Thankfully, staunch individualism, trusting only one’s self and one’s own assessment of reality (without ever ignoring others’, that’s not what this is about), is a guaranteed, if possibly drawn-out and painful, cure.
K: Here in this one post, we see why conservatism is such a failure…
and the interesting thing will be that “Pedro” will have absolutely no
idea why his beliefs are a failure or why the beliefs of conservatives are
a failure…
See Rengel this is the sort of stuff consensus is made of.
Some person who is ten lifetime away from braving the first step of logic being able to blubber some words and another person who speaks the same language actually being able to suspect that he is saying something.
The method the liberals are using is killing millions of people and enlisting hordes of remorseless morons like the one you just witnessed in action to pretend to themselves and each other, en masse, that it didnt happen.
Thats consensus, all it is ever good for. Lies.
But this is an interesting avenue, let’s explore it further.
Why is the mention of consensus, “scientific consensus,” such a surefire win for leftists? because, thanks to the magnificent USofA, it has become reflex to assume that ultimate authority lies in individuals. when they say consensus, scientific consensus, tey are claiming there are scientists, individualists by nature, who all agree on certain things.
Of course, this relies on people ACCEPTING that “consensus,” obeying that collective of scientists, and enver ever ever actually engaging in an act of consensus, which would require knowing what exactly it is these supposed scientists are saying and what they are basing it on and how it corresponds with the real world, with things that acutally happen or not in an observable way.
See the beauty of observability is that it relies on an observer. An individual.