Fundamental Ontological Censorship

The anti-human censorship on this site is unconstrained. And evidence of it is continually erased. So far as I know no disciplinary action has been taken to move towards a remediation of this hideous circumstance. The site is wholly unsupervised. And so open constructive discussion is shut down in advance.

Every philosophical discussion site including this one has their good, bad and ugly.
From more than 15 years of discussion in various forums, this the best site i.e. 90% good, 5% bad and 5% ugly.

If you have provided clear propositions supported with evidences and sound arguments, I don’t see any reason for any moderator to intervene.

Most of the time I missed the intended purpose of your OP and posts, I tried to participate but then you complain I am off point, got it wrong.
Actually the problem is you are not clear with your thesis or problem statement.

I suggest you present you OP in the following format:

Thesis: You main issue, topic or proposition
Arguments and supporting evidences as follow:

Example:
Thesis: Kant Claimed the Noumenon aka Thing-in-itself is illusory
Arguments and supporting evidence:
I will provide supporting quotes from Kant’s CPR and
present the necessary arguments.

Moved to Meta, as this is a discussion of site policy. Also locked, because this appears to be redundant of this thread.