Sounds good, and with foundation established. However, foundation through action is the only way to earn validity , and as I understand it, the raising of the politically martyred crucified boy, whose reality is much in doubt, used as a cause celebre, as much as Marx’s idea of effects beginning with the beginning of social history, must give a pause, politically speaking.
The inclusion of what reduces Stirner to the level of political stress, does create the tension caused by occultist backgrounds, or is it a matter of the sufficient conflict causing the chaotic occultist solution?
The dressed up solution within the object-subject preoccupation along the lines of the New Heglelians, is a tried concept, and Putin’s indulgence in the Crimea , as proof positive of Dugin’s influence, is as yet inadequate in forming a new national socialism, as built on such questionable grounds.
Perhaps political risk taking as a form of warning , used as bargaining chips, where the chips are funded by the idea of a pan- Asiatic Axis, may prove more likely. The Russia-Iran-Syria connection, may be a preview, and certainly of major concern, an allusion to the paranoid philosophy of using the risk of the the use of the
occult , where the substantiation of the possible with that of the actual tries to delete saturated all inclusiveness of a purported and upheld chaos.
This causes a necessary reduction into the basis of a dangerous neopolitic, a revision of past Marxist-Leninist dogma.
That the dogma’s failure need not detract the resurfacing of ideas along the lines of Young Heglelians, particularly the adoption of ego psychology as a bridge of a much more general theory of social contractual manifestations of it.
The more poignant question of whether social devolution and political chaos presently. Is reaching a level of predictable maximum uncertainty , as world politic moves into the NWO.
The answer is no, geopolitically speaking, the actual chips are much more unevenly matched, and the Crimea is no Poland, as far as seeing it in other terms then reclaiming a very closely aligned country, with very close historically tied societies.
The same can not be said to be of Poland, because Poland has been way closer tied to Russia.
Ribbentrop’s visit, forging a fake German Russian alliance was a masterstroke of prevention.
Now look at some of his back ground, :In 1986 Dugin joined Pamyat, an organization dedicated to restoring old monuments. This innocuous aim was soon overshadowed by the anti-Semitism of its leader, Dmitry Vasilyev, a paranoid actor who believed the Jews were destroying Russia’s patrimony and had sent Zionists to kill him.[14] Pamyat attracted more hooligans, crypto-fascists, and nationalists than art restorers but it stirred a patriotic sense in Dugin; he began to wear a black shirt, leather belt, and shoulder strap, the garb of the Black Hundred, a patriotic tsarist movement of the early twentieth century. The historian Walter Laqueur, who wrote a book about the Black Hundred, noted Dugin’s activities as early as 1993; with Dugin, he wrote, “we move from the realm of a quasi-rational approach to the depths of irrationality.”[15] Readers of Dugin out of sympathy with his ideas may agree.
From DARK STAR RISING: Magick and Power in the Age of Trump by Gary Lachman, published by TarcherPerigee, an imprint of Penguin Publishing Group, …
The whole structural basis and organization of character, is simply not there, in Dugin , to mirror an international , worldly concern, other than the tried Caucasus invasion, which is turning into mostly a litmus test.
On the question of the degree of seriousness with which to take Dugan, any thing is possible, yet as major Russian policy, he appears to be incidental to the old Putin preoccupation that mirrors Trump, : bring back the great Russia.
There are Islamists, as well, who longe for the return of the Ottoman Empire.
At the same token, one can not absolutely dismiss Chamberlain professing ’ Peace in our Time’.