Lol, see? Pivot points. The plieeeege.
Continuity, Deleuze was also talking about continuity. The unfolding of the labyrinth. but see? How can you let mathematics in here? Predetermination, neh? However irrational. But no, it’s not pivot commands, or even predictions of movement. It’s pivot POINTS. Deleuze was even talking about how you can choose your own point at an intervening place.
It’s interesting. There is also a duality, there are two labyrinths: of matter and of the soul-ah. so the soul labyrinth… Well he hasn’t gone there yet, but presumably the soul series works off the pivot points of the matter series. That kinda works too. But there is something missing here. Will. the thing that pivots. Fuck. Am I gonna sit down here again and keep listening to Deleuze? I guess I am. Maybe I gotta remember: it’s not about the series, it’s about the fold.
But yeah, so far that’s the difference I see. Deleuze is simply describing the genealogical progression. No mention yet of the toolbox that I mentioned. I guess in the end it’s inconsequencial. The only pivots that will happen, the only expressions of will that transcend, will occur at the pivot points. The inflection points.
Yeah, that’s good enough. That’s good enough. Let’s keep listening then, shall we? The irrational numbers aren’t an insult, they are a compliment.