There is an irony here, which exposes a hidden coercion in the “free” market.
It’s obvious enough that you are forced to supply a trade that meets some demand by others, else you are excluded from the considerable advantages that the market can provide, and you must rely on self-sufficiency or breaking the law.
This goes without saying for any economic model though, because the law of increasing entropy demands at least that somebody works whether anyone wants to or not - in order to lower the rate of increasing entropy. So physically no market is “free”, and every market involves coercion.
The more freely available the product or service, the more the “free” market comes to rely on security services to prevent the freedom of their availability, in order to justify imposing a price to sell them. Think intellectual property or anything publishable on the internet.
When this imposition rightly fails, imposing adverts is the modern resort as a lame kind of backup strategy.
Adverts, by derivation “to turn” you “towards” a product or service, are not intended to be skippable - they are intended to infringe on what you would otherwise choose to do in order to persuade you by whatever means to at least consider and preferably submit to the trade of your money for their product or service. The better the manipulation of human psychological weaknesses, the more effective the advertisement - and if they did not work then it would not be a monumentally huge industry.
This is the deception of advertisement: to convince you that “you don’t have to” pay attention to the means by which companies make you feel like your subsequent purchase was your own choice uninfluenced by their advertisement. “The customer doesn’t know what they want” and “we’re only providing information on where to go to get what you want” are patent deceptions delivered with an air of innocent benevolence. If the customer doesn’t know what they want, you could simply provide them with dry information on an optional platform, which simultaneously provides information on where to go to get what you want. Anything above that is unnecessary to innocent causes.
Even more advanced is the stage where you are convinced to submit yourself to these means out of duty to support the company that distributed the ad…
The structure itself requires private property laws, and only within the ability to privatise (make unfree within particular constraints) can such a market be “free”.