[b]Jan Mieszkowski
Read Schopenhauer to understand Nietzsche.
Read Hegel to understand Schopenhauer.
Read Kant to understand Hegel.
Then read Spinoza to understand that you don’t understand anything.[/b]
Oh, and why is that?
[b]Would have taken Twitter by storm:
Pascal
Hume
Wittgenstein
Adorno
Lacan
Would do well to stick to Facebook:
Plato
Descartes
Kant
Heidegger
Derrida[/b]
Let’s entirely clear this up.
Who gave philosophy such a bad name?
Plato: Sophistry
Aristotle: Plato
Leibniz: Aristotle
Hume: Leibniz
Kant: Hume
Hegel: Kant
Schopenhauer: Hegel
Nietzsche: philosophers
Let’s entirely clear this up.
Bacon: Knowledge is power
Foucault: Power shapes interpretation
Nietzsche: Interpretation destroys knowledge
Hegel: The destruction of knowledge is knowledge
Bacon: Knowledge is power
Hey, what goes around comes around, right?
Idealism: You’ve got all the answers for all the right reasons
Realism: You’ve got all the answers for all the wrong reasons
Materialism: You don’t have any answers for all the right reasons
Existentialism: You don’t have any answers for all the wrong reasons
Thank god for nihilism, he thought.
[b]A Brief History of Philosophy
- Know the void
- Accept the void
- Embrace the void
- Fill the void
- Null and void[/b]
Who cares, as long as there’s a void there.