Why We Don't Like You Anymore

And it is ONLY about individuals as entities.

That other shit you say, that’s what these silly-ass succesful capitlaists keep appologizing for.

Them’s the chains.

See you around you beautiful communist bastard.

I read your book.

Blood flows thicker than water.
Till we meet again, Don Pedro.

  • I like these terms. Better than the ones we set earlier. Not sure about the 60s thing, I prefer American cars from that age. Montreal seems a righteous place for a Cadillac.

I continue to be skeptical.

One word: chemistry.

It was pretty high end. Sold like gold. Fcourse I wasnt greedy enough.
But in general I sold many visual narrative concepts as a designer of commercials and tv programs. Its just what was out there to sell was no where by near close enough to what I would buy.

My spare time writing diverted me from my directorial career. I could simply not root in the type of tastes that were running the mouth.

What is there to sell in a declining world? Mostly distractions. I dont like these as products, they require too much upkeep.
High maintenance products arent my game.

But now there is a fresh new world for putting things down that will last forever. That kind of deal bores most capitalists, Apple complains that people are using their iphones for too long, its not good to have a lastable product. Thats not to me an ideal sort of mindset, and it is a good sign that these products withstand the producers will to have them be obsolete. Its a sign the products are becoming one with out life tissue, that we are cyborgs. No longer consumers of the product but consumed by our consumption of it, we are now supernatural in our capacity to receive and represent. I see this again as Demiurgic, at least when Im looking for a parallel in myth and symbol. But I realize the term probably has a negative connotation.

In any case there is no stopping it, so thats what philosophy really has to address. Philosophy contra Communism as a preserver of Capital.

We all have stories and great ideas. With love, cause me too, but you know. Be careful where you hang your legitimacy.

A Caddy it is, then.

Im not especially proud of having sold stuff I made but I must admit to the reality of it in this context. They werent stories. They were… experiences, licenses, paths, you know, Capitalistic fiber. I have a taste for it. Thats not the same as storytelling, its more insidious, it is allowing people to tell themselves stories. Thats Product.

Yeah because with the potholes in Rosemont, I doubt a Porsche could even survive.

I’m just saying. A capitalist, a proper capitalist, doesn’t make things. He devises production systems that generate financial returns.

I myself have done a thing or two I consider of great value. Does not a capitalist make.

Anyway.

Ia survive just fine, you just gotta know how to dodge 'em.

Lol, and that’s not what I meant by stories. I meant the “I woulda been a rich entrepreneur except…”

We all have those.

The returns mostly went to others, but I devised them and earned from it.

The value Ive produced far exceeds anything Ive sold or tried to sell.
But I know my way around the free market. Somewhat.

My plan for the Philosophers Clan was to make a Product out of the spirit for internet philosophy. But things got in the way. As expected, naturally. Because there wasnt a stict enough angle. But even in failure the enterpriseling produced some produce that will later be forged into product.

As an entrepreneur, I dont need to produce the value, I need to see it, and combine, to cause value to beget a returning harvest of money.
Look, Ive been completely stranded capitalistically by the power of philosophy that swept me, a philosophy of value. I understand what it is that Im not currently doing. But that story of weve all been down that road is the masses’ story, but the magic of money is having an eye for what is different, for experience and for latent value that can be exploited.

Philosophy can be exploited as a stimulant. Weve talked about this in the guise of that other science.
Seeing where the potential lies for a big reaction. Capitalism is chemistry, a chemists approach to psychology and need.

That to harvest, one must sow. Not all that is sown bears immediate fruit. Rarely anything does.
The idea is not to trample the ground where one has sown. That is all. The weather will do the rest.

Youre all standing on mountains of wealth. All these readers. But wealth doesnt make for a capitalist mindset. Its like the chicken and the egg.

Ah, but I dont.

ilovephilosophy.com/viewtopi … 4#p2243835

you… yoooou. you got a gift, my friend. yoou got a gift. oh yeah. you saw that there was something that i was tryin’ ta do and you… you figured that out. that’s why you are who you are…

Lol, like I said, poetic vision you got. And I say this as a guy who understands that truth is more or less the place where poetry and philosophy intersect, it does not make you untruthful or detached from reality.

But my points, my brilliant insights into politics, all that is war by other means, you do not address any of them. Because I do not speak poetics. And you seem not to be able to talk straight brilliant.

This may seem like an attack or that I’m not a big fan of your poetry. I am. That post you linked to, that’s my kind of poet. That’s raw truth, and only poetry because of the cojones it takes to write it down and publish it, that will make people not take it literally (minus the ones that simply will not have an inkling you even said anything).

Maybe to the extent that I unmasked you is the sense in which I always did take you literally. I’m clever like that.

When you start doing that, taking men literally, you run into that brilliant insight of Baudrillard’s which is that what they are hiding is that they are hiding nothing. Only people with this insight will understand the true genious of what I write, all these weasels trying to see what I’m hiding. U.S.A. bitch. I ain’t hiding shit.

I’m just a connoisseur of propaganda, is all. No need for the flattery…

My dear friend Brian (I take that liberty because you had the audacity to call me peter), what I sincerely believe is that they want us to treat eachother as worthless animals and to act like such.

What I propose is that we treat eachother like men. We’re not supposed to. If we do just that, that will already be their defeat.

Commies almost had that insight, you know with the whole comrade thing. But the distance encompassed by that almost is the distance between genocidal totalitarianism and freedom.

The standard of a man, the cusp of which is a gentleman.

Its not war if no one addresses it.

Nuh-uh I called you Pedro. And it couldn’t have been a typo either because I just checked all my devices; none of the auto corrects turned pedro into peter. I can’t believe I just spent two minutes doing this. You must be interesting to me. Weird.

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=194729&p=2719059

Sure it is. The declaration is the war, the response is already that: a response.

My words be writ. Keen observers will notice. Or not, I don’t really fucking care, like Mamet says, these thoughts are just like diseases I gotta say out loud to be cured from.

I know because, even though so much of the political warfare that went on in Venezuela went unaddressed, plenty of the tactics and strategies employed are being used today at the highest levels.

Wanna talk about innovation?

It will take centuries for people to acknowledge just how much of an innovater ol’ Chavez was, God rest that beautiful motherfucker’s soul.