Guide wrote:
You’re not considering that the magnet is what men manifestly call true freedom. That is because it is vulgar to love what is needed. Ergo, they give it a high name. Yet, the philosopher is much more cold, and doesn’t fly into fancy.
It takes practice to overcome the draw, not by denying it, but by keeping the potential energy at bay. Magnetism was used in the 16 th century (Parscelsus) and the 18 th (Mesmer) as a cure. It was supposed to draw out ills, using a very tight metaphore, the conclusion can encompass both: the inward and the outward pull.
As in : whatever is being pulled out, once, was drawn in, and whatever was drawn in had parts of it pulled out
Its a systemic machine, much like described by Deleuze and Guittari.
It is a foreshadowed cyborg.
The symposium does enclose both: the high and low , and as such, can absolutely understand both.
I’m interpreting freedom and love and necessity as considered as your notion of very loosely structured metaphore metaphore : however coding loosely is open to such wide array of interpretation, that it works against the necessity of using code.
It became erogenized by Freud/Reich.
In Heidegger eros is only sorrow (sorge), and not Freude or “joy”, however, nothing and fullness happen in being. If we all follow Aristotle, eros is not Freudian, connected to hidden interpretations of gestures pointing to drives and Ronellian idocy, rather, it is the deepest pessimism of the theory of happiness as the sublime. As technological cure for the necessary needs of humans. So, in this, you forget, the war over what is noble.
Sure of Aristotle is followed, the hidden need not and cannot ascertained by implication, however.
If that would hold, Jung could also be dismissed as irrelevant .
Modern behaviorism could survive, but had it?
Newest behavioral guidelines have practically eliminated analysis, but merely for political and financial reasons and treatment methodology revolves around medicating emotional and cognitive distortions.
Heidegger is not dismissed but evolved into the persistence of German pessimism.
The same oroborous covers both, pleasure and pain , into an unholy alliance , where the will will determine the pejorotive, or approbatory.