5G and the AI

3a4pyi.jpg

To be completely drank, the various channels of reality that comprises knowledge, both Mind~Brain , comprises the geophysical crisis to which technology is reacting to.

The compensating effect toward functional progression rather then unstoppable regression. can not be humanly achieved.

So the overall boundaries that are established regarding adding carcogenics to life, are balanced bybaixh factors as credible projections of setting up future space colonies.

By the time the crisis reaches levels of total societal collapse, the tools to leave earth by at least those adept to survive . All predicated on the e evolutionary prediction that signals those whose survival value appears to be the fittest.
A1 and 5G is testament to progress and survival at whatever cost.

Not much different from principles of eugenics.

But will it work? Or will it be allowed?

Humans couldn’t survive in space for more than a few generations, because of gravity-deprivation, which will completely screw up the harmony of bone structure and the rest of the body. It is horrendous to contemplate the defects.

Other than that its not exactly noble to completely rape and ruin a whole planet and then leave. I am of the opinion personally that we either salvage this planet or die with it.

I agree. And then, it’s home. I feel connected to it, a part of it. It’s not a one-use barbeque grill to throw away when we’re done with it.

Its quite possible they could find some planet that is similar and they may overcome velocity escape. Modern science is barely 150 years old!

Let me explain:

Let us say that secret research is already anticipating the critical breakaway point of Earth’s sustainability.

They will develop escape vehicles , at tremendous cost, artificial planets, like Galsctoids , which can sustain life indefinitely, that can accommodate a thousand people at one time. galactoids, built at tremendous costs, maybe trillions of dollars each, leaving earth yearly, and secretly funded.

They might set their own course, and relative velocity through time and space will accelerate their time span…

Earthly populations will shrink accordingly, as more poisonous material will decrease quality if life. More people will start to suffer immunological illnesses which will adversely effect therapy, and viruses and bacteria will over come the various therapeutic agents to which they will develop resistance …

The Galsctoids over time can carry millions of healthy people into
voyages of new undiscovered frontiers , planets very similar, in regions yet to be conquered. People that can overcome uncertainty, will at first give immense hope to the general population , by lifting morale, by bringing back a new age of exploration, but as the criticality of earthly existence nears uninhabitable levels, -if voluntary changes of living are not equally as suddenly instituted; the multitudes will panic and struggle to get on board the planetary vessels leaving earth.

The near end will describe a state of meltdown for those who could never leave.

, where Galsctoids can no longer sustain hope of leaving , their production may become impossible, because the plummeting belief that certain groups, can never be qualified to leave., but here is an uncertainty which given enough time, may change.

Those groups will be understood to be as large as 95 percent or more of the population, however a stasis may be reached, with enough people leaving and the rest learning to conserve discourses, that the equation may change to suit indefinite survival mode.
And a turn around, could be arrived at, where subterranean cultures will manage a new sub marginal population, as long as they autonomously could suddenly understand new requirements to change life forms, in order to adept to increased levels of conserving the environmental conditions at that time.

It is inconceivable that such progress can not evolve, and with the overall doubling of knowledge every year or so the odds for such to happen may increase , as the unlikelyhood of it decrease conversely.

Once inter galactic escape is achieved, those aboard the galactic ships will experience a vast change in temporal marking, a year up there could eventually approach total near absolute earthly demarcations of time.

They in fact could return to a time prior to when they left, or return exactly just a few years after leaving, unnoticed, that they actuallt could have spent hundreds or thousands or even millions future earthly years while away.

Calibration of temporal return will be so difficult, however, that when current civilisations presume to notice returnees, they may be perceived as alien spaceships.
Perhaps this stage has already been passed, and our awareness of it may already be known to some researchers.

Jules Verne was quite remarkable for his time, and the view described above is not that much astounding, given the framinf of relative reference.

For me this would represent matricide, self-hatred on a vast scale, and a terrific failure.

Why would it? Please explain!
Does going along with evolutionary theory , along the lines of Darwin not support such an idea of the survival of the fittest ? Is it applicable here as postulated ?
If so, at least logically, feasibility is not ruled out. Or is it?

I find the idea of diminishing returns , even, compatible with escape before time runs out!

Perhaps Capitalism realizes that human nature .can not accommodate the present stage of human conscious awareness in reality and opts for the principle of maximising pleasure absolutely compelling.

How would matricide argue successfully against it?

evolution or whom or whatever created social mammals, and we are not run by the simple heuristic, survival of the fittest, which isn’t quite Darwinian anyway. It’s more survival of the suited, the ones who fit the ecosystem, and not necessarily the most suited, just suited enough. And we social mammals, perhaps others, perhaps even trees, but we love not just each other but the places we are inherently connected to. People who don’t care about their mother are welcome to leave, as long as the process of leaving doesn’t damage us.

Well one we that as a given as well, and does not preclude the existential present state:

Without demonizing Capitalism, it fits properly as a shoe how the one view competes with the other.

The reason Freud’s economy of the ID’s rejection was it’s untimeliness, as it confitm’s Marx’s notion of diminishing returns. Can not these thoughts form syntactical confirmations?

?

Capitalism is not allowing the most interesting creatures to thrive. In fact it benefits those who destroy everything, even for themselves. It’s like severely damaged mammals get to run things over those who are not so damaged. But their damage gives them an edge. They might as well be viruses.

" like severely damaged mammals get to run things over those who are not so damaged. But their damage gives them an edge. They might as well be viruses."

Perhaps viruses are more primordial then the hosts, with which they later on have to tangle with. For viruses are pre-evolutionary, perhaps, but at least process life under the same principle of existential survival. They compete for existence. Viruses may have an internal mechanism which tries to reverse evolution.
Look at AIDS. Viruses exhibit some kind of subliminal intelligence in mutation. Behaviorism stems from new definitions of mind, and that includes intelligence.

Behaviorist intelligence is a priori or based on compilation of learning effect, it can’t think a aposteriori, it reverts all learned and noted-remembered knowledge into a faux natural repetition.

And enough repetition results in automative effects, an expanded form of basic intuition, or instinct.

It fits the pattern.

Yup.

Not quite, They may not be the most attractive.

Why are they damaged? Contraryly, they are the least damaged. That morally and ethically they are working for self interest based on their seven lo ped sense utility?
That concept basically is using social mores to self realize an intentional, internal sense of improving their own life, in a very difficult dog-eat-dog set up. In fact , before we could , bird like, take off into flight , we were constrained among mongrels.

They’re not the fittest. You think Trump is the fittest? He’ll be on those rockets leaving behind radioactive waste and a messed up planet if he has his way.

He may not agree with You there.

Could be. Do you think he is an example of the fittest? If not him, it will be men like him on those ships. I mean, that’s more or less what he’s doing. Creating more rich with more resources. Sort of subplanet where the rich can live and the rest is garbage. That’s what fucking up this planet and then moving on is. It’s interstellar neo-con dreams.

Here are some tentative conclusions regarding some assessment that may bear on being fit, :

The rich really are different — and, apparently more self-absorbed, according to the latest research.

That goes against the conventional wisdom that the more people have, the more they appreciate their obligations to give back to others. Recent studies show, for example, that wealthier people are more likely to cut people off in traffic and to behave unethically in simulated business and charity scenarios. Earlier this year, statistics on charitable giving revealed that while the wealthy donate about 1.3% of their income to charity, the poorest actually give more than twice as much as a proportion of their earnings — 3.2%.

“There’s this idea that the more you have, the less entitled and more grateful you feel; and the less you have, the more you feel you deserve. That’s not what we find,” says author Paul Piff, a psychologist at the University of California, Berkeley. “This seems to be the opposite of noblesse oblige.”

There are uncharted connections a) over the place between fitness(including where , how and why people fit) and what a person and/or others mean by that term.

Don’t You agree?

The rich usually become rich is by utilizing social structure to their own benefit. They will agree only until it is in their best interest.
Then they will beg to agree only to disagree.
That is why Democracy is failing in this country. It is becoming unaffordable.

now , it is rare to find even the most religious and ethically sound person to go against self interest of the kind of economic uncertainty put to the test Nowedays, as never before.

That is why the economy of the ID and
the economy of social indeterminacy clash as never before.
Darwin vs. Freud. In fact that is mere appearance. They are clashing, one has to compensate the other.

Conventional wisdom was predicated on strict ethical standards, prior to the 1960’s, when post war economic boom and cheap gas came to an abrupt halt.
Then what appeared ? Payback. Liberal and moral laxity, cheap thrills and their condonement. Something had to give: Marylin Monroe was an erotic genius. She went out before ‘something had to give’

But I am jumping ahead of myself improperly leaving you behind

They also consider themselves exempt from the law, which, unfortunately the courts are now confirming for them. This is not just due to having better legal representation, it is that the courts systematically show empathy for wealthy people that they do not show others. Their jobs are considered to important to be left behind if they serve time. Prison is seen as a shock to them, but not to working class people, for example. These considerations lead to probation instead of prison or simply being released without a sentence whereas poorer people would serve time. They also consider themselves immune to oversight by governmental agencies, not simply through revolving door positions with these agencies, but they simply refuse to comply with them.
Equal under the law is getting worse.

And yes, there are all sorts of psychological parallels, where their problems are considered as or more important then the real problems other people face.

And shaping it so it works for them. Campaign finance, lobbying, revolving door of oversight, access to politicians, backdoor non.democratic influence through G8, Bilderburg, the Triliateral Commission, legal help and much much more.

It isn’t a democracy and has not been in my lifetime which is not short. But it is less of one than when I was younger.