[b]Jan Mieszkowski
Time is
Philosophy: an ideal construct
Economics: a real construct
Psychology: a material construct
Existentialism: a drag[/b]
Obviously: None of the above.
On Christmas we remember that
Marx: capitalism is a religion
Schopenhauer: God is gift wrapping
Nietzsche: gift wrapping is dead
Well, maybe next Christmas.
All I want for Christmas is
Leibniz: a perfectly rational language
Hegel: a perfectly determinate negation
Marx: a perfectly dynamic model of labor
Nietzsche: a perfectly good excuse to ignore all you clowns
Well, maybe next Christmas.
Idealism: I’ve understood your arguments and refuted them
Empiricism: I’ve understood your arguments and ignored them
Existentialism: I’ve completely misunderstood your arguments but have decided to steal them anyway
Which one is most likely to be the least misunderstood?
Email from a student who failed to turn in the final paper: “I got embroiled in a two-day debate on Reddit and had nothing left to give.”
So, is this even possible?
Psychology: Blame your parents
Political Economy: Blame your boss
Sociology: Blame your community
Philosophy: I’m logically, ontologically, epistemologically, ethically, and aesthetically innocent!
Clearly: We’ll need a fucking context!