It is appropriate that I’m in this sub-position. Why?
It has become obvious to me that apologies are not needed for self expression. But in spite of that, I have made numerous ones in talking within the hidden language if philosophy, to solve the most basic question of the very reason of using that language.
Oh no, I am the least presumptive of people, and really, the vanity I purport is more in line, or trying to be like into the modicum of Shopenhauer’s v
Vanity of Existence, the hyperbolic magnification of Man in love with his anthropomorphic creations.
The intent exemplifies a need for transcendence, at first dialectic, then doubtful, then transformatively willing, to expose the natural fallacy, yet, still insisting on it.
What this is, is the Greek ideal, and yes, Man wants to live himself, but is troubled by aspects of self love that misses the point, by engaging in structural self punishment.
Karen Hornet thought it possible, and the charge of a philosophical overbarance to solve psychological paradoxes appears so reactionary to those whose genetic misgivings rises to the level of out and out hate of a creator.
They rather think of a philosophically justified underbelly as a compensation toward the injustice inherent in the will to power over the sampled ideals of variant forms: such as women admiring more righteous, wise, and well formed, as interrelated.
Such interrelatiins of human qualities have to be fought for, through innumerable generations of romantic coupling, and these forms, through the use of the power to will are ongoing battles , through the sexes, the societal structures and biases hidden within.
Everyone alive has great struggles to do battles through, and ultimately it is the most logically pre eminent time of development that he has to overcome.
In the beginning was the word, but beneath the word is whete theights and the shadows lurk that later develop into that unanswerable questuon: why was he not consulted whether he wished to be born into a situation in which ultimately had to be the one to solve the problem of existence. Why was he born at all?
Was there a conscience packed into the send off , consisting of payback, of karmic debt that he had to assume?
Was part of that debt made into doubly jeopardy , by throwing in genetic instability? Was this an effort by higher order functions to firm higher order differentials?
And finally did not man’s self approbative conscious fragility no triplly bear him down with quantum absurdity?