Again Peacegirl, there may not be a viable argument here.
Lorentz-Einstein preceded by Michaelson and Morely show a pretty fair inductive chain, and Your response asks the hidden objective reference, as if temporaluty can assail or forward any congruence or dis - similarity between the absolute certainty between death and the lesser certain applications of the will hiding behind causes erased from memory.
If the birth-death parameters are bracketed , existentially, then the intervening variable substancive being , may appear as nothing but reliance on a hypothetical totality.
It doesmtatter at all, whether that totality is defined as the sum total of known historical compoaite of all known sets of near absolute quanta, set in an absolute approachable limit , or, presupposed as the one ideal form of being, because even one scintilla of difference produces two identical copies.
I asked St. James about it , and he rightly asserted at least one individual copy of every identifiable humam being.
Quantification through population growth does not matter since up to one single increment , there is a cosmological equivalency.
I do not hold St James above or under the very same field, because 1 increment below simultainity reduced multiple worlds as indistinguishable .
Now if this were not true, then the idea of existence would become impossible , per esse est percipii.
This sounds impossible , nut does not an infinite cosmos sound equally so?
Same goes between various quantum differentiating between 2 or millions of families of resemblances , the difference is within a single unit of recognance~per recognition.
The breaching of levels do not even abide by karmic cause and effect, nor by chance , where this difference is again too close to call.
That without this conflation between similar recognized identities result in existential jumps , does appear illusively on basis of again a transpersonal , transcendent time, encompassing ages of past and future, to create that minimum absolute (eigen vector- eigen value), that determines the preceptive apparatus based on the dynamics of measurement. Here I am using intuitive based matrix reversal , not through derivation , but through the use of absolute imminent qualifiers)