Comedy

:laughing: =D>

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eajkTddpeQQ[/youtube]

:laughing:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyrBA2f4Tx0[/youtube]

imgur.com/a/kFGVENF

Lol…

I asked him after “if you wanted to go buy a book right now and educate yourself, what’s stopping you? Is that Satan also dumbing down the population? As I have said, it is ignorance of which creates the cycle of evil. Not a symbol that depicts everything except evil or “satan” as you call it.“

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pR3fB9HKf5Y[/youtube]

i put this post here because ‘zizek vs peterson’ can only be a comedy act.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=78BFFq_8XvM[/youtube]

i’m not surprised that zizek let peterson live, even considering the dangerous popularity that amateur windbag has among millennial college students. it’s due to zizek’s generally congenial nature and his lack of hostility… or perhaps a recognition that peterson’s rivalry wasn’t something to be taken very seriously. the disconnect between the audience and the debate occurs when it’s realized that zizek’s ideas are something to be chewed on and digested, while peterson’s diatribe alway consists of shallow, quick blanket statements that have profound effects on the listeners. he simplifies what cannot be simplified (but must be chewed on for more time that is allowed)… and for that very reason he is better received by the audience; he is more easily understood because he says nothing substantial.

peterson turns a subject that belongs to a more technical environment into something like a pop-theory, continues to systematically misrepresent marxism, and repeats the same old informal fallacies in his criticism of the failed ‘communist’ (in parentheses because they weren’t true marxist states) countries while conveniently avoiding any mention of the atrocities committed by capitalistic imperialism. but this is to be expected; this is all the right has ever done, and can ever do. i think zizek realizes this and rather then devoting much time to defending marxism, he instead just let’s peterson have it as a friendly gesture.

but really, it’s painful to listen to peterson talk. i cringe at least once every 27 seconds and can barely manage to keep up with the number of ambiguous comments he fires off one after the other.

i guess it was decent though, if only because i got the opportunity to watch zizek play with peterson a little bit.

i fear there will be more of these pop-philosophers like peterson in the decades to come. philosophy itself as an institution has been finished for a century, so all that is left are these post-modern caricatures and sophists who’s rhetoric contains nothing but pathos and ethos. the express purpose being to persuade and convince a generation who’s confusion is really irrelevant anyway.

lol go to 1:46:50. finally zizek smacks that asshat. we had to wait almost two hours to see it. that’s crazy. zizek could’ve been doing this the entire time.

I guess you didn’t wait for Petersons answer.

No wonder, as Zizek has to repeat his question four times so he can understand it himself. Or just harvest some more laughter from the imbeciles (Marxists) in the room.

He did write one good book, Zizek. I read through six of them, mostly its repetitive trash. But he had some sane things to say about Heidegger in one of them.

Commendable how Peterson always manages to be the adult in the room with these spasmodic Marxists. They’re more worrisome than Christians speaking on tongues.

vocaroo.com/i/s0FdD1BTToql

Zizek’s mind is too fast for his mouth, that’s all. But his spasmodic demeanor is one of his greatest features, I think. The guy loves what he does. He gets into that shit.

Well it gets him a lot of money.

In his life he said one interesting couple of three things. That was in this one book I won’t mention as someone will shit on it.

Ive read through about six of his works and they got increasingly Hegel-like.
Ever read the Phenomenology of the Spirit? Zizek just copied the method and kept going doing the exact same thing like twenty times.

I never found any sense when the guy talks. He is really a simpleton. He just got some bad but infectious ideas from Hegel and a few good ones from Heidegger and, admittedly, Lacan too. That was quite cool. What he did to Lacan.

That Marxist shit is like, when someone shoots some one dead, and someone says “he used a Smith & Wesson”, and Zizek goes: “well tell me, where, where, where, where itch this Shhhcmitssh, and where isscchch this Wessssschcon?”

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFy_X6IVmkc[/youtube]

Soros is not the Ouroboros. But he is also from Hungary.

Heres your Marxists… and your comedy

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dJ2ojjgTEh4[/youtube]

You have to stick around for the “oppression map”.

That probably hurt marx more than me, even if he’s rolling in his grave right now. These ‘modern’ so called marxists are even worse than the modern nietzscheans. My sympathy for ol karl just went up a couple notches after watching that video. Poor bastard. He was a couple hundred years too early… or too late.

Well Im glad I showed you.
Now you know what we’ve been dealing with.

Forget about poor Karl, think of the children.

That’s what we’re doing… trying to unfuck history so that more children have a better quality life. The masses, the rabble, the mediocrity… that’s the bulk of mankind, so that’s what we’ve got to work with. The disease of capitalism is just a dialectical stage that’ll take a while to get past, that’s all.

There is no hope if even these examples don’t make you see that there is something you need to look at, as a Marxist.

I really can’t fathom how Marx could be as blind as to address the production process by completely ignoring what is being produced, and why. That really reeks of deliberately messing up peoples minds and value systems.

Marx: 1+1= not 2, that is evil oppression, 1+1 is actually -8674895698357987. Now avenge yourselves on the ones who work with 1+1=2!

:confused: :confused: :confused: :confused:

and then people start actually DOING that.

Ugh.

This is like watching 90 year olds trying to use a computer :blush: :laughing:
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1OADXNGnJok[/youtube]

The title of this article :-k

reuters.com/article/us-athl … CY20101009

.