Hi Arc, nice to hear You !(of)
Hope to see You more but unsurprisingly, the ships passing at night is better then nothing, specially when most on board think telepathy is used. But again can’t be ruled out.
Peacegirl:
Time uncooperative, only focus now can be the contradiction .
The sense You are using makes it (sense) , in terms of , well the best analogy I can come up with is a differential gear. And please don’t assume that I’m a philosophical wunderkind of some kind, - sorry duty call a will resume at the earliest. Sorry.
but having having second thoughts about this analogy …
Try again: at the level of contrariness, contra meaning against, which is inclusive within a level of formative logic: reflective of ontological valuation like this:
When comparing two objects, separated by dis similarity ( based on the principle that no similar objects are absolutely identical) one says to another: this is this but not that
They are contrarily indicative toward each other. They presuppose a third, an object (objective) which cam describe both, on basis of their characteristics. The third object is am ideal object which more generally defines them, such as the ansolute spherical figure , that both contradictory figures resemble , albeit imperfectly.
Naxk in the early days of philosophy, talk was compelling to visualize in terms of such ideal object, as if, for instance, the more a polygon slides or partial sides become shorter and shorter, the more they will approximate an ideal circle or sphere.
This language implied the contra indicative image as imperfect up to the ideal . the language subordinated similar objects as dissimilar absolutely up until the partially differented sides loose their measure of extension. Ideally this never cam happen, and contrariness excluded the ideal.
So if the solution is by asserting the non existence of the ideal, the ontological representation of objects, including the self, become entangled with other partial representations, forming a language of variable meaning per representation of based on similarity, and the degree of similarity can not be assumed, except by a feed.back system between represented objects reflecting a cohesive recognition, most.particularly self representation via the other object.
The most general characteristics subordinate the least, therefore the system is reductive toward the most inclusive characteristic
The way I am using the way Peace girl is using it, is not by aumptive theoretical efforts, for that way the method will result in a circularity, the way it has been classocally, as.two closest image of similarity, where the two spheres cam not be distinguished from one another.
The contradiction. can be avoided by accepting the language of contradiction both literally and figuratively, both by assessing the intended meaning utilizing the objective, or the hypothetical ,meaning of the figure of speech which uses models of the closest latitides to escertain that meaning of the objective can correspond most exactly what is meant.
Reductionism into absolute value does not work this way, at a certain critical point, the way the object is apprehended splits from how it is described.
An example in Sartre’s Nausea, shows a.waiter in a role of acting in bad.faith, since he is merely acting like a waiter waiter, and not really being one.
The contradiction is appearent in roles or people in jobs for which they were.not properly trained, and as a.consequence they can not faithfully term the job as.one which they like to do, noatter how painfully try to act as if the.contrary was.true.
If a.person tries.to negate this assumption, he will show an inauthentic performance . He can not appreciate this, because it never was his objective to act in that role, he is unprepared and unhappy in trying to cover this left of clarity toward the implicit object of his attempt at self convincing.
If he.could be retrained because of his own volition. because he really would like to appreciate the work on itself it’self and not become a.clock watcher reduced into partial unfocused performances, them he.could.refocus unto the objective which ceases to be merely a wish to find some meaning along the way, becaisemall his time will be.consumed by repeated validations of.self validation. , lime self hypnosis
The fact that majority of.working people live for the paycheck , 11, they need to reconcile the two ways of trying to understand how to change their reasoning as.to accommodate to changing contexts within which they understand the meaning, the objective and upper level evaluations thereof their performance.
As most of evaliations are based on upper level authoritarian criteria, the level of transparency may be contingent upon more general assessment related to used standards (some of which are near disfuntional utilization ); and appear more as outer sourced determinancy , where the minimum use of self ontological valuing has less transparent motivational value.
The above effect may indicate a use of collusive effect of internal efforts to control ongoing operational suppression of employee insight into over the top modeling of employee productive capabilities.
I suggest, utilization of both systems, albeit conflicting, may pave the way toward not only better employee-employee relations, but may result in superior production and work morale.