Past present future ,are mere images contained other images.contained this in stance, in a stance a posture of contention , holding up that image just a few moments.
This holding up can last a few seconds at most, then torn from within on a flash.
Bring it back again and again look,
this way and that, turn around,
I don’t want him to see me,
he really doesn’t like me,in the present
his beat friend told me.
Just a second I didn’t get that imagining some far.away island drink pina colada at sunset.
Go to work , no, Kropotkin, check out
that woman in the bright yellow hat
Ain’t she peculiar?
This moment on:
Your on target,
You ain’t one,
Just do Your thang,
Wait!
Tomorrow , pay check
& home, tv dinners the kids the grandkids bubbling with excitement but, god dann it it’s not ad hominem
What made you go to Europe so sudden?
Last summer? Liz is dead.
Tenement square changed and now, as suddenly time has receeded flashy
Into tahiti huts and can Gogh
Dramatics one jealous ear.Still!
Hanging, by a.thread,
Oh it’s a.crazy lazy dream
a dolly may have, it’s all
Cut!
Cut!
Off!
Off!
The steamy native hits back,
Ward travel in time, collusive cults staring that way into dark,he points toward that god and this
Oh pleeeeaaaase do not go on stop time atop it , a stop it, prop it but don’t drop it, lot it , bob it , got it.
his tool boring into soft.tissues,
angling this and that way, her old man
toward The sea went fishin’ caught one lost it on the way back to shore,
Hasn’t been seen back since mane drwnin of broken heart, or felled.by cranes asunder.flyin’ back from clock fights , now seeking warmer climate.
Faint glow of.thunder within cascades of subdued mixture pf laughter and disdainful clapping of hands
This as min.'d (Ed) comic effect interrupt flowing thought images defining flow of time , may be placed elsewhere ,
Coitus interrupt us of faculties far and wide.
Count them: Arc cha rec ter, art through premise, mag (z) d her and her rhythm"n blues, barbaric acts and unfathomable presumptions, the labyrinths of ambiguity, the miseries of peace ,and course the guy in philosophers fixed in aspic onentiger eye shewn2 3 ways, iirreligiois, irreverent jacob and last not least not waiting for no time world war three gib’s terrific oh happy our happy day, and deservedly deservedly d 63 mulling like the thinker aside in al-Qaida , a side of him , glossy film through darkness of the mirror darkly atlas, shrug! and not lastly or or save for.the beat# art themes.and beams of.hidden candles of.cathedral beams of ages.spiraling.spires, candles and hits on expired roaches.
And unmentionables like ; Carlos and
Delivery and anomaly. Few left out imclusovely pupiseleasly. , not willfully, and without that much determinance.
youtu.be/ehTsjtd-GAI
Oh, ech, ech, u2,
Peacegirl maybe should trans fore tis’ peace of… to writing. ? If You concur will ask Magazine, jee.! Or Mike?
youtu.be/9ckv6-yhnIY
Time is not a dimension. The future is only a dream of something yet to come, & if they have no transcendental relation, them, collusion or overlap define it through absorptive effects of mutual self consumption.
& I like u2.
Now will follow relatively non specifically without boundaries. A while at any rate .
Of Chang.e.
–
The past is a memory in the mind’s eye. That doesn’t mean our past experiences didn’t happen, but we reside in the eternal now. Time is not a dimension. The future is only a dream of something yet to come, and only becomes actualized in the present. I’m not sure how we got here, but the conversation has taken another detour. 
The past is a memory, the future is a dream
Doesent mean a memory through mind’s eye- but reside in the eternal now. (Significant)
That residence fades . with time/ in time. -is that fade within its own cogniscance or is able to recover it merely as a partial image ? (Memory of residence)
Is the partial image as represented become the control around which the significance between residence and the mind’s eye are negotiated ? ( Can current residence be tied to in a real way to the past to signify change)?
What is the difference? Is there one, that we can apprehend, or, is it mere entertaining visual clues? (Connecting partially cut images and reassembling them like Picasso did? ( Better melt them like a doll.i (Eeeeeeeeek.)).
m.phys.org/news/2011-04-scienti … nsion.html