The cat may merely has come out of the box of uncertainty, and may have only appeared drunk, to prove he was still alive. Maybe his will can over come that impression.
I know my cat/my little buddy very well… he encountered something or someone… could be chemical cat repellant laid down by the neighbours, as they are (literally) tired of his shit. Haha! He’s too Alpha for it to be anything else…
But how do they figure? If he is only acting out of an assigned role or not? If he is, the gravity may merely pull him into an abyss, that may appear to be a set up. Then the whole game plan changes. No?
No!
He’s back in sorts, so not out of sorts, so a temporary anomaly to his former catty self… caused by? whatever can cause such a sudden and swift demise of self… have you studied the Sciences Meno_?
Not all is solvable or can be boiled down to Philosophy, ergo… there are many things we cannot philosophise our way out of or convince ourselves that they pertain to… philosophy.
I slept till after 2… pm, and am now gearing up to start to enjoy my Friday night… I’ve always preferred the dawn and the dusk but not the day… how dare us types be disturbed from that slumber to partake in the drudgery that daytime is. 
I agree. Between the dawn and the twilight, reality exposes all that may be better kept hidden. The romance that is lost with overexposure is such a waste, and after all philosophy is an art, open the myriad interpretation . yet, we indulge in it.
Science too, is an art, and it is a.derivitive of the same sources , and ways of thinking.
As for the aforementioned, there is little need ultimately to make the distinction, perhaps , because the distinction depends on a crucial fact.
Of there is a universal script somewhere somewhere, signifying an eternal hold on the ultimate containment of knowledge, then, sciences come and go, naturally and otherwise, always ready to coincide with the level of civilizations which require it by ‘discovery’
But if there isn’t, then is it conceivable another homo erectus may never happen again, ? But how can that ever be the case, when living processes operate within types of similar structure?
Therefore , science , natural science may not be as different from ‘pure’ sciences, since their typically consists of logical modes of classification.
Natural orthogenesis is more genus exemplary, and popular science was always more promising and romantic.
Travel in the old times was drought with more use of image-enation, so was image making via the use of it in the written word, rather like in TV, whwre the image is ‘put out’.
Therefore,
“He’s back in sorts, so not out of sorts, so a temporary anomaly to his former catty self… caused by? whatever can cause such a sudden and swift demise of self”-
he is not out, but back of sorts, sorted likely, similarly, my favorite way of putting it is de differentiated , or deconstructed, into a faux image of the way it was. he was.
That is , after sufficient recycling the cause of his ever evolving doubt, .
Which he cannot really live through, and he has to, for his sanity’s sake become more and more positive.
Now, we have reached.the nadir of that positivism, and have become again uncertain of where such almost delusive analysis could lead us.
AI will have to guide is, Big Brother, because with god dead, we need a simulated alternative.
I think I’ve gotten to the bottom of it. A TV crew turned up – unannounced – “We’re making a documentary about Jihad.”
Somewhere in Syria. Three very young children were quite excited about the prospect of stamping on the head of the apostate.
Hearing this news, apparently, one of the partners began some kind of diatribe… “Three young boys appeared on British TV screens, blah. blah/ blah.”
Well, it turns out that live tv, whilst advertised as live tv - “occurring now” – is, in fact, subject to a ten second delay.
This ten second delay is known in television circles as the ‘golden alley’.
Solicitors are prone to stalk live tv, waiting to pounce on anything that veers from the nature of reality. They have ten seconds in which to react. Wait patiently and you may well hit the jackpot. It’s not dissimilar to the taxi-rank formula – although a little more proactive.
Long story short: British TV screens are, in fact, predominately Taiwanese or Japanese or Chinese or Korean screens. Occasionally they will originate from within the EU. Perhaps Holland or Germany.
However, as we are in the EU, we are unable to trade with nations outside the EU. To state that they are British TV screens may well draw attention to Brazil and Venezuela - honorary members of the EU. Coffee does not grow on trees, any more than does money! And if we leave the EU where are we going to get our Bananas? Whoa! Who mentioned leaving?
The Television Company was presented with a legal bill of something in the region of £122,000.
It’s not been confirmed.
Sure that it wasn’t some A1 script to alley any suspicion of deep state?
Nah!
Meno, it’s after 3 am, here! What is deep state? It has provoked much puzzlement, and much mirth in the office. Mister Trump mentioned it in one of his - can we say, rally speeches? Guest appearance by Cliff Bennett and the Rabble Rousers.
That sounds like a cue for a song.
Thank you, MagsJ
Beatles gave it away! How good were they?
Do white supremacists plan their vacations to coincide with the Olympic Games? How can they afford to go away for weeks at a time? Three? Four weeks? Who hires them?
Excuse me sir, I’m the cleaner. Whoever you’re looking for, they went home hours ago.
I had an appointment.
You may have got your timing wrong, it’s after three am… Are you sure your appointment wasn’t three in the afternoon?
That would make more sense wouldn’t it. Do you know, I couldn’t sleep last night? I’ll let you get on. Sorry to trouble you.
You have a good day.
CCTV Footage.
I did also not even a few hours of sleep around 3 am here time .so I’m making up for it now, hoping can sleep tonight.
Deep State is very invested interests who run this country, but with Trump in the helm, only rumors can verify any contention.
No one knows how so much in moving constitutionality can pass by without so much as a whimper , but they must know something we don’t and my guess is it’s a critical moment not few can be allowed for they would not understand and probably most of it is secret.
A whole lot is most likely connected to NWO and AI related policies.
Conceptual understanding is deeper then either conventional wisdom or speculation, and the thing is, conspiratorial belief has always been the underbelly of common sense recently, adversely effecting people who were previously fans of Tom Paine.
The Beatles, yes, were soul searchers , and they propagated a new era with astounding and honest success, the like of which may probably never be heard again .
Today the worst of best days or the best of the worst I dunno.
I won’t press or impress or compress, few sayin’ what. How to do yoga out of images, because @ 3 am or near the totality of live grabs one.
If, whatever, thereby could be sacrificed, one second for eternity one would do it.
I choose not to.
The escape is total.
Where from never ask Where to maybe, and where at is : a flash, just like the explosiveness of orgasm.
Hold it, back, and it’s seen what it is and what it isn’t : if you reject it you’ll never know it, for what it may be.
Constant power, lest missing this chance , what do you expect near another sleepless near three, .
Can glean your English.
Today I bet all I had until next pay lost but all, and wonderously won it back exactly, not a penny more, so guess its some kind of warning.
Otherwise, hum drum, and loving them who I’m with day, thank God they’re letting me its a privilege.
Went to my car this morning to start up my car, looked at the house where the English woman lives and it is occupied by Latino people neighbor who lives next door, who kind heartedly feeds and fixes stray cats said she left, the English woman, with her dog because her husband died suddenly of heart attack.
She always wanted to speak I felt, new to neighborhood I felt premature, so regret comes last but there was a lot of fantasy about it
Now the streets feel that much poorer
Thank you, Meno, for your responses. You should retire now. Probably best to watch from a safe distance.
I hear news of some pretty heavy artillery on the way. Keep your head down. 
They’re using live ammunition.
And thank You. Safety locked. And took notice, any aim will miss me, for inordinately thick skin.
And they lived happily ever after.
Reality exposes the mundane drudgery of the day… better to be at home or in the office… not even venturing out for the obligatory lunchtime Pret sandwich or walk in the park.
Evening brings with it less people and calmer different sounds… much more soothing and preferable to day, and Halloween being the preferable religious holiday of choice. 
I don’t believe in a god, but I do go to church… I go, out of respect for my mother and upbringing. Family time, followed by a family dinner and much merriment… till late. But why does the priest dowse me in so much holy water though? can he tell I stopped believing… stopped believing a long time ago.
Hunter watching fam on TV: youtu.be/f3FvsK6FP1M
Hunter in distress: youtu.be/rn0RaqvU8t4
Hunter getting caught getting caught short lol: youtu.be/VI04apT8-7g
For me the question ceased to be ephemeral and noe the theological-deintologically reduced question consists of a reduction from doubt to logic certainty:
Either, ultimate knowledge tests in uncertainty, via:dispersive knowledge, or, it is a containment of totality transcending time and space. To me the latter choice is more likely.
Not for me it doesn’t… are we conversing on the same matter here?
…but it doesn’t relate to the discussion… you are racing ahead of yourself… it happens.
and it has not happened Yet, but it is likely to happen if, the guide is any sign , that the trend of progression sustains momentum.
and i do admit that this argument is set on an idea based on the inverted pyramid, whose apex has now been almost reached.
to be completely blunt, MagsJ, i am of those who truly believe that Christ will return to judge the living and the dead.
Yea… whatever happened to that guy? Where is he when you need him…?
Hey, why not… 
Don’t you just hate those judgemental types. 
Woke up out of a very good sleep, but don’t know why… an early breakfast, if I don’t get back to sleep anytime soon.
How are family matters and such, Meno? Hope good.
Really, MagJ, I shall not comment on that but listen to this spoken by a Babylonian baru, to a king of Babylon:
‘He that stilleth all to rest, that pacifieth all.
By whose incantations everything is at peace.’
Babylonian magic transpired into Egypt, as noted in the Talmud. Mesopotamia is the oldest viable civilization, many Egyptian instances of magic are notable, but I need not list some of them.
The point that relates to mystical revelations such as the pyramid and it’s inversion point to thousands of years of obscure but tenable beliefs. In Egypt, religion and psychic magic were not dicernly differentiated.
Layer philosophy, such as that of post Descartes searchers for certainty, have suffered an unintelligible reductive process in which the phenomenon we experience has reversed , unbound. These concepts are huge conceptual archetypes which modernity can not really eradicate, because it would consist of sacralige in what the West considers as epitomes of fallacious thought.
I literally can not try to vindicate the slicing of reality, into its early middle and modern stages, because they are cotemporanious psychic presences.
It is still early here , and I am guilty prematurely by 6 hours, but I criticise Dareley for that requirement to write, simply because the relative space time continuum does not jive with spotting the eternal presence into time zones.
There are serious reconsideration into Saint Anselm’s ontological argument. Don’t laugh.
Cartesian Consciousness
Reconsidered
Alison Simmons
Harvard University
© 2012 Alison Simmons
<www.philosophersimprint.org/012002/>
Descartes revolutionized our conception of the mind by
identifying consciousness as a mark of the mental: the Carte-
sian mind is essentially (and uniquely) a thinking thing, and
Cartesian thought is by its very nature conscious.1
,
2 Or so the story goes.
I do not deny the revolution story, but I want to ask what it amounts
to. In particular, I want to explore here Descartes’ rather astonishing
claim that all thought is conscious: “Nor can there be any thought in us
of which, at the very moment it is in us, we are not conscious.”3
- See Principles I.9, AT VIII-A 7, and Second Replies, AT VII 160. In both the
text and notes, I use “AT” to abbreviate Charles Adam and Paul Tannéry, eds.,
Œuvres de Descartes, nouvelle édition (Paris: J. Vrin, 1996). Translations are
my own, but they have benefited from consulting J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff,
D. Murdoch, and A. Kenny, trans. and eds., The Philosophical Writings of Des-
cartes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984–1991). - To say that thought is by its very nature conscious is not to say that conscious-
ness exhausts the nature of thought or even that it gets at the essence of
thought. Intellection also plays an important role in Descartes’ conception
of thought (see, e. g., Meditation 6, AT VII 78, and Principles I.48, AT VIII-A
23). The precise nature of the relationship among consciousness, intellection,
and thought is a controversial matter that I address below in Section I.B. At
the moment what matters is that Descartes commits himself to the claim that
all and only thought is conscious; hence its status as a mark, whatever else
thought may be. - Fourth Replies, AT VII 246; see also First Replies, AT VII 107, and Meditation
3, AT VII 49. Strictly speaking, this passage says only that occurent thoughts
are conscious. What of dispositional thoughts like standing beliefs, emotions,
and memories? I will say more about them in what follows in Section II.A,
but suffice it to say for now that they are not so much thoughts in the Carte-
sian ontology as they are potential thoughts or dispositions to have thoughts.
Thoughts proper are occurent thoughts. Why? Descartes’ substance-mode
ontology will restrict the thoughts of a mind (as it does the shapes of a body)
to those that are modifying it from moment to moment. Just as the fact that
a spherical piece of clay was cubical yesterday and may be cubical again to-
morrow doesn’t make cubicalness a property (that is, a mode) of the clay
now, so the fact that I felt a pang of regret yesterday and may again tomorrow
doesn’t make regret a property (that is, a mode) of my mind right now. Might
standing emotions, beliefs and memories be mental but not thoughts? No.
Apart from the transcendental properties that belong to all substances (e. g.,
duration), Cartesian substances have only one principal attribute of which
all of its properties are modes (Principles I.53, AT VIII-A 25). The substance-
mode ontology, then, will restrict the mind to a series of occurent (conscious)
thoughts. Thanks to an anonymous reader of the journal for pressing me to
be clearer about this point.
And Saint Anselm:
Ill reconsidered my reply, thanks MagsJ, family hanging, but get through day to day with the love for them through the higher powers. Hope all’s well on Your end.