5G and the AI

Why would it? Please explain!
Does going along with evolutionary theory , along the lines of Darwin not support such an idea of the survival of the fittest ? Is it applicable here as postulated ?
If so, at least logically, feasibility is not ruled out. Or is it?

I find the idea of diminishing returns , even, compatible with escape before time runs out!

Perhaps Capitalism realizes that human nature .can not accommodate the present stage of human conscious awareness in reality and opts for the principle of maximising pleasure absolutely compelling.

How would matricide argue successfully against it?

evolution or whom or whatever created social mammals, and we are not run by the simple heuristic, survival of the fittest, which isn’t quite Darwinian anyway. It’s more survival of the suited, the ones who fit the ecosystem, and not necessarily the most suited, just suited enough. And we social mammals, perhaps others, perhaps even trees, but we love not just each other but the places we are inherently connected to. People who don’t care about their mother are welcome to leave, as long as the process of leaving doesn’t damage us.

Well one we that as a given as well, and does not preclude the existential present state:

Without demonizing Capitalism, it fits properly as a shoe how the one view competes with the other.

The reason Freud’s economy of the ID’s rejection was it’s untimeliness, as it confitm’s Marx’s notion of diminishing returns. Can not these thoughts form syntactical confirmations?

?

Capitalism is not allowing the most interesting creatures to thrive. In fact it benefits those who destroy everything, even for themselves. It’s like severely damaged mammals get to run things over those who are not so damaged. But their damage gives them an edge. They might as well be viruses.

" like severely damaged mammals get to run things over those who are not so damaged. But their damage gives them an edge. They might as well be viruses."

Perhaps viruses are more primordial then the hosts, with which they later on have to tangle with. For viruses are pre-evolutionary, perhaps, but at least process life under the same principle of existential survival. They compete for existence. Viruses may have an internal mechanism which tries to reverse evolution.
Look at AIDS. Viruses exhibit some kind of subliminal intelligence in mutation. Behaviorism stems from new definitions of mind, and that includes intelligence.

Behaviorist intelligence is a priori or based on compilation of learning effect, it can’t think a aposteriori, it reverts all learned and noted-remembered knowledge into a faux natural repetition.

And enough repetition results in automative effects, an expanded form of basic intuition, or instinct.

It fits the pattern.

Yup.

Not quite, They may not be the most attractive.

Why are they damaged? Contraryly, they are the least damaged. That morally and ethically they are working for self interest based on their seven lo ped sense utility?
That concept basically is using social mores to self realize an intentional, internal sense of improving their own life, in a very difficult dog-eat-dog set up. In fact , before we could , bird like, take off into flight , we were constrained among mongrels.

They’re not the fittest. You think Trump is the fittest? He’ll be on those rockets leaving behind radioactive waste and a messed up planet if he has his way.

He may not agree with You there.

Could be. Do you think he is an example of the fittest? If not him, it will be men like him on those ships. I mean, that’s more or less what he’s doing. Creating more rich with more resources. Sort of subplanet where the rich can live and the rest is garbage. That’s what fucking up this planet and then moving on is. It’s interstellar neo-con dreams.

Here are some tentative conclusions regarding some assessment that may bear on being fit, :

The rich really are different — and, apparently more self-absorbed, according to the latest research.

That goes against the conventional wisdom that the more people have, the more they appreciate their obligations to give back to others. Recent studies show, for example, that wealthier people are more likely to cut people off in traffic and to behave unethically in simulated business and charity scenarios. Earlier this year, statistics on charitable giving revealed that while the wealthy donate about 1.3% of their income to charity, the poorest actually give more than twice as much as a proportion of their earnings — 3.2%.

“There’s this idea that the more you have, the less entitled and more grateful you feel; and the less you have, the more you feel you deserve. That’s not what we find,” says author Paul Piff, a psychologist at the University of California, Berkeley. “This seems to be the opposite of noblesse oblige.”

There are uncharted connections a) over the place between fitness(including where , how and why people fit) and what a person and/or others mean by that term.

Don’t You agree?

The rich usually become rich is by utilizing social structure to their own benefit. They will agree only until it is in their best interest.
Then they will beg to agree only to disagree.
That is why Democracy is failing in this country. It is becoming unaffordable.

now , it is rare to find even the most religious and ethically sound person to go against self interest of the kind of economic uncertainty put to the test Nowedays, as never before.

That is why the economy of the ID and
the economy of social indeterminacy clash as never before.
Darwin vs. Freud. In fact that is mere appearance. They are clashing, one has to compensate the other.

Conventional wisdom was predicated on strict ethical standards, prior to the 1960’s, when post war economic boom and cheap gas came to an abrupt halt.
Then what appeared ? Payback. Liberal and moral laxity, cheap thrills and their condonement. Something had to give: Marylin Monroe was an erotic genius. She went out before ‘something had to give’

But I am jumping ahead of myself improperly leaving you behind

They also consider themselves exempt from the law, which, unfortunately the courts are now confirming for them. This is not just due to having better legal representation, it is that the courts systematically show empathy for wealthy people that they do not show others. Their jobs are considered to important to be left behind if they serve time. Prison is seen as a shock to them, but not to working class people, for example. These considerations lead to probation instead of prison or simply being released without a sentence whereas poorer people would serve time. They also consider themselves immune to oversight by governmental agencies, not simply through revolving door positions with these agencies, but they simply refuse to comply with them.
Equal under the law is getting worse.

And yes, there are all sorts of psychological parallels, where their problems are considered as or more important then the real problems other people face.

And shaping it so it works for them. Campaign finance, lobbying, revolving door of oversight, access to politicians, backdoor non.democratic influence through G8, Bilderburg, the Triliateral Commission, legal help and much much more.

It isn’t a democracy and has not been in my lifetime which is not short. But it is less of one than when I was younger.

You nailed the shit out of it in that first paragraph, KT.

knuckle bump

That fits the glove of an oligarchian knockout!

Note that a decision is yet to be made.

The rich lose relatively more when they go to prison. The fall is deeper. Since the judge is also rich, he really sympathizes with that.
Rich people are snowflakes. Except Trump, who is getting people out of prison that Obama put there, but hey that doesn’t count for KP and Prom because these people are black. Who cares for a black person in prison right? I mean poor is good but black… ew. Thankfully Trump is not sociopathic like that and, as the first president ever, takes the trouble of looking at unjust incarcerations which are of course usually suffered by black people

Still the world is royally fucked because all these idiotic white and black supremacists spending their whole energy on masking their racism to themselves run all inner city institutions and media franchises and apparently this is enough to delude enough people to make progress completely impossible.

(Of course the dragon didn’t know it was impossible and he did it anyway.)

The dragon is the true spirit, the power of freedom, that which doesn’t even know anyhing besides freedom and thus doesn’t even understand when it is imprisoned, which has it crashing into walls all the time but eventually that just erodes the walls.

Freedom erodes chains.

Dumbasses who think Trump is to blame for the system he inherited are not going to be of any use in the Revolution - one needs to be able to see beyond decent and indecent without wetting ones undergarments to be a Revolutionary.

Revolution is underway. Black and White aren’t anything but the closest of friends, the best racial blend that the earth has perhaps seen, the most successful combination. America is nothing if not the marriage of black and white. The turbulence that exists in a marriage shouldn’t be mistaken for hatred. It is simply ontic tension between positive types.

they’re lazy good for nothin’ tricksters… crack-smokin’ swindlers… big butt havin’, wide nose, breathin’ all the white man’s air.

and i’m quoting a black white supremacist - clayton bigsby - so even black people agree with me.

trump is not to blame for being what he is, for there is no freewill. instead, on january 20th, 2017, the determined universe decided to tell a joke, and that joke was donald trump.

remember first to ask as as marcus aurelius did:

Of each particular thing ask: what is it in itself? What is its nature?

that thing is, in itself, a trump. the essence of its nature is trumpness. trumpness is its haecceity.