I dunno… Her and Crenshaw… They have healthy psyches in the sense that they are not driven by resentment. But one also gets the feeling that they manage that by a kind of emptiness of deep thought like Trump has.
They are both too… Loyal. A president can’t be loyal except to the people through the schemes he (or she) hatches. That was the big Obama disappointment, the popped balloon of socialism. Socialism relies on loyalty. To ideas, to groups, to schools of thought. These things all get in the way of loyalty to the people.
In the end, it is the game Chavez played that fucked us all. Loyalty to socialism.
Her background is insanely good. She dropped the favoured position bestowed on her by the Clinton to go serve as a medic in Iraq.
I half expect her to become a golden running mate as a start to something bigger.
Obviously Im loyal to Trump, I ve always been with him through thick and thin and he has done more for humanity than anyone except people like the inventor of antibiotics and such.
I am just, showing you, this girl has more potential than the rest of the Dems combined.
Its just the question of what she will end up doing with it.
They really like her at CNN.
I remember when she announced, it was on CNN and the host was over the moon, he was practically tearing up with pride.
This guy too, he gives her some urgent advice on how to do even better in the debates. breitbart.com/politics/2019 … -to-serve/
Finally they’ve got one with brains and balls, even a woman with balls, and also nice looks and of a native-Samoan background who has served in the army (none of the others have) and is for thinking a bit more deeply about warfare, and of course she is the fraud.
So do I. She would be a great president and/or vice-president. She has poise, gender orientation, experience, and most of all, “inhabegeschutz”. What in English means “got what it takes”.
I know my threads are more challenging for the soul than anyone elses. But please be honest about this and say “Gee bbhorde I just dont know how to deal with these facts you show me” and not be a joke about it and try to pretend to be “above” it all.
I think to be a success in debate or negotiation, being stupid is actually better than being smart.
If you are stupid, you are exempt from having to heed to reason, and that gives you a huge advantage.
Not that I know whether this chick is smart or stupid or in-between. But Chinaman will despise having to negotiate eye-to-eye with a woman. They will be upset from the get-go that she’s not serving coffee or shining their shoes, and not shyly looking at her own deformed feet, quietly muttering, “be clean and quiet”.