The entanglement is so profound , Ec, that it becomes the most suppressed of all clear intentional clarity. Let me clarify, nut return to one key concept that You used. , : that is ‘human slavery’.
I am going this time in, from the outside, an eco-genesis through the shell which we ourselves created, to sort of alienate the inside so that we can recreate this Grand Illusion called the self or the ego.
Marx was completely anti shamanic, he painted a picture of a dissolved Heglelianism. So as to unite the forces of the ideal and the pragmatic.
He failed miserably. Why? Not only because the ends dis not justify the means, bit because the whole logic was using the forces at the shamam’s disposal to create the semblance of sentiment.
Socialism has utopian and humanistic elements, and appears to eradicate the ego, into uniform and malleable feasibility. It appears to profess humanistic and even Christian ideals , in the very basic Hermainic Heglelian sense, while masking the basic constrained of the recognition within the abrupt new form development of its anti them within. the existential despair inherent in Dostoevsky through Nietzsche.
While this topicalitu goes by most intellectuals of the past, since their primary concern is still within the philosophy of mind, which will reduce everything to positivism and all that entails, Marx takes a turn , and dreams up a world where Kant’'s imperatives categorically defy Hegel’s spirituality.
Camt be done say the voice, the subconscious fro. The inside, England, the cradle of Capitalistic production, if not by de facto exhibition like the demonstrative implications that the 1900 world faire pronounced, but by the utilization. of the principles which set it in motion.
Once the utility of claims to pragmatic concerns were set, there was not a bit
anything anyone could do, if there was anybody around like that in those times able to figure it out, its future implocations.
I think Marx did and the results crossed the thresholds of fasticity, crossed the boundaries of reason, that has become an ex post facto.
In fact, pragmatism utilized for its own sake and not for the essence that is contained within it, is totally outsourced from its primacy, and never ever thought in terms of its universal effects.
The mistake became obvious when theorists analyzed why communism was not bred in England , but in Russia.
We come.back to Dostoevsky and Nietzsche again in a full circle
All the other notions will fall in place, about the internal world, and its relation to the other, in this very , and I wish I could use Iambigious’ terms, but it escaped me relating to anti intellectualism, but shall return, after drawing this set principled drawn progressove situations ad hoc.
There is a lot more development needed to disqualify Marx as an insubstantial shaman, but in fact what he was.doing was.creating a.shadow world against the unstoppable development of functional theory corresponding with pragmatism, that it SHOULD be perceived that the ego within the realm of the Ancien Regime needs.more.chastisememt then a mere.few decapitated vested personages.
The punishment will consists of total anonymity into a classless society.
Without ego, and reverting Hobb’s paranoid elitist controllers, the emergence.of the egoless comrades.will replace them, by a return to Rousseau’s noble savage.
Now what on earth does all that mean in terms of the subconscious Freudian man, who’s can remain aware only until then dawn of civilization , circumscribing the birth of.tragedy?
Will follow with corrections and connections to what really is going on and why Ann Raynd is not such am absolute evil which after all, in her efforts.to point or the folly following the yellow brick road.
Or, if You follow this train , the red.one, instead.of the yellow, and symphatize with it, thenaybe come.to the similar conclusion that Trump is reallynsimilarly, merely following a post.scribes script.of the inevitable, that practice , praxis need.to be recognized as hopelessly convoluted.
We.can never figure out our own dreams and the messages comtimed in it, even of we.perfectly remember it in every detail, not.less.the.dreams and individual goals that may serve as a.guide.
The contradiction and the following. Rhetorical State, is implicit in any legal-political argument staged in the modern world, as a result
Must follow up, really, if not merely for my own edification .
And You must not worry overtly, about the mods, they utilize intent more then exploitive in their judgement, however I’m not 100 percent on this one, however I thank You for the reserved manner of describing it.
ALAN Cohen, ’ The decadence of the Shamans’ 1991
shamanview.blogspot.com/2012/10 … d.html?m=1
I do agree with the assessment that people should move more of their subconscious motivation into their awareness, but there is no clear distinction in the first place, so which part to move to which part? (Since most remembered dreams are fragmented ). But lets say philosophers are more adept at it, how does this make it generally. more relevant?
Solve underlying problem leaving charges not unlike Iambig’s.