Iambiguous,
I’ve told you many times that what’s true for all possible beings, transcends subjectivity and is necessarily objective.
1+1=2: true for all possible beings
Nobody wants their consent violated!! True for all possible beings.
Now, I keep encountering these people who think they’re real badasses, and that ANYONE WHO HAS THEIR CONSENT VIOLATED UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCE is just a pansy not deserving of life , “grow up!” They say.
To which I reply, “so if your mother is brutally tortured, raped and murdered, while you are strapped to a chair watching it all, your consent wouldn’t be violated ??”
To which I say, “it may not be your mother, but to some mother and child, this is happening all around the world every day”
Yes. My consent is violated if anyone has their consent violated !!
People try to sound so badass, like urwrong, who says these are just weak people unfit for survival …
Urwrong is giving permission to have this done to him, and that’s a VERY SICK FUCK!!!
Nobody wants their consent violated, and that includes (except urwrong) more than me, myself and I …
That’s objectively true.
Urwrong demands his mother be raped …
I hope you’re not the same.
What does this have to do with freewill?
We discover proofs.
They transcend all possible being.
In a “subjectivist stance” non freewill (what everyone believes or states is true) we’d have no possible will.
I have a will so I know this isn’t true
There has to be something for a will to be for