentions or wishes for those that have stirred them so, ergo Private Lives.

Sometimes… when out n about, I see couples giving a cheeky smile or look of contentment, so perhaps they feel in a safe space to be able to do so… it ain’t easy being a snowflake in a society of salt and grit, who are just waiting for you to dissipate under their surface. So maybe it’s not a matter of ‘most people simply pretending they have something they don’t’, but a matter of protecting what they do have?

…and so it shouldn’t.

It’s more of a De-Sade-esque vulgar symbolic imagery of mine employed to show how really a majority of women care so little about men other than disposable economic utility and along with illustrating the basic reptilian primitive mind of human females that will do anything to procreate with men of power, status, or wealth.

Although what you mention is pretty funny also. :sunglasses:

No, my overall disdain, cynicism, criticism, and border-lining of outright hatred of women’s sexual behavior proclivities haven’t changed much at all. I’ve been very consistent with that all these years.

My cynical philosophical theories on women are expanding and evolving where I feel I’m very close to unlocking the female psyche underneath that false facade of pretenses that they show towards the rest of the world. I’m getting better at articulating this hatred, contempt, or disdain of mine.

Women don’t want a non-money oriented social union with men, that’s my point. Women are purely venture sexual capitalists masquerading as romantic idealists. Sexual interaction is merely an economic business model of women.

Sexual interaction on the part of women is nothing more than a social capital enterprise.

The exceptions are so minor or rare they’re pointless in discussing in contrast to the majority of cases and overall prevailing social norms.

I bet you like a majority of women reject lower caste men as below your societal stationary position in life. There are literally hordes of lower caste men out there that want a singular woman or a social and sexual companion but because they’re deemed societal inferiors women instead just ignore the shit out them treating them horribly. “I’m so above that than to demean myself being with men like them.”

So women ride the cock carousel with a variety of upper class wealthy men hoping one day they can nail the right one to stick with them the rest of their lives except that those same upper class wealthy men have no desire of settling down which is why my dear you’ve been reduced to a permanent sexual mistress for life until there comes a day that men will no longer even desire that from you. These sexual mistresses age and get older where their uterus shrivels up drying out where afterwards in their older years remain alone single for the rest of their lives.

De-Sade-esque. :sunglasses:

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eTuzCUWmrYg[/youtube]

I never said I slept with any of these men… they never got that far… it never got beyond the asking, then begging, then they eventually go away, onto the next one… as the sing goes.

I don’t partake in expected normal, or other, social behaviours and interactions, but I guess that wasn’t clear in my post?

Lol at that video…

Just keep angling that lure of bait into the waters and some upper class man will eventually take it, am I right?

Women are so predictable whether you try to sleep around with such men as a mistress or not. [Many mistresses indeed do in wining, dining, and fucking the male bull shark hoping that she’ll at last become chosen.]

I bet you ignore the men of the lower wards, do you like a majority of modern women?
Not upper middle class or wealthy enough to provide for you the lavish lifestyle you’ve grown so accustomed to.

When a woman grows accustomed to a certain lavish lifestyle she’ll never lower her standards again and indeed for modern women lowering their sexual standards regarding males is equal or parcel to that of a feminine sexual cardinal sin. If you want to gain access to the lavish lifestyle of the male top you got to secrete greasing the wheels fucking your way to the influential social top.

Always trying to gain attention of the wealthy upper class men looking for sexual validation, legitimacy, and recognition by them as acquired learned cultural behavior has told you that you’re nothing as a woman without it yet amusingly in a simultaneous manner calling yourselves individually socially independent.

…it’s not me that does the angling, so you are wrong. Are you under the impression, or is that delusion, that men don’t approach women from out of nowhere, for whatever reason they are doing so/to fulfil a whim or want that they have invented or convinced themselves of…

Why do you think that it’s just about an accustomed lavish lifestyle? as if that’s the only thing under consideration in such a decision to be made. You do like to only concentrate on the one angle, don’t you…

butthead: uh-huh-huh… uuuuh-huh-huh-huh… hey beavis, he said cock carousel.

beavis: yeah yeah… that was pretty cool. hmm-hmm…hmm… hey butthead, check this out; COCK A DOODLE DOOOOO!!!

butthead: UH-HUH-HUH-HUH!! UHHHH-HUH-HUH!!

Impression not delusion, fill in the blanks for us the Londonist gal within England.

I’ve never claimed men were angels, but I will say women overall compared to men are devils in disguise.

What other angles or considerations would you like us to focus on? I’m all ears patiently waiting. :sunglasses:

Understanding sexual markets, female hypergamy, erotic capital, sexual capital, rent seeking relationships, transactional love, relationship commodification, evolutionary biology, sexual economic utility, and the financial economic manipulation or exploitation of men by women.

“Some men see a beautiful woman and comment on their faces, hips, hair, breasts, asses, or general overall physical figure. Instead when I see a woman I wonder how much she is going to cost me with that price tag hanging over her head and how much money it’s going to take for me to rent, financially exchange, financially negotiate, or purchase her affections.”