The Philosophers

Sisyphus
Path
Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: Honor to Trump’s victory Tue Jan 31, 2017 11:20 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
New slogan for the anti-Trump protestors:

“Jump For Trump”

off a bridge, a building, whatever.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Honor to Trump’s victory Tue Jan 31, 2017 11:22 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Sisyphus wrote:
New slogan for the anti-Trump protestors:

“Jump For Trump”

off a bridge, a building, whatever.

LOL


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Honor to Trump’s victory Mon Feb 27, 2017 6:14 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
“MAGA.” --Nietzsche


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Honor to Trump’s victory Mon Feb 27, 2017 6:15 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
LGBT: Let’s Get Behind Trump


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Sisyphus
Path
Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: Honor to Trump’s victory Mon Feb 27, 2017 11:58 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Thrasymachus wrote:
LGBT: Let’s Get Behind Trump

How do you spell relief?

NoAids

2img.net/h/s30.postimg.cc/l71up … G_1099.jpg

Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Venezuela Mon Mar 06, 2017 11:22 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
I’ve been thinking of Pezer lately, and recently I had an online chat with a socialist who claimed Venezuela isn’t “real socialism”… I explained philosophically why Venezuela specifically has failed, and then i explained philosophically why socialism doesn’t work. Of course he had no response but to insult me and play the Chomsky game of demanding I know all the hyper-particular details of every government and economic moment in order to explain why it didn’t work… when I explained why that analytic-empirical (anti-philosophical) Chomsky-ite approach is bullshit, and I demanded he address what I wrote about the nature of socialism as well as Venezuela’s specific problems caused by Chavez and their oil situation (ironically only the “great evil” USA paid full price for their oil) and that how a country with more oil than Saudi Arabia can fuck up so badly, he promptly left.

Anyway, I’m convinced he was a paid subversive shill working the internet for disinformation purposes. I’ve encountered these types before.

I hope Pezer is doing well.

On a related note, this video is what inspired me to share my story of the chat I had. This is really a fantastic video:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8UJlRRahNzw[/youtube]


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Venezuela Mon Mar 06, 2017 11:32 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Very good analysis. Let’s get BTL News going and link to Molyneux.

“It is sad there are so many people who have not developed the level of maturity that is necesssey in order to make political choices”.

Absolutely.

Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: A possible formula Thu Feb 16, 2017 5:23 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Selfvaluing is power to will, will is will to power, power is will to love, love is will to life, life is will to give, bring forth, create-through. And that’s the end of that.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Sisyphus
    Path
    Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: A possible formula Fri Feb 17, 2017 12:17 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Does love really need to be in there? Love is one of those words with so many connotations.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: A possible formula Fri Feb 17, 2017 9:28 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
will to exalt, then -
I mean among other connotations to refer to the idea of creating beyond oneself, and to take pleasure in serving a real cause that includes but exceeds oneself, or at least that part of oneself that one wishes to cultivate - what I call the selfvaluing logic.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Sisyphus
    Path
    Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: A possible formula Sat Feb 18, 2017 2:47 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Fixed Cross wrote:
will to exalt, then -
I mean among other connotations to refer to the idea of creating beyond oneself, and to take pleasure in serving a real cause that includes but exceeds oneself, or at least that part of oneself that one wishes to cultivate - what I call the selfvaluing logic.

Yes, this I can easily work with. I think that a full life includes holding ideals greater than one’s self. If you will, having an ideal you are willing to die for in order to protect or accomplish.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: A possible formula Sat Feb 18, 2017 3:08 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Very well. I see that ethics is the sort of context where you can best follow what I am saying.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Sisyphus
    Path
    Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: A possible formula Sat Feb 18, 2017 3:56 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Fixed Cross wrote:
Very well. I see that ethics is the sort of context where you can best follow what I am saying.

Well done Fixed Cross.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Drops_Of_Jupiter
bowstring
bowstring

Posts : 32
Join date : 2017-02-03
Age : 57
Location : Columbus, Ohio USA

PostSubject: Re: A possible formula Wed Mar 01, 2017 10:40 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
I don’t agree with holding onto a concept that we will “die” for. - That seems a young persons creed. However, having made it to 56, very little in life is worth dying for…if anything.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail facebook.com/debbie.styers
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: A possible formula Sat Mar 04, 2017 7:33 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Drops_Of_Jupiter wrote:
I don’t agree with holding onto a concept that we will “die” for. - That seems a young persons creed. However, having made it to 56, very little in life is worth dying for…if anything.

Its a great privilege to have such a value as to exalt ones consciousness above ones physical self. Usually we dont have it. Modernity is in a sense mans impotence to value beyond his mortal coil… he does not have the will to sow himself like a seed.

But mans greatness is a seed.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Defenders of the Earth
    Tower
    Tower
    avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: A possible formula Sat Mar 04, 2017 7:36 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
I can’t imagine a worse hell and fate than to have nothing worth dying for.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: A possible formula Sat Mar 04, 2017 8:03 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Drops_Of_Jupiter
bowstring
bowstring

Posts : 32
Join date : 2017-02-03
Age : 57
Location : Columbus, Ohio USA

PostSubject: Re: A possible formula Sat Mar 04, 2017 8:14 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Hmmm… When I was younger, I would have “died” for many of my beliefs. But something happened… I got a business education and grew up.

I used to see only my side of the coin, the “right” side. Now I see multiple sides and angles. Let’s take the controversial topic of abortion. When younger, I knew in my heart that it is wrong. Then I met my best friend. She had an abortion when she was young. She explained her story and I felt her pain and understood. Still, it was “wrong” in my book. Then, I met another friend whose beliefs are “Its a woman’s body and her right to choose.” I don’t know that I agree with that. Seems really out there to me. ---- But I ask, “Who am I to judge??” I’m just a woman. I’ve never been pregnant. I’ve never been faced with the choice to make. How can I judge or stand for or against this???

Most all people in this world are doing the best that they can. Everyone makes choices based upon their experiences. Until I live another’s life, I don’t think I can judge.

I ask, " How can I die for issues that are so complex - and have an individual side to them as well?" An Aerosmith song comes to mind…(changing the lyrics a bit [Livin On the Edge])… “If you can judge a wise woman by her decisions, Based on her individual experiences, Then mister your a wiser person than me!!!”

No dears… I will not be dying for some “cause.” There is “All Sides with Debbie Styers [Ann Fisher].” It is sad that some people cannot see another’s point of view…with love in their heart and understanding in their mind.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail facebook.com/debbie.styers
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: A possible formula Sat Mar 04, 2017 8:21 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Drops_Of_Jupiter wrote:
Hmmm… When I was younger, I would have “died” for many of my beliefs. But something happened… I got a business education and grew up.

I used to see only my side of the coin, the “right” side. Now I see multiple sides and angles. Let’s take the controversial topic of abortion. When younger, I knew in my heart that it is wrong. Then I met my best friend. She had an abortion when she was young. She explained her story and I felt her pain and understood. Still, it was “wrong” in my book. Then, I met another friend whose beliefs are “Its a woman’s body and her right to choose.” I don’t know that I agree with that. Seems really out there to me. ---- But I ask, “Who am I to judge??” I’m just a woman. I’ve never been pregnant. I’ve never been faced with the choice to make. How can I judge or stand for or against this???

Most all people in this world are doing the best that they can. Everyone makes choices based upon their experiences. Until I live another’s life, I don’t think I can judge.

I ask, " How can I die for issues that are so complex - and have an individual side to them as well?" An Aerosmith song comes to mind…(changing the lyrics a bit [Livin On the Edge])… “If you can judge a wise woman by her decisions, Based on her individual experiences, Then mister your a wiser person than me!!!”

No dears… I will not be dying for some “cause.” There is “All Sides with Debbie Styers [Ann Fisher].” It is sad that some people cannot see another’s point of view…with love in their heart and understanding in their mind.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Drops_Of_Jupiter
bowstring
bowstring

Posts : 32
Join date : 2017-02-03
Age : 57
Location : Columbus, Ohio USA

PostSubject: Re: A possible formula Sat Mar 04, 2017 8:44 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Hey Babe - I appreciate the crayons [keyboard & forum.]

Did you know what makes humor, funny? LOL!!! It’s the tiny degree of truth in it.

As for the helmet… that is kind of like the old CB Rambo thing that truckers used to use. You know, you can say anything because no one knows who you are (because you are hiding behind a CB mike somewhere). I didn’t pick up the helmet. You have my real name right there. I see no reason to use a helmet. LOL…I reckon I appreciate the gesture though. LOL!
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail facebook.com/debbie.styers
Sisyphus
Path
Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: A possible formula Sat Mar 04, 2017 12:55 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Helmets are useful if things are dropping down from above.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: A possible formula Sat Mar 04, 2017 1:07 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: A possible formula Sat Mar 04, 2017 1:15 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Drops_Of_Jupiter wrote:
Hmmm… When I was younger, I would have “died” for many of my beliefs.

““died””?

I imagine a priest on a funeral reading the last sacrament, and then saying here lies DOJ, he wiggles fingers “died” for his country.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Drops_Of_Jupiter
    bowstring
    bowstring

Posts : 32
Join date : 2017-02-03
Age : 57
Location : Columbus, Ohio USA

PostSubject: Re: A possible formula Mon Mar 06, 2017 5:52 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Thrasymachus wrote:

Seriously, to quote Ray Stevens “Everyone is Beautiful.” Why make fun of some picture of some woman that probably has no clue your even using her picture.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail facebook.com/debbie.styers
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: A possible formula Mon Mar 06, 2017 7:10 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
I think my point was lost on you.

Beauty actually means something. Not everyone or everything is beautiful. As soon as you universalized beauty you destroyed it.

Modern leftist-liberal-PC culture of making everyone feel like a beautiful precious snowflake is fucking stupid.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Drops_Of_Jupiter
bowstring
bowstring

Posts : 32
Join date : 2017-02-03
Age : 57
Location : Columbus, Ohio USA

PostSubject: Re: A possible formula Mon Mar 06, 2017 7:33 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Thrasymachus wrote:
I think my point was lost on you.

Beauty actually means something. Not everyone or everything is beautiful. As soon as you universalized beauty you destroyed it.

Modern leftist-liberal-PC culture of making everyone feel like a beautiful precious snowflake is fucking stupid.

A person is born with her mother’s and father’s genes. She can only control so much of her physical appearance. Why make her feel less “beautiful” cause her face doesn’t meet your standards of beauty? That is not only cruelty, but it is also unnecessary.

I think its sad when people look for ugliness, instead of seeing the beauty in most all of life!

Do you fear that “universal beauty” will destroy your “special beauty?”
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail facebook.com/debbie.styers
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: A possible formula Mon Mar 06, 2017 7:44 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Do you even know what beauty is, and means? Do you even believe in the concept of beauty?

It seems not.

You have re-defined beauty as “whatever makes me feel good”. It makes you feel bad to pass judgment on anyone for being “less beautiful”, therefore you have re-defined beauty as “never feeling bad by judging anyone for being less beautiful”. In the process of your aspirations to universal kindness and warm-feeling you have lost sight of reality, it seems.

You are free to go along with your female feeling of never feeling bad for judging anything in a way that might feel bad to someone else, by all means keep it up. But don’t pretend what you’re doing is either philosophy or has anything to do with what beauty really is.

No matter how much the feminish-leftist-liberal-politically correct paradigm doubles down on this approach, it will not change the fact that beauty means something and we are beings that respond to beauty and to what beauty indicates. No amount of warm-feeling liberalism will reverse ugliness and beauty, no matter how much you wish it could.

And of course physical beauty is connected to genes… so what? Does that somehow belie the fact that beauty is beauty? No it doesn’t. Everything has a reason and cause for being what it is, including beauty and ugliness. But again, feel free to pretend that isn’t the case.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: A possible formula Mon Mar 06, 2017 7:45 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
To me, the great ugliness is the fact that people like you have lost the ability to call ugly ugly, and beauty beauty.

It is profoundly ugly that you can no longer differentiate properly, all because it might not “feel good”, or something.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Drops_Of_Jupiter
bowstring
bowstring

Posts : 32
Join date : 2017-02-03
Age : 57
Location : Columbus, Ohio USA

PostSubject: Re: A possible formula Mon Mar 06, 2017 8:42 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Beauty means of extraordinary quality that is pleasing to the sight.

You seem to limit sight to the surface…as in skin deep. The woman’s picture doesn’t meet your qualifications as beautiful because you see only her face. - Sadly, this I understand. However, I believe that the motto of …if you can’t practice kindness, then nothing should be said. Can you possibly imagine having your picture being mocked and posted online like this? It is simply hurtful, unkind and cruel. - Ironically, you seem to fancy yourself as a thinker. Yet, you think nothing of being hurtful! To me, that is ugliness.

I see beauty in that woman’s picture because I suspect she as seen it, has been hurt by people like you, yet…most likely goes on to live a somewhat “normal life.” But in truth… we really don’t know the damage those remarks under the woman’s picture has caused her! - Yeah, I can look at reality. I know beauty from ugliness.

— I read somewhere once that when a person lies to protect another’s feelings, it demostrates that the person has a higher IQ than someone who doesn’t, because it takes intelligence to actually consider another’s feelings.

Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail facebook.com/debbie.styers
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: A possible formula Mon Mar 06, 2017 1:55 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Thrasymachus wrote:
To me, the great ugliness is the fact that people like you have lost the ability to call ugly ugly, and beauty beauty.

It is profoundly ugly that you can no longer differentiate properly, all because it might not “feel good”, or something.

It doesnt feel good to the ugly, but nothing feels good to them. I mean ugly in the broad sense, like Obonko and Cloggcunt represent.
And this is the goal: to eliminate all good feelings, because some unfortunates don’t have the capacity for them.
That is Socialism in a nutshell: to level with unlimited violence and intrusion all mans feelings to those of the very most miserable miscreants.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Fixed Cross
    Doric basterd
    Doric basterd
    avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: A possible formula Mon Mar 06, 2017 2:00 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Drops_Of_Jupiter wrote:
Beauty means of extraordinary quality that is pleasing to the sight.

You seem to limit sight to the surface…as in skin deep. The woman’s picture doesn’t meet your qualifications as beautiful because you see only her face. - Sadly, this I understand. However, I believe that the motto of …if you can’t practice kindness, then nothing should be said.

Then you are a slave.

Quote :
Can you possibly imagine having your picture being mocked and posted online like this? It is simply hurtful, unkind and cruel. - Ironically, you seem to fancy yourself as a thinker. Yet, you think nothing of being hurtful! To me, that is ugliness.

Your mind is deformed. It’s very ugly to look at. Cover it up, show some decency, slave.

That that woman is ugly is your judgment by the way, the picture doesn’t say that. its all in your mind.
So not only are you ugly, you are also cruel and mean to that poor woman, and without being able to help yourself.
Your subconsciousness decides that she is ugly and has you interpret the pic like that, and then your consciousness is scared of your judgment and blammes it on T.

Sad.

Quote :
I see beauty in that woman’s picture because I suspect she as seen it, has been hurt by people like you, yet…most likely goes on to live a somewhat “normal life.” But in truth… we really don’t know the damage those remarks under the woman’s picture has caused her! - Yeah, I can look at reality. I know beauty from ugliness.

— I read somewhere once that when a person lies to protect another’s feelings, it demostrates that the person has a higher IQ than someone who doesn’t, because it takes intelligence to actually consider another’s feelings.

Oh you read that, huh?
That’s impressive man.
Now you have your own opinion about IQ. That’s so awesome. Cherish that opinion. It’s super-important, slave.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Defenders of the Earth
    Tower
    Tower
    avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: A possible formula Mon Mar 06, 2017 3:44 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Fixed Cross wrote:
Thrasymachus wrote:
To me, the great ugliness is the fact that people like you have lost the ability to call ugly ugly, and beauty beauty.

It is profoundly ugly that you can no longer differentiate properly, all because it might not “feel good”, or something.

It doesnt feel good to the ugly, but nothing feels good to them. I mean ugly in the broad sense, like Obonko and Cloggcunt represent.
And this is the goal: to eliminate all good feelings, because some unfortunates don’t have the capacity for them.
That is Socialism in a nutshell: to level with unlimited violence and intrusion all mans feelings to those of the very most miserable miscreants.

Yeah, that ^

Drops_Of_Jupiter
bowstring
bowstring

Posts : 32
Join date : 2017-02-03
Age : 57
Location : Columbus, Ohio USA

PostSubject: Re: A possible formula Mon Mar 06, 2017 4:06 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Fixed Cross wrote, “And this is the goal: to eliminate all good feelings, because some unfortunates don’t have the capacity for them.
That is Socialism in a nutshell…”

Okay…I understand your furry at me and the need to defend your friend. However, I must ask, “In this furry did you lose your ability to think?”

All people (unless there is some rare or special disease that I don’t know about) feel. They have both good and bad feelings - and a spectrum of feelings. To say “some unfortunates don’t [feel]” shows no thought on your part.

LOL!!! It does show when frustrated your ability to name call comes out [socialist]. LOL!!
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail facebook.com/debbie.styers
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: A possible formula Mon Mar 06, 2017 4:09 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster

Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail facebook.com/debbie.styers
Drops_Of_Jupiter
bowstring
bowstring

Posts : 32
Join date : 2017-02-03
Age : 57
Location : Columbus, Ohio USA

PostSubject: Re: A possible formula Mon Mar 06, 2017 4:21 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster

LOL!!! Actually, I did say!! S M I L E LOL!!

Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Trump Victory Santions: War for Love Mon Nov 14, 2016 5:44 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
The ignorance of what Trump is has the form of the conviction that he is against love itself. What this means tis that the disenfranchised anarchists now have only one sanction;l to war for love over hate.

true rage is now employed under the word; Love.
This is good.

Absolute trembling skepsis along the abyss is now practiced in those media, that have lost their grip. This too is good.

The ID has come loose from the Real into the Word - and this word is now ‘Love over Hate’.
Precisely because this is the word, the Id has come loose.
The word-as-such as been revealed: self-valuing. The superego has become the id, which it always was. The monster of energy, no real face, just facets. At the eye of this storm now appears a figure - one question remains: what will come of his hair?


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Defenders of the Earth
    Tower
    Tower
    avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Trump Victory Santions: War for Love Mon Nov 14, 2016 6:45 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Haha yeah you are right… all these raving angry people chanting “Love over hate” is pretty fucking ironic.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Trump Victory Santions: War for Love Mon Nov 14, 2016 8:20 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
They should all go south and be baptized in Georgia… under a weeping willow. Then theyll find the Jesus and his flaming sword.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Sisyphus
    Path
    Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: Trump Victory Santions: War for Love Mon Nov 14, 2016 11:58 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
A perfect example of why I don’t talk about the word “love” very often. The word has so many connotations, many of them negative.

Their love sure has been showing lately, hasn’t it?
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Trump Victory Santions: War for Love Mon Mar 06, 2017 4:45 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
This is a good summary of leftist insanity so far:

truthjustice.net/politics/ra … ent-trump/


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Sisyphus
Path
Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: Trump Victory Santions: War for Love Tue Mar 07, 2017 2:00 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Sadly that’s pretty close to reality today.

You fuck with my delusions and I will kill you.

Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Negotiation Techniques Tue Mar 07, 2017 3:23 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EScVpo-1zlw[/youtube]


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Drops_Of_Jupiter
    bowstring
    bowstring

Posts : 32
Join date : 2017-02-03
Age : 57
Location : Columbus, Ohio USA

PostSubject: Re: Negotiation Techniques Tue Mar 07, 2017 7:44 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Excellent example of your quote!

Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Open letter to Google, YouTube, Alphabet, DARPA, CIA Wed Mar 08, 2017 12:01 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Google – read this!

You can be a hero

Stop being the villain

Follow your own motto, “Don’t be evil”

You can make so much more money… helping humanity

Working with truth and not against it

I know you are reading this

Google

YouTube

Alphabet

NSA

DARPA

CIA

We need your help!

Work with us, not against us

The future needs you.

Do the right thing, Google

Be a hero of truth.

I know you can.

The future is yours, and ours

It belongs to truth

It belongs to humanity.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Sisyphus
Path
Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: Open letter to Google, YouTube, Alphabet, DARPA, CIA Wed Mar 08, 2017 12:18 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Reading it and acting upon it are two totally different actions.

Last edited by Sisyphus on Thu Mar 09, 2017 1:48 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Open letter to Google, YouTube, Alphabet, DARPA, CIA Wed Mar 08, 2017 1:37 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Thrasymachus wrote:
Google – read this!

You can be a hero

Stop being the villain

Follow your own motto, “Don’t be evil”

You can make so much more money… helping humanity

Working with truth and not against it

I know you are reading this

Google

YouTube

Alphabet

NSA

DARPA

CIA

We need your help!

Work with us, not against us

The future needs you.

Do the right thing, Google

Be a hero of truth.

I know you can.

The future is yours, and ours

It belongs to truth

It belongs to humanity.

Shared on Facebook.

Also from Facebook:

i.imgur.com/0PmCSP0.png


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Sisyphus
    Path
    Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: Open letter to Google, YouTube, Alphabet, DARPA, CIA Thu Mar 09, 2017 1:49 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Still searching for the truth, are you? Lots of luck with that one.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Open letter to Google, YouTube, Alphabet, DARPA, CIA Fri Mar 17, 2017 11:08 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Google, you’re on notice:

Until I determine that you have become the champion of truth (humanity) rather than its enemy, I will from this point onward be using DuckDuckGo instead of you.

Take notice. That’s -1 user for you. Until you change.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Open letter to Google, YouTube, Alphabet, DARPA, CIA Fri Mar 17, 2017 11:57 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
hey thats a nice one.

duckduckgo.com/?q=%22value+onto … =he&ia=web


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Defenders of the Earth
    Tower
    Tower
    avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Open letter to Google, YouTube, Alphabet, DARPA, CIA Fri Mar 17, 2017 1:29 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
After clicking “more results”,

duckduckgo.com/?q=%22value+onto … =he&ia=web

Defenders of the Earth

Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Philosophy in present times Tue Mar 07, 2017 3:57 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Great stuff:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HcEJr8h_yGM[/youtube]


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Philosophy in present times Tue Mar 07, 2017 4:04 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
“Our choices determine the destiny of the world… You get nailed when you make a stupid decision, because you’re altering the structure of reality, and it’ll snap back and take you out.” --Peterson


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Philosophy in present times Tue Mar 07, 2017 5:15 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
I like that formulation.
Kinda fits to astrology.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Sisyphus
    Path
    Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: Philosophy in present times Tue Mar 07, 2017 11:57 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Thrasymachus wrote:
“Our choices determine the destiny of the world… You get nailed when you make a stupid decision, because you’re altering the structure of reality, and it’ll snap back and take you out.” --Peterson

Well, I like this quote. Very Taoist.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Drops_Of_Jupiter
bowstring
bowstring

Posts : 32
Join date : 2017-02-03
Age : 57
Location : Columbus, Ohio USA

PostSubject: Re: Philosophy in present times Tue Mar 07, 2017 7:41 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Stupid used to mean “mentally slow,” and at one time used to describe a degree of retardation. Today, they don’t even use retardation anymore. I think the PC words for it are mentally challenged.

Looking at the quote from a Charles Darwin view, it seems to make sense. Only the smart and strong survive. But this brings up the question… is there such thing as “dumb luck?”
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail facebook.com/debbie.styers
Sisyphus
Path
Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: Philosophy in present times Wed Mar 08, 2017 1:15 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Yes, I think there is such a thing as dump luck. I generally refer to it as good fortune but it’s the same thing. Being in the right place at the right time, planned or unplanned.

If we want to be rained on we must go to where it is raining.

Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Philosophy in present times Wed Mar 08, 2017 2:38 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
This starts getting interesting around 18 minutes, and seems to fall to shit around an hour or so. I stopped listening at an hour 20 min.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B9eKURpdFM8[/youtube]


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Philosophy in present times Wed Mar 08, 2017 2:42 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
If one of us had been in that conversation things wouldn’t have devolved like that. What is lacking is a proper philosophical context, to avoid pointless categorical disagreements and to unite the scientific will properly under the ‘psychological’ truth that is, as you hear in that conversation above, struggling from both sides to break free, but can’t quite do so.

This “‘psychological’ truth” is, of course, self-valuing and the daemonic.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy

Last edited by Thrasymachus on Wed Mar 08, 2017 3:44 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Philosophy in present times Wed Mar 08, 2017 3:28 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Possible better continuation:

Harris: You can’t deny that the weaponizing of smallpox would represent a truth.

Peterson: Yes absolutely, there is a truth, or a set of facts, that is required to be understood and actualized in order to be able to weaponize smallpox. But what I am saying is that there are greater and lesser facts, greater and less truths.

Harris: Ok, so if I am understanding you here, you are saying that facts are facts, and that the totality of all fact might be called “truth”. But in addition, that within that domain of all facts, “truth”, there are greater and lesser facts, which corresponds to a greater or lesser degree of truth.

Peterson: Yes, absolutely. What I saying is that, and I agree with you about what you said just there that the totality of all facts is what “truth itself” means, in the broadest sense, or perhaps in the most scientific sense, but in addition to understanding this we also need to be able to look at particular ranges within this totality and realize that certain facts, or certain collections of facts, rank higher or lower based on a certain standard.

Harris: And what standard would that be? Because so far you have seemed to be saying that Darwinian selection and survival is the most fundamental standard.

Peterson: Well what I really mean to get at, is that when I said “reality is that which selects” what this really means is that certain truths, or facts if you like, are more significant, have more meaning and more reality based on how comprehensive they are; based on how many other facts they subsume under themselves, and based on the significance and far-reaching consequences that usher from those facts. Part of this significance and broader totality of consequences includes whether or not we will survive. So survivalism is indeed nested inside your sort of realism, or materialist realism, but there is also a larger category here: that even given the let’s call it scientific or empirical fact that survival and Darwinianism is nested inside of a larger realism, realism itself is also nested inside of a larger metaphysical space that we might call the universe of meaning, in which certain truths or facts acquire substance and potency, meaning and significance, based on the degree to which those truths lead to something. If the invention of weaponized smallpox leads to the annihilation of humanity then it is indeed correct to say that the weaponizing of smallpox was indeed true, and based on facts that made such a task possible, however we can’t stop there, we need to go a step further and say that this truth failed to rank higher than other truths which could have allowed for the persistence and expansion into actuality of even more truths, including in this case of course our own survival.

Harris: So you are claiming that even realism is nested inside of, what seems to be, its own rank-ordering and with respect to a certain kind of “metaphysical” significance?

Peterson: Well yes, but to be even more accurate, we need to isolate facts and truths and see how fundamental they are, which means we need to do a phenomenological reduction here on par with Husserl and try to eidetically identify the root of a fact, to find its necessity, and to see on what that fact depends and to what other facts it is linked.

Harris: Ok I think I am starting to see your perspective here, and I don’t think I necessarily disagree. To me, materialist realism is quite close to Hussal’s own phenomenological project, because while on the one hand we can always say that a fact is a fact and regardless whether or not any living beings are around to comprehend that fact, this fact itself, of knowing this, of stating that ‘a fact is a fact regardless…’, is itself also just another fact within the larger totality of facts.

Peterson: Exactly. And what is so interesting is that facts are infinite for this very reason, that not only do you have an individual fact like “such and such technological process in molecular biology will yield weaponized smallpox”, for example, but you also have to say that it is a fact that “such and such…”, basically you need to say that, of any fact at all, it is also a fact that that fact is the case. And then you open up a whole other universe of facts, derivative or meta-facts, which are facts about facts. This is why I was invoking Nietzsche earlier, because Nietzsche points out, correctly I think, that some facts are “just facts” while other facts are facts about facts, meta-facts if you will… and if we follow a kind of Platonic metaphysical example here, or Husserl even, we find that there are also facts about the fact which are about a fact, and all the way up and up, without end. Nietzsche was interested in climbing the ladder as high as he could, to identify the most summative and therefore fundamental of all facts. And if that is the project we and philosophy and science ought to be pursuing, then we must abandon so-called individual or merely self-sufficient facts, like whatever it takes to create weaponized smallpox for instance, as occupying a lower rung in the totality of all facts.

Harris: I like how you express this idea, and it seems we now agree that a fact is a fact regardless of its utility value to us or to anything else. Even if smallpox were to be synthesized in this way and ends up killing all humans, it is nonetheless a incontrovertible fact that such-and-such a process of producing that smallpox was indeed true. But now you’re bringing in a larger concern, and claiming that even though this is true, there are larger or more comprehensive truths, and that these latter are even more important. I find that interesting, because of my own interest in morality.

Peterson: This gets at the concept of self-valuing, which is also a fact. Self-valuing is the idea that all beings, whether we call them alive or not, exist in a way that they are self-valuing, namely that they hold themselves as the standard for their activities and interactions. So a human being values itself by acting and interacting in certain ways that implicitly, necessarily, hold that human being itself, as precisely what it is, even if it doesnt know what that is, as the core standard of measure and of value. Because if a human being did not do this then it would quite simply perish almost immediately. And this self-valuing logic also holds for any thing whatsoever, even fish and rocks and hydrogen atoms.

Harris: Then you are invoking Nietzsche here and attempting to condition realism to a larger moral principle, which to me seems somewhat similar to the notion of the will to power, which is also a survivalist notion.

Peterson: Yes and no. Survival is indeed necessary, but for one thing it is not sufficient, and for another thing it is not comprehensive. Survival does not encompass all that a being is, and indeed surviving is more like a secondary side-effect of that which a thing is. Darwin recognizes this when he realizes that selection is fundamentally driven by the contingent environmental conditions to which a living thing is subject. But it goes even deeper than that, because regardless of those contingent environmental conditions and contexts it is always the case that any being, whether or not it survives, was attempting to act and interact in such a way where it held what it is as a standard for those actions and interactions. A fish values water more than air, and a fish that attempts to value air over water will die. A rock values the distribution of force across its molecular bonds in such a way that maintains the integrity of the rock as structure, and when it is unable to distribute force in that way, for example if the force is just too strong for those chemical bonds, then the rock breaks apart, or melts, or whatever.

Harris: Now you have identified a subtle distinction here between living and nonliving things, because the rock is either able or unable to self-value, as you say, but a fish or a human seems to be able to make a kind of choice regarding its activities and interactions, and could possibly error in that choice even if the environment doesn’t create too great a force upon it, such as was the case with the rock that shattered or melted.

Peterson: Exactly right. This is also a Nietzschean or Platonic observation, because living things rank higher on the continuum of being, on the standard-order of “power” or of what is meaningful. Namely that living things have access to a whole new category of facts which stuff like rocks have no access to. The rock has no choice but to be a direct consequent of whatever its environment throws at it, although even despite this it is still the case that the rock is valuing itself, namely that that which the rock is, a certain molecular composite of chemical bonds and structures with certain physical properties for example, is going to act and interact with the imposing environmental forces in a predeterminate way, and that way is precisely that way which maximizes the chance of the rock remaining what it is, but within the bounds of what is possible for the rock to do. A rock has no option to, say, shift its angle to deflect an incoming force, because a rock has no muscular structure to move itself, no bone structure against which to generate kinetic force in its muscles to create such movements, and no sensory apparatus and corresponding neurological systems to integrate incoming data from the environment to determine that it should move itself like that. But a fish or a human does have those systems, which means the fish and the human have access to a whole new realm of reality. And this access gives them an increased range of possible values, although somewhat ironically it doesn’t mean that the fish or the human will survive longer than the rock will survive, in fact often it is the exact opposite.

Harris: So maybe living things are more contingent and fragile precisely because they have this newfound capacity for understanding their environment and changing their behavior accordingly?

Peterson: Well a living thing, ok any thing that has the subtle and highly complex inner structure able to for example possess eyes, a brain, muscles and bones, is necessarily going to be far more molecularly complex than is a rock, because the living thing needs to have all the lesser biological structures in place to even have eyes, muscles, etc. That involves DNA, and so many other things too. So it isn’t that the fish or the human is necessarily less survivable than is a rock merely because the fish and human have greater access to truth, rather there is a correlative element here that isn’t directly causal: namely, being able to have that greater access entails that a being is far more complex and conditional in its own ‘materiality’, to use your term, and therefore will have a lot more requirements that go along with maintaining and sustaining that materiality. But I think this goes hand in hand, and in a way evolution can be thought of as the process by which beings become so much more complex and conditional that they are required to “survive” in new and more demanding and precise ways than other things which are not as complex and conditional. A human has far more precise requirements to continue existing than for example does a rock, or does a hydrogen atom to use an even more extreme example.

Harris: I find this all quite fascinating. We seem to have combined our respective positions on “what is truth” into a larger purview, where not only is Darwinian selection nested inside realism, and realism is also nested inside a kind of selection principle too, but that this bi-conditional or dual structure is itself nested inside an even larger space, the space of the rank-ordering of truths with respect to a common principle of logic the you call self-valuing.

Peterson: I think this is the case. So we are both correct here. Morally speaking, we are realists that are always striving for a higher and more comprehensive picture of reality, so that means we both become more survivable and more exposed to new dangers, but all that is secondary; what is primary is that, the very fact that we are “always striving for a higher and more comprehensive picture of reality” is itself actually just a secondary expression of a more primary fact, namely that we are climbing further up the ladder of being.

Harris: So a proper philosophy would take all of this into account, and assign proper places to facts, and would always seek the larger purview of facts not only because that is going to make us have a greater change of survival, because sometimes it will also expose us to new dangers like the possibility of weaponizing a synthetic smallpox virus, but simply because that is exactly what it means for us to be us. Self-valuing requires that we keep pushing upward in this manner, expanding the sphere of our survivability and our mortality. This seems to explain how morality is so contentious and difficult to universalize, because every moral step, if your theory is correct, would be a step that both increases the moral “good” while also in the same way increasing the moral “bad”, and morality itself is the attempt to reconcile these together.

Peterson: Yes, to reconcile them together but in a very special way: in a way that not only includes and incorporates both the good and the bad, and not only implicitly or explicitly organizes goods and bads relative to each other and relative to contingent environmental factors, but also in a way that corresponds to the very climb into the universal itself, our continuing subsumption of lesser facts to greater facts. And further, what I was saying before about rank-ordering certain facts within the totality of all facts, the standard by which this is done is not merely with regard to that totality or to the climb or fall within it, but is actually necessarily grounded in that being which is actually doing the rank-ordering. Because this brings being back to itself, in Heidegger’s sense of man as “that being for which its own being is an issue”, we see that any being capable of attaining this high space within the totality of facts, within truth, is going to still be self-valuing, and therefore will rank-order not only with respect to the facts and fact-ranges at its perception and disposal and the various ‘objective’ thresholds and comprehensivities of those facts or ranges, but more importantly or at least as importantly it is going to be doing this rank-ordering still based on what that being itself is, its own values and requirements for existing.

Haris: Damn, now you have blown my mind completely. I need to rethink everything. We should work together and change the course of philosophy!

Peterson: Yes I think we ought to do that, and we can do it.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Sisyphus
Path
Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: Philosophy in present times Thu Mar 09, 2017 1:54 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Someone once said something like, you should not expect different results if you continue doing the exact same thing over and over again.

I stopped getting married after three failed attempts.

Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Philosophy in present times Fri Mar 17, 2017 2:03 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Goddammit but I just fucking love this guy. Peterson I mean. Edit: Mil0 is great too.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6b_pWJkrhSg[/youtube]


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Philosophy in present times Fri Mar 17, 2017 3:40 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Thrasymachus wrote:
Goddammit but I just fucking love this guy. Peterson I mean. Edit: Mil0 is great too.

Fantastic.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Fixed Cross
    Doric basterd
    Doric basterd
    avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Philosophy in present times Fri Mar 17, 2017 3:46 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
He explains exactly why I want Milo as press secretary.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Defenders of the Earth
    Tower
    Tower
    avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Philosophy in present times Fri Mar 17, 2017 4:41 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Fixed Cross wrote:
He explains exactly why I want Milo as press secretary.

He would undoubtedly be the best press secretary in history.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Philosophy in present times Fri Mar 17, 2017 4:43 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
When someone like Peterson already exists and has millions of interested followers, you realize that someone like Zizek is already 100% irrelevant.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Philosophy in present times Fri Mar 17, 2017 4:50 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
'Zek (kek) had value in bringing up a new vigor for theoretical psychology. But he never was a psychologist himself, he is rather autistic in fact - as it appears. He does not learn about human realities very well. Rather a matrix exists in his mind through which he wrings humanity and comes up with interesting sounding sentences, which spark thought in an intelligent human encountering this style for the first time.

Peterson is actually a kind of Socrates. I mean that in a good way.

Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: turns of phrase Fri Feb 03, 2017 1:43 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
“We should not be afraid of movement or competence; it is required to make necessary turns.”

  • Runeclaim

" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Drops_Of_Jupiter
    bowstring
    bowstring

Posts : 32
Join date : 2017-02-03
Age : 57
Location : Columbus, Ohio USA

PostSubject: Re: turns of phrase Fri Feb 03, 2017 2:34 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
I dislike fear and do my best to throw it a side. However, fear is not something that is a should or should not. It is an emotion, a feeling. The Runeclaim quote says, “We should not be afraid.” The quote would be better to have started with, “Don’t be afraid…”

Please don’t tell people how they “should” feel.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail facebook.com/debbie.styers
Sisyphus
Path
Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: turns of phrase Sat Feb 04, 2017 12:25 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Yeah, fear is a favorite concept of mine.

It is an instinct. It helps us while we are in our life learning phase. But at some point I think we should have acquired enough knowledge of life so that we can throw away most, if not all, of our fears. Understanding replaces most fears. Understanding inspires respect and this respect can replace fear.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Drops_Of_Jupiter
bowstring
bowstring

Posts : 32
Join date : 2017-02-03
Age : 57
Location : Columbus, Ohio USA

PostSubject: Re: turns of phrase Sat Feb 04, 2017 2:03 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Sisyphus wrote:
Yeah, fear is a favorite concept of mine.

It is an instinct. It helps us while we are in our life learning phase. But at some point I think we should have acquired enough knowledge of life so that we can throw away most, if not all, of our fears. Understanding replaces most fears. Understanding inspires respect and this respect can replace fear.

Sadly, most of us find a comfort zone and never re-test the boundaries…

I think fear needs to be felt every now and again to ensure “we are being all we can be.”
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail facebook.com/debbie.styers
Sisyphus
Path
Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: turns of phrase Sat Feb 04, 2017 7:04 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Drops_Of_Jupiter wrote:

Sadly, most of us find a comfort zone and never re-test the boundaries…

I think fear needs to be felt every now and again to ensure “we are being all we can be.”

True that. Now in old age I have my comfort zones. But I have said before, we each should test our capabilities and capacities now and then just to see if anything has changed.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: turns of phrase Sat Feb 04, 2017 7:53 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Sisyphus wrote:
Yeah, fear is a favorite concept of mine.

It is an instinct. It helps us while we are in our life learning phase. But at some point I think we should have acquired enough knowledge of life so that we can throw away most, if not all, of our fears. Understanding replaces most fears. Understanding inspires respect and this respect can replace fear.

Fear is a hormonal means of greasing the organism to respond to certain situations naturally. In a society like ours it impedes more often than it serves. And yet to release all fears is irrational, as there are many unknown unknowns that we may have to be alert for when they arrive into the sphere of knowns.

Vigilance. That is the aspect of what once was fear in apes, that we men must maintain. But make no mistake, vigilance is a daughter of fear, and certainly no stranger.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Sisyphus
    Path
    Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: turns of phrase Sun Feb 05, 2017 12:18 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster

[quote=“Fixed Cross”]
Sisyphus wrote:

Fear is a hormonal means of greasing the organism to respond to certain situations naturally. In a society like ours it impedes more often than it serves. And yet to release all fears is irrational, as there are many unknown unknowns that we may have to be alert for when they arrive into the sphere of knowns.

Vigilance. That is the aspect of what once was fear in apes, that we men must maintain. But make no mistake, vigilance is a daughter of fear, and certainly no stranger.

No serious problem with your first paragraph. However, your “release all fears” is questionable. Are we releasing (ignoring) our fears or are we replacing our fears with knowledge, understanding and respect? I prefer the latter.

But I do agree, if we must remain vigilant there is obviously something we fear that we must remain vigilant for. But really, we don’t need to fear the lion anymore. Not many of them roaming around free. But there are a lot of stupid people.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Thismare89

Posts : 1
Join date : 2017-03-18

PostSubject: Re: turns of phrase Sat Mar 18, 2017 5:39 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
return man 3 hacked Fear can convert into power.

Last edited by Thismare89 on Wed Sep 06, 2017 3:21 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Sisyphus
Path
Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: turns of phrase Sun Mar 19, 2017 2:33 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Thismare89 wrote:
Fear can convert into power.

But generally that power will be used irrationally.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: turns of phrase Sun Mar 19, 2017 6:36 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Thismare89 wrote:
Fear can convert into power.

How?

Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Joy in Truth Mon Mar 20, 2017 7:22 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Die Wahrheit zu sagen, wenn die Unwahrheit herrscht, ist mit so viel Vergnügen gemischt, dass der Mensch ihretwegen das Exil, ja noch Schlimmeres erwählt.

“To speak the truth, when the lie rules, is mixed with so much joy, that the person will for its sake choose exile or even worse.”

  • Nietzsche, notebooks, fall 1876

" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Sisyphus
    Path
    Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: Joy in Truth Mon Mar 20, 2017 10:55 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
I stopped telling lies a long time ago. I couldn’t remember which lies I had told which people so I just said “to hell with it” and started telling the truth. Some people didn’t like it and wanted me to return to lying. I refused.

Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Critique my concerns about Trump Tue Mar 21, 2017 4:42 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster

  1. Trump made a statement indicating he is aware of Hilary’s connection to missing children in Haiti, these children being taken by the thousands for the sex trade, m.youtube.com/watch?v=KMJoNl2RHIU this is related to Pizzagate of course, and some of it may be untrue or baseless conspiracy thinking but I’ve looked into it as much as I can stand to do, and it seems quite possibly true. Indeed Trump is making a joke here, seems to be joking about her involvement in this.

  2. which brings me to my second point that Trump has made seriously fucked up sexual comments about his daughter, in more that one occasion. It’s hard to fathom a father even being capable of saying those things about his daughter, especially when she was still a child. Which leads me to my third point,

  3. Trump visited Epstein’s pedo-sex mansion and flew on his sex plane “Lolita Express”. Old interviews with Trump show he was good friends with Epstein, but after the sex scandals broke Trump distanced himself from him. Trump’s lawyer even claimed they had no connection, which according to previous interviews was a blatant lie.

  4. this is all connected into the following: Trump did not call out Bill Clinton for visiting Epstein’s pedo-sex mansion (Bill Clinton went there over 20 known times), and more importantly the leftist media who would stop at nothing to attack Trump personally and demean his character, never once mentioned his known connection to Epstein. Why is this? Most likely because it’s not just Trump but so many powerful politicians that are connected into that.

  5. Trump’s current wife (actually his fourth wife) slipped in an interview and alluded to the fact that she was a prostitute when they met. I can’t find the clip right now but I’ve seen it.

  6. leaving that stuff behind for a moment, Trump knows the Clintons and has been quite friendly with them. It’s very hard to imagine that he is really this obstinate, independent person not beholden to anyone but himself and really a true political outsider, although yes that is possible. But what I see is also possible and perhaps more likely is that Trump is friendly with the Clintons and others in positions of political power, and he basically just knew what to say and how to act to "be a politician himself. He has plenty of acting experience, he knows how to play a crowd and what to say to win the favor of his crowd. And back when I first disliked Trump I catalogued times when he blatantly lied, even knowing full well that the previous things he had said (about which he was now lying) were on video for anyone to see.

  7. Trump is not following through on repealing Obamacare. This is very important, Obamacare is perhaps the worst piece of legislation signed by Obama except for maybe the NDAA which establishes an Orwellian Ministry of Truth, making the government responsible for determining which statements in the media and public published discourse are true or untrue, and sanctioning the development of propaganda to that end.

Obamacare is 20,000 pages of regulations, and massive unfunded liabilities to “care for people” at government expense; not only this but it also is a massive payout to insurance companies, a violation of the first amendment by mandating everyone purchase a product (health insurance), and basically hands over healthcare services to crony monopoly control.

If Trump were for real he would be rejecting the neocons like Ryan and others pushing their own “Obamacare Lite” which basically capitulates to the principle of the ACA, and will only make it worse by leaving in place massive liabilities while undercutting the funding streams for them. They are voting on Thursday on this Ryancare bil, and I hope it fails hard. But it is telling that Trump is actually championing it and trying to get other Republicans on board.

Anyway these are my concerns so far. I hope I am wrong about all of them. Please critique them, because I am hoping they can be somehow discredited as critiques. I want to think Trump is legit too, but I am having my doubts.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Critique my concerns about Trump Tue Mar 21, 2017 4:50 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
In addition, Trump’s budget is basically debt-neutral, because all of his cuts are compensated by increases to the military.

Both Obama and Trump each ran on being anti-establishment and critical of foreign wars, yet both of them seriously increased military spending… at least that is what Trump wants to do, if his budget passes.

The current situation:

^ Would an anti-war candidate really be adding to that?


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Critique my concerns about Trump Tue Mar 21, 2017 10:19 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Yeah its looking dirty.

It’s gonna get fucking messy if he allows for this bill.

On the sex issues, I dont want to say too much, dont want this site to get traction on account of that shit, thats the worst - but it looks like everyone has something really bad over everyone elses head. We can do the game theory math based on this and conclude that all fighting will stay indirect, as direct attacks would result in jailtime for big players, which would result injailtime for other big players.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Defenders of the Earth
    Tower
    Tower
    avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Critique my concerns about Trump Tue Mar 21, 2017 10:58 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
I also do not want BTL to get bogged down like that either. Trump represents something positive, even if he himself is somehow compromised in some ways, his movement is still a Sign. But you’re right about the healthcare bill, Trump could easily be a 1-term president if he doesn’t back off this and find real solutions. Fuck the establishment, that is the sentiment that got him elected, and rightly so.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Critique my concerns about Trump Tue Mar 21, 2017 1:34 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
It’s not even the negativity, it’s also the search terms and all that, it’s all so nasty, that world of the sexually depraved.
It should not surprise us that a thick slimy layer of it pervades the entire establishment, and certainly Trumps overt “lewdness” should be mightily uncomfortable for any of the more serious deviants. Likely he has some blackmail boxes as life insurance.

I’m glad to hear you say Trump stands for something positive- he still does - and his victory is definitely positive, but I hope he does not turn out to be just ‘the lesser evil’, rather than an actual good president.

Regardless though, change has set in. If Trump doesn’t push through, we’ll be guaranteed another couple of years of upheaval, and eventually the extortion system is going to tumble.

Sometimes I think the white house just has some kind of electrical signal running through it that makes drones out of people.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Defenders of the Earth
    Tower
    Tower
    avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Critique my concerns about Trump Tue Mar 21, 2017 1:42 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
He should have permanently relocated to Trump Tower. Fuck the White House.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Critique my concerns about Trump Tue Mar 21, 2017 1:45 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Thrasymachus wrote:
He should have permanently relocated to Trump Tower. Fuck the White House.

Maybe he still will. If enough threats and intruders come in it would be easy to justify it.
The protests he’ll get around Trump Tower would be like the pious circling that odd black cube in Mecca.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Defenders of the Earth
    Tower
    Tower
    avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Critique my concerns about Trump Tue Mar 21, 2017 2:05 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Fuck mecca too.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Critique my concerns about Trump Tue Mar 21, 2017 2:42 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
It was not meant as a compliment.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Defenders of the Earth
    Tower
    Tower
    avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Critique my concerns about Trump Tue Mar 21, 2017 3:11 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Haha yeah, it would be impossible to compliment something like that. That’s why apparently it only inspires mindless prostration.

Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Ode to the Real Women Tue Mar 28, 2017 2:24 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6rBK0BqL2w[/youtube]


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Ode to the Real Women Tue Mar 28, 2017 2:29 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
She almost smiles a couple of times, but otherwise looks pretty bored throughout. Haha, gvd damn.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QnHbZAB_U-Q[/youtube]


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Ode to the Real Women Tue Mar 28, 2017 2:40 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Ode to the Real Women Tue Mar 28, 2017 2:42 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ppO5HwJjPEM[/youtube]


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Ode to the Real Women Tue Mar 28, 2017 2:42 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Ibanez makes good guitars. I should know, I have one.

Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: What is academia? Thu Mar 09, 2017 1:24 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Academia is joy-taking in the abandonment of mind.

But as it turns out, a mind is needed for joy to exist.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Sisyphus
Path
Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: What is academia? Fri Mar 10, 2017 12:14 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
I practice empty-minded meditation.

This is beyond joy and sorrow.

Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: What is academia? Fri Mar 10, 2017 3:32 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
I don’t believe in “emptying” the mind. But I’ve done those meditations myself, years ago.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Sisyphus
Path
Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: What is academia? Fri Mar 10, 2017 2:16 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Thrasymachus wrote:
I don’t believe in “emptying” the mind. But I’ve done those meditations myself, years ago.

I don’t force it. Sometimes it happens and sometimes it doesn’t.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: What is academia? Fri Mar 10, 2017 3:34 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
I look the minds eye in its eye and it breaks into silence.
But it is within thunder.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Fixed Cross
    Doric basterd
    Doric basterd
    avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: What is academia? Fri Mar 10, 2017 3:39 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Academia is just breeding.

The Greek notion of an education in different disciplines was simply a way to learn discipline. These fields were means, not ends.
Academia in these early days was a means to hone men out of beasts.

Perhaps one day, when Pezer is back, some shit can be re infused with a vigor that is long lost. But for now let the fever rage until it breaks. Memes are the only language to approach the absurdity.

Memes and cold chicken.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Sisyphus
    Path
    Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: What is academia? Sat Mar 11, 2017 12:38 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Fixed Cross wrote:
I look the minds eye in its eye and it breaks into silence.
But it is within thunder.

Yes, the monkey mind is what it is. Hard to tame that beast. But in reality it is only the mind stating that there is still unfinished business.

The less importance we place on our unfinished business the quieter the thunder becomes.

Or. the sooner we can finish our unfinished business the quieter the thunder becomes.

To sleep without dreams and awake without worry. This is a mind at peace.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Sisyphus
Path
Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: What is academia? Sat Mar 11, 2017 12:43 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Fixed Cross wrote:
Academia is just breeding.

The Greek notion of an education in different disciplines was simply a way to learn discipline. These fields were means, not ends.
Academia in these early days was a means to hone men out of beasts.

I wish I had had a good education when I was young. I quit school in the 10th grade to join the Army. That was my best available option.

But I feel I have done pretty well after having awakened to the importance of having a varied base of knowledge.

Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: What is academia? Mon Apr 17, 2017 12:38 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vr3nAmULix0[/youtube]

^ “I was brainwashed by public schools.”

Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Good versus bad Rhetoric Sat May 06, 2017 3:34 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
A nice article with a sound thesis.

aeon.co/essays/what-is-the-diff … l-rhetoric

Quote :
Athens’ downfall provides us with a cautionary tale in our own era. While it would be wrong to reject a persuasive speech simply because the speaker fails to belong to our preferred political party, it would be equally wrong to think that we should accept every speech that strikes us as persuasive. Adolf Hitler’s Nuremberg Rallies of the 1920s and ’30s were highly effective propaganda tools in consolidating power for the Nazi Party and influencing the views of the German people, but the wider effects of his ability to fabricate a redeemed Germany were devastating for the country. The principle here is simple: good rhetoric is not reducible to persuasive rhetoric. Persuasion might often be the goal of the rhetorician, but if rhetoric is to serve some civic good, it must serve the people on whom it operates. Plato was the first to observe that persuasion cannot in fact be the proper end of rhetoric, since it is an open question how it serves the interests of an audience to have their views influenced by a persuasive speech.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Defenders of the Earth
    Tower
    Tower
    avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Good versus bad Rhetoric Sat May 06, 2017 4:57 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Very true, I would say. It is good to be persuasive, persuasiveness as such is a virtue, but that does not mean that that which is persuaded for is always good, nor that it is always good to be persuaded.

Likewise we can say that unpersuasiveness is not necessarily a vice, because it is not always bad to be unpersuasive. For example, if someone has very bad ideas then it is in their and everyone else’s best interest that this person not be very persuasive.

Persuasiveness is just the way in which arguments are formulated to produce agreement and/or understanding in others. Rhetoric as an early form of marketing.

Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Blue pillers Mon Apr 17, 2017 6:53 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
What do blue pillers like typical libs, SJWs, academics, “moderates”, Christian conservatives, actually fight for?

They are fighting for the right to keep believing what authority tells them. They are fighting to be able to never take responsibility for their own beliefs, emotions, thoughts, and for their own lives.

It really is that simple.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Blue pillers Mon Apr 17, 2017 6:56 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Socialism and communism (socialism is just communism-lite) are literally the end of the idea of self-responsibility. These “people” would all vote for any politician who promised them free weekly food stamps and opiates. That is their model of “the good life”.

Fuck Bernie Sanders too, that self-righteous fucking brain dead thieving retard.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Blue pillers Mon Apr 17, 2017 7:05 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
These motherfuckers aren’t even human.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Sisyphus
Path
Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: Blue pillers Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:42 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Thrasymachus wrote:
These motherfuckers aren’t even human.
Well said.

And yes, they are socialists but don’t you dare tough their money.

Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Blue pillers Tue Apr 18, 2017 11:39 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Sisyphus wrote:
Thrasymachus wrote:
These motherfuckers aren’t even human.
Well said.

And yes, they are socialists but don’t you dare tough their money.

Lol.

 G(v)d	View previous topic View next topic Go down 

Go to page : 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Next
Author Message
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: G(v)d Mon Oct 31, 2016 10:17 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Philosophers are Gods.
Philosophers are Gods.
Philosophers are Gods.
Philosophers are Gods.
Philosophers are Gods.
Philosophers are Gods.
Philosophers are Gods.
Philosophers are Gods. Philosophers are Gods. Philosophers are Gods.
Philosophers are Gods. Philosophers are Gods.
Philosophers are Gods.
Philosophers are Gods.
Philosophers are Gods. Philosophers are Gods. Philosophers are Gods. Philosophers are Gods.
Philosophers are Gods. Philosophers are Gods.
Philosophers are Gods. Philosophers are Gods.
Philosophers are Gods. v
Philosophers are Gods. Philosophers are Gods. Philosophers are Gods. Philosophers are Gods. Philosophers are Gods.
Philosophers are Gods. Philosophers are Gods.
Philosophers are Gods. v
vPhilosophers are Gods. Philosophers are Gods. Philosophers are Gods. v
Philosophers are Gods. Philosophers are Gods. v
Philosophers are Gods.
Philosophers are Gods.

Philosophers are Gods. Philosophers are Gods.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy

Last edited by Capable on Wed Nov 02, 2016 10:45 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: G(v)d Mon Oct 31, 2016 10:20 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
H.
H.H.
H.
H.
H.H.H.H.H.

H.H.
H.
H.H.

H.H.H.H.H.

H.H.H.H.
H.
H.
H.
vH.H.H.H.H.H.
H.H.
H.
H.H.

Looking to turn my piss into wine.

Killing me just the same.

And I feel this coming over like a storm again.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: G(v)d Mon Oct 31, 2016 10:21 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
A cross is not a cross, it is a rising star.

Star

Rise


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: G(v)d Mon Oct 31, 2016 10:31 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Etc. Etc.
Etc. Etc.Etc. Etc.Etc. Etc.
Etc. Etc.Etc. Etc.
Etc. Etc.
Etc. Etc.Etc. Etc.

Etc. Etc.Etc. Etc.Etc. Etc.
Etc. Etc.
Etc. Etc.
Etc. Etc.Etc. Etc.Etc. Etc.Etc. Etc.
Etc. Etc.Etc. Etc.Etc. Etc.Etc. Etc.Etc. Etc.Etc. Etc.Etc. Etc.Etc. Etc.
Etc. Etc.v

v
Etc. Etc.
Etc. Etc.
v
Etc. Etc.vEtc. Etc.

Etc. Etc.Etc. Etc.Etc. Etc.
v
Etc. Etc.
Etc. Etc.

vEtc. Etc.Etc. Etc.Etc. Etc.
Etc. Etc.
Etc. Etc.Etc. Etc.
Etc. Etc.Etc. Etc.
Etc. Etc.Etc. Etc.Etc. Etc.Etc. Etc.Etc. Etc.Etc. Etc.Etc. Etc.Etc. Etc.Etc. Etc.
Etc. Etc.
Etc. Etc.
Etc. Etc.Etc. Etc.vEtc. Etc.Etc. Etc.v

Etc. Etc.Etc. Etc.

Etc. Etc.
Etc. Etc.
Etc. Etc.Etc. Etc.Etc. Etc.Etc. Etc.
Etc. Etc.
Etc. Etc.

Etc. Etc.
Etc. Etc.
Etc. Etc.
Etc. Etc.Etc. Etc.Etc. Etc.Etc. Etc.
Etc. Etc.
Etc. Etc.
Etc. Etc.
v
Etc. Etc.
Etc. Etc.v
vEtc. Etc.Etc. Etc.Etc. Etc.vEtc. Etc.Etc. Etc.Etc. Etc.Etc. Etc.Etc. Etc.

v
Etc. Etc.v
vv
vvvvv
v
v
v
v
v
v
vvv
v
vv
vvvvvv
v
vv

vv
v
vv
v
vvvv

v
v
vvv
v
v
v
vvvv
v

v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v

v
vv
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
vvv
v
v


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: G(v)d Mon Oct 31, 2016 11:38 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.vBegging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.

vBegging for your fatass dirty dollar.
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.

Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.

Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.

Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.v
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.

(ding ding dong dong bee beep)

(la la tee daa da le laa)

Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.

Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.

Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.

Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.
vv
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.

Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.
Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.

Begging for your fatass dirty dollar.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: G(v)d Mon Oct 31, 2016 11:39 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
God should fuck himself so He feels what it feels like. To be fucked, I mean.

“Creation” . Ok then


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: G(v)d Mon Oct 31, 2016 11:50 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Lie cheat and steal.

No one is inno

cent.

RAH

(Undertow)

(Riff riff)


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: G(v)d Mon Oct 31, 2016 11:53 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
But I’m breathing so I guess I’m still alive

Even is signs seem to tell me otherwise

Do unto others what has been done to you
My lamb and martyr

For

One

Sweet

Moment

I am

Home …

Do unto me now
What has been done to me

Even if signs seem to tell me otherwise


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: G(v)d Mon Oct 31, 2016 11:57 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: G(v)d Mon Oct 31, 2016 12:00 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Why can’t we be sober? --Socrates (or Tool)


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: G(v)d Mon Oct 31, 2016 12:06 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
But my soul must be iron
Because my fear is naked


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: G(v)d Mon Oct 31, 2016 12:17 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Why don’t you watch where you’re wandering
Why don’t you watch where you’re stumbling

I mean, Jesus fucking Christ on a cracker

You’re still stumbling

No one even invited you in

Suffocate

No one

Told you
To

Come


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: G(v)d Tue Nov 01, 2016 1:03 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: G(v)d Tue Nov 01, 2016 1:09 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: G(v)d Tue Nov 01, 2016 1:09 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: G(v)d Tue Nov 01, 2016 1:10 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: G(v)d Tue Nov 01, 2016 2:04 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Fun fact: If you’re wearing headphones, people will leave you alone, even if you’re not listening to anything.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: G(v)d Tue Nov 01, 2016 2:08 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Fun fact #2: Game of Thrones sucks.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: G(v)d Tue Nov 01, 2016 2:09 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Fun fact #3: tigers are cool.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: G(v)d Tue Nov 01, 2016 2:10 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Fun fact #4: wearing a red clown nose through airport security, with no explanation at all, is hilarious.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: G(v)d Tue Nov 01, 2016 2:13 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Fun fact #5: Black Widow says love is for children, but actually Black Widow is for children.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: G(v)d Tue Nov 01, 2016 4:01 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Fun fact #6: A woman’s soul simply stops at a certain point.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: G(v)d Tue Nov 01, 2016 6:57 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: G(v)d Tue Nov 01, 2016 6:59 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
If a woman’s soul stops at a certain point, this means it is bordered by something… hard reality contact.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
WendyDarling
arrow
arrow
avatar

Posts : 341
Join date : 2016-06-18
Location : @home

PostSubject: Re: G(v)d Tue Nov 01, 2016 9:01 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Capable wrote:
If a woman’s soul stops at a certain point, this means it is bordered by something… hard reality contact.

Man.

Defenders of the Earth
Tower

Pezerocles wrote:

Freedom is to completely take ownership. There is no altar of excess:
excess is what we do with OUR property. What we decide to do is not
determined by what is available to us, it is determined by what we own:
excess exists only after we have made something ours, after a whatever
has been subjected by the process of valuing from self value. Do I go left?
Do I go right? This question does not exist for freedom except as a tickle.
Something being disposed of is something owned and freedom in action.
The deep darkness is not god, it is fundamentally ours. God can be owned
too! So… Ownership is freedom.

Message
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: The end of thinking Thu Jul 20, 2017 9:05 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Modern technology especially TV and the internet have caused a regression in thinking for most people. Smart phones made it worse. We enjoyed a brief window of time where more people were interested in thinking, maybe 10% or so of all people in the west, but that ended between the late 1990s and 2010. Thinking requires free time without distractions, and that isn’t possible anymore since people are endlessly distracted by their technology.

So 10% has become 1%, probably less. Not only that but life has become such a burden of work and debt that people need the distractions even more now, and have even less free time. So basically no one thinks anymore, except us.

Oh well. RIP humanity.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Sisyphus
Path
Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: The end of thinking Thu Jul 20, 2017 11:55 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Well, I think I still think.

And apparently you had no one to cause you to think so you thought on your own. Self-inspired thought. You done good.

But yes, so many people believe they have so much to do that they just don’t have time to be thinking. They let the Media do it for they. Sponges?

Would you believe it? I don’t even own a cell phone.

But then, I don’t, very often, sit around thinking about things I have no control over.

It’s actually pretty nice living alone in my old age.

Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: The end of thinking Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:20 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Right, age is only feared by those who have nothing more to do, to think, to become… imagine being a “finished” being at 19. Lol.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Sisyphus
Path
Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: The end of thinking Fri Jul 21, 2017 12:48 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Thrasymachus wrote:
Right, age is only feared by those who have nothing more to do, to think, to become… imagine being a “finished” being at 19. Lol.

That would be sad. At 19 I was on my way to Germany for my first tour of duty there. Just beginning a life of wonderment.

Nietzsche told us to live beyond good and evil. I suggest we can live beyond death. (The death of the fear of dying.)
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: The end of thinking Fri Jul 21, 2017 2:56 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Anyone who is afraid of dying is simply not really living. But I can understand sadness over dying, having to lose others we care about. Fear of pain is also rational or at least mostly unavoidable… but fear of dying, to me that makes no sense at all.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Sisyphus
Path
Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: The end of thinking Fri Jul 21, 2017 11:45 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Thrasymachus wrote:
Anyone who is afraid of dying is simply not really living. But I can understand sadness over dying, having to lose others we care about. Fear of pain is also rational or at least mostly unavoidable… but fear of dying, to me that makes no sense at all.

Fears will always hold us back from doing what we naturally want to do in life. They are limiters we have allowed our fears to place upon us.

I can’t say I have a fear of pain but I sure don’t like pain. I prefer pleasure.

The pain of losing those we care about was spoken to very well by the Buddha. He spoke to the importance of not forming permanent attachments with others as well as to things. And in Daoism we speak of the constant changing of the Ten Thousand Things - the coming and going of material things, including people. Basically, the importance of acknowledging the natural processes of the universe.

Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: The end of thinking Sat Jul 22, 2017 7:35 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
I don’t believe in artificial “detachment” from meaning.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Sisyphus
Path
Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: The end of thinking Sat Jul 22, 2017 8:24 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Thrasymachus wrote:
I don’t believe in artificial “detachment” from meaning.

Great perspective. Chuang Tzu would have enjoyed hearing that, I think.

Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: The end of thinking Thu Jul 27, 2017 6:30 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Not sure where to post this, so I will just post it here. Pretty funny.

Stranger: what do you think of Trumps transgender ban?
You: I am undecided so far. I can see how it makes sense, but I haven’t studied the issue enough yet.
Stranger: its discriminatory
You: True, but everything is discriminatory, it is just a question of whether that is rational or not
Stranger: theres nothing wrong with trans people in the military, they are like you or i
You: I don’t know that, because who knows if ‘transgender’ is really a mental health issue or not? It seems like it probably is. Mentally ill people are not allowed into the military. Also, Trump consulted with his top military people and I am sure they are aware of any issues or problems associated with transgenders in the military.
Stranger: who cares your gender! trans people are people too, you just hate them cause you dontknow them
You: Who cares about gender? Well these “trans” people sure seem to care about it, a lot more than the rest of us. Also there is no such thing as “transgender”, there are only two genders and you cannot change them because this is your chromosomes. But you can definitely alter your gender expression.
Stranger: fuck you, bigot
You: Haha.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Sisyphus
Path
Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: The end of thinking Thu Jul 27, 2017 10:38 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
That conversation didn’t go well, did it?

The military has been screwed up every since the draft was ended. That’s the early 1970s.

They have had to constantly lower prerequisites in order to get the units’ positions filled.

Won’t be long they will be allowing chimps to enlist.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: The end of thinking Fri Jul 28, 2017 2:46 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Yes, chimps and droids, cybernetically enhanced chimps - with six genders, fifteen phalli, seventeen vaginal orifices and no ears or noses, to strategically upset the enemy into a bout of disgusted laughter to the end of having them all choke in their vomit…

it is highly advanced strategy man.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Sisyphus
    Path
    Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: The end of thinking Fri Jul 28, 2017 11:55 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Fixed Cross wrote:
Yes, chimps and droids, cybernetically enhanced chimps - with six genders, fifteen phalli, seventeen vaginal orifices and no ears or noses, to strategically upset the enemy into a bout of disgusted laughter to the end of having them all choke in their vomit…

it is highly advanced strategy man.

Well, you went a bit further that I did but I can relate to what you said.

I mean, governments do have to have someone or some thing to do their killing for them.

Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: The end of thinking Sat Jul 29, 2017 4:13 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Cybernetic multigenders. I should get the patent.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Sisyphus
    Path
    Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: The end of thinking Sat Jul 29, 2017 11:52 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Fixed Cross wrote:
Cybernetic multigenders. I should get the patent.

You would become the wealthy man on the planet.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Parodites
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 757
Join date : 2011-12-11

PostSubject: Re: The end of thinking Sat Jul 29, 2017 12:01 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
“He spoke to the importance of not forming permanent attachments with others as well as to things.”

Fucking, what’s the point of any of this then.


A sik þau trûðu

Nisus ait, “Dine hunc ardorem mentibus addunt,
Euryale, an sua cuique deus fit dira cupido?”

Have the gods set this ruling passion in my heart,
or does each man’s furious passion become his god?

  • Virgil.

It is not opium which makes me work but its absence, and in order for me to feel its absence it must
from time to time be present.-- Antonin Artaud
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: The end of thinking Sat Jul 29, 2017 1:08 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Parodites wrote:
“He spoke to the importance of not forming permanent attachments with others as well as to things.”

Fucking, what’s the point of any of this then.

All we ever have are our attachments to others, and to ‘things’.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Parodites
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 757
Join date : 2011-12-11

PostSubject: Re: The end of thinking Sat Jul 29, 2017 1:21 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
I didn’t leave my house or interact with another human for literally a decade, the only thing I got from the no attachment thing was a lot of free time, which allowed me to get a lot done I guess. But there is no wisdom in it.

What is love if it isn’t a permanent attachment. Maybe there was wisdom in my refusal of attachment, maybe I was wiser once but, if love makes you unwise, “wisdom requires moderation, as does everything else.”


A sik þau trûðu

Nisus ait, “Dine hunc ardorem mentibus addunt,
Euryale, an sua cuique deus fit dira cupido?”

Have the gods set this ruling passion in my heart,
or does each man’s furious passion become his god?

  • Virgil.

It is not opium which makes me work but its absence, and in order for me to feel its absence it must
from time to time be present.-- Antonin Artaud
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: The end of thinking Sat Jul 29, 2017 1:51 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Yeah, the whole Eastern religious thing of “no attachments” is just a cop out, an excuse to allow the mind and heart to die a quiet death. Return to the nothingness from which you came. Entropy of thanatos.

Basically it is lazy philosophizing. The concept of nirvana is the same, you try to get rid of your desires and attachments in order to achieve… what? Some sort of ideal, perfect and eternal state. Yeah, that is called death, and it isn’t a “state” of anything.

The philosophy of no attachments is an ideological means of killing thought, reason, passion, and emotional honesty, and I am sure this serves a purpose, namely to make people complacent so they can be ruled and controlled more easily. “Oh well, life is shit, but life is an illusion anyway! Just disassociate yourself from your suffering!” Lol.

Why is thought, reason, passion, (and desire), and emotional honesty difficult? Because these demand something of us, these demand we make mistakes and own those mistakes so we can learn the next time around. They mandate a progressive journey into self-knowledge and correcting our errors, both cognitively and emotionally. That is the true path, to admit our errors and work harder to own and fix them. This also requires humility, which means real humility rather than they fake cop out of “well we all die, life is an illusion, don’t have attachments, desires are not real, blah blah blah” and all that fucking bullshit.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: The end of thinking Sat Jul 29, 2017 1:54 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
When faced with problems there are two options: either you honestly address the problem and try to fix it, which is hard, or you just close your eyes and go “la la la” and pretend the problem doesn’t exist, which is easy.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Sisyphus
Path
Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: The end of thinking Sat Jul 29, 2017 11:23 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Well, consider that a vacuum cleaner is useless without attachments.

This attachment concept has been severely messed up by the “new age” philosophers.

The Buddha proposed it in the light of not making “permanent” attachments with things and others as if they were a part of who we are. There is nothing in the universe that is permanent.

We have to understand that things are going to break and people are going to die and that is just the way of the nature of the universe.

Sure, we should hold those we care about in love. We should care for the things that make our life easier. But we must understand that our life will continue until it is our time to transmutate.

Because we lose a loved one or because we lose something that was of great value to us isn’t grounds for us to alter our way of life. We can love other people and we can buy new things.

Its all just the passing of time. When we try to hold too tightly we will always face great suffering when we lose that whatever.

The end of suffering was the Buddha’s major goal.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: The end of thinking Sun Jul 30, 2017 1:21 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Attachment is the basic category of existing. We are attached to reality, by definition. Eastern philosophy is really about making better attachments over time, but isn’t honest enough to come out and say that. It just cloaks it in “attachment / desire is bad” rhetoric.

Denial is never an answer. You should always confront reality and improve it over time. That is truth-seeking, and the ontological basis of existence as such.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: The end of thinking Sun Jul 30, 2017 1:22 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
If you have good things to attach yourself to, then more attachment = better. If you have bad things to attach yourself to, then more attachment = bad.

So obviously the problem isn’t “attachment” itself.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: The end of thinking Sun Jul 30, 2017 2:08 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Yes, but not until VO was there any philosophy of attachment.
No philosophy could prescribe attachment without limiting.

Buddha was very attached - to his peace of mind. A western philosopher doesn’t have that attachment.

This is what didn’t work for me in Buddhism, this insistence on peace. Fuck peace. I want life, which includes struggle with contradiction, or even is that.

Buddhism tends to hone in on those attachments we can’t shed, like breath. It then becomes a religion of breathing, attaching with extreme intensity to the breath, seeking all value and meaning in it. And that works pretty well, but it is certainly not shedding attachment, it is focussing attachment on something one can control relatively well.

Gravity is the basic Zen attachment. Zen meditation consists largely of physically being as a mass.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Sisyphus
    Path
    Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: The end of thinking Sun Jul 30, 2017 11:36 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Thrasymachus wrote:
If you have good things to attach yourself to, then more attachment = better. If you have bad things to attach yourself to, then more attachment = bad.

So obviously the problem isn’t “attachment” itself.

Yeah!

What more can I say? You did that very well.

Drops_Of_Jupiter
bowstring
bowstring

Posts : 32
Join date : 2017-02-03
Age : 57
Location : Columbus, Ohio USA

PostSubject: Re: G(v)d Fri May 05, 2017 6:13 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Jim - do wars ever bring about peace?
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail facecrook
Sisyphus
Path
Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: G(v)d Sat May 06, 2017 12:49 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Drops_Of_Jupiter wrote:
Jim - do wars ever bring about peace?

Well, the USA is at peace with Japan and Germany. So I guess I have to say, “Yes, sometimes.”

But we are not at peace with North Korea or most of the Middle East countries.

The USA’s involvement in Korea, Vietnam, and the Middle East have all been failures because they were fought based on lies by our government. Even winning a war does not imply peace if the war was dishonorable.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: G(v)d Sat May 06, 2017 3:10 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
The US seems to have done better in wars they did not themselves begin.
Perhaps this is roughly the law: either you start a war, or you win one.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Defenders of the Earth
    Tower
    Tower
    avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: G(v)d Sat May 06, 2017 4:54 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Fixed Cross wrote:
The US seems to have done better in wars they did not themselves begin.
Perhaps this is roughly the law: either you start a war, or you win one.

Great observation. I love the simplicity of that maxim:

“Either you start a war, or win one.”


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Sisyphus
Path
Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: G(v)d Sat May 06, 2017 7:31 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Fixed Cross wrote:
The US seems to have done better in wars they did not themselves begin.
Perhaps this is roughly the law: either you start a war, or you win one.

Yes. Very well said.

Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: I want more women’s equality Tue Apr 11, 2017 10:30 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Real equality would mean women also have to struggle and suffer and work equally as men do. Not being sheltered and expecting things for free. The collapse of the welfare state, for example. The end of alimony. The end of quotas and affirmative action, which is far more insulting and harmful to women especially than to men. The ideal of self-ownership and self-responsibility.

Using sex and flirtation as a weapon is a good example of why women aren’t equal, and don’t want to be. Not all women of course, but this applies to the ones who do these things. We’ve all known women like this. Luckily I stayed away from these women, but others haven’t been so lucky.

Not equality of outcomes but equality of demands, of self-value self-reliance. Not using others for one’s own gain at their expense; any man who uses others for his own gain and at the ruin of the other is basically just a whoring woman, trying to steal “free” stuff from reality at high irrationality of cost, at the mutual destruction of truth. The proper nature of women is to give, not to demand and take. And this holds for men as well – that is the gender equality that I want.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: I want more women’s equality Tue Apr 11, 2017 10:50 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Defenders of the Earth
    Tower
    Tower
    avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: I want more women’s equality Tue Apr 11, 2017 10:58 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Self-responsibility brings self-respect.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: I want more women’s equality Tue Apr 11, 2017 10:59 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster

thetower.org/wp-content/uplo … 75x320.jpg

just took it from google images, didn’t read the article but here it is - I think that’s real feminism in the Socialist sense where they had communities.
I was in one of these for a few months in 1998. Pretty nice living, especially if you can get foreign kids to do your chores for a bed, their crappy food (Jews cannot cook) and 1 shekel an hour. Lol.

thetower.org/article/some-zi … fulfilled/


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Sisyphus
    Path
    Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: I want more women’s equality Tue Apr 11, 2017 12:08 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Thrasymachus wrote:
Self-responsibility brings self-respect.

I totally agree with this.

And yes, I have known many women who have earned their self-respect.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: I want more women’s equality Thu May 18, 2017 12:12 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Sisyphus
Path
Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: I want more women’s equality Thu May 18, 2017 12:58 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Want respect? Earn it!
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: I want more women’s equality Fri May 19, 2017 1:25 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
That’s what I’m saying.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: I want more women’s equality Fri May 19, 2017 1:56 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Thrasymachus wrote:

^ this guy is very perceptive and articulate. The only thing I find to disagree with in what he says here is the idea that only people with kids should vote. But I understand his point.

The idea that people shouldn’t be able to vote if they take more then they contribute in taxes/welfare is another tricky idea. I understand the reasoning here, but in practice I can’t see that working. We don’t want to move from one sort of authoritarianism/repression to another. I think we have to win on the basis of ideas, which requires all people participating in the process, and voting is just one way that ideas are thrown together to product an outcome on the basis of those ideas. The decline of standards and rationality is easily observable when you let these people vote, and because it’s easy to see it’s also easier to refute its errors.

So now it’s just a race between the natural process of rising ideation to a higher truth standard in the open discourse, versus the importing of millions of uneducated non-Western people. Truth process within the west versus demographics.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Sisyphus
Path
Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: I want more women’s equality Fri May 19, 2017 11:05 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Thrasymachus wrote:
That’s what I’m saying.

I’m glad we get to agree on something now and again.

Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Reality Wed Aug 02, 2017 7:36 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
To a good extent, we are what we appear to be. After all, the beings that interact with us act with respect to us in the way that they do because of our appearance.
Naturally, the mode of perception of the perceiver determines halfway the appearance. The other half is what we project.

Evolution therefore also happens in terms of appearances.
Whether a male is seen as fit for the eggs of a female is determined by how the male appears. Hence, the mating dance, the peacocks feathers, and the wide proliferation of forms throughout the animal and plant kingdoms.

So, what we can accomplish determines on what we project.
What we can project relies on what we are.
What we do project is determined largely by what is projected to us.
Often we do not know what we are capable of projecting - and with that, what we are capable of becoming.

“Adapt to the venom”
that was what the snake told Eve,
the forbidden knowledge of how we got where we are.

Taboo, which can only be released in the daemonic reaching. This is why we do what we do as a species, why we build what we build and make it so big and dangerous. It has nothing to do with what we would be able to make use of, even less what is necessarily to our benefit, it simply follows from the fact that can’t possibly do anything besides create beyond ourselves, and this terrifies us now, and thus this building is suffused with terrible motives and dank tastes.

Capitalistic growth is the same as militaristic proliferation, and both of it is necessary for us to not go insane. Unless or until an earthly logos is found.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Sisyphus
    Path
    Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: Reality Wed Aug 02, 2017 12:03 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Agree that others respond to us according to how they perceive us.

So the image of our self we are projecting should be within our capabilities to reify.

Author Message
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: The joy of the gods Mon Aug 07, 2017 9:05 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
“perhaps this is the true joy of the gods, that they can create perfection.”

a helrunar


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Sisyphus
    Path
    Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: The joy of the gods Mon Aug 07, 2017 11:30 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Fixed Cross wrote:
“perhaps this is the true joy of the gods, that they can create perfection.”

Then why haven’t they done so thus far?
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: The joy of the gods Mon Aug 07, 2017 3:36 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Excuse you?
What about me?


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Sisyphus
    Path
    Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: The joy of the gods Mon Aug 07, 2017 11:03 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Fixed Cross wrote:
Excuse you?
What about me?

Sorry about overlooking you.

Okay, aside from you, I see little that qualifies as perfect to all observers.

Author Message
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: What is liberal/leftism? Wed Jul 12, 2017 5:20 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Many artists and writers and ‘emotional’ people are on the left. Why?

I have a theory that liberal/leftism is a symptom of how mental energy-effort is being used (or not used), specifically that mentality as a whole is curbed so that mental effort can be allocated in one direction only, toward one’s domain of art for example, so that there is a pool of such energy able to be utilized toward one area. Stephen King is well known for hating Trump and conservatives for example, and despite seeming highly intelligent he is unable to see how liberal leftism fails intellectually when compared to conservatism. I also used to hate conservatism, back when I was more actively reading and writing philosophy, and also using mental and emotional energy on my job.

I was literally blind to the intellectual deficits of my default leftist position, because I wasn’t allocating enough mental energy to process the intellectual sphere of the leftist ideas. Actually it is the conservative, right-wing idea set that is the default, intellectually speaking, but I couldn’t see that. Why not? Simply lack of mental resources. They were all being used for specific artistic and philosophical tasks.

As for emotions, many emotional people are on the left because their emotionality requires that mentality not overly exert itself, because that exertion would lead to a breakdown of liberal left ideation, and liberal left ideation is just a “safe space” protecting narrow efforts. Emotions themselves are not curbed by conservative thinking, but it appears that they are from the perspective of a default leftism because the safe space of leftist mentality has been falsely associated with emotionality as such.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: What is liberal/leftism? Wed Jul 12, 2017 10:29 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
It’s striking that humanity and especially the west is going to be brought down by one idea, one set of work, ultimately one person… Marx.

Maybe on the tombstone of humanity it will read, “A species with such promise but which was tricked and betrayed, and ultimately destroyed forever, by one of its own.”


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Sisyphus
Path
Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: What is liberal/leftism? Wed Jul 12, 2017 11:40 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
The real problem is that most have been doing too many drugs and their brain is fried. No hope for recovery.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: What is liberal/leftism? Thu Jul 13, 2017 7:14 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
"September 2013
Southern Poverty Law Center Denialism on Frankfurt School
It’s an interesting question. Why is it that the left doesn’t want mainstream liberals to know the history of the left?

Even taking it a step further, why try to convince those liberals that conservative discussion of that history is a conspiracy theory?

For a decade, the Southern Poverty Law Center and others on the left have been trying to hide and distract from one of the main origins of both radical academia and media hostility towards capitalism: the ideology of cultural Marxism and Critical Theory that arose from the Frankfurt School.

The SPLC and others dismiss the facts about the German think-tank and its subsequent influence in America as a conspiracy theory. Understanding these attacks is an object lesson in how the left creates self-sustaining mythology by demonizing the people who dare expose their ideology while misdirecting their own followers as to the real story behind liberal ideas.

Organizations on the institutional left such as the Southern Poverty Law Center didn’t just appear out of nowhere or in an ideological vacuum. The SPLC in particular has a specific role of designating organizations as ‘hate groups’, often smearing mainstream conservatism by falsely tying it to tiny, violent and racist organizations.

The SLPC’s designation of what does and doesn’t constitute a hate group has clear foundations in the world of academic political correctness and censoring of speech it considers ‘racist, sexist and homophobic’; all terms that it defines in leftist terms and very selectively. For example, in the wake of last year’s shooting at the headquarters of the Family Research Council, the SLPC went out of their way to double down on it’s claim that the FRC is a ‘hate group.’

Even political correctness, however, didn’t just suddenly pop up out of thin air; it has its basis in a group of academic Marxist philosophers that came together in Germany between World War I and World War II called the Frankfurt School. Their cultural Marxist approach would go on to have a profound influence in the United States after many in the Frankfurt school fled Germany and came to America in the 1930s.

Due to the work of writers like the late Andrew Breitbart, many conservatives now have at least a passing familiarity with the Frankfurt School and their influence. Leftist groups like the Southern Poverty Law Center don’t want liberals to know this history, however, as evidenced by their disinformation campaign that pretends that conservatives who bring up the Frankfurt School are crazy racists who shouldn’t be taken seriously.

Typical of this ‘nothing to see here and you’re a nut-job for even looking’ tactic is a piece from Red Phoenix (described as ‘the newspaper of the American party of Labor’) which defines cultural Marxism as ‘a meaningless phrase used to signal that the writer or speaker has no idea what he or she is talking about’, and then says:

First, to understand cultural Marxism as a phrase is nearly impossible. The phrase itself is meaningless. Next time you find yourself in a discussion where your partner invokes cultural Marxism, ask them to define exactly what that means. Most people don’t even attempt to answer. Those that do give a definition that has nothing to do with Marxism. They may be totally convinced that cultural Marxism is destroying their society, to the point of obsession, yet they stammer and hesitate when asked for a coherent definition.
So, without stammer or hesitation: Cultural Marxism is a branch of Marxism advocated by the Frankfurt School of philosophers such as Erich Fromm, Max Horkheimer and Herbert Marcuse that focuses on cultural factors as agents for social change, as opposed to the traditional Marxist view that focused on economic factors.

That’s a short definition but one of the best summaries of the Frankfurt School and the impact it had on America is Andrew Breitbart’s highly lauded chapter entitled Breakthrough from his book Righteous Indignation. Although it may appear self-serving for this suggestion to come from a friend of Andrew Breitbart’s, nearly anyone who has read the chapter will tell you that Breitbart’s explanation of the Frankfurt School is scholarly, detailed and actually fun to read. Breitbart explains the history and significance of the Frankfurt School, cultural Marxism, critical theory and the impact on contemporary issues such as political correctness and multiculturalism. It’s a must-read for anyone interested in learning more about the influence of these ideas on our national politics.

In 2003, the Southern Poverty Law Center made a preemptive strike against anyone exposing the Frankfurt School in an essay by Bill Berkowitz entitled ‘Cultural Marxism’ Catching On. Although it was published a decade ago, the article has been referenced in many other pieces on the same subject; such is the power of the Southern Poverty Law Center brand on the left.

An in-depth dissection of the article is warranted, since the article is frequently cited by those on the left who are keen to sweep the facts about the Frankfurt School under the rug.

Take the following paragraph from the SPLC article that tosses buzzwords likes racist and extremist in with accusations that anyone looking into the Frankfurt school is anti-Semitic. Berkowitz writes:

Right-wing ideologues, racists and other extremists have jazzed up political correctness and repackaged it — in its most virulent form, as an anti-Semitic theory that identifies Jews in general and several Jewish intellectuals in particular as nefarious, communistic destroyers. These supposed originators of “cultural Marxism” are seen as conspiratorial plotters intent on making Americans feel guilty and thus subverting their Christian culture.
The charge that discussing the Frankfurt School is anti-Semitic gets raised a number of times by those like the Southern Poverty Law Center wishing the bury the truth, so let’s dispense with it as soon as possible. In short, the Jewish heritage of the Frankfurt school is irrelevant. It’s equally true that the major figures at the Frankfurt School were all Jewish and also that some of the major figures exposing the Frankfurt School such as Andrew Breitbart and David Horowitz are also Jewish. Anti-Semitism is a false, collectivist view that has no more place in any legitimate argument than any other form of actual racism trotted out by tribal mentalities. However, in exactly the same way that it would be invalid to criticize the ideas of the Frankfurt philosophers on the basis of them being Jewish, it’s equally invalid to exempt them from any criticism for that reason.

The SPLC throws in the charge of anti-Semitism in its attempt to hide the truth about the Frankfurt School for one reason; it’s exactly the kind of politically correct smear that is the modus operand of the SPLC throughout their work. It’s no small irony that it’s the exactly the technique made possible by the Frankfurt School ideology.

As the Southern Poverty Law Center article continues, they use a number of subtle (and not so subtle) linguistic tricks to create the utterly false notion that the Frankfurt School is some kind of boogeyman invented by conservatives. Take the next paragraph and note that they also continue to push the ‘anti-Semitic’ notion:

In a nutshell, the theory posits that a tiny group of Jewish philosophers who fled Germany in the 1930s and set up shop at Columbia University in New York City devised an unorthodox form of “Marxism” that took aim at American society’s culture, rather than its economic system.
The first alarm bell goes off over the use of the phrase ‘the theory posits’ in a sentence that goes on to factually describe the Frankfurt School philosophers. There’s not one thing in that sentence that is theoretical or in the least bit in factual dispute but describing it as a ‘theory’ gives the Southern Poverty Law Center audience the impression some of it could just be made up by wacked out right-wingers.

Next, note the use of scare quote around the word “Marxism”, which has the same goal of trying to give the reader the impression that maybe those crazy right-wingers are tossing the word Marxist around loosely, as some sort of insult rather than a 100% factual descriptor that’s beyond question.

Just as one example that the members of the Frankfurt school considered themselves Marxists, here’s a video interview with Herbert Marcuse explaining in his own words the group is firmly in the Marxist tradition despite their criticism of some aspect of Karl Marx’s original theories. Please note that the video link is presented here as a quick & easy way to confirm the Frankfurt School’s self-avowed Marxism, not to suggest the SPLC writer did or didn’t see it. The fact that the Frankfurt School is made of up self avowed Marxists is so clearly beyond any dispute that it’s easily confirmed by even the slightest amount of research.

As just one other example, here’s the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy as it defines Critical Theory:

“Critical Theory” in the narrow sense designates several generations of German philosophers and social theorists in the Western European Marxist tradition known as the Frankfurt School.
However, like a wily attorney trying to plant reasonable doubt about the guilt of a confessed suspect, the SPLC wants their readers to believe that ‘Marxist’ is just a wild accusation. Note the repetition of ‘theory’, charges of anti-Semitism and scare quotes in the next paragraph of Southern Poverty Law Center article:

The theory holds that these self-interested Jews — the so-called “Frankfurt School” of philosophers — planned to try to convince mainstream Americans that white ethnic pride is bad, that sexual liberation is good, and that supposedly traditional American values — Christianity, “family values,” and so on — are reactionary and bigoted. With their core values thus subverted, the theory goes, Americans would be quick to sign on to the ideas of the far left.
Once again, the SLPC uses the word theory at the top of a paragraph that is describing undisputed facts.

Marcuse was the philosophical hero of the New Left in the 1960s; at marches in Paris, they carried banners that read “Marx, Mao and Marcuse.” As Andrew Breitbart described Herbert Marcuse in Righteous Indignation:

Marcuse’s mission was to dismantle American society by using diversity and “multiculturalism” as crowbars with which to pry the structure apart, piece by piece. He wanted to set blacks in opposition to whites, set all “victim groups” in opposition to the society at large. Marcuse’s theory of victim groups as the new proletariat, combined with Horkheimer’s critical theory, found an outlet in academia, where it became the basis for the post-structural movement–Gender Studies, LGBT/”Queer” Studies, African-American Studies, Chicano Studies, etc. All of these “Blank Studies” brazenly describe their mission as tearing down traditional Judeo-Christian values and the accepted traditions of Western culture, and placing in their stead a moral relativism that equates all cultures and all philosophies–except for Western civilization, culture, and philosophy, which are “exploitative” and “bad.”
Is there any doubt whatsoever that Americans influenced by Frankfort School ideas on American ‘racism’ and sexual liberation (Marcuse coined the phrase “Make Love, Not War”) quickly ‘signed up’ for the radical anti-war movement of the late 1960s? It’s equally obvious that the various cultural studies programs that sprouted in that era have thrived in academia in the past fifty years and that such programs have had a tremendous political influence, seen in contemporary news stories ranging from the Trayvon Martin shooting to immigration reform.

This is what the Southern Poverty Law Center calls ‘theory’; the very notion of pointing out the existence of political correctness and multiculturalism and pointing out the clear origins. The coup d’ grace is that SPLC actually uses political correctness in their attempt to claim that the Frankfurt School is a fever dream of conservatives; they argue anyone using the term ‘cultural Marxism’ to describe cultural Marxism is a racist lunatic to be dismissed. They write:

The very term, “cultural Marxism,” is clearly intended to conjure up xenophobic anxieties. But can a theory like this, built on the words of long-dead intellectuals who have little discernible relevance to normal Americans’ lives, really fly?
Conservatives know better. The average well-read conservative understands the Frankfurt School much better than the average well-read liberal. Such is the nature of the hermetically sealed media environment that mainstream leftists find themselves in due to groups like Southern Poverty Law Center, utilizing the ideas of the Frankfurt School.

Let the circle be unbroken."

By Lee Stranahan

thepopulist.us/2017/06/this-stor … boyle-why/


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Sisyphus
Path
Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: What is liberal/leftism? Thu Jul 13, 2017 12:17 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Well, so far they are doing a good job at avoiding the truth and feeding us bullshit.

The USA is no longer a nation of Americans. It has become a nation of special interests instead of common interests.

I’m getting to the point where I don’t even like the term “liberal” any more.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: What is liberal/leftism? Fri Jul 14, 2017 4:22 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
This is the proper approach to this issue T, as neuroscience, or at least a direct derivative of it.

You are pointing to something massively important. The conflation of emotionalistic thought and emotion.

The Left has this emotionalistic thought, where they don’t feel and also do not think, but use the brain to construct ideas that look to them like emotions, and to which they respond in physiological ways that remind of extreme emotional distress.

Emotions are bypassed. Ive been thoroughly ravaged by this weird mind state as it has usurped the entities of most of my family members and most friends in the Netherlands - they are psychotic zombies that neither think nor fee, but use the vocabulary and gestures that have been derived in the past from emotions.

They are essentially dead, what they do is spread death around them, and it is really very problematic, as the human constitution is tough, and these people are essentially huge cockroaches now.

Because Ive been so close to them, and so tightly surrounded by them for so long, so long that I was fooled into believing that they cared for me, or for anything at all, it is a fucking torment to even gradually wake up to what Ive let them do to me, to how close they’ve gotten to me - so much acid and poison comes out of me just becoming aware of what certain memories really tell me. Many restroom breaks, suffice to say. Contact with such vermin is a very real sickness, and the medicine is really not a soft one, it is a torment to disentangle, as it all literally needs to come out.

It seems like the leftist brain has been coopted by the liver, it runs on bile.
And all affection for any of them that is in my system now must come out of me in the form of bile, shit, stomach acid, as Ive been caring for absolute monsters, using all my genius do delude myself into perceiving them as humans.

This is absolutely the End Time, in the sense that it was alway implicit in the enormous brainpower of the human, and the very difficult taks of using that power constructively for the benefit of oneself through the benefit of ones surroundings (self-valuing logic) is just far too much to ask for a randomly progressing process like evolution.

It was always certain, and this is I suppose how prophecies were conceived, by simple psychological skill, that humanity would have to face its ultimate enemy: its brain. The brain can be used to attain truth, but it is far better at inventing means to avoid truth. That is what leftism is, and the emotionalistic… ectoplasma that manifests as Media and Social Justice, and all these horrors, this flows straight out of the metaphorical gates of hell, which means the abused brain.

Ive seen it proven now that these people aren’t capable of having emotions. They are absolutely dead at heart. And yet they are breeding, my monstrous bile-hearted cousins are having children… meaning, since infants aren’t capable of instantly being as wretched as all grown humans can be, there will be such a terrible struggle of generations to come… maybe a time is coming where children kill their parents and vice versa.

All this to the “purpose” of restoring basic human emotions. Of course non teleologically, just by necessity, by lack of alternative, the emotiolalism that spends itself in the most rotten ways drives carriers to a consequence that confronts them with the basic emotion that discerns death from life: Fear, the emotion that birthed all mass-religions.

Once this is happened, once the now plasmic sub-humanoid substance of the European Left is confronted with a shred of reality, the new time will begin, an age of complete upheaval will begin, wherein new religions are born, and from thereon, new social orders can be forged, through heated battle involving both arms and philosophy.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Defenders of the Earth
    Tower
    Tower
    avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: What is liberal/leftism? Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:47 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Fixed Cross wrote:
This is the proper approach to this issue T, as neuroscience, or at least a direct derivative of it.

You are pointing to something massively important. The conflation of emotionalistic thought and emotion.

The Left has this emotionalistic thought, where they don’t feel and also do not think, but use the brain to construct ideas that look to them like emotions, and to which they respond in physiological ways that remind of extreme emotional distress.

Emotions are bypassed. Ive been thoroughly ravaged by this weird mind state as it has usurped the entities of most of my family members and most friends in the Netherlands - they are psychotic zombies that neither think nor fee, but use the vocabulary and gestures that have been derived in the past from emotions.

They are essentially dead, what they do is spread death around them, and it is really very problematic, as the human constitution is tough, and these people are essentially huge cockroaches now.

Because Ive been so close to them, and so tightly surrounded by them for so long, so long that I was fooled into believing that they cared for me, or for anything at all, it is a fucking torment to even gradually wake up to what Ive let them do to me, to how close they’ve gotten to me - so much acid and poison comes out of me just becoming aware of what certain memories really tell me. Many restroom breaks, suffice to say. Contact with such vermin is a very real sickness, and the medicine is really not a soft one, it is a torment to disentangle, as it all literally needs to come out.

It seems like the leftist brain has been coopted by the liver, it runs on bile.
And all affection for any of them that is in my system now must come out of me in the form of bile, shit, stomach acid, as Ive been caring for absolute monsters, using all my genius do delude myself into perceiving them as humans.

This is absolutely the End Time, in the sense that it was alway implicit in the enormous brainpower of the human, and the very difficult taks of using that power constructively for the benefit of oneself through the benefit of ones surroundings (self-valuing logic) is just far too much to ask for a randomly progressing process like evolution.

It was always certain, and this is I suppose how prophecies were conceived, by simple psychological skill, that humanity would have to face its ultimate enemy: its brain. The brain can be used to attain truth, but it is far better at inventing means to avoid truth. That is what leftism is, and the emotionalistic… ectoplasma that manifests as Media and Social Justice, and all these horrors, this flows straight out of the metaphorical gates of hell, which means the abused brain.

Ive seen it proven now that these people aren’t capable of having emotions. They are absolutely dead at heart. And yet they are breeding, my monstrous bile-hearted cousins are having children… meaning, since infants aren’t capable of instantly being as wretched as all grown humans can be, there will be such a terrible struggle of generations to come… maybe a time is coming where children kill their parents and vice versa.

All this to the “purpose” of restoring basic human emotions. Of course non teleologically, just by necessity, by lack of alternative, the emotiolalism that spends itself in the most rotten ways drives carriers to a consequence that confronts them with the basic emotion that discerns death from life: Fear, the emotion that birthed all mass-religions.

Once this is happened, once the now plasmic sub-humanoid substance of the European Left is confronted with a shred of reality, the new time will begin, an age of complete upheaval will begin, wherein new religions are born, and from thereon, new social orders can be forged, through heated battle involving both arms and philosophy.

Fuck, yes. Brilliant analysis.

I’ve lost faith in the west. Of course I hope I’m wrong that it is doomed through and through, but I can see the writing on the wall.

When the USA becomes the USSA and Europe becomes Islamic Europe, there will be no other western rational power to oppose and defeat it, like the west defeated the USSR. Imagine the 20th century without an America or a sane Europe in existence, what would have happened? This is our very near future.

On one hand I’m sometimes sad that I don’t have children, I mean really sad about it, but on the other hand it is a blessing. When I try to imagine what I would feel like for my children in this present moment in the world, with what is coming, my mind shuts down. I simply can’t posit such a high value, as having one’s own children to love and care for, in the context of the coming times.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: What is liberal/leftism? Fri Jul 14, 2017 7:40 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Yeah, I definitely relate to that.

I left Vienna in 2012 because my girlfriend wanted children. I just could absolutely not justify having a child in Europe at that time.
It saddened me profoundly for two to three years, but I never regretted my decision.

What makes it very hard to regret is to see the young fathers in my family. They seem as slavish, soulless as a woman in a burqa does. Leftism is like a burqa for men.

We will have to see if humanity really goes down with these aberrations, or if some sap of life can still keep hold of our species through philosophy and simple common sensical courage, which is what intact humans are prone to.

I will wager for the latter, simply because I will fight to that end with the last drop of blood in me. And to just perceive and somehow accept the nature of these … creatures, that turns to a relief in itself, like I guess taking a long overdue shit on an existential level.

Flushing that crap is a hell of a job though. Motherfuck. Its probably safe to say these are the ugliest creatures in the Earths history.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Defenders of the Earth
    Tower
    Tower
    avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: What is liberal/leftism? Thu Aug 10, 2017 10:53 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Stranger: how are you doing?
You: I’m good, you?
Stranger: i’m good as well.
Stranger: where do you stand politically?
You: More on the right, or so
Stranger: you fucking right wingers want to disenfranchise the poor and vulnerable.
You: No I don’t
Stranger: prove you don’t.
You: You made the claim, you can’t demonstrate it? Guilty until proven innocence, is that it now?
Stranger: fuck off and die
Stranger has disconnected.

Kek


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Sisyphus
Path
Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: What is liberal/leftism? Thu Aug 10, 2017 10:40 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Yeah. Sad. Most of us don’t even know what the fuck we are talking about any more. Just repeating BS we were told to believe. The thinking mind is becoming extinct.

Message
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Eurofascism Fri Mar 10, 2017 10:57 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
In the EU there are laws against speech that is offensive or insensitive. You can actually go to prison for saying something “rude” or “mean”, if the right person overhears you and takes you to court.

But why is there not a clause embedded in the law that stipulates if something offensive/insensitive is also true then the saying cannot be considered criminal?

Obviously such laws should not exist at all. But given that they do exist, because apparently most Europeans are pussies, these laws should at least have clauses allowing for such statements to be legally made provided that the statements can be demonstrably considered true. Namely, if you are taken to court over something you said or wrote, you should be able to defend yourself by showing that what you said happens to be true. I don’t think that is how it currently works, though.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Sisyphus
Path
Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Sat Mar 11, 2017 12:52 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
The more laws a society has the more criminals that society will have.

Governments are beginning to negate the need for gods.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Sat Mar 11, 2017 6:37 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Why the fuck do Europeans not demand the right to freedom of speech? Is this simply holocaust guilt, or what?


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Sat Mar 11, 2017 7:13 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Thrasymachus wrote:
Why the fuck do Europeans not demand the right to freedom of speech? Is this simply holocaust guilt, or what?

Which speech laws are you referring to?

I know of the law against incitement to hate, which goes for representatives. Its a dangerous law, but it doesn’t really curb free speech.

It’s just that the people themselves don’t allow thinking in their midst.

World Wars in Europe is far worse a trauma than merely the holocaust, and these wars are absolutely great part of the reason of European apprehension before people-power - as Parodites had correctly identified that these two wars were peoples wars.

An entire generation of men was sacrificed in WWI, just to have an equally bad war ensue. People dont want this ever again, so they shun nationalistic aggression at all cost.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Fixed Cross
    Doric basterd
    Doric basterd
    avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Sat Mar 11, 2017 7:25 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
The problem in Europe is not with authorities. These are simply symptoms of the craziness that has wrecked through the various attempts at permanent civilization that different peoples made.

The problem is rather that there is no aim, no objective.
This is an essential unfreedom, inability to speak. There is nothing to say.

What would be most beneficial for Europe right now is a Philosophy of the Future.

It speaks for itself that my plan for Europe as Ive outlined and detailed it in the past years, in videos and posts, is to my eyes the best plan. In fact it is the only way Ive ever seen that could lead forward.

Three pointers:

France leaves EU
Italy takes more prominance
Germany is conditioned to reality through Amsterdam

Center of the actually European Union is the following:
The Rome-Amsterdam Axis


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Defenders of the Earth
    Tower
    Tower
    avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Sat Mar 11, 2017 7:29 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
I’ve heard of peoole being fined or imprisoned for saying politically incorrect things, or for denying the Holocaust or putting up a swastika for example. Let Pen had her “immunity” retroactively cancelled so she could be sued for having posted about ISIS violence. I’ve heard plenty of similar stories. But yeah you’re right that the peoole just don’t tolerate it, they repress themselves. But I believe what is needed is a near-absolute guarantee to free speech and free press at all costs, as a primary value and legal principle. People should know they are not at danger from saying something unpopular.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Sat Mar 11, 2017 7:36 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
You are right, there are more conditions than in the US - and representatives do indeed not have total freedom of speech. In a sense the attacks on Trump are similar - the truth is always illegal, as legality is always a primordial crime.

Regardless, nothing can be imposed on the Europeans from the outside.
Europe must be reformed by a European, from the inside.

I’m willing to state that Europe will simply not be free without my plan, period.
Thus: there is no point discussing Euro-affairs in any other terms than this plan.

France and Germany can never function under the same standards. That is far more certain than that “A” = “A”, it is actual value ontology.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Fixed Cross
    Doric basterd
    Doric basterd
    avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Sat Mar 11, 2017 7:46 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Thrasymachus wrote:
I’ve heard of peoole being fined or imprisoned for saying politically incorrect things, or for denying the Holocaust or putting up a swastika for example. Let Pen had her “immunity” retroactively cancelled so she could be sued for having posted about ISIS violence. I’ve heard plenty of similar stories. But yeah you’re right that the peoole just don’t tolerate it, they repress themselves. But I believe what is needed is a near-absolute guarantee to free speech and free press at all costs, as a primary value and legal principle. People should know they are not at danger from saying something unpopular.

In fact most muslims are denying the holocaust, but Ive not seen anyone imprisoned for that.
Freedom of speech that is used and turned to mass-lying by perverted political wills allows a lot of actual victims in Europe to be quite destroyed and robbed of honor.

Freedom is never a beginning. It is a result of strength. Freedom of speech belongs to sane people. Insane people aren’t free in their mind/heart, thus freedom of speech doesnt apply to them.

In fact Europe could use a lot more coercion and actual top down rulership - but not from Brussels, but from Rome and Amsterdam.

Hail Caesar…
What saved the US is the Strong Man. Same for Russia. And it is precisely that type of human that’s been feared in Europe as the hallmark of fascism.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Defenders of the Earth
    Tower
    Tower
    avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Sat Mar 11, 2017 8:07 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Freedom as a result of strength, yes. The imposition of a legal order is required, the uncomfortable truth is that the basic guarantee is one of primordial force. Once such a system is set up it becomes convenient to forget this fact.

Trump galvanized people, I see him as a sign of what America wanted-needed. Europe could have the same thing if not for Europe’s stupid parliamentary coalition government systems. Those systems prevent true democracy qua representation as binary 1/0 decision-making, thus politics in Europe could in theory never act as a mind and mirror for societies in the general sense.

Freedom also creates its own luck, its own possibilities. The future is infinite even a few iterations forward in time, and legal freedom recognizes this basic fact and that fact’s connection to vitality and valuing, to the possibility for a flourishing life.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Sat Mar 11, 2017 8:19 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
First of all we need to stop pretending Europe is unity or entity of any sort like a nation. There is little or in common between Ireland and Spain or Holland and Poland. There is no European self-valuing. There should never be European law. The idea of a European constitution has been rejected by all peoples in referendums, and that was ignored. It doesn’t really legally exist to my mind, nor should or will it.

All Europe can be is a texture of vastly differing and fundamentally independent nation states, a group of which invented the nation state, the national identity.

In 100 years, some European countries will be world powers again, whereas others will not even exist anymore.

There is no such thing as Europe in political terms.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Defenders of the Earth
    Tower
    Tower
    avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Sat Mar 11, 2017 8:38 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Yes that makes sense. I use the term Europe primarily for convenience, but I see the danger you mention, of assuming too much homogeneity amongst the various nations and cultures there.

I remember when the Euro currency was first introduced, it was after I had already been to Italy and spent their lira while there. I wasn’t that old yet, but I remember being deeply offended at the idea that these countries and peoples were being forced to abandon their unique currencies for a common one. It still feels offensive to me.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Sat Mar 11, 2017 10:10 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Yes, all our currencies were beautiful.
Google “gulden biljetten”.

To assume France and Germany are under one value roof is to assume the US and Iran are identical.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Defenders of the Earth
    Tower
    Tower
    avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Sat Mar 11, 2017 10:16 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Wow you are right, very nice currency.

Point taken about France and Germany.

Here in the US I hear a lot of alarmism that the collapse of the Euro/EU would be an economic disaster for the US and to dollar, but I honestly don’t believe that. But honestly the EU is falling apart regardless. I’m still somewhat shocked that European nations actually allowed the EU and the Euro in the first place.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Sat Mar 11, 2017 5:01 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
It was a sudden decision really, it felt like. It just happened.

As of this week I am aiming for a relinquishing of France from the Euro, as France is stronger without the EU and the EU is more of a well oilable machine without France.

Return to national currencies will not necessarily be of interest to the central Euro axis, in the current political climate. We can’t go back - there must be some continuation of the functionality - i.e. the riches that have been acquired can’t be squandered. Too much is lost already - cutting our losses has started with Brexit and is going to happen, sensibly, with France, or otherwise I just don’t see the possibility of improvement. But Germany, Austria, Italy, the Netherlands and Sweden could form a deeply functional axis.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Defenders of the Earth
    Tower
    Tower
    avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Tue Mar 14, 2017 8:47 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
This is precisely what I was talking about, no concept of freedom of speech whatsoever. If you can’t protect unpopular speech then no speech is safe.

mobile.reuters.com/article/techn … SKBN16L14G

"Germany already has some of the world’s toughest hate speech laws covering defamation, slander, public incitement to commit crimes and threats of violence, backed up by prison sentences for Holocaust denial or inciting hatred against minorities. It now aims to update these rules for the social media age.

…“We do not want an internet police or thought control,” the council’s president, Josef Schuster, said. “But when hatred is stoked, and the legal norms in our democracy threaten to lose their relevance, then we need to intervene.”

Wow.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Tue Mar 14, 2017 8:48 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
“When hatred is stoked”… translation: when you say something that the ruling establishment doesn’t want you to say.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Tue Mar 14, 2017 8:50 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Political correctness is the worst fucking disease imaginable, a true disease of language. Politics-legality is acting as a parasite infesting language; it breeds larva, goo-humans.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Tue Mar 14, 2017 11:44 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Yes, that is fascism.
It shouldn’t surprise us really, the Germans never had any other tendencies.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Fixed Cross
    Doric basterd
    Doric basterd
    avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Tue Mar 14, 2017 12:08 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
ok check out this barbie of the third reich.
Not the guy in the thumbnial, that is Wilders, who knows what it means to have values. His opponent, who is hired for one reason alone: to get muslims to vote for his party. He has alientated most muslims as well as most socialists. Here again, he instantly begins to demonize Wilders in terms even more grotesque than a Calligula speech. This is the sort of man you need to imagine if you want to understand Brussels.

This is Wilders vs Asscher, who has made the soclal democrat party plummet but still manages to be arrogant.
If there is a contest for soul-lessness, he leads the charts in the Netherlands.

Look at him.
Mussolinis favorite pet.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Defenders of the Earth
    Tower
    Tower
    avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Tue Mar 14, 2017 3:07 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster

^ Haha, fuck yeah.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Thu Mar 23, 2017 4:43 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Polish PM stands firm for truth, despite threats from EU:

"“I hear in Europe very often: do not connect the migration policy with terrorism, but it is impossible not to connect them,” the Polish premier told the TVN24 broadcasting network.

Poland’s governing Law and Justice Party (PiS) is currently locked in a struggle with the EU’s unelected executive, the European Commission, over its refusal to accept 6,200 migrants under a bloc-wide mandatory quota system, which was imposed despite the resistance of much of Central Europe.

“If some of them do not comply,” he warned, “the Commission has the power [and] the tools to convince these countries.”

The bloc wishes to fine member-states €250,000 for every migrant they refuse to receive – a sanction which would cost Poland billions, but be difficult to impose.

Swedish MEP Cecilia Wikström has proposed simply withholding funds from ‘troublesome’ countries – a punishment which would be easier to implement.

Poland has taken a similarly no-nonsense stance after other European terror events, with interior minister Mariusz Błaszczak declaring in no uncertain terms that “well-organised marches” and “painted flowers on the sidewalks” are no solution to Europe’s terror crisis after the Bastille Day truck attack in Nice, France.

“We must reject political correctness and call things by their true names,” he said. “Rather than shedding tears like [European Union High Representative Federica] Mogherini [and] organising marches that solve nothing, authorities should ensure the safety of citizens.”

breitbart.com/london/2017/03 … on-policy/


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Thu Mar 30, 2017 1:53 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Soros-funded NGOs and EU politicians sneaking in backdoor thought crime legislation in Ireland:

vid.me/xqVe

“If you want to know who rules over you, find the people you’re not allowed to criticize.”


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Fri Mar 31, 2017 3:48 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Feminists and women finally waking up to what radical Islamic immigration represents for them:

breitbart.com/london/2017/03 … entalists/


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Fri Mar 31, 2017 4:24 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
It is very possible that at one point China will begin methodically eradicating Islam. Coldly, without any human consideration, as one approaches a pest. Islam controls much of the resources they feel entitled to.

I googled around a bit (whats the alternative engine you used, something with duck?) on this subject, to see if anyone has similar thinking as Ive been having since a muslim generals son explained to me a few primordial fears of Islam, and ran into this Christians blog article, which conveys the same sort of idea.

shoebat.com/2015/06/30/china-ban … -complain/

China wants world-dominion, not a monopoly, but it knows itself a primacy of the Earth. Eventually Islam, as it grows larger, dumber, uglier and more of a nuisance, will just come to stand in its way. Which is an unfortunate position, to stand in the way of China’s idea of progress.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Defenders of the Earth
    Tower
    Tower
    avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Fri Mar 31, 2017 4:32 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
duckduckgo.com

Message

Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Fri Apr 14, 2017 6:41 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
The danger of censorship is that by censoring something you stop your own ability to properly attack and discredit it, because you don’t need to anymore-- you can simply throw the other guys in prison. Censorship actually strengthens the censored positions, because it means they aren’t being challenged openly by facts and in the free market of ideas. Censorship also gives the impression that whatever is censored is dangerous, which makes it more interesting to people… “how is this dangerous, why? What is going on in this viewpoint here that is so threatening? Why isn’t anyone actually arguing against it? Maybe they don’t have good arguments against it, could that be the reason?” Etc. goes the thinking of people.

I am a strong defender of free speech. The test of free speech is whether or not unpopular and offensive speech is also protected, because if it isn’t then there isn’t actually any freedom of speech at all. Censorship is enforced by a particular government and positions and people in power, and the perspective and narrative of those people is going to determine what is free or unfree speech.

Look at all the holocaust denial stuff for example, these viewpoints and the people who hold them aren’t going away just because Europe has made it a crime to say such things. European censorship is strengthening that which is censored, both directly and indirectly. But that is a secondary argument; the primary argument is of course that freedom of speech is a basic universal human right and if you don’t like what someone else is saying then you can either argue against it with your own speech or you can choose not to associate with that person and just walk away. That is a properly human, rational position based on self-respect and the refusal to use force against others merely because you don’t like what they are saying.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Fri Apr 14, 2017 9:36 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Thrasymachus wrote:
The danger of censorship is that by censoring something you stop your own ability to properly attack and discredit it, because you don’t need to anymore-- you can simply throw the other guys in prison. Censorship actually strengthens the censored positions, because it means they aren’t being challenged openly by facts and in the free market of ideas. Censorship also gives the impression that whatever is censored is dangerous, which makes it more interesting to people… “how is this dangerous, why? What is going on in this viewpoint here that is so threatening? Why isn’t anyone actually arguing against it? Maybe they don’t have good arguments against it, could that be the reason?” Etc. goes the thinking of people.

Good points. It’s how Trump won the elections, by being censored.

Quote :
I am a strong defender of free speech. The test of free speech is whether or not unpopular and offensive speech is also protected, because if it isn’t then there isn’t actually any freedom of speech at all. Censorship is enforced by a particular government and positions and people in power, and the perspective and narrative of those people is going to determine what is free or unfree speech.

Yes, absolutely, Im with you.
If a society cant withstand free speech, it is already dead.

Quote :
Look at all the holocaust denial stuff for example, these viewpoints and the people who hold them aren’t going away just because Europe has made it a crime to say such things.

The opposite indeed.
Italy has always freely published Mein Kampf and has an untroubled fascist segment, and probably because of this no one is actually denying the Holocaust. At worst some argue that it was a good thing, I suppose. Most will disagree, so case closed.

Quote :
European censorship is strengthening that which is censored, both directly and indirectly. But that is a secondary argument; the primary argument is of course that freedom of speech is a basic universal human right and if you don’t like what someone else is saying then you can either argue against it with your own speech or you can choose not to associate with that person and just walk away. That is a properly human, rational position based on self-respect and the refusal to use force against others merely because you don’t like what they are saying.

Its not even a basic human right (as rights, by nature, cant be all that basic, since all possible rights contradict certain other possible rights, thus legality is always a mess) but a basic human property. Without free speech, humanity is not.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Defenders of the Earth
    Tower
    Tower
    avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Fri Apr 14, 2017 9:41 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Fantastic point… not a right but a property. Yes. I said “right” in so far as the freedom to speak without repercussions of legal force and censorship is paramount to the kinds of beings that we are; I see rights as simply expressions of the facts of the kinds of beings that we are. Governments do not give rights, governments either acknowledge the rights we naturally have (own, as you point out) or fail to do so.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Fri Apr 14, 2017 9:43 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
The notion of God-given rights comes closest to this, saying God-given rights is just another way of saying that these ‘rights’ are integral to what we are. No one “gives” them. We had to invent and tie this to a divinity figure in order to articulate it properly, at least 250 years ago.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Fri Apr 14, 2017 9:56 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Right, so a basic human right should be interpreted as any state or activity that one can not impede without reducing the being from a nominal human to something less.

This means we can define the human being in terms of its natural activities, rather than merely as a list of biological attributes. So we can define a human being in terms of a human life. Thats a big leap forward.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Fixed Cross
    Doric basterd
    Doric basterd
    avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Fri Apr 14, 2017 10:00 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Yes, this is truly a breakthrough.
Right is a word, concept, just like Being is.
As humans, we have the right (duty qua full humanity!) to interpret our concept of Human Right in the most responsible way.
That means to derive it directly from what in our most profound explication of our valuing, a Human Being is. Whatever this is, it must be expressed by us in Rights.

In as far as General Rights go, that is integral to whatever we conclude about General Being(s).


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Defenders of the Earth
    Tower
    Tower
    avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Fri Apr 14, 2017 10:02 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Fixed Cross wrote:
Right, so a basic human right should be interpreted as any state or activity that one can not impede without reducing the being from a nominal human to something less.

This means we can define the human being in terms of its natural activities, rather than merely as a list of biological attributes. So we can define a human being in terms of a human life. Thats a big leap forward.

Yes absolutely… I used to be somewhat intuitively against the idea of ownership, I remember writing about this in DFIOS, and I ended up going back and re-writing that section because my thoughts changed on it. I regret that the version Pezer has still has the old writing in it, because I recall he was also a proponent of this notion of ownership being significant.

Ownership is simply the basic category of the individual; we ‘own’ ourselves, our speech, our thoughts, our emotions, out behaviors, our tendencies, our goals… and as you point out, this isn’t simply a static biological sort of property but is rather that which we are as natural activities, as human life so-called. We are self-valuing, which logically necessitates a whole host of related properties and attributes and requirements. All of these “owned” things come from values.

Ownership is key. Ownership is simply an extension of self-responsibility, the ability to dispose of something according to how we want to do that. Of course ownership/property are abstract concepts, it isn’t as if we really literally “own” in a metaphysical sense, but rather the entire notion of ownership is like the logical basis-structure for how we as self-valuing act and enact in the world; ownership is the abstract dimension of being, but tectonically-speaking it is quite physical and not at all “merely abstract”. Therefore the philosophical or legal recognition of the idea of ownership and property is just a way of setting that sort of being which we are properly on track with the sort of living, requirements and expectations that are essential for us.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Fri Apr 14, 2017 10:05 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Quote :
Ownership is key. Ownership is simply an extension of self-responsibility,

Wow, this is the core essence. This brings us finally onto the bridge from valuing to value - what makes valuing valuable, a first tectonics.
I’d even leave out the ‘self-’ - it is an extension of responsibility.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Fixed Cross
    Doric basterd
    Doric basterd
    avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Fri Apr 14, 2017 10:10 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
A selfvaluing is a value to other selfvaluigs on account of its responsibility for its values.
Thereby it both stabilizes itself, and makes itself predictable and potentially accountable, and it creates the possibility for other valuings to recognize those values it upholds as its responsibility, and value them also. Cosmos is the result. Or: economy.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Defenders of the Earth
    Tower
    Tower
    avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Sat May 20, 2017 2:52 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster

“The Identitarian Movement, which has around 500 members, promotes “traditional national values” and is also strongly opposed to illegal immigration into Europe. The movement said their Friday protest targeted Justice Minister Heiko Maas and his proposed law, which received a first reading on Friday, designed to force social media platforms to quickly remove unlawful, offensive comments.“Justice Minister Heiko Maas is dissatisfied with the already existing censorship on Facebook and Twitter, and would now force these companies to take even more rigorous action against what the German government does not want to see on social networks,” the group said in a statement.The Identitarians last made headlines in August when they climbed the landmark Brandenburg Gate, hanging a banner on the monument reading “Secure borders, secure future.”The anti-immigrant movement is monitored by domestic intelligence agency BfV for becoming increasingly radical and possibly breaching Germany’s laws on xenophobia.”

rt.com/news/389049-berlin-r … g-protest/


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Sun May 21, 2017 5:45 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
breitbart.com/london/2017/05 … -migrants/


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Sun May 21, 2017 10:10 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Sisyphus
Path
Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Sun May 21, 2017 12:00 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Nazis with masks. Anything negative said against the governments’ policies is in violation of the law. So much for free speech.

But then, the Germanys were never all that good at free speech anyway.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Sun May 21, 2017 12:57 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Sisyphus wrote:
Nazis with masks. Anything negative said against the governments’ policies is in violation of the law. So much for free speech.

But then, the Germanys were never all that good at free speech anyway.

Which is the reason Nietzsche never speaks of his contemporaries holding the powers of his own country, which were rather significant to the coming century of war.

Bismarck was Nietzsche’s contemporary, and it is evident how much respect N has for him if you read between the lines -
He was himself from Prussia as well.

Not much is spoken of this tie, weirdly. It seems far more important than his relation to Wagner.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Sisyphus
    Path
    Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Sun May 21, 2017 10:39 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Fixed Cross wrote:

Which is the reason Nietzsche never speaks of his contemporaries holding the powers of his own country, which were rather significant to the coming century of war.

Bismarck was Nietzsche’s contemporary, and it is evident how much respect N has for him if you read between the lines -
He was himself from Prussia as well.

Not much is spoken of this tie, weirdly. It seems far more important than his relation to Wagner.

Yes, I did notice the respect N had for Bismarck. (I am Prussian on my mother’s side (Yunker).)

And I agree, his link with Wagner was only via the arts. When Wagner became openly anti-Semitic the link was broken.

I can’t recall N ever being negative toward Bismarck or the trend of the government.

Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Mon May 22, 2017 2:43 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
You are half Prussian? Delightful!

If you havent, watch this movie. Ive rarely watched, no strike that, Ive never watched an American film that was this straightforwardly informative.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Sisyphus
    Path
    Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Mon May 22, 2017 4:08 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
I haven’t seen that yet. I’ll put it on my list of things to do. Thanks.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Wed Jun 14, 2017 4:10 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
I think Eurodeath is a clear indication of the consequences of Marxism. These socialist countries have become disconnected from reality, that is what socialism means. Disconnect from reality and call that a virtue. Really that is all leftism means, at least in current form. Classical liberalism actually values reality, but Marx fucked that up for everyone.

Swedes and Germans and French and Dutch and English simply cannot reason or even feel something like the danger they are facing. They no longer live in the real world. They apologize when their own people get raped and killed, and talk about tolerating rape and murder, where they actually acknowledge it’s even happening which isn’t often. Lemmings with VR headsets is the current ideal.

I would guess the only method for bringing people back to reality would be war. It’s sad this has to be the case but I can’t imagine anything less will work.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Wed Jun 14, 2017 4:48 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
EU imposing sanctions against three European nations over their refusal to allow their countries to be destroyed by mass immigration,

euobserver.com/migration/138216

To the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland I say: nice work. Congrats on having some balls, and keep it up. The USA is with you on this one.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Sisyphus
Path
Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Wed Jun 14, 2017 11:42 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Yesterday I welcomed a new member to the Daoist forum. He live in Greece. Said there weren’t many Greeks left. Most seem to be moving out of the Muslim nation.

Seems that the Persians have finally defeated the Greeks.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Thu Jun 15, 2017 1:38 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Europe defeated itself. Marx is the new god now, a pure deathgod.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Thu Jun 15, 2017 3:24 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
This is indeed half about the ME empires feeling entitled to owning Europe, theyve always said it, in recent years they screamed for Rome.

That Greek was likely exaggerating, Greeks are rather proud and, as we know, they’ve endured many, many more occupations than any other European nation. From the Romans to the Nazis, they’re used to being oppressed. They dealt with the nazis more bravely than most, and I expect them to fight through this the coming centuries.

Europe has however indeed defeated itself. Another way of saying what happened is that Germany managed to win the war in the end. It is now like it would have been in the Third Reich: anyone who says anything against Germany policies and German ideas will suffer the wrath of the entire horde, that the population has been turned into.

But Germany can only defeat itself too - it has no temperament for enjoyment. Once it has sufficiently weakened the rest, the war will start.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Defenders of the Earth
    Tower
    Tower
    avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Thu Jun 15, 2017 3:50 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Eurofascism Thu Jun 15, 2017 4:27 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Wilhelm_II_of_Germany

Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Words Tue Sep 19, 2017 2:24 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
We have the best words. All of our words are the best, and we always use only the best words.

Philosophy is knowing how to only use the best words.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Words Tue Sep 19, 2017 2:25 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
This requires knowing how to not use the words that are not the best words; and also requires not knowing how to use the words that are not the best words.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Sisyphus
Path
Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: Words Tue Sep 19, 2017 11:26 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
You do know that Nietzsche made up a lot of his own words because the Germany language didn’t have a word for the concept he was trying to express?

I try to use words that have few connotations. Words with many connotations oftentimes cause confusion or misunderstandings.

And yes, I do sometimes make up my own words and then explain further when questioned.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Words Wed Sep 20, 2017 1:31 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
I like English because it has so many multiple overlapping meanings for so many words, creating a lot of depth and multiple possible connotations. I also like how many idioms English has. I would say that English is the superior language when it comes to philosophy, at least based on the little I know of Spanish and French and German (at least we don’t need to make new words that are 20 letters long when we want to expressanewconceptinEnglish).


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Words Wed Sep 20, 2017 4:19 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Lol
but which are those long German words you dont like? I am not aware of that issue, haha. German is pretty damned economic.

Its true N doesnt translate into English too well. Some fundamental terms literally have no English translation, like Geist, which is central. But these arent words above the normal letter count.

Uebermensch is also untranslatable. It certainly doesnt mean Superman.

Message

Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: For T - Jordan Peterson and the Ethical and Supernal perspectives Wed Sep 20, 2017 8:50 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
If you would do me this favour, please watch 30 seconds up to a few minutes from this video from 9:30.

This ties into our wondering about Jordans future, as he is picking up pace and merging with the phenomenon he has been representing; the thing that lies beyond ethics; selfvaluing qua self-valuing; rather than “I am what I am”, “I am that I am”. He is heading to “cross the abyss” and seems to be doing so in a timely fashion, at the ideal moment in a mans life to take that last leap known to the ancients; what powers lie beyond are always unfathomable in advance.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XzC1rJjZ3_c[/youtube]

link to the proper moment:
youtu.be/XzC1rJjZ3_c?t=9m30s

Clearly, in this model the work of yourself, Parodites and myself would be considered to take place in the Supernal triad; beyond the reasonings that take place within the existence of ethics. Any great scientist operated here, but only philosophy attempts to completely grasp this Supernal triad and subsume the glyph in daemonic truth, where all is seen and no part is lost to any other part; the supreme activity of cosmos; such power as a lesser musician would only recognize as grinding but which is the subtlest of all things.

The Machinery of the Universe, the Foundation, the way near-being conspires with near-being to allow for their mutually coveted being to come about; this restless pond is always at the party, lurking within the banality to make it real at the right moment.

There is no way for banality to stop the encroaching of subtlety. There is no way for the banal to properly apply subtlety, without the consequences slipping through his fingers. This is “the machinery”, as I divine it; the supreme subtlety of the fluxing manifestation hierarchy, “the subtle guiders of relentless fire” as Zoroaster saw it in a vision - VO resolves all these ancient visions of the same. Prana, the Holy Spirit, magic, all this is seething self valuing plasma that is awaiting to be chosen into the cellularly manifest; it relates to the daemonic Excess, or is perhaps the very same thing. That from which tings are drawn. There is no need for an ether, there being is its own medium. Being is the mediating, which is seen as valuing, consequences of that, amounting in self-vauings coming about, which form beings temporal… temples to itself.

Message

Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Christ will always be kicking the living shit out of Kant Wed Mar 08, 2017 1:03 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
We all know Kant’s “Golden Rule”. It’s not even worth mentioning.

Christ on the other hands says: “I accept your flaws but not my own.”

My own rule, which i have lived by as far as Ive been able to, is to treat others better than I expect them to treat me.
(scorn & laughter)
But that is what standards are for: to be just out of reach. A standard makes man into an arrow.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Defenders of the Earth
    Tower
    Tower
    avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Christ will always be kicking the living shit out of Kant Wed Mar 08, 2017 1:08 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Fuck yes.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Christ will always be kicking the living shit out of Kant Wed Mar 08, 2017 1:15 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
And for Sisyphus, this isnt a theological post. God is irrelevant here, or subservient to the ethics on display.

All religious prophets are simply people who succeed in attaching their real world standards to the fantasmagoric label “God”.
By this competition, where that name is the gold-medal of ethical effort, a label you get to stick on your standards if you’ve basically killed or subjected everyone you didn’t convert, our cultural ethics were formed.

So what happened in Judea, Greece and Rome when we mark the beginning of our calendar, is the usurping of the name God in the spirit of a couple of beliefs about right and wrong. And as it happened this vision, unlike that of for example the Babyloneans, was to do with man himself attaining to godhood.
This put a grandiose load of responsibility on the mind of men, that they were supposed to be somewhat like this Christ, because he was after all a man, even if son of god and thus god. It caused a lot of cognitive dissonance, to begin with. That is why these martyrs went into the Collosseum with glad hearts - their unfathomable pain in the brain, of being Christ-torchbearers but by long shot no Christs - would be allowed to kill them, and death would wash them clean of pain and imperfection, the latter being their greatest source of pain.

What happened to them after death? They rotted away and became examples to new ones of the same spirits, and eventually, this made such an impression on the thinned out Romans, no longer Etruscans in blood but Europeans, that they began to get the ethical virus, lost their resistance and had to aim for an entirely new notion of health –
which is really the most perverted thing that ever was. Medieval healthcare… ok.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Fixed Cross
    Doric basterd
    Doric basterd
    avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Christ will always be kicking the living shit out of Kant Wed Mar 08, 2017 1:25 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
But healthcare, care, wasn’t the issue - health was supposed to be the passion for the Christ.
And we can be assured that health was required and attained in the building of this.

This is Christianity qua France.
Unprovoked, unexpected glory.
Ive actually spent some time on the courtyard all the way on top in the monastery, the now glass-walled patio garden that would in the real days be wrecked with storms. To be a monk there, that was no lowly fate.

Somber, stoic trees have their roots in the walls and walkways of the fortress.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Sisyphus
    Path
    Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: Christ will always be kicking the living shit out of Kant Thu Mar 09, 2017 1:48 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Fixed Cross wrote:
And for Sisyphus, this isnt a theological post. God is irrelevant here, or subservient to the ethics on display.

We already know that I will have nothing to do with Kant.

As to the word “God”; I really don’t have a problem with it when it is used to label an unidentifiable Prime Mover of the universe.

It is when the unidentifiable is then personified and given magical powers but yet that unidentifiable Supreme Power created a universe with innumerable flaws. I mean, really, if there were such a thing as n Omni-potent Power wouldn’t he want to create something he could be proud of?

To have faith in a personified Prime Mover requires one to hold to delusions. The only purpose of personifying the Prime Mover of the universe is for the creator of the lie to have control of the people. That is all.

The initial intent of religions is to be able to explain events that are otherwise unexplainable because of man’s ignorance of the processes of nature. This is not a problem, IMO. It is when the religion becomes a tool for controlling the mind of the people that religion becomes hypocritical.

All cultures like having religions and their “God” so that they can be “God’s chosen people”. The Jews said it straight out, most other religions believe the same thing but keep the thought behind a bunch of smoke and mirrors.

Institutionalized religions are designed for dumbing down the believers. And the priests are the only avenue through which a believer can communicate with their God. Power to the maximum.

All of the original great societies were destroyed by their own religion. Rome was ruined by religion. I could do research and likely find about a hundred more societies that were ruined by their own religion.

Now, I have nothing against religious spirituality. And this will remain pure as long as one does not attempt to personify something that is beyond the understanding of the human mind. We will never know of anything that happened before the beginning. It is a waste of mental power to attempt such an endeavor.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Christ will always be kicking the living shit out of Kant Wed Sep 20, 2017 6:06 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Fixed Cross wrote:
But healthcare, care, wasn’t the issue - health was supposed to be the passion for the Christ.
And we can be assured that health was required and attained in the building of this.

This is Christianity qua France.
Unprovoked, unexpected glory.
Ive actually spent some time on the courtyard all the way on top in the monastery, the now glass-walled patio garden that would in the real days be wrecked with storms. To be a monk there, that was no lowly fate.

Somber, stoic trees have their roots in the walls and walkways of the fortress.

People like Kant only “believe in God” because they don’t actually believe anything of the sort. They are incapable of value proper but have been guilted into whatever world of symbols happen to exist around them at the time.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Christ will always be kicking the living shit out of Kant Wed Sep 20, 2017 6:14 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Yes. Kant is a symptom of “the problematic side of German” in this sense, like Wittgenstein was in a more graceful and honest (and overtly silly) way. They actually assume that things exist in as much as there is a word for them.

True Christians in the sense of “in the beginning was the word”.
Heidegger is a direct attack on this.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Drops_Of_Jupiter
    bowstring
    bowstring

Posts : 32
Join date : 2017-02-03
Age : 57
Location : Columbus, Ohio USA

PostSubject: Re: Christ will always be kicking the living shit out of Kant Wed Sep 20, 2017 10:00 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Fixed Cross wrote:
We all know Kant’s “Golden Rule”. It’s not even worth mentioning.

Christ on the other hands says: “I accept your flaws but not my own.”

My own rule, which i have lived by as far as Ive been able to, is to treat others better than I expect them to treat me.
(scorn & laughter)
But that is what standards are for: to be just out of reach. A standard makes man into an arrow.

I don’t know… I’ve been taught the lifeguard’s method. Save my self first. Then work to save others, when possible.

The other issue here is “expectations.” When we have lower expectations, it is easier to be delighted. However, when we have higher expectations, the quality and level of delightment is much more satisfying when achieved. - Personally, I rather have a few high quality friends than many fair weather friends of low quality.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail facebook.com/debbie.styers
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Christ will always be kicking the living shit out of Kant Thu Sep 21, 2017 4:06 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
A lifeguard obviously treats the drowning person better than he expects the drowning person to be able to treat him.

My standard applies to all nobility.

I deleted your post on Maslov, since you claimed there was a logic to it but then you didn’t show that logic. Im getting a bit tougher on stupidity and pretentiousness.

I nearly removed your membership on account of this pretentiousness, but then I saw you are Sisyphus’ friend. I like Sisyphus.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Sisyphus
    Path
    Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: Christ will always be kicking the living shit out of Kant Thu Sep 21, 2017 11:20 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
I have nothing to say right now. Just letting Y’all know that I am reading this thread.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Christ will always be kicking the living shit out of Kant Thu Sep 21, 2017 12:20 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Quote :
I deleted your post on Maslov, since you claimed there was a logic to it but then you didn’t show that logic. Im getting a bit tougher on stupidity and pretentiousness.

I nearly removed your membership on account of this pretentiousness, but then I saw you are Sisyphus’ friend.

^ Yeah, that.

Pezer
builder
builder
avatar

Posts : 2190
Join date : 2011-11-15
Location : deep caverns in caves

PostSubject: If chaos, then what? Tue Jun 05, 2018 11:22 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
We got to a point on the philosopher’s thread on ilp where Sawelios said (paraphrasing) ‘nothing, an infinity of turtles upon turtles, whatever.’

Thus justifying magic, that inscrutable point of inception, also known as superstition.

But the what does matter. Whether it’s an infinity of turtles upon turtles or nothing or what. If you are not prone to superstition at least, it matters very much.

The what is chaos. The greeks knew it, but let’s not attempt to take up the greek conversation. It is chaos, that is obvious.

So the ethics is, um, shit I forgot.

Make the most of it I guess.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Pezer
builder
builder
avatar

Posts : 2190
Join date : 2011-11-15
Location : deep caverns in caves

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Tue Jun 05, 2018 11:35 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Right, ok. If chaos is inscrutable in its totality, yet it answers the question where does everything come from…

Getting closer. Brb.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Tue Jun 05, 2018 12:00 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
It occurs to me that vo can be called chaos ontology.
Or chaos architecture.

Simply because its premises preclude perfect top down pattern weaving.

don’t mean to interrupt.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Pezer
    builder
    builder
    avatar

Posts : 2190
Join date : 2011-11-15
Location : deep caverns in caves

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Tue Jun 05, 2018 12:06 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
You sus interrupt.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Pezer
builder
builder
avatar

Posts : 2190
Join date : 2011-11-15
Location : deep caverns in caves

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Tue Jun 05, 2018 12:07 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
*did.

Hold on.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Pezer
builder
builder
avatar

Posts : 2190
Join date : 2011-11-15
Location : deep caverns in caves

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Tue Jun 05, 2018 12:18 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Right. The ethics is.

Chaos precludes the possibility of a unifying principle, a single guide. Since one would preclude the whole rest of chaos. And it is inscrutably inmense.

Vo deals with this lack of unity (on the surface, since it does hold the mechanism of vo itself to be The Answer, the unifying principle from which is the totality of everything). But it doesn’t show why. I just have.

The ethics then is to. Goddamnit man. You fucked my whole shit up.

Anyway, the idea of an architecture or ontology of chaos is patently absurd.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Tue Jun 05, 2018 10:19 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Yes yes, difference precedes every order. But.

Actually you just described why VO gives architecture of chaos.

I agree with the general principle, but in general, existence precludes the possibility of a unifying underlying principle. At least, if we assume real existence. If there is a unifying principle, all is a simulation and nothing actually exists, so it can’t explain itself so it can’t explain its origins so we get the old god back.

Otherwise, unification can only be done through long effort of will, with is born of what you call chaos and I difference, which is born from self-valuing principle.

VO shows why there is lack of unity, because it precludes a priori unity and yet offers the fundamental theorem about being. So being can’t be fundamentally a unity.

To always have to disagree to agree…


You posit “if chaos” and then draw a valid “then” - but only though VO have I been able to establish that chaos is prior to order.

Tell me, how do you explain order from chaos?
How, if Chaos is the premise, does order follow?


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Pezer
    builder
    builder
    avatar

Posts : 2190
Join date : 2011-11-15
Location : deep caverns in caves

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Wed Jun 06, 2018 2:06 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Unification of what?

I don’t explain order from chaos. This would imply chaos is distinct and separate from something.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Wed Jun 06, 2018 2:09 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Asking if order can come from chaos is like asking if god can make a rock so heavy he can’t lift it. Just metaphysical games. Semantics only.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Wed Jun 06, 2018 2:42 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
“Unification of what?”

Of existence.
What the will to power attempts.
To bring all under one signifier.
What VO basically manages.

“I don’t explain order from chaos. This would imply chaos is distinct and separate from something.”

No, rather that you don’t explain order from chaos implies that chaos is separate from everything.

Chaos means void.
If Void is the basic premise, then how does non-void arise from it?

This is why I don’t take Buddhism as an intellectual, but only as a physiological premise.

There is only the relative stillness of the nerves.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Fixed Cross
    Doric basterd
    Doric basterd
    avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Wed Jun 06, 2018 2:45 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
“Asking if order can come from chaos is like asking if god can make a rock so heavy he can’t lift it. Just metaphysical games. Semantics only.”

Haha, but no. It is rather the question what is meant with the pretty word “chaos”.
If not the actual meaning, that is - which is “void”.

Noting can come from void, obviously. So if chaos is the basic premise, then the universe contradicts that premise. Thats cool though. But I prefer such artifices of language in French.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Fixed Cross
    Doric basterd
    Doric basterd
    avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Wed Jun 06, 2018 2:49 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Its very tedious to have to repeat all the fucking time.

Self-valuing precedes any relative chaos. Chaos, in the empirical light of existence, is either fabricated, or a term for a local, specific absence of recognizable patterns.

Absolute chaos is in direct contradiction with experience. Absolute self-valuing is the point toward which being is an asymptote.

Games so much annoy me.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Defenders of the Earth
    Tower
    Tower
    avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Wed Jun 06, 2018 2:51 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Me too. For me, chaos is always a relative measure of some either disorder or unpredictability within an existing system. Order and chaos spin each other into existence and work together, it’s just the logic of things. Value logic precedes all this of course.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Wed Jun 06, 2018 2:53 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Another way chaos can be perceived is from a lack of control, a weak power.
A weak centre of power means a very limited ability to see order around itself.
Everything is like, overwhelming and shit. Oooh, its so chaotic!
Yeah, imagine Napoleon exclaiming that.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Defenders of the Earth
    Tower
    Tower
    avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Wed Jun 06, 2018 2:54 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Olol, yeah


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Wed Jun 06, 2018 2:56 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
In his case, the weather finally was cause to chaos. It had rained before the battle of Waterloo, making certain tactics or strategy impossible, ridding Napoleon of his control, his self-valuing of the battle. But this simply meant that chaos disappeared from the other side.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Defenders of the Earth
    Tower
    Tower
    avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Wed Jun 06, 2018 2:57 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Supposedly his extension of capital credit was also removed at a key moment.

But yes, anyone who sees complexity as “chaos” simply isn’t trying hard enough. So I guess that would make such a person merely… chaotic.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Wed Jun 06, 2018 3:02 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Thrasymachus wrote:
Me too. For me, chaos is always a relative measure of some either disorder or unpredictability within an existing system. Order and chaos spin each other into existence and work together, it’s just the logic of things. Value logic precedes all this of course.

Right, but does this not mean that chaos is a crucial element to order?

I think this is the case.

In the sense that sv-logic is essentially an order, since logic is really an order -
and since it is not top down bot bottom up, in order for this order to exist it must face relative chaos outside of itself, even so as to be able to maintain the order, which after all involves incorporating uncertainties.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Fixed Cross
    Doric basterd
    Doric basterd
    avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Wed Jun 06, 2018 3:06 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Thrasymachus wrote:
Supposedly his extension of capital credit was also removed at a key moment.

Seems to fit the picture. What is certain is that when the battle was lost the first Rothschild quickly sped to London and announced that Nap had won, crashing the London exchange, from what I understand decimating it - so that Rothschild could buy the whole thing. I think this is the cause to the ongoing resentment against Jewish bankers in England.

Anyway maybe it was Rothschild who financed Nap too then? Seems a nifty plot.

Quote :
But yes, anyone who sees complexity as “chaos” simply isn’t trying hard enough. So I guess that would make such a person merely… chaotic.

Certainly the term chaos is just not cutting it, unless P is willing to narrow it down - which would have to be done in terms of the basic logic we already have.

Maybe chaos can mean the absence of pure absence, and nothing more - leaving the question of presence aside.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Defenders of the Earth
    Tower
    Tower
    avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Wed Jun 06, 2018 3:16 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Yes, or he could use his own logic, that would be cool too.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Wed Jun 06, 2018 3:17 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
What P tends to present as chaotic are invariably windows through which more of the majestic order is revealed.
In this sense his “chaos” is akin to the shamanic, magical valuing type of vision -
that which is unhindered by what it sees - that which sees without interpreting.

Relatively, of course - simply letting reality impact layers far beneath the most eager contexts.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Defenders of the Earth
    Tower
    Tower
    avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Wed Jun 06, 2018 3:26 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
That’s why I’ve always thought of Pezer as a tectonic-tactician. I would very much like to see his further elaborations of the sort of logic he sees at work, in chaos or anything else.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Wed Jun 06, 2018 3:29 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Thrasymachus wrote:
Yes, or he could use his own logic, that would be cool too.

He will always use his own structural integrity and build edifices of logic, consequential things. But VO is unassailable, and I don’t think P disagrees -

I just realize that if WtP is the Hammer, VO is the Anvil.

The ground that gives the hammer its hammer-ness from which swords emerge.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Fixed Cross
    Doric basterd
    Doric basterd
    avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Wed Jun 06, 2018 3:52 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Challenging WtP-VO – will to value (double entendre) – is like words competing with the sentence in which they appear.

Which is what poetry and philosophy both are, that is true.
Not every good line is a sentence.

“go on break it
it aint sacred
its not holy —”

Thrasymachus wrote:
That’s why I’ve always thought of Pezer as a tectonic-tactician.

Fuck thats an excellent term.
He is certainly good at being that.

Quote :
I would very much like to see his further elaborations of the sort of logic he sees at work, in chaos or anything else.

I don’t mean to impede any of it.
But even less I mean to impede my philosophic self-valuing, which is a devouring monster of energy.
If I am anything it is a problem with which the world will have to come to get to grips. An by the world I might mean what Pezer intends with it - he sets the right goals. So I toss mountains in his way to make a path.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Fixed Cross
    Doric basterd
    Doric basterd
    avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Wed Jun 06, 2018 3:55 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
VO is indeed an anvil, as breaking the anvil leads to impotence of the hammer. Because the hammer is power, this can’t be done.

Lets say VO is the hammer and anvil, where the hammer had already been developed by Nietzsche. I needed to make something that the hammer occult destroy to explicate precisely the friction of the WtP with itself.

Message

Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Wed Jun 06, 2018 4:12 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
tectonic tactician/fixed cross/capable of demonstration
for example

Pezer would be the Master of Ceremony of this group.
Frankly we’re all very good rappers, the world should know our style.

Nthing is trivial. Thus "Everything, “All” is definitely trivial. What that leaves is a very peculiar moment of the choosing of my own tastes when a magician told a story.

(etc -)


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides

Last edited by Fixed Cross on Wed Jun 06, 2018 4:19 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Wed Jun 06, 2018 4:14 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
That the thing rappers are never alone.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Fixed Cross
    Doric basterd
    Doric basterd
    avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Wed Jun 06, 2018 4:16 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
I don’t believe in chaos
I am chaos
they tell me

why don’t I believe in myself they ask

chaos is in the formation of a flower, it is all that collapses in favour of the Great.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Fixed Cross
    Doric basterd
    Doric basterd
    avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Wed Jun 06, 2018 4:26 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Rap gives an opportunity to bring back the old materials and start from the bottom, the rock where it still meet the grass. It has a kind of pedestrian nature as morality always does before the billions of years - and it uses this, like playing craps against the walls of eternity as I called it - and in this game finds the stone, the eternal dance of an environment of chance, the certainties. Win and lose - these are monumental concepts, the pillars of mercy and severity as they occur in time and define us step by step.

Determining what we wish to win is prior to all this but most of it is implicit in our nativity.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Pezer
    builder
    builder
    avatar

Posts : 2190
Join date : 2011-11-15
Location : deep caverns in caves

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Wed Jun 06, 2018 5:23 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster

Well ok, you want a more concrete definition of chaos. You did what I said not to do, which is continue the greek conversation. Chaos meant void then. Kaoc, the sound of a drop onto a pool. Also why Thales held water to be the what everything is essencially. But the -oc was then deemed too hardcore, so it was softened into oç. It was the sound that determined existence, chaogenetic. Try it! Dyonisoç, Dyonisoç. Etc.

But this obviously is not the chaos Nietzsche, for example, refered to. It is simply its genetic precursor.

Chaos is, as traceable from that very genetic line, that which everything is.

Let’s take it from the search for the grandest, most all determining, all encompassing, all being real thing. Famously pursued by catholics and philosophers. Is it God? But this would imply a unity of some sort. Everything can’t be God and God remain a distinct thing. As you say, all knowledge must be rooted in experiencie. Can any such unity be drawn from experience?

Nietzsche and Kierkegaard both stumbled on this. The lack of unity.

The only term, and one which understanding requires only the barest intellectual honesty, that encompasses everything, absolutely everything, from order to what mathematicians call chaos or entropy, to punk horses, to what can’t quite be put into words yet or ever or really anything at all and everything, including void, truths that contradict void, truths, absoluteness, the impossibility of absoluteness, sadness, blorgorg, infinity, an infinite etc. is chaos.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Pezer
builder
builder
avatar

Posts : 2190
Join date : 2011-11-15
Location : deep caverns in caves

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Wed Jun 06, 2018 5:26 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
And even that elemental Greek pool, kaoc, is only void un like a genetic almost mystical place, a transition between chaos and Gods and Stuff, not because chaos requires one, or there necessarily is one. Just because chaos includes it un its inscrutable infinity.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Wed Jun 06, 2018 5:49 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Thats profoundly clarifying.
Yes then, chaos includes order, chaos is simply that which is but isn’t subjected yet.
Lol, that explains my behaviour as FC.

Still this stresses self valuing logic principle as the architect of, for with and by or at least through chaos.
But maybe thats like saying the engine is the architect of the distance. One bridge too far.

VO needs wheels. Chaos can be its wheels.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Fixed Cross
    Doric basterd
    Doric basterd
    avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Wed Jun 06, 2018 5:55 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Because VO is an order that destroys all previous orders of its… order.
Thus, it must have a kind of ally, something it doesn’t destroy, to navigate itself, to self-valuing.

The self valuing logic is the dancing star born amid the chaos -
chaos is that which has no laws, so that lawlessnesses can exist and set their own laws, so that things can exist.

Chaos is the inverse of the grass growing through the rock, or tarmac. I don’t know what that means, I just missed the metaphor.

But now see why chaos is a birth ground, even though not to itself, as it is simply the intermediary of being and the next instance of being; it is the collective unconscious will, the monster of energy that must seclude itself from itself in many compartmentalized chambers called entities; self-valuing is the escape of chaos from itself, which it fortunately never even intended to be, as that would be its death.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Defenders of the Earth
    Tower
    Tower
    avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Wed Jun 06, 2018 5:56 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
I believe that ‘void’ is only meaningful in relation to something which is absent. Thus there must be “some thing” already, thus absolute void-as-such, in a universal or a priori sense, makes no sense. I see this also applying to chaos.

I will give a brief overview of my argument for the meaninglessness if non-existence, or rather for the fact that something has always existed and it makes no sense to speak of a time at which there was nothing anywhere;

  1. Principle of Sufficient Reason (it makes no sense, not even potentially or in imagination, to speak about something existing or occurring for literally no reason; you can always ask of everything “why did it occur? Why is it what it is, rather than something else?)

  2. something exists right now (this cannot logically or sanely be denied)

  3. ergo, given 1 and 2, something has always existed

  4. ergo, given 3, it makes no sense to posit or speak about a time or original state of “void” wherein nothing existed anywhere, ever, at all.

—-

Therefore, in my view anyway, something has always existed and this is an absolutely fundamental and undeniable Fact. So given this fact, to speak of void is to speak of a specific absence of something which already exists or which already existed. Void just means “hey this existing thing isn’t happening to be here anymore”.

As for chaos, I’ve stated how I define this. I don’t believe in an absolute chaos because that would imply an absolute lack (void) of order, which would make no sense. For any thing to exist or to be the case, it must have some sort of ordered-ness to it. Order simply means relations between, structure, being-ness; without such things, no thing could exist, since this is basically just describing what it means to exist anyway.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Wed Jun 06, 2018 5:59 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Pezer wrote:
And even that elemental Greek pool, kaoc, is only void un like a genetic almost mystical place, a transition between chaos and Gods and Stuff, not because chaos requires one, or there necessarily is one. Just because chaos includes it un its inscrutable infinity.
I like this.

Yeah this oq- it sounds Arabic.

Khalaq

Certain relatively chaotic beings.

tarmoq
roq.

Oq = death
to update suihelios


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Fixed Cross
    Doric basterd
    Doric basterd
    avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Wed Jun 06, 2018 6:13 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Thrasymachus wrote:
I believe that ‘void’ is only meaningful in relation to something which is absent. Thus there must be “some thing” already, thus absolute void-as-such, in a universal or a priori sense, makes no sense. I see this also applying to chaos.

Absolutely. So the Zen Void, it makes sense then that it is attained, to simply something contemplated; a true void of awareness (which first took me several hours of energizing, yoga and then meditation to attain, which I did every day for six months) is attained through recognizing all things and aligning them all on precisely the same wavelength. Then, the brain relaxes to about a tenth of its normal effort in a sort of sigh, and can be silent in absolute bliss for hours. Just nothing except use empty roaming of objectless release of endorphins and what not.

This it is simply neurological emptiness of tensions. It has no bearing on any ontological realities. It is the mind which ceases to identify with its thoughts and withdraws in the suspense of disbelief, or the suspense of discernment, not because there is nothing but because there is more than enough, so it doesn’t matter whats what, and only in that carelessness before pure being, therein enjoying itself for its simple hearth, is this rapturous bliss of which angels are made to be enjoyed in a sensible, constant manner.

Quote :
I will give a brief overview of my argument for the meaninglessness if non-existence, or rather for the fact that something has always existed and it makes no sense to speak of a time at which there was nothing anywhere;

  1. Principle of Sufficient Reason (it makes no sense, not even potentially or in imagination, to speak about something existing or occurring for literally no reason; you can always ask of everything “why did it occur? Why is it what it is, rather than something else?)

  2. something exists right now (this cannot logically or sanely be denied)

  3. ergo, given 1 and 2, something has always existed

  4. ergo, given 3, it makes no sense to posit or speak about a time or original state of “void” wherein nothing existed anywhere, ever, at all.

Or, time is a possibility, and possibility has always existed - apparently. There are many ways to satisfy this question - but the one that finally satisfied me was “nothing has no power to enforce itself”.

Quote :
Therefore, in my view anyway, something has always existed and this is an absolutely fundamental and undeniable Fact. So given this fact, to speak of void is to speak of a specific absence of something which already exists or which already existed. Void just means “hey this existing thing isn’t happening to be here anymore”.

As for chaos, I’ve stated how I define this. I don’t believe in an absolute chaos because that would imply an absolute lack (void) of order, which would make no sense. For any thing to exist or to be the case, it must have some sort of ordered-ness to it. Order simply means relations between, structure, being-ness; without such things, no thing could exist, since this is basically just describing what it means to exist anyway.

Chaos go me now means the basic ground of all tectonic differentiation; the medium generated by self valuing principle through having multiple instances of itself, which is basically what self-valuings encounter when they are perpetuating themselves; it is as if it is the abyss between principle and manifestation.

Daath, in qabaliq order, would correspond to chaos.
One can only know chaos by traversing it, because to know it not-traversingly is not to exist.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Fixed Cross
    Doric basterd
    Doric basterd
    avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Wed Jun 06, 2018 6:19 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
But it could be that as chaos, one traverses the rest of being and leaves fertile chaos in ones wake.

(ᚢ — Digging downward-forward. Ploughing through life and leaving fertile chaos and upheaval as a trail. Mammoth strength. Marching barbarian army. The synchronized heartbeats of a million soldiers. Drums in the deep.) (Uruz is the abyss from which the primordial waters of Laguz flow - Billian lore)


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Fixed Cross
    Doric basterd
    Doric basterd
    avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Wed Jun 06, 2018 6:25 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
What follows is that chaos means power.

To be considered chaotic means to not be controlled.
But since there is nothing that doesn’t consist of WtP, if it isn’t controlled it means it must be self-governed.

Throughout written history this has been the case, the apparitions of power dreams, the structures not known that can’t even be registered as proper structures, and yet don’t fail to conquer;

chaos is being as it comes in.
Humanity is chaos-resistance.
And all life is human in this way.

Chaos can be known, but only like light can be seen.
You can see where it just struck.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Fixed Cross
    Doric basterd
    Doric basterd
    avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Wed Jun 06, 2018 6:30 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Power is a tolerance of chaos, and chaos is a tolerance of power.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Pezer
    builder
    builder
    avatar

Posts : 2190
Join date : 2011-11-15
Location : deep caverns in caves

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Wed Jun 06, 2018 8:22 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Well it was a nice try anyway.

We may have better luck next time!
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Wed Jun 06, 2018 8:44 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
I was going to announce that reply, but I figured Id let you have it.

But yeah, Im still irritated by how predictable you become when you see disobedience.
I tend to understand peoples intuitions better than they do, and thats not appreciated.

I guess Ill have to grant you time to incorporate this all into your language.

Nice setup, anyway.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Fixed Cross
    Doric basterd
    Doric basterd
    avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Wed Jun 06, 2018 8:51 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Your chaos is still god. “Is it god?” no, god is dead.
It is the earth in which god was assimilated

You still fundamentally underestimate the depth of the principle, and the abyss that it represents.

Chaos is the result of necessity.
Chaos is not arbitrarily there, it has a character.
Existence isn’t bland faceless pasta. Necessity has a countenance.

Look to the left.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Fixed Cross
    Doric basterd
    Doric basterd
    avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Wed Jun 06, 2018 8:57 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
The God recognizes your offering.

Wik wrote:
Chaos theory

Chaos theory is a branch of mathematics focusing on the behavior of dynamical systems that are highly sensitive to initial conditions. ‘Chaos’ is an interdisciplinary theory stating that within the apparent randomness of chaotic complex systems, there are underlying patterns, constant feedback loops, repetition, self-similarity, fractals, self-organization, and reliance on programming at the initial point known as sensitive dependence on initial conditions

So VO is actually recognizably and paradigmatically the mathematical axiom of chaos.
I didn’t even realize how well it fits into the tradition of chaos-theory, how perfectly it completes it.

This solves the presentation problem. VO is axiomatic chaos theory.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Fixed Cross
    Doric basterd
    Doric basterd
    avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Wed Jun 06, 2018 9:09 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
ACT


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Fixed Cross
    Doric basterd
    Doric basterd
    avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Wed Jun 06, 2018 9:11 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Pezer, you genius pathfinder.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Fixed Cross
    Doric basterd
    Doric basterd
    avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Wed Jun 06, 2018 9:19 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Presently existing Chaos Theory can be defined as behavioural chaos theory.
Its mathematics are simulations.

Axiomatic chaos theory is the proper integrating and explicating algebra, gives what in geometry is a system of axes and the zero at its heart, except that it isn’t a zero but a self-valuing reference frame.

The curvature of the mapping of the progression of connecting self-valuing is the fractal.

I saw the basic implication a while ago;

“Gravity is subtle local derivative of the sort of value transaction constants offered as the motions of the planets with respect to one another with respect to their star with respect to its galactic center, with respect to what lies beyond into the vast ordering fractal Omega.” [Clockwork Blue]


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Fixed Cross
    Doric basterd
    Doric basterd
    avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Wed Jun 06, 2018 11:48 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Science is cruel.
The ontological tyranny can not be broken.
It can merely be seen for what it is, and cultivated.

All of the ground is turning green
and Johnny is working on a big machine
ain’t much left for the working man to sing

(Uncle Walt’s Band, Getaway)

Thats what the episode ends with anyway.
For chaos theory, Silicon Valley is a good show.

Chaos is overwhelming odds which is why existence is heroic.
Daemonism usurps the chaotic to spit it out again, a whirling snake through lesser chains of probability, the kundalini eats chaos and breathes health into the realm.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Fixed Cross
    Doric basterd
    Doric basterd
    avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Wed Jun 06, 2018 11:54 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
How to get from chaos to health is in circles.

Time becomes a flower anyway, so why not work with it.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Fixed Cross
    Doric basterd
    Doric basterd
    avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Wed Jun 06, 2018 12:18 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Quote :
Logic is the will to predict. Without it, nothing can live. We observe regularities, and note these and include them into a system of other already discovered regularities. This has allowed us to conclude so many things that we know even less than we did when we knew nothing, because we have been caged inside our regularities and predictions and all the as yet unclassified rages among us unseen, and causes havoc and the end of our world. Affectance-Storms, nuclear fallout from broken self valuings, splinters of the anentropic shells blasting through our world as it stumbles.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Defenders of the Earth
    Tower
    Tower
    avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Wed Jun 06, 2018 10:59 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Chaos arises because of insufficient valuing, some of which is necessary and some of which isn’t.

There could be no chaos without an underlying and overlying order. Self-valuing is always inadequate to itself, to a degree, and has issues relating to other self-valuings; that is all chaos is. Complexity in both order and error and the necessities and contingencies of these.

Idealizing or metaphysicizing chaos is dumb, and will never justify anything like nihilism or apathy.

Author Message
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Thu Jun 07, 2018 4:18 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Im going to disregard the notion of chaos outside what it means in chaos-theory, which is basically waiting for VO to make sense out of it.

What chaos is in chaos theory is not a metaphysical entity as Pezer seems to envision it, some great All, but simply … self-valuing.

Let me explain. In chaos theory, the source of the chaotic behaviour of any kind of progression/form/environment is seen to be the initial state of that form; and the initial state is the reference frame in terms of which the environment is valued so as to amount to this particular progressing shape.

So what you get is an environment consisting of innumerable such initial states, all valuing each other in terms of he’s initial states, and this turns to reality, which indeed is highly fractalized.

I didn’t quite know yet how to approach VO to develop a mathematics out of it, that problem is now solved.

— indeed, the whole crux of this all is that synthetic self-valuing isn’t sufficient to itself. The field of excess this asymmetry produces through what could be simplified as friction, is “the world” which is fractalized, and “chaotic” in that sense.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Defenders of the Earth
    Tower
    Tower
    avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Thu Jun 07, 2018 4:27 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Right, basically there are numerous different tectonic layers of valuings-goings-on that are forced by proximity to interact with one another but which actually individually operate by totally different continent principles and patterns, so that chaos appears in the middle, rhizomes of earth. That’s world, nature. Then as you say, these all try to value each other to themselves producing exponentially more chaos but also reconciliations into meta orders.

Regardless of all that, there is no Chaos God, there is no metaphysic here, other than order, logic as such; SV. Logic is THE fundamental. Period.

Chaos is just a bastard stepchild of logic. And even buried inside every SV since as I said, it’s always going to be self-inadequate and self-inexpressible to some degree. That’s also why when we use philosophy to refine ourselves toward minimizing those two conditions of limit, the chaos in our world greatly declines.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Thu Jun 07, 2018 4:28 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
I’ll take a look at that math later.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Thu Jun 07, 2018 4:31 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Meta tektoniks of inter-layer replications and rhizomatic proliferations daemonically bent through the eye of SV.

Dude, fuck chaos. Life is little more than making chaos one’s own biatch.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Thu Jun 07, 2018 4:42 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Vikings know how to tame chaos.

Eat and drink like Ragnar, I say …”they said I’m the first of a species they call a real motjerfucker”.

I am the Alpha and the Omegle — order. Orderzzz

Logik , teh truthz. Yea I’m so fucking sick of bullshit. Over it. Done. So deal.

Mind ain’t no mystery son.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6663
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: If chaos, then what? Thu Jun 07, 2018 5:04 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Gotta agree with all that.

Chaos by itself is definitely not a true concept.

It only becomes conceptual with chaos-theory which ironically is a mathematics of increasing order, orders so intertwined and sensitive that they appear unpredictable.

They are so causally responsive that they even look chaotic.

Chaos as the summum of increasing order.

Pezer
builder
builder
avatar

Posts : 2190
Join date : 2011-11-15
Location : deep caverns in caves

PostSubject: For Whom The Hawk Shrieks Wed Jul 25, 2018 1:31 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Ask not for whom the hawk shrieks,

It shrieks for thee
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: For Whom The Hawk Shrieks Wed Jul 25, 2018 10:58 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
central hawk stare undoes even the strongest man.

i.imgur.com/RN4yEAp.jpg
i.imgur.com/PqLloEA.jpg

Author Message
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: logic of beliefs Mon Nov 12, 2018 6:32 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
religions and belief systems are really nothing more than languages, words. like a word, a belief means nothing on its own, it exists simply as a representation and expressive symbol for some truth. a word on its own is meaningless, but it has meaning in how the word points to and represents something true and real. this is also how religions and belief in general work.

so it’s not a question of if a religion of belief system is true or not, just like it’s not a question if a word is true or not. words don’t exist, not really; same with religious and other belief systems. what actually exists is the meaning, truth, reality, facts, significance which these mere symbolic systems of represented in point to and allow us to see.

if a word, a religion, or a belief system is able to represent something true then that word, religion or belief system is justified in doing its job. it doesn’t matter if the religion or belief uses “untrue” aspects like ideas of gods or whatever, because those ideas are literally the same type of thing as a word is: just a mostly arbitrary scratching of symbols that has no meaning in itself but is able to be used in a larger system of similar symbols, namely languages, to recall and represent something truthful and real.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6661
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: logic of beliefs Mon Nov 12, 2018 7:57 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Yes, there is no word without assumption and no second word without adding some, the building of any sentence is an expression of complex beliefs.

Some beliefs are built on grammar, the idea that there is a subject and an object and a verb, an activity that should stand separate of these and that yet binds them, etc -
these are relatively deep yet still naive beliefs.

And some beliefs are entirely built of trigger words.
this is the system of any excited, disenfranchised mass.

Trump is one of the few rare folks out there to ever pull this shit who hard just to distract from it, so we can get back to deeper beliefs, built on greatness rather than on triggeredness. You have to use the word, it is fundamentally a tool, and its materials to work on are man, and the art you’re creating out of it is what is pitifully called a congregation. A movement.

VO has been pure because it doesn’t do this. Its not an easy term to get used to at all, it rearranges your whole mind, it reinforces the whole structure of meaning giving, it annihilates the difference between subject, verb and object. The belief is now restricted to a grammar that disrupts all previous grammar. It is a fundamentally iconoclastic belief, it can’t destroy itself because it is already made of the same stuff of what nihilism is made of. It is nihilism rearranged, so that it turns out as earth. The pieces in their place, we see that relativity of values is not a top down condemnation of value but a grond to generate whatever already is of value - such as the sense that there is something of value - from what is irrevocably here, now.

De-facto-ism.
Thats where you don’t need words in the first place.
seeing what speaks for itself first without the use of any word.

Of course, if you’re in a busy city this can get pretty depressing. Among talking people you need to be talking or you’ll be violated and disrupting.
A city is “all talk”.
City talk radio, almost a tautology. And in this snow of noise, a new ground to silence and abstinence from belief is born - the jazz like talk that passes the time, in which a pure stoic soul takes hold that believes nothing, and firmly. Such a man can discover a universe of feels in any given thing, that is the advantage. A truly firm nihilist can always be moved by seeing that someone put in a little extra effort. And this is what nature made of, extra effort - and so the nihilist becomes a philosopher, by seeing that to be nihilistic may be true, but apparently just not good enough. This is when envy comes to the aid of wisdom. All sins have their place.

Fixed Cross

Doric basterd
Doric basterd

Posts : 6665
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Neutrinos as quasi-being Tue Nov 29, 2011 10:16 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
It is possible to say that “a neutrino” is only a theoretical unity interpreted out of a collection of detected properties assumably resultant of disintegration of better understood forms of energy, things that more literally fit the description ‘particle’.

If so, a neutrino, and this goes for more subatomic definitions, is to be understood, if we are aiming for epistemic exactness, a case of transfer of information. I.e., parts of what we may define as a particle – empirical results amounting to almost a particle.

What kind of structural consistency does a neutrino have? It does not respond to electromagnetism, only weak-forces affect it.

It may exist only as our assumption, its structural integrity may be a fiction, an inference made because of the assumption that all change detected must be the effect of particles, which is how we still understand quanta.

It may not be the case that the transferred energy amounting to the detected neutrino is caused to be measured by it being there as such, separate from the measurement. It may be that the qualities that amount to the definition ‘neutrino’ are in part ‘teleported’, by the very expectation of and preparation for the ‘arrival’.

A neutrino may in part be caused ( in terms of space-time consistency ) by the placement of the receptive material, the terms of its being-measured, which accounts for its existence. The neutrino can not positively affect, the conditions for its existence must be created. Part of the work of its being is done for it – this may account for the lack of space-time momentum – it is in part a non-entity, appearing here and there as ‘real’, actively constant particles permit it.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides

Last edited by Fixed Cross on Tue Dec 06, 2011 3:57 pm; edited 6 times in total
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6665
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Neutrinos as quasi-being Thu Dec 01, 2011 11:08 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
It is clear that what I describe as method to measure / establish is what is always used in physics / chemistry, particle-science. Assumption of what will happen if the calculations are correct, suspension of judgment until the assumption is recognized in what occurs. I would propose that perhaps in the case of / at the level of neutrinos, our methods of establishment what “is” are unsound.

It seems to be a natural assumption that the surplus of gravitation measured/inferred from the movement of certain galaxies, may be the result of wrongfully applying laws that we have establlished to predict the movements occurring in our own “system” - galaxy.

It is my understanding at least that Dark Matter, the assumption made necessary by the application of Newtonian Law to “The Entire Universe” (the assumption of a universal totality) would be present mainly in a specific form of galaxy, one that is relatively young, and less circular, more elliptic.

I have read this at one point but I can not find it on the internet. The point would be that dark matter, i.e. surplus gravitation, is unequally distributed in proportion with “legal”, expected gravitation.

Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6665
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Phonons Sat Dec 03, 2011 2:06 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster

Apparently, such auto-controlled turbulences are sometimes considered as having particle like properties.

In physics, a phonon is a collective excitation in a periodic, elastic arrangement of atoms or molecules in condensed matter, such as solids and some liquids. Often referred to as a quasiparticle, it represents an excited state in the quantum mechanical quantization of the modes of vibrations of elastic structures of interacting particles.<<<< en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phonon

Very useful information.
This forum is intended to collect useful models
applicable by value - logic.

IN order to create a physical science
based the ethical aspect of the will to power.
the artificial removed from intelligence, the cruelty of the stupid is unnecessary

assemble the logics of chemistry and physics around the activity to value all in terms of self,
which amounts to nothing more than this activity or tendency -

Lordly courage imagines the good, malicious ambition anticipates profiteering, the struggle for power continues as the stakes are raised…
tragic… born out of the spirit of music.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Parodites
    Tower
    Tower
    avatar

Posts : 757
Join date : 2011-12-11

PostSubject: Re: Phonons Thu Dec 15, 2011 5:27 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Although I am not a fan of dialectics and Hegel, the man did make a good point. How are we supposed to conduct scientific research if our science is not at every single step of the way complimented by a science of the mind, which is the proper philosophy? Our science has never been complimented in this way, and thus we run into unbridgeable gulfs in our knowledge, like that between classical and quantum physics, we run into paradoxes and singularities, etc.

James S Saint
rational metaphysicist
rational metaphysicist

Posts : 244
Join date : 2011-12-26

PostSubject: Achieving Faster than Light Sun Jan 01, 2012 11:31 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
I have often stated that absolutely nothing can ever travel faster than what we refer to as “the speed of light”. But just as a minor interesting note, there are technically actually 2 exceptions.

My meta-particle tracking program monitors for anything with gimbal velocities and anything traveling faster than light, primarily to help hunt down any errors in the program. Recently, I found it triggering yet I could find no error in the program. I investigated the equations over and over and was a bit puzzled as to how a particular particle could have a velocity greater than the max possible.

Well, as it turned out, a bit of a philosophical thought came to mind and revealed what was happening.

A particle’s location is defined by its center. By tracking its center, one knows at what velocity it is traveling. But in the case of particles, especially particles that are just beginning to form, an interesting effect takes place.

If a particulate is already traveling close to the speed of light, a common occurrence, and it runs up on a similar particulate running slightly slower, you would think the end velocity would merely be an average of the two. And it is… sortta. But what happens is that the two particulates merge into a single particle and guess what happens to the center of the first? Quite suddenly the center of the “particle” went from position A to position B (a particulate width distance away) almost instantaneously.

Of course the reason was simply that the particulate was still in a growth stage and as it grows, its center can outrun all of its constituents. Technically speaking, that really is the same as traveling faster than light. So it can be legitimately stated that a growing particle can, for a short time at least, travel faster than light. Of course, that time is in the range of fractional pico seconds, but still, it is an interesting note.

Then it occurred to me that every particle is actually growing and shirking at the same rate all the time and is thus stable. But what if I were to cause it to grow faster on one side and shrink faster on the opposite side? Again, as it turns out, for short times, that can actually happen and no doubt in space, it does happen.

The requirements for causing such an event involves a charge gradient which of course cannot continue for very long, but it could lead to much greater durations of exceeding the speed of light for non-growing particles than the growing particles mentioned before. And an ideal place to find such a naturally occurring situation would be the famed black hole. I can safely say, that some of the particles speeding into a black hole, especially one with a significant charge field, will in fact rush to their demise even faster than the light rushing along side of them. For how long that might be, I couldn’t venture a guess.

The shifting center would not actually add to the momentum of the particle, so no common energy equation theories get violated. The particle merely shows up at the destination and its demise before its photon partner.

…just an interesting observation.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
James S Saint
rational metaphysicist
rational metaphysicist

Posts : 244
Join date : 2011-12-26

PostSubject: Re: Achieving Faster than Light Mon Jan 02, 2012 12:07 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Oh hell…

Very shortly after posting that OP, it dawned on me how one could theoretically keep a particle experiencing a positive gradient and thus continue to travel faster than light. It would be extremely difficult to arrange, but theoretically possible.

Let’s say you had an electron orbiting its nucleus and had the technical means to increase the charge (or mass) field in front of the electron while reducing it behind the electron. By arranging to do that sequentially, much like a stepper motor or an alternator, the field changing constituents would not need travel or change faster than light for the particle to never be able to catch up to the changing field in front of it. As the particle passes, the field in each location would be reduced back to a lower level.

The electron would be in a state of constantly growing more in front and shirking behind and thus its center would be shifting forward faster than its constituent mass could possibly travel. For as long as the device was operational and kept sync with the orbiting electron, the electron would achieve and maintain faster than light travel.

I really hate it when I outwit my own proclamations of impossibility…sigh Mad
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
James S Saint
rational metaphysicist
rational metaphysicist

Posts : 244
Join date : 2011-12-26

PostSubject: Re: Achieving Faster than Light Mon Jan 02, 2012 12:34 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Continuing even further…

Again theoretically, a linear accelerator and relay could be arranged such that a particle could carry the information of an event in a straight line.

As the particle either traveled linearly itself, or relayed its effect to other particles inline, even though its own charge field could not grow faster than light such as to have affect as it passed, it could reach the end of a line and begin having its field effect upon the terminal detecting device before a photon had a chance to get to the detector.

Information traveling faster than light… gees… it must be bad news.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5478
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Achieving Faster than Light Mon Jan 02, 2012 2:24 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Very interesting - can you expand on how you understand what a photon is? With respect to an otherwise “particle” or growing “pre- or semi-particular” field/cloud?


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Abstract
Oracle
Oracle
avatar

Posts : 142
Join date : 2011-11-15
Age : 31
Location : The Moon

PostSubject: Re: Achieving Faster than Light Mon Jan 02, 2012 6:20 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
If the development of the center when to things collide occurs so fast is it possible to use such a principle for something like at least faster then light speed communication? For example the merger of a long string of particles can be watched and when the center shifts in one way we have a 0 and another way we have a 1…or something like that…


“There is only one good, knowledge, and one evil, ignorance.” -Socrates
“Nature herself has imprinted on the minds of all the idea of God.” -Cicero
“It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain an idea without necessarily believing it.” -Aristotle
“I have gained this by philosophy: that I do without being commanded what others do only from fear of the law.” -Aristotle
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
James S Saint
rational metaphysicist
rational metaphysicist

Posts : 244
Join date : 2011-12-26

PostSubject: Re: Achieving Faster than Light Mon Jan 02, 2012 8:32 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Abstract wrote:
If the development of the center when to things collide occurs so fast is it possible to use such a principle for something like at least faster then light speed communication?
At this point, it seems definite. But I’m not going to make any promises until I create one inside my metaspace. The great thing about my “hyperspace window” is that it is actually real. Anything that can occur inside that space (short of programming errors) can and does occur in physical space. And if you REALLY want to get buzzed, realize that anything that occurs within that window can be arranged to occur in societies. One society can relay information to another faster than any electronic signal could pass that information. But of course that would be incredibly difficult to arrange.

Abstract wrote:
For example the merger of a long string of particles can be watched and when the center shifts in one way we have a 0 and another way we have a 1…or something like that…
“Something like that” perhaps, but I don’t think merely a string of particles would cut it. I’m pretty sure that it would be impossible to maintain that string (but not making any proclamation concerning the impossible for a while… bet you love that don’cha Wink ). And I’m not so sure than transferring from particle to particle in that fashion would cut it either. There would be inertia issues. I suspect the way to go would involve transverse displacement such as to produce a wave along the side of the particles. But merely a very finely tuned special particle accelerator would do the trick. No more than one particle per “bit” would be necessary.

If I wasn’t so brain fried from merely creating the metaspace, I would be creating a meta-communicator (“subspace communicator”) already.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Abstract
Oracle
Oracle
avatar

Posts : 142
Join date : 2011-11-15
Age : 31
Location : The Moon

PostSubject: Re: Achieving Faster than Light Mon Jan 02, 2012 8:43 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
James S Saint wrote:
Abstract wrote:
If the development of the center when to things collide occurs so fast is it possible to use such a principle for something like at least faster then light speed communication?
At this point, it seems definite. But I’m not going to make any promises until I create one inside my metaspace. The great thing about my “hyperspace window” is that it is actually real. Anything that can occur inside that space (short of programming errors) can and does occur in physical space. And if you REALLY want to get buzzed, realize that anything that occurs within that window can be arranged to occur in societies. One society can relay information to another faster than any electronic signal could pass that information. But of course that would be incredibly difficult to arrange.

Abstract wrote:
For example the merger of a long string of particles can be watched and when the center shifts in one way we have a 0 and another way we have a 1…or something like that…
“Something like that” perhaps, but I don’t think merely a string of particles would cut it. I’m pretty sure that it would be impossible to maintain that string (but not making any proclamation concerning the impossible for a while… bet you love that don’cha Wink ). And I’m not so sure than transferring from particle to particle in that fashion would cut it either. There would be inertia issues. I suspect the way to go would involve transverse displacement such as to produce a wave along the side of the particles. But merely a very finely tuned special particle accelerator would do the trick. No more than one particle per “bit” would be necessary.

If I wasn’t so brain fried from merely creating the metaspace, I would be creating a meta-communicator (“subspace communicator”) already.
Sounds kool what is this meta space you have created… is it a simulation in a computer?


“There is only one good, knowledge, and one evil, ignorance.” -Socrates
“Nature herself has imprinted on the minds of all the idea of God.” -Cicero
“It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain an idea without necessarily believing it.” -Aristotle
“I have gained this by philosophy: that I do without being commanded what others do only from fear of the law.” -Aristotle
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
James S Saint
rational metaphysicist
rational metaphysicist

Posts : 244
Join date : 2011-12-26

PostSubject: Re: Achieving Faster than Light Mon Jan 02, 2012 8:57 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Capable wrote:
Very interesting - can you expand on how you understand what a photon is? With respect to an otherwise “particle” or growing “pre- or semi-particular” field/cloud?
That one is a bit of an interesting story from my perspective.

Just shortly before I finished installing the rules for afflate engagement into the program, I could already see how and why a particle was going to form… and it wasn’t how I had previously speculated. And sure enough, immediately small particles began to form. Not that it was quite that simple. At one point before I got the details ironed out, the first particle that formed just kept growing. That wouldn’t have been terribly interesting, but the particle gains a naturally occurring spin and shortly it exploded, leaving little meta bits all over my screen… quite picturesque actually. I wish I had thought to take a screen shot before I corrected the problem.

Anyway, even after I had worked with the particle formations and installed various monitor and tracking devices, I realized that I still hadn’t seen or figured out exactly what the photon was all about. None of my particles could qualify as a photon. I was puzzled for a few days before I suddenly laughed as it hit me, “what an idiot”.

A photon is only a particle in the sense that it can maintain its form and philosophically anything that maintains its form is an “object” or particle. But the more informative truth is that a photon is merely a part of a wave. Take any ole traveling EM wave and chop off all but a tiny bit without disturbing that bit, and you have your photon.

Despite what contemporary physics will tell you, photons don’t really have “frequency”, but rather they are a culmination of chaos that has a Fourier dispersal of aberrant frequencies with a mean at the frequency noted by ye ole common physicist. I had realized that as I created my “Afflate Analysis”, I was creating “Photon Analysis”. Every one of my afflates (200,000) is a photon, a clump of noisy EM with an average affectance state 1st derivative.

But avoid the idea that a photon, even as a particle, can maintain its form as it encounters other photons. They don’t merely interact, they often combine and take on as many shapes as you will ever see in a sky of clouds. They smear, twist, entwine, break away, disperse, and on rare occasion even develop a spin, although once they develop a self sustaining spin, they gain inertia and are no longer a mere afflate or photon and can no longer travel freely.

Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
James S Saint
rational metaphysicist
rational metaphysicist

Posts : 244
Join date : 2011-12-26

PostSubject: Re: Achieving Faster than Light Mon Jan 02, 2012 9:14 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Abstract wrote:

Sounds kool what is this meta space you have created… is it a simulation in a computer?
A simulation is where a programmer takes a set of rules for the behavior of an object and has the processor dictate those rules to a replica of the object. Every video game is a simulator.

But my program is different in a very serious way. Although it uses simulation techniques here and there, what it is a part of is a actual reality that is not a mere simulation. The difference is in that if you follow the exact rules of reality, then you ARE reality, not an imitation or simulation of a speculated shape and behavior.

The objects formed within a true metaspace are real and formed only by the rules of reality itself. They are not a construction in the normal sense. They form from what would appear to be nothing, into no more than exactly what they are, not merely something with similar shape or behavior (“simulation”) of something. A true metaparticle is as real as any physical particle, formed by the same hand and of the same “stuff”, merely a step higher.

As far as I know, I have sitting on my desk the first and only true/real “hyperspace”/ “metaspace” window in human history, albeit crude at the moment, and in a state of disrepair half the time from me trying to add a mod or change something, then requiring anything from hours to weeks trying to hunt down what I screwed up. Mad

Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
James S Saint
rational metaphysicist
rational metaphysicist

Posts : 244
Join date : 2011-12-26

PostSubject: Re: Achieving Faster than Light Mon Jan 02, 2012 9:28 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Btw, I refer to my metaspace program as “Jack”, because frankly, until you learn Rational Metaphysics, you don’t know jack. Cool
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Abstract
Oracle
Oracle
avatar

Posts : 142
Join date : 2011-11-15
Age : 31
Location : The Moon

PostSubject: Re: Achieving Faster than Light Mon Jan 02, 2012 1:46 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
James S Saint wrote:
Abstract wrote:

Sounds kool what is this meta space you have created… is it a simulation in a computer?
A simulation is where a programmer takes a set of rules for the behavior of an object and has the processor dictate those rules to a replica of the object. Every video game is a simulator.

But my program is different in a very serious way. Although it uses simulation techniques here and there, what it is a part of is a actual reality that is not a mere simulation. The difference is in that if you follow the exact rules of reality, then you ARE reality, not an imitation or simulation of a speculated shape and behavior.

The objects formed within a true metaspace are real and formed only by the rules of reality itself. They are not a construction in the normal sense. They form from what would appear to be nothing, into no more than exactly what they are, not merely something with similar shape or behavior (“simulation”) of something. A true metaparticle is as real as any physical particle, formed by the same hand and of the same “stuff”, merely a step higher.

As far as I know, I have sitting on my desk the first and only true/real “hyperspace”/ “metaspace” window in human history, albeit crude at the moment, and in a state of disrepair half the time from me trying to add a mod or change something, then requiring anything from hours to weeks trying to hunt down what I screwed up. Mad

what’s it look like?


“There is only one good, knowledge, and one evil, ignorance.” -Socrates
“Nature herself has imprinted on the minds of all the idea of God.” -Cicero
“It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain an idea without necessarily believing it.” -Aristotle
“I have gained this by philosophy: that I do without being commanded what others do only from fear of the law.” -Aristotle
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Abstract
Oracle
Oracle
avatar

Posts : 142
Join date : 2011-11-15
Age : 31
Location : The Moon

PostSubject: Re: Achieving Faster than Light Mon Jan 02, 2012 1:47 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
James S Saint wrote:
Btw, I refer to my metaspace program as “Jack”, because frankly, until you learn Rational Metaphysics, you don’t know jack. Cool
good one. farao


“There is only one good, knowledge, and one evil, ignorance.” -Socrates
“Nature herself has imprinted on the minds of all the idea of God.” -Cicero
“It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain an idea without necessarily believing it.” -Aristotle
“I have gained this by philosophy: that I do without being commanded what others do only from fear of the law.” -Aristotle
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Abstract
Oracle
Oracle
avatar

Posts : 142
Join date : 2011-11-15
Age : 31
Location : The Moon

PostSubject: Re: Achieving Faster than Light Mon Jan 02, 2012 1:54 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
do you have any screen shots of this thing?

And is not all mass just a wave? energy in a particular state or vibration?


“There is only one good, knowledge, and one evil, ignorance.” -Socrates
“Nature herself has imprinted on the minds of all the idea of God.” -Cicero
“It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain an idea without necessarily believing it.” -Aristotle
“I have gained this by philosophy: that I do without being commanded what others do only from fear of the law.” -Aristotle
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
James S Saint
rational metaphysicist
rational metaphysicist

Posts : 244
Join date : 2011-12-26

PostSubject: Re: Achieving Faster than Light Mon Jan 02, 2012 11:37 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Abstract wrote:
what’s it look like?
I haven’t gone to all the trouble to format a series of pics so as to present anything of much value yet, but let me give you merely an upload of one screen shot I made a while back. Getting all of the details straight and bringing Jack to life over and over after my inadvertent screwups was a very serious and grueling endeavor for me and frankly, I am still a bit brain fried by it. I very, very seriously need a break.

i.servimg.com/u/f45/17/15/61/06/10-31-12.jpg

That was an earlier snapshot using a tracker to locate and follow particulates forming. The big circles are the tracker.

What you are seeing is the center x-y plane of a cube of metaspace. At that stage, the tracker would follow the drifting Brownian type motion of the particle throughout metaspace while keeping the screen centered around the particle, or in that case, 2 particles. The red circle is indicating a particle that is in another x-y plane along the z axis. You can only watch one plane at a time in 2D of course.

I started to create a 3D spreadsheet for Jack, but Excel turned out to be too limited and I didn’t want to go relearn C++.

Jack has had various brain surgeries since that pic and looks a little better, but the entire thing wasn’t really for sake of public display so most all of it is merely sufficient for me. I need to create some good animations and screenshots for full explanations later sometime.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6665
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Achieving Faster than Light Sun Jan 08, 2012 10:48 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
James S Saint wrote:
A particle’s location is defined by its center. By tracking its center, one knows at what velocity it is traveling. But in the case of particles, especially particles that are just beginning to form, an interesting effect takes place.

If a particulate is already traveling close to the speed of light, a common occurrence, and it runs up on a similar particulate running slightly slower, you would think the end velocity would merely be an average of the two. And it is… sortta. But what happens is that the two particulates merge into a single particle and guess what happens to the center of the first? Quite suddenly the center of the “particle” went from position A to position B (a particulate width distance away) almost instantaneously.
Quote :
The shifting center would not actually add to the momentum of the particle, so no common energy equation theories get violated. The particle merely shows up at the destination and its demise before its photon partner.
very interesting. In fact this seems like precisely the technical explanation I was looking for on physics fora when I posed my neutrino ‘theory’, the idea that what in fact travels faster than light is not actually a particle in the sense of momentum, but simply the components that would theoretically constitute a particle. What travels faster than light is not matter itself, but the structural “information” (what comes to us, the thing that makes us interpret something as particle).

I am curious to see more of Jack, by the way – this picture looks like you’re doing some complicated work there, but it is hard to make out of it what it is , as I am not used at all to such environments. I would like to see it “move” - to see what happens, changes, to get a picture of what is going on. Not to say that I expect to then understand the whole setup, let alone the math, but perhaps I would learn a bit about the technical aspects involved in such a project.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    James S Saint
    rational metaphysicist
    rational metaphysicist

Posts : 244
Join date : 2011-12-26

PostSubject: Re: Achieving Faster than Light Mon Jan 09, 2012 9:13 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Yes, I need to find a good way to do the You-tube type of thing or merely a sequencing applet that can install here.

I keep trying to clean up Jacks neurology a bit and every time, I end up having to spend days or weeks reviving him. But I want to make the display a little more revealing such as to do just as you said; show the motion involved and little more of the actual relations.

I really need a C++ programmer associate to make it truly a refined public display. I wasn’t expecting it to get so complicated, so I started at a bad point having to use VBA. I hadn’t used programming languages for years and my memory isn’t worth anything any more, so it isn’t really worth the effort for me to relearn C++ merely to make a public display. The essential demo-proof for academia was the point of the project and it has gotten to that point.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Abstract
Oracle
Oracle
avatar

Posts : 142
Join date : 2011-11-15
Age : 31
Location : The Moon

PostSubject: Re: Achieving Faster than Light Mon Jan 09, 2012 3:20 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
James S Saint wrote:
Yes, I need to find a good way to do the You-tube type of thing or merely a sequencing applet that can install here.

I keep trying to clean up Jacks neurology a bit and every time, I end up having to spend days or weeks reviving him. But I want to make the display a little more revealing such as to do just as you said; show the motion involved and little more of the actual relations.

I really need a C++ programmer associate to make it truly a refined public display. I wasn’t expecting it to get so complicated, so I started at a bad point having to use VBA. I hadn’t used programming languages for years and my memory isn’t worth anything any more, so it isn’t really worth the effort for me to relearn C++ merely to make a public display. The essential demo-proof for academia was the point of the project and it has gotten to that point.

I know C++… but not really that well… though 'm good with algorithms…


“There is only one good, knowledge, and one evil, ignorance.” -Socrates
“Nature herself has imprinted on the minds of all the idea of God.” -Cicero
“It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain an idea without necessarily believing it.” -Aristotle
“I have gained this by philosophy: that I do without being commanded what others do only from fear of the law.” -Aristotle
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
James S Saint
rational metaphysicist
rational metaphysicist

Posts : 244
Join date : 2011-12-26

PostSubject: Re: Achieving Faster than Light Mon Jan 09, 2012 5:16 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Abstract wrote:
I know C++… but not really that well… though 'm good with algorithms…
Have any urge to move to Oregon? Shocked
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Abstract
Oracle
Oracle
avatar

Posts : 142
Join date : 2011-11-15
Age : 31
Location : The Moon

PostSubject: Re: Achieving Faster than Light Tue Jan 10, 2012 6:51 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
James S Saint wrote:
Abstract wrote:
I know C++… but not really that well… though 'm good with algorithms…
Have any urge to move to Oregon? Shocked
Lol…
Unfortunately i doubt that would work…
But if you ever need some help at least thinking about how to construct an algorithm and loop things and such feel free to ask… I might be a little out of age with my c++ vocabulary but I can figure most stuff out…but I can be lazy…


“There is only one good, knowledge, and one evil, ignorance.” -Socrates
“Nature herself has imprinted on the minds of all the idea of God.” -Cicero
“It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain an idea without necessarily believing it.” -Aristotle
“I have gained this by philosophy: that I do without being commanded what others do only from fear of the law.” -Aristotle
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
James S Saint
rational metaphysicist
rational metaphysicist

Posts : 244
Join date : 2011-12-26

PostSubject: Re: Achieving Faster than Light Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:44 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Well, like most professors, I am going to leave the rest of the “grunt work” up to the undergrads, but thks. Cool

Message

Pezer
builder
builder
avatar

Posts : 2190
Join date : 2011-11-15
Location : deep caverns in caves

PostSubject: Psychoanalysts: The Last Bastions Of Absolute Idealist Philosophy Thu May 17, 2012 5:06 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Who else is taken seriously in a metaphysical sense?

They continue to believe that absolute objectivization for it’s own sake not only exists but, if achieved, will justify its own existence.

Of course, christiandomity (subconscious kidnapers of the subconscious, so very close to power, to boot) tends to filter through like in most nihilistic objectifying systems.

Again, disproving god does not prove the devil: non-nihilistic (in this case cannot-justify-its-own-existence) does not thus mean stupid.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6665
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Psychoanalysts: The Last Bastions Of Absolute Idealist Philosophy Sat Aug 11, 2012 10:51 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
I see psychoanalysis as a set of techniques, among which are observing, keeping silent and suspension of judgment.
It’s premise, the subconscious, has proven to be scientifically reliable. Technology of power.

Ideally, the analyst is the agent of the subjects powerstruggle with a hijacked subconscious.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Parodites
    Tower
    Tower
    avatar

Posts : 757
Join date : 2011-12-11

PostSubject: Re: Psychoanalysts: The Last Bastions Of Absolute Idealist Philosophy Sat Aug 11, 2012 10:58 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Psychoanalysis and the Tragic Sense of life.

columbia.edu/~rr322/Tragedy.html

Great read.

Psychoanalysis and Tragedy

Just as the journey is so often the metaphor for the process of discovery that takes place at the very heart of tragedy, so, too, is it one of the most compelling of metaphors for the process of psychoanalysis. This is true because in both instances the central figures are striving to discover things that involve unknown territory and primitive dangers. In both, a contemplative stroll on the parapet can end up bringing one face to face with one’s terrifying ghosts; a walk down to the harbor can lead ultimately to a confrontation with one’s monsters. In neither case does the confrontation occur by chance. Rather, it is only when the journey is undertaken with a special courage and pursued with an unusual perseverance that such monumental confrontations ever come to be. Such journeys are precisely the province of the worlds of psychoanalysis and of tragedy.

To undertake such a journey is what is asked of patients in psychoanalysis. It is a journey into territory neither analyst nor analysand knows completely, and both participants must recognize that they cannot know in advance what they will ultimately discover.

Nevertheless, it is not a journey which is entered into blindly, for each party knows something of what is in store. The analyst, as expert --or perhaps guide, has been on such expeditions before. He knows how to go about such an exploration, even if the particular territory in question is new to him. The analysand, on the other hand, is the owner of the territory. He has far more local knowledge and initial familiarity with the landscape and its inhabitants --even if there be regions he has walled off and not dared to enter into very deeply.

Psychoanalysis, like tragedy, is vitally concerned with those regions of an individual’s experience that defy exploration. It recognizes that there are secrets people carry deep within themselves and treat as unapproachable. At times the secrets are horrible, and always the secrets are terrifying. The very concept of the unconscious, quintessential to all psychoanalytic theories, is predicated on precisely this belief. Whether conceived of as being completely the result of repression, as it is in most post-Freudian systems, or in the more classical way, as a combination of some instinctual inheritance and that which is repressed thereafter, the unconscious represents that part of an individual’s psychic existence that the individual considers too dangerous to be known.

The avoidance of these terrible secrets constitutes the essence of all psychopathology. Erwin Singer (1973) wrote that at the heart of all psychopathology was the abandonment of “a birth right and a fundamentally given human capacity: to see what can be seen, to grasp what can be grasped.” (p.187) Thus it is that the forces of repression counsel one, like Jocasta warned Oedipus: “I beg you --do not hunt this out --I beg you, if you have any care for your own life.” Psychoanalysis calls on one, like Oedipus, to “not be persuaded to let be the chance of finding the whole thing out clearly.”

If there is any value judgment that is intrinsically psychoanalytic, it is the Socratic bias that the unreflective life is not worth living, or its New Testament version, “The truth will set you free.” Freud (1915) insisted that psychoanalysis must have at its very foundation the absolute commitment to truthfulness. As in the tragic vision, the psychoanalytic approach demands that one use “all the resources of his soul,” (Freud, 1916-1917, p. 454; here using Riviere’s translation) in the pursuit of the truth.

Tragedy and psychoanalysis are cognizant both of man’s hunger for full and direct experience of himself and of his world, and of his simultaneous propensity desperately to hide from it. Both place ultimate stress on the value of the quest for this truth, while at the same time recognizing the monumental courage required not to flee and abandon the journey.

Thus psychoanalysis attempts inexorably to draw one deeper and deeper into this journey of confrontation with one’s self. It calls on the individual to overcome his repressions and face that from which he has been hiding --to transcend the bounds of the secure systems he has established to keep full and immediate experience at bay.

The patient in psychoanalysis, like the tragic hero, senses that this journey threatens ultimately to bring him face to face with some ancient terror that stalks his world. And, in one way or another, all psychoanalytic theories would agree with him.


A sik þau trûðu

Abstract

Oracle
Oracle

Posts : 142
Join date : 2011-11-15
Age : 31
Location : The Moon

PostSubject: How can the physical be all there is? Wed Dec 14, 2011 6:10 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
The physical is by virtue of what we call laws of nature, of science. But how can the answer to understanding reality be explained by physicality for that would require explaining the laws that allow and govern physicality by means of physicality.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5478
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: How can the physical be all there is? Tue Dec 27, 2011 7:04 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Abstract wrote:
The physical is by virtue of what we call laws of nature, of science. But how can the answer to understanding reality be explained by physicality for that would require explaining the laws that allow and govern physicality by means of physicality.

I tend to think of physicality as a merely sufficient relatability between forms (of energy, or whatever). Forms attain to certain degrees of scope, influencing power and “force” potential (i.e. to act as a resistance to/against other forces). The extent to which this “degree of scope…” overlaps from one form/entity to another would be the extent that each entity “perceives” (experiences, is affected by) the other as “physical”, i.e. as solid or substantial.

Thus I tend to think that we already have a means of explaining the laws of nature in a way that appeals to a basic, rational understanding of physicality. In other words I see no problem here.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Abstract
Oracle
Oracle
avatar

Posts : 142
Join date : 2011-11-15
Age : 31
Location : The Moon

PostSubject: Re: How can the physical be all there is? Wed Dec 28, 2011 8:33 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Capable wrote:
Abstract wrote:
The physical is by virtue of what we call laws of nature, of science. But how can the answer to understanding reality be explained by physicality for that would require explaining the laws that allow and govern physicality by means of physicality.

I tend to think of physicality as a merely sufficient relatability between forms (of energy, or whatever). Forms attain to certain degrees of scope, influencing power and “force” potential (i.e. to act as a resistance to/against other forces). The extent to which this “degree of scope…” overlaps from one form/entity to another would be the extent that each entity “perceives” (experiences, is affected by) the other as “physical”, i.e. as solid or substantial.

Thus I tend to think that we already have a means of explaining the laws of nature in a way that appeals to a basic, rational understanding of physicality. In other words I see no problem here.
Perhaps I shouldn’t have related this only to physicality… perhaps what I am asking is how can we explain the laws without referencing other laws, and as such how can we explain all laws…


“There is only one good, knowledge, and one evil, ignorance.” -Socrates
“Nature herself has imprinted on the minds of all the idea of God.” -Cicero
“It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain an idea without necessarily believing it.” -Aristotle
“I have gained this by philosophy: that I do without being commanded what others do only from fear of the law.” -Aristotle
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
chise

Posts : 9
Join date : 2011-12-09

PostSubject: Re: How can the physical be all there is? Wed Dec 28, 2011 10:04 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Abstract wrote:
The physical is by virtue of what we call laws of nature, of science. But how can the answer to understanding reality be explained by physicality for that would require explaining the laws that allow and govern physicality by means of physicality.

Interesting. One such law that I see needing addressing would be: what holds the form of a physicality at a subatomic level, into a togetherness; what force, mysterious law holds the physical intact; the beloved atoms what is there link and connection to each other? how do they know to form a relationship? what is the intelligence of the atom?
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
chise

Posts : 9
Join date : 2011-12-09

PostSubject: Re: How can the physical be all there is? Wed Dec 28, 2011 11:32 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
In having to undress and strip the beloved, layer per layer, garment after undergarmet, we arive at the heart which is the nuclei, within it - are pulsating arteries called, protons, deep inside the pulsation we find the quark.

(The layers are levels of reality? Each reality is held up by consciousness and energy? And when these levels are tighted, pressed together and coagulated, by a mind (?) we have matter in its rawest state as it appears?
The deeper the reality; the smaller the particle, the more powerful the energy… as evidenced by the atomic bomb… The levels of reality and their make up is a mystery. I posit that what some see that isn’t visible on the level we’re accustomed to is a form from these other levels? the unusual, that which remains unexplained, such as instantenous healings, instant manifestations, are fits performed through the accessing of these other realms and their energetic fields? in cases of death and dying, the corruption and decay of the human body, the unseen personality self goes to such realms, unseen worlds?

Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Abstract
Oracle
Oracle
avatar

Posts : 142
Join date : 2011-11-15
Age : 31
Location : The Moon

PostSubject: Re: How can the physical be all there is? Wed Dec 28, 2011 4:39 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
chise wrote:
Abstract wrote:
The physical is by virtue of what we call laws of nature, of science. But how can the answer to understanding reality be explained by physicality for that would require explaining the laws that allow and govern physicality by means of physicality.

Interesting. One such law that I see needing addressing would be: what holds the form of a physicality at a subatomic level, into a togetherness; what force, mysterious law holds the physical intact; the beloved atoms what is there link and connection to each other? how do they know to form a relationship? what is the intelligence of the atom?
Though not an answer, I have recently considered that love and gravity are the same thing…exactly.

things are similar because things see them as such; thus it is by perception that things are united just as it is by perception that things are parted… union through perception… is love?


“There is only one good, knowledge, and one evil, ignorance.” -Socrates
“Nature herself has imprinted on the minds of all the idea of God.” -Cicero
“It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain an idea without necessarily believing it.” -Aristotle
“I have gained this by philosophy: that I do without being commanded what others do only from fear of the law.” -Aristotle
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
chise

Posts : 9
Join date : 2011-12-09

PostSubject: Re: How can the physical be all there is? Thu Dec 29, 2011 10:20 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Abstract wrote:
Though not an answer, I have recently considered that love and gravity are the same thing…exactly.

things are similar because things see them as such; thus it is by perception that things are united just as it is by perception that things are parted… union through perception… is love?

Similar insights have walked into my brain: love was seen to be, in it’s grandest state. The glue that fastens the universe from crumbling into nothingness. The main ingredient firmly holding stuff at an individual and universal scale in their material forms.

The perception side of it wasn’t considered much til lately.

, in being humbled enough, to perceive the individual self, not as a separate, but a oneness with the whole. of life (and yet within that, an individual) , imagining existence being merely an act of perception, is conceivable… as self centered and ego tripping as it sounds Smile

chise wrote:

Interesting. One such law that I see needing addressing would be: what holds the form of a physicality at a subatomic level, into a togetherness; what force, mysterious law holds the physical intact; the beloved atoms what is there link and connection to each other? how do they know to form a relationship? what is the intelligence of the atom?
Though not an answer, I have recently considered that love

if this is so, if The force binding the atoms together and holding the levels of reality within the atom in their shelves, is a loving perception from an observer, that does give the observer a tone of power & responsbility eh it implies that everything only comes to existence when it is looked at? where man isn’t nature is fallow? matter is changeable with a change of perception? why isn’t and how is matter mutated at a glance?
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Abstract
Oracle
Oracle
avatar

Posts : 142
Join date : 2011-11-15
Age : 31
Location : The Moon

PostSubject: Re: How can the physical be all there is? Fri Dec 30, 2011 5:41 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
chise wrote:
Abstract wrote:
Though not an answer, I have recently considered that love and gravity are the same thing…exactly.

things are similar because things see them as such; thus it is by perception that things are united just as it is by perception that things are parted… union through perception… is love?

Similar insights have walked into my brain: love was seen to be, in it’s grandest state. The glue that fastens the universe from crumbling into nothingness. The main ingredient firmly holding stuff at an individual and universal scale in their material forms.

The perception side of it wasn’t considered much til lately.

, in being humbled enough, to perceive the individual self, not as a separate, but a oneness with the whole. of life (and yet within that, an individual) , imagining existence being merely an act of perception, is conceivable… as self centered and ego tripping as it sounds Smile

chise wrote:

Interesting. One such law that I see needing addressing would be: what holds the form of a physicality at a subatomic level, into a togetherness; what force, mysterious law holds the physical intact; the beloved atoms what is there link and connection to each other? how do they know to form a relationship? what is the intelligence of the atom?
Though not an answer, I have recently considered that love

if this is so, if The force binding the atoms together and holding the levels of reality within the atom in their shelves, is a loving perception from an observer, that does give the observer a tone of power & responsbility eh it implies that everything only comes to existence when it is looked at? where man isn’t nature is fallow? matter is changeable with a change of perception? why isn’t and how is matter mutated at a glance?
It would seem contradictory to say something comes to existence only when it is looked at because in order to be looked at it must already be an existing thing capable of being looked at…

The reason (following this philosophy) that I would say matter cannot be changed , evidently, by a change in perception… is that you are thinking of individual perception change as the changing factor… I would not necessitate a oneness exactly that perceives, it is just as well that all individuals do and yet that which ‘is’ is the result of the…agreement… or rather happened perception or general perception of all beings… perhaps it is like the perceived average, except it is universal as all seem to be subject to this perception…In other words nothing is going to change unless we all agree on it. (for example if we wanted a heaven state, we would all have to agree on what that state would be…)


“There is only one good, knowledge, and one evil, ignorance.” -Socrates
“Nature herself has imprinted on the minds of all the idea of God.” -Cicero
“It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain an idea without necessarily believing it.” -Aristotle
“I have gained this by philosophy: that I do without being commanded what others do only from fear of the law.” -Aristotle
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
chise

Posts : 9
Join date : 2011-12-09

PostSubject: Re: How can the physical be all there is? Fri Dec 30, 2011 6:47 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
It would seem contradictory to say something comes to existence only when it is looked at because in order to be looked at it must already be an existing thing capable of being looked at

This is the true, if ‘looking or seeing’ is limited to the action of the visual perceptive organ, the eye. “Looking or seeing” starts with a visual image, and an intent to look at thing; the thing is first seen in the mind. This mental picture itself can be seen as a ‘coming into existence’ can’t it? (thought is the first principle of creation) this was more of the line of thinking I was going by

The reason (following this philosophy) that I would say matter cannot be changed , evidently, by a change in perception… is that you are thinking of individual perception change as the changing factor… I would not necessitate a oneness exactly that perceives, it is just as well that all individuals do and yet that which ‘is’ is the result of the…agreement… or rather happened perception or general perception of all beings… perhaps it is like the perceived average, except it is universal as all seem to be subject to this perception…In other words nothing is going to change unless we all agree on it. (for example if we wanted a heaven state, we would all have to agree on what that state would be…)

This is also true, change would be easier and quickly if more people focused their energies on whatever it is they wanted to change. It is easier to believe in something when everyone else does and easy to doubt in something when noone else believes it. The reason I consider this possibility is from an encounter I have had with someone who really showed a certain degree of a mastery of mind over matter. As stated earlier perhaps accessing the hidden realms, the energetic fields of atoms at a nuclei level (atomic bomb stuff) can bring home this potential. Will let ya know when this philosophizing becomes an, actual realized truth!! Smile
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Abstract
Oracle
Oracle
avatar

Posts : 142
Join date : 2011-11-15
Age : 31
Location : The Moon

PostSubject: Re: How can the physical be all there is? Fri Dec 30, 2011 8:56 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
chise wrote:
It would seem contradictory to say something comes to existence only when it is looked at because in order to be looked at it must already be an existing thing capable of being looked at

This is the true, if ‘looking or seeing’ is limited to the action of the visual perceptive organ, the eye. “Looking or seeing” starts with a visual image, and an intent to look at thing; the thing is first seen in the mind. This mental picture itself can be seen as a ‘coming into existence’ can’t it? (thought is the first principle of creation) this was more of the line of thinking I was going by
Yet how is it that the percivers know of things such as to bring them into existence before having witnessed them, but that we already know all things? If so then our efforts to seek the truth by looking outside ourselves may be the least effective when(though truely in this case what is outside is a part of the one or the whole that we are) it would seem better to find the truth by looking into the self…

Quote :

The reason (following this philosophy) that I would say matter cannot be changed , evidently, by a change in perception… is that you are thinking of individual perception change as the changing factor… I would not necessitate a oneness exactly that perceives, it is just as well that all individuals do and yet that which ‘is’ is the result of the…agreement… or rather happened perception or general perception of all beings… perhaps it is like the perceived average, except it is universal as all seem to be subject to this perception…In other words nothing is going to change unless we all agree on it. (for example if we wanted a heaven state, we would all have to agree on what that state would be…)

This is also true, change would be easier and quickly if more people focused their energies on whatever it is they wanted to change. It is easier to believe in something when everyone else does and easy to doubt in something when no one else believes it. The reason I consider this possibility is from an encounter I have had with someone who really showed a certain degree of a mastery of mind over matter. As stated earlier perhaps accessing the hidden realms, the energetic fields of atoms at a nuclei level (atomic bomb stuff) can bring home this potential. Will let ya know when this philosophizing becomes an, actual realized truth!! Smile

And perhaps not only do others influence what is perceived as physical but also others and the will they might have to change things…


“There is only one good, knowledge, and one evil, ignorance.” -Socrates
“Nature herself has imprinted on the minds of all the idea of God.” -Cicero
“It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain an idea without necessarily believing it.” -Aristotle
“I have gained this by philosophy: that I do without being commanded what others do only from fear of the law.” -Aristotle
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
James S Saint
rational metaphysicist
rational metaphysicist

Posts : 244
Join date : 2011-12-26

PostSubject: Re: How can the physical be all there is? Fri Dec 30, 2011 10:19 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Hmm…

Doesn’t this thread belong under the “Anti-Science” or perhaps “The Occult” or “Inter-subjective” forums? Neutral

The cause of quantizing/particlizing is known and provable. But it cannot be physically seen and thus Science cannot physically verify it. It is instead in incontrovertible result of the math/logic involved.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
chise

Posts : 9
Join date : 2011-12-09

PostSubject: Re: How can the physical be all there is? Mon Jan 02, 2012 5:27 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Abstract wrote:
chise wrote:

This is the true, if ‘looking or seeing’ is limited to the action of the visual perceptive organ, the eye. “Looking or seeing” starts with a visual image, and an intent to look at thing; the thing is first seen in the mind. This mental picture itself can be seen as a ‘coming into existence’ can’t it? (thought is the first principle of creation) this was more of the line of thinking I was going by
Yet how is it that the percivers know of things such as to bring them into existence before having witnessed them, but that we already know all things? …

Do we know all things? in other words is there a limit to what has come into existence? knowing or creating ideas seems limitless?
to what degree have we deliberately barricaded our ability to know and to create?

Abstract wrote:

If so then our efforts to seek the truth by looking outside ourselves may be the least effective when(though truely in this case what is outside is a part of the one or the whole that we are) it would seem better to find the truth by looking into the self

it would and is, unfortunately the road is treacherously paved with doubt and disbelief in self…: Perhaps, ‘the pursuit’ in truth. is a Journey to find our certitude in our ability to know and to create,… any thing ?!

chise wrote:

This is also true, change would be easier and quickly if more people focused their energies on whatever it is they wanted to change. It is easier to believe in something when everyone else does and easy to doubt in something when no one else believes it. The reason I consider this possibility is from an encounter I have had with someone who really showed a certain degree of a mastery of mind over matter. As stated earlier perhaps accessing the hidden realms, the energetic fields of atoms at a nuclei level (atomic bomb stuff) can bring home this potential. Will let ya know when this philosophizing becomes an, actual realized truth!! Smile

And perhaps not only do others influence what is perceived as physical but also others and the will they might have to change things…

true, some do, others, inspire others by providing the ideal… not the idol

Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Abstract
Oracle
Oracle
avatar

Posts : 142
Join date : 2011-11-15
Age : 31
Location : The Moon

PostSubject: Re: How can the physical be all there is? Mon Jan 02, 2012 5:53 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
James S Saint wrote:
Hmm…

Doesn’t this thread belong under the “Anti-Science” or perhaps “The Occult” or “Inter-subjective” forums? Neutral

The cause of quantizing/particlizing is known and provable. But it cannot be physically seen and thus Science cannot physically verify it. It is instead in incontrovertible result of the math/logic involved.
How is this known, how is it proved… what is its cause if it was caused by things, and if we are only looking at one of the causes in the infinite streaming of beginning of the thing we are not actually finding the proof we are just becoming satisfied with one domino on the infinite line of understandings or thoughts that can occur in relation to the topic.


“There is only one good, knowledge, and one evil, ignorance.” -Socrates
“Nature herself has imprinted on the minds of all the idea of God.” -Cicero
“It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain an idea without necessarily believing it.” -Aristotle
“I have gained this by philosophy: that I do without being commanded what others do only from fear of the law.” -Aristotle
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Abstract
Oracle
Oracle
avatar

Posts : 142
Join date : 2011-11-15
Age : 31
Location : The Moon

PostSubject: Re: How can the physical be all there is? Mon Jan 02, 2012 5:59 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
chise wrote:
Abstract wrote:
chise wrote:

This is the true, if ‘looking or seeing’ is limited to the action of the visual perceptive organ, the eye. “Looking or seeing” starts with a visual image, and an intent to look at thing; the thing is first seen in the mind. This mental picture itself can be seen as a ‘coming into existence’ can’t it? (thought is the first principle of creation) this was more of the line of thinking I was going by
Yet how is it that the percivers know of things such as to bring them into existence before having witnessed them, but that we already know all things? …

Do we know all things? in other words is there a limit to what has come into existence? knowing or creating ideas seems limitless?
to what degree have we deliberately barricaded our ability to know and to create?
Perhaps it is only to what existent we recognize our abilities to be limited that we can be limited. And so it is best not to ask or think how we might be?

Quote :

Abstract wrote:

If so then our efforts to seek the truth by looking outside ourselves may be the least effective when(though truely in this case what is outside is a part of the one or the whole that we are) it would seem better to find the truth by looking into the self

it would and is, unfortunately the road is treacherously paved with doubt and disbelief in self…: Perhaps, ‘the pursuit’ in truth. is a Journey to find our certitude in our ability to know and to create,… any thing ?!
Perhaps it is truly just a journey to aid the growth of comfort with limitless uncertainty…


“There is only one good, knowledge, and one evil, ignorance.” -Socrates
“Nature herself has imprinted on the minds of all the idea of God.” -Cicero
“It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain an idea without necessarily believing it.” -Aristotle
“I have gained this by philosophy: that I do without being commanded what others do only from fear of the law.” -Aristotle
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
chise

Posts : 9
Join date : 2011-12-09

PostSubject: Re: How can the physical be all there is? Mon Jan 02, 2012 7:17 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Abstract wrote:
Perhaps it is only to what existent we recognize our abilities to be limited that we can be limited. And so it is best not to ask or think how we might be?

Smile Yes! but see asking and thinking in this case… would be a response from an experience failing to yeild a desired outcome… reflection encourages a better approach in the future. There would be no questions if success was/is guaranteed each time. We are already in the hole, if we had known that we could walk on air we wouldn’t have fallen into the ditch. So here we are, climbing out, with the virtue, which is wisdom, of our experiences. (The hole is the attachment to the past… past experiences and indeed the extent that we recognize their existence)…

How do we know what being unlimited is without knowing limitation?

fyi- the motive behind the question in my previous post was especially for contemplative purposes on the readers part … but thanks for the response
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Parodites
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 757
Join date : 2011-12-11

PostSubject: Re: How can the physical be all there is? Fri Feb 10, 2012 9:36 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Abstract wrote:
Capable wrote:
Abstract wrote:
The physical is by virtue of what we call laws of nature, of science. But how can the answer to understanding reality be explained by physicality for that would require explaining the laws that allow and govern physicality by means of physicality.

I tend to think of physicality as a merely sufficient relatability between forms (of energy, or whatever). Forms attain to certain degrees of scope, influencing power and “force” potential (i.e. to act as a resistance to/against other forces). The extent to which this “degree of scope…” overlaps from one form/entity to another would be the extent that each entity “perceives” (experiences, is affected by) the other as “physical”, i.e. as solid or substantial.

Thus I tend to think that we already have a means of explaining the laws of nature in a way that appeals to a basic, rational understanding of physicality. In other words I see no problem here.
Perhaps I shouldn’t have related this only to physicality… perhaps what I am asking is how can we explain the laws without referencing other laws, and as such how can we explain all laws…

Originally, what is called the universe was a unified force undifferentiated by time or by space. What we call creation is actually the decomposition and disintegration of ousia, to speak Greek, of physical reality. When we finally manage to reconstruct in our little simian brains a mathematical and theoretical conception of such a unified force (ie. unified field theory) then we will understand all physicality in only one “law” as you call it, one formulation.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
Parodites
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 757
Join date : 2011-12-11

PostSubject: Re: How can the physical be all there is? Fri Feb 10, 2012 9:39 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
chise wrote:
One such law that I see needing addressing would be: what holds the form of a physicality at a subatomic level, into a togetherness; what force, mysterious law holds the physical intact; the beloved atoms what is there link and connection to each other? how do they know to form a relationship? what is the intelligence of the atom?

… The fundamental interactions. You should have learned that in high school, not to be an ass, though it is in my nature.

Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
Parodites
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 757
Join date : 2011-12-11

PostSubject: Re: How can the physical be all there is? Fri Feb 10, 2012 9:46 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Just take away your preconceptions as a living thing and look at it for a moment. Blind, space-less, timeless, power; infinitely dense and hot. It existed forever, and was “nowhere” for it took up no space. Suddenly it ruptures, the unified force shattering and decomposing into our universe. Particles and anti-particles sparred for awhile, spontaneously generated by the conversion and regression of energy into matter, matter into energy. Temperatures eventually cooled enough for the first atoms to form. Stars formed, burning this primordial “stuff.” In their burning, the stars produced more complex atomic structures, the elements needed to build planets and lifeforms. Then we show up on earth. That is a very small summary of the history of our universe. A wonder, granted, from the perspective of a living thing. From any other perspective, however…
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
James S Saint
rational metaphysicist
rational metaphysicist

Posts : 244
Join date : 2011-12-26

PostSubject: Re: How can the physical be all there is? Fri Feb 10, 2012 9:51 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
There is what changes and what doesn’t.
The physical universe is what changes…
… and doesn’t.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Parodites
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 757
Join date : 2011-12-11

PostSubject: Re: How can the physical be all there is? Fri Feb 10, 2012 10:13 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
It also gets on my nerves sometimes.

I guess the universe is a pretty cool guy though. Eh. Makes black holes and doesn’t afraid of anything.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
Arcturus Descending
arrow
arrow
avatar

Posts : 293
Join date : 2011-12-07
Location : Hovering amidst a battle of Wills

PostSubject: Re: How can the physical be all there is? Fri Feb 24, 2012 5:56 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster

Abstract…

Quote :
… I have recently considered that love and gravity are the same thing…exactly.
We might say that these words correspond to each other. They are similar in that love may keep one ‘grounded’ but at the same time love is capable of allowing us to soar. So you might also say that love and wings are similar.

In another respect, love may make us quite grave. Evil or Very Mad

Quote :
things are similar because things see them as such; thus it is by perception that things are united ?
When we use ‘things’ as metaphors to assign meaning and interpretation.

Quote :
just as it is by perception that things are parted… union through perception… is love

This is why it is important to examine/re-examine our perceptions. They are not necessarily based in truth but based on how we sensate and interpret the moment.

Union through perception may also lead to altered truth…which might eradicate the love which was once seen.


Each of our lives is a part of the lengthy process of the universe gradually waking up and becoming aware of itself.

Philosophy is the childhood of the intellect, and a culture that tries to skip it will never grow up."

“If I thought that everything I did was determined by my circumstancse and my psychological condition, I would feel trapped.”

Thomas Nagel
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Abstract
Oracle
Oracle
avatar

Posts : 142
Join date : 2011-11-15
Age : 31
Location : The Moon

PostSubject: Re: How can the physical be all there is? Wed Feb 29, 2012 12:36 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
I’ll have to respond later when i’m not feeling so mind numb…


“There is only one good, knowledge, and one evil, ignorance.” -Socrates
“Nature herself has imprinted on the minds of all the idea of God.” -Cicero
“It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain an idea without necessarily believing it.” -Aristotle
“I have gained this by philosophy: that I do without being commanded what others do only from fear of the law.” -Aristotle
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
RIW

avatar

Posts : 1
Join date : 2012-09-22
Location : RI USA

PostSubject: Re: How can the physical be all there is? Sat Sep 22, 2012 3:05 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Before our time began the infinite became self aware and it observed all for it was all. With love it created a perfect order of single point mass particles and then releases it so the mass particles could all coming by and with their own preference’s of movement. The Infinite made this possible knowing that it would be finite but that it would also bring forth that which can and would observer. At the same time the universe falls in to disorder it also moves to higher levels of connection and complexity. Choice is necessary for evolution. Choice is necessary for all observers to evolve. Love is a creating force hate is a destroying force. Do not try and put god in your back pocket. The Infinite will not fit in there instead put love in your top front pocket near your hart, and hate in your back pocket out of sight. Connecting to that which is good is connecting to the living universe. Yes this is a living universe when preferences of movement and an inclination to connect in ways of ever high complexity are given to mass things evolve. The Infinite has made the laws and set the physical values of our universe for life to exist. All life is an observer of existents. God does not move rocks. God is the infinite. God is the understanding of the collective infinite. For the void connects all things to the Infinite.

Abstract
Oracle
Oracle
avatar

Posts : 142
Join date : 2011-11-15
Age : 31
Location : The Moon

PostSubject: Effectance Mon Nov 19, 2012 2:45 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
I’m perplexed by a problem. Does everything effect everything to some degree? Does say a planet in a galaxy we have yet discovered have some effect on us hear on earth, no matter how small? Basically is the field of effectance of objects infinite?

If so it would seem that what we consider finite objects are then infinite in nature.
But further this can imply things about the nature of actions, in areas of consideration like the idea of sin. Is a sin infinite? If so, if its effect extends outwards in the present infinitely and/or continually ways effect in the future then it is not so illogical for there to be an infinite karmic or otherwise punishment for a sin. Unless you then count that a good action does the same then your faced with waying two infinites against each other which leaves the resultant polarity of action indeterminate.


“There is only one good, knowledge, and one evil, ignorance.” -Socrates
“Nature herself has imprinted on the minds of all the idea of God.” -Cicero
“It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain an idea without necessarily believing it.” -Aristotle
“I have gained this by philosophy: that I do without being commanded what others do only from fear of the law.” -Aristotle
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6665
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Effectance Tue Nov 20, 2012 4:06 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Abstract wrote:
I’m perplexed by a problem. Does everything effect everything to some degree? Does say a planet in a galaxy we have yet discovered have some effect on us hear on earth, no matter how small? Basically is the field of effectance of objects infinite?
I’m no specialist on this but I’d say that this is probhably not the case. For one, a solar system may be sucked into a black hole, and when it does it is nof no consequence what curve some tennisball had on some planet, or at what angle some plane crashed into a mountain.
Also I was thinking that a lot can happen within gravitational systems that does not disturb the balance of that system and thus does not project it’s effect outward from the system.

Quote :
If so it would seem that what we consider finite objects are then infinite in nature.
But further this can imply things about the nature of actions, in areas of consideration like the idea of sin. Is a sin infinite? If so, if its effect extends outwards in the present infinitely and/or continually ways effect in the future then it is not so illogical for there to be an infinite karmic or otherwise punishment for a sin. Unless you then count that a good action does the same then your faced with waying two infinites against each other which leaves the resultant polarity of action indeterminate.
If there was indeed infinite effectance, then still it is very possible, and on Earth very often clearly the case, that an act considered in one realm as negative would be received as positive in another. “Sin” is a value judgment, and this certianly is not universal, but purely local, contextual.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Fixed Cross
    Doric basterd
    Doric basterd
    avatar

Posts : 6665
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Effectance Fri Mar 08, 2013 12:40 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
The key to open any kind of space-time power is to include as much contradictory logi into one logos as your energy can muster. Then consolidate in ritual (instances of exalted, eternal life) and create a symbolic order. Then obey that order.

Message

Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6665
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Before the Big Bang Thu Aug 01, 2013 8:34 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Relations are a priori dual, triple, => , not merely after the fact of measuring them. The relations we measure in physics and chemistry do not only exist in terms of force.
There is also another aspect, and this is unmeasurable in exact terms, as it involves not just the present state but its entire history and future of affect in every possible universe in which it could exist.

Even the very idea of a particle is cleaved. There are always two ways of contemplating the object. For example:

  • The minimal and maximal requirements for its existence, its ‘essence’, raw (unmeasured) content. ⇔ Its maximal power to affect (a quantity of force).

  • The possible ways in which it can affect and be affected (a number of qualities in various quantities). ⇔ Its measurable effect. (its measurable activity at a given moment).

These cross relate into two four further dualities, of which two are simple and two quite a bit less so. More on these later. In the above, the second part of each pair is expressed in terms of something outside of itself. The first part expresses all that it can possibly be, i.e. all possible contexts for it to exist in. The second is a process of valuing and counter valuing, the second part is translatable in common sensical speak only via such words as (value-) standard and consistency.

In the case of the latter it is very difficult to distinguis action from passive existing. Something “just exists” only to the measure that it is active. Even if this activity may be wholly enforced by the ambient history, it does act itself in a particular way that can only be affected by the ambient indirectly. Thus it is an integer being, essentially independent, yet requiring for this independence something to be independent from.

And such arrays of standards arrange themselves alongside those standards to which they may favorably compare. I.e. each thing seeks (gradually falls into) the context in which the most is required of its essential potential.

In human lore this is called Good versus Evil, but it is the inevitable form of time, the progression of increasing density on the one hand, and slowing relative time on the other.

The end scenario is one of complete stability and zero progression of time. Time would then ‘freeze’, undoubtably for it to burst open in a new Big Bang (or Crash - as in a pulverizing sheet of glass).

Pezer
builder
builder
avatar

Posts : 2190
Join date : 2011-11-15
Location : deep caverns in caves

PostSubject: God is Dead: Scientific Fact Thu Aug 08, 2013 4:13 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
“Evolutionists” who call for a return to the bestial logic of our tried-and-true evolutionary processes don’t get the point. An evolutionist claims that the bestial logic of our tried and true evolutionary processes are things which have always been and continue to be right at the core of our existence. The evolutionist uses consciousness to fabricate an image of its consciousness which he then recognizes even before the image. Evolutionism is not primitivism because everything is already primitive, evolutionism is a full circle from feeling to knowing to know-feeling and feel-knowing

The importance of the death of God is what? That all we have is this, and ourselves. Our worship of God produced such intricate and sophisticated work, one wonders what similar sentiments could produce when attached to a vision of reality which is corroborated by its very object and which object is very thirsty for power, also better equiped than when this ever was dreamed of.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6665
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: God is Dead: Scientific Fact Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:05 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
The term “God” remains vague. Who is dead? Is it Zeus? No way, he lives in Jupiter and the thunderstorms that free my heart. Is it Baal? Sure, he could be dead-ish, no one worships him. Is it Yahweh? Well - he’s alive and kicking in the hearts of not only Jews, but all Western occultists. Who is dead is Jesus and his dad. That’s what’s significant – the God of meekness of turning the other cheek, he’s dead. At least - is he? Is not Jesus only a reference to a solstice, and Mary to the constellation Virgo?

In any case, you are right in your conclusions.

“Our worship of God produced such intricate and sophisticated work, one wonders what similar sentiments could produce when attached to a vision of reality which is corroborated by its very object and which object is very thirsty for power, also better equiped than when this ever was dreamed of.”

God allowed man an uncanny thirst for power. Conviction was the means to this will. Our “problem” here is to get motivated to that same level. With value ontology a seed was planted. I felt at that time the power to create new Gods. We had a talk about that, then. The first enthusiasm (-- from en “in” (see en- (2)) + theos “god” --) paid off, and here we are.

“God is dead” is not enough of a statement. God is a … fill in the blanks -
man will always require something higher than his present state to orient on. It can be his future self, it can be a future descendancy (the Uebermensch) but it needs to be something ahead of him. Or am I wrong?


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Pezer
    builder
    builder
    avatar

Posts : 2190
Join date : 2011-11-15
Location : deep caverns in caves

PostSubject: Re: God is Dead: Scientific Fact Thu Aug 08, 2013 4:45 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
The problem with God is precisely those general terms. God can be anything, it is a word that simply conjures the hole in the moment which the company has decided to explore no further. A scientist must chase these holes down, not give them names and worship them. I, as you know, give the exception to Chaos, for reasons that can become clear with some thought.

This other God, this Yehova, God of Abraham, perhaps God of the Egyptians, or some Egyptians, this is the curse behind Iesus and not the other way around. Jesus was a hippy who got taken advantage of by over-zealous rabbies with that good ol’ God in their hearts and revenge in their minds.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5478
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: God is Dead: Scientific Fact Fri Aug 09, 2013 1:29 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
None of us can see tomorrow. Our words are still yesterday’s languages. Who has the power to think the pure un-thought, the strangest derivation in the moment? We must learn to follow even the tiniest clues, even the ones that aren’t there yet.

Let us learn to speak like the wind. Let us learn to seek like the wind.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6665
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: God is Dead: Scientific Fact Fri Aug 09, 2013 5:34 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Pezer wrote:
The problem with God is precisely those general terms. God can be anything, it is a word that simply conjures the hole in the moment which the company has decided to explore no further. A scientist must chase these holes down, not give them names and worship them. I, as you know, give the exception to Chaos, for reasons that can become clear with some thought.

This other God, this Yehova, God of Abraham, perhaps God of the Egyptians, or some Egyptians, this is the curse behind Iesus and not the other way around. Jesus was a hippy who got taken advantage of by over-zealous rabbies with that good ol’ God in their hearts and revenge in their minds.
That’s crazy. In the whole world, there is no group that has resisted the idea of the “Jewish” Son of God with such baffled repulsion as the rabbi’s.
God has no one Son. His son is Beauty itself, the theatre of experience.

The tree of life (the glyph of which YHVH is an outtake and to the front of which ‘Iesu’ (the guy didn’t really exist) was modeled) is the scientific model pur sang. Newton was a kabalist and Einstein definitely read a lot of it.

But also my own thoughts about value-relativity merged after many years of meditation on the sephirotic combinations of the ‘bare (meaningless) logics’ that can reasonably be said to sustain the human mind as representing reality. For example: Force/Form, Possibility/Decision Overflowing/Limiting-standardizing – or Force/Overflowing, Overflowing/Possibility, Form/Limiting-standardizing, Limiting-standardizing/Decision - and then such contrasts as Overflowing/Decision and Possibility/Limiting-standardizing at the midst of which is the theatre of experience, the “Self”, which does not exist except through such relations.

Capable wrote:
None of us can see tomorrow. Our words are still yesterday’s languages. Who has the power to think the pure un-thought, the strangest derivation in the moment? We must learn to follow even the tiniest clues, even the ones that aren’t there yet.
Quote :
Let us learn to speak like the wind. Let us learn to seek like the wind.
I like this.
Frames, running colors, streaks - caves, black bear with a red tongue and white teeth, snarling. A blue sky, a bald predator lurks, vast wings, hanging still. A volcano-top in the distance. Ants, colonies. Zoom in: Marches across the desert. A man with a female crotch and an electrifying voice.

The pyramids - I step on one of them and hurt my foot. My blood gushes down, the red birth of the Nile. The river feeds the barren Earth. A civilization of ants arises. Ant-history lives forth in ant-eternity. Ants call other ants Gods. In the meantime, the Sun slowly sets and I perceive my tent. I had already put it up. I forgot. A rabbits-stew, a wife in grey, a telescope.

Chaos and the wind are friends, we do not essentially disagree.

The Tree of Life is no limiter, it’s to use freely and discard freely, it is a means to escape language and human context without losing control of logic. There are other means - but this one is particularly powerful, and has often been near and sometimes at the very core of western scientific progress.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Fixed Cross
    Doric basterd
    Doric basterd
    avatar

Posts : 6665
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: God is Dead: Scientific Fact Fri Aug 09, 2013 5:50 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Quote :
The problem with God is precisely those general terms. God can be anything, it is a word that simply conjures the hole in the moment which the company has decided to explore no further. A scientist must chase these holes down, not give them names and worship them. I, as you know, give the exception to Chaos, for reasons that can become clear with some thought.
That is not true. God-systems are far more complex and deliberate than that. Consider the yoga-science as someone like sri Yukteshwar developed, or these standard kabalistic attributions:

[[[[Sephirah Divine name Archangelic name Choir or Host of Angels Mundane Chakra Summary

  1. Kether (Crown) Eheieh (‘I am’, ‘I will be’, ‘I Become’ or ‘I am that I am’) Metatron Chayoth ha-Qadesh (“Holy living Creatures”) aka Seraphim Primum Mobile /First Swirlings (Neptune) The richest and most supreme source of energy

  2. Chokmah (Wisdom) Jehovah / Yah (“The Lord”) Raziel Auphanim (“Wheels”) aka Kerubim Zodiac (Uranus) Uncompensated, boundless energy, primordial maleness.

  3. Binah (Understanding) Jehovah Elohim (“The Lord God” or “Lord of Gods”) Tzaphkiel Aralim (“Strong and Mighty”) aka Thrones Saturn The archetypical womb, the female potency of the universe

  4. Chesed (Mercy) El (“God - The Mighty One”) Tzadqiel Chashmalim (“Brilliant Ones”) aka Dominions or dominations (Kyriotetes) Jupiter The archetypical ideas which are the basis of our manifested universe

  5. Geburah (Strength) Elohim Gebor (“God of Battles” or “God Almighty”) Kamael Seraphim (“Fiery Serpents” or “Flaming Ones”) aka Order of Powers (Exusiai) Mars The power to carry out cosmic law, thereby enabling cosmic justice

  6. Tiphareth (Beauty) Jehovah Eloah Va Daath (“God Made Manifest in the Sphere of Mind” or “Lord God of all Knowledge”). Raphael Malachim (“Kings”) aka Virtues, angels and rulers (Dynameis) Sun The central Sephiroth is a stage of balance, beauty and harmony.

  7. Netzach (Victory) Jehovah Tzabaoth (“Lord of Hosts”) Haniel Elohim (“Gods”) aka Principalities (Archai) Venus The balance and mutual fruitation between the individual and the collective

  8. Hod (Glory) Elohim Tzabaoth (“God of Hosts”) Michael Beni Elohim (“Sons of God”) aka Archangels Mercury The stage of concentration where energy is controlled and molded into forms

  9. Yesod (Foundation) Shaddai El Chai (“Almighty Living God” or “Almighty God of Life”) Gabriel Kerubim (“Strong Ones”) aka Angels Moon The magical link between mind and matter, a force for good and evil

  10. Malkuth (Kingdom) Adonai Malekh (“The Lord who is King”) or Adonai ha-Aretz (“Lord of the Earth”) Sandalphon Ashim (“Souls of Fire”) aka Blessed Souls / Souls made perfect Earth (Pluto) The final manifestation, where things exist, happen and are sensed, right now ]]]]

“I am a sorcerer. Everything I see I create. I have created, and will continue to create my own world” - Morten Haas

I recommend trying to pronounce these names with full-breath resonance and observe the sonsequences. Before you judge it as arbitrary, I mean.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Pezer
    builder
    builder
    avatar

Posts : 2190
Join date : 2011-11-15
Location : deep caverns in caves

PostSubject: Re: God is Dead: Scientific Fact Fri Aug 09, 2013 9:26 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Wisdom is always cool, but what props up this wisdom? The Abrahamic wisdom? It is the zealousness of the rabbis. That the ones who took advantage of Jesus were detestable even by other rabbi’s standards doesn’t mean they weren’t earnestly zealous. This is why all occult Jewish knowledge tends to amount to monotonic temple prayer sessions and some elevated grip over the world, but nothing to rock anybody’s pants. Even though I can obviously recognize that the wisdom, or science, is pretty good. It is a fine smell, but very earthy, the sound of the language has very little of jagged and lightning. This is not against it in any ethical or moralistic level, simply a note on taste, on effectual smell.

All those terms are, of course, quite familiar to my ears. It reminds me of the times in religious study as a child when the stories seemed to shine through some value of its own, some secret deivinity. I suppose all the guilt is piled on top of that. But this is my point: it is at the same time powerful, maleable and secretive. Fine material for weak frames, unhelpful in this secretivness for science.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Pezer
builder
builder
avatar

Posts : 2190
Join date : 2011-11-15
Location : deep caverns in caves

PostSubject: Re: God is Dead: Scientific Fact Fri Aug 09, 2013 11:25 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Let’s take biodynamic agriculture as an example. The originating mind behind it placed so much of the importance of his newly framed field of study on a spirituality of the cosmos, he closed opportunities for future generations to use the term for its basic scientific tenets and their ability to include things unpredictable, such as microscopic reactions comparable to the drug experience, and that’s just from my own bias, there are many other biases that go uninvited to this wonderful field because there is an unknowability there which is attributed to something other than chaos; that is, a human outside of the human, a plan outside of the planners. If this plan can precede us, why create? Science is creation, the disacknowledgement of all non-human plans and the ultimate placer of responsibility on man, the heaviest crown for the mightiest sceptre.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6665
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: God is Dead: Scientific Fact Fri Aug 09, 2013 12:02 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
But what is man?
You could not use a car if you did not know about the pedals, the wheel and the ignition.
Kabalah draws so much more energy and power out of man than the regular superexited state, that it is dangerous. It’s basically rocketscience. No one masters this system. Those that come close burn up in eternal glory.

Seriously man I can’t take you seriously here until you’ve astrally walked a few of these paths.

qabalah.dk/paths.html

you’ll need this:

qabalah.dk/sephiroth.html

These paths, I walk about 1 a year, are by far the most vivid creative experiences I’ve had, and they redefined my approach to memory - it’s now completely physiological. This is also a great danger, There’s a point of no return somewhere along the tree. And once you’ve crossed that, you have to ascend to ‘divine madness’, and so it within the ethics your memory can sustain.

it’s like painting with a gun to your head.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Fixed Cross
    Doric basterd
    Doric basterd
    avatar

Posts : 6665
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: God is Dead: Scientific Fact Fri Aug 09, 2013 12:08 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
It all sounds very boring. But it isn’t if you stand before the bridge you are about to build. This “God” that is constantly mentioned is merely the galactic center, or that black hole around which the nearby galaxies revolve - it’s a specific target, a source of real energy, valuing, from which tautologically the measures and powerrelations of our scientific world derive.

The celestial entities are real. Their influence is scientifically very well identifiable. But as with all technology, this requires an Uranian approach. Where is your Uranus? How is it placed? Tell me what aspects it makes.

astrotheme.fr/theme_astral_e … u_ciel.php


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Fixed Cross
    Doric basterd
    Doric basterd
    avatar

Posts : 6665
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: God is Dead: Scientific Fact Fri Aug 09, 2013 12:32 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUpWCRadIIA[/youtube]

8:50 - He took Lambda from the Tree of Life - “Lamed” - but he was too simple about it. The constant also involves the other path on the expansion-side of the tree.

In any case, now you know why he said

“The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources.”

Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6665
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Radical idea of multiple histories Thu Aug 29, 2013 2:20 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Once again, if we take value ontology to the extreme and set value as prior to any formation of whatever affectance as literally as possible, then causation is free from itself.

Imagine this: is it perhaps possible that our value systems do not only dictate the future we create, but also the past from which we came?

What about this: Next to an origin of man from Ape, there is an origin of man via Atlantis, Lemuria, Hyperboria to beings like Wainamoinen. The history of the organism then depends on the substance which the soul takes on - in terms of which science of the body the subject values itself presently.

I know this is probably not the case. But it is now thinkable and illuminates at least that our memory, individual and collective, is greatly determined by the language we use to propel our essence back through time to arrive at a concept of an originating.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Pezer
    builder
    builder
    avatar

Posts : 2190
Join date : 2011-11-15
Location : deep caverns in caves

PostSubject: Re: Radical idea of multiple histories Sat Aug 31, 2013 1:49 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
No, I think it is true. It is the function of the difference between those who cannot do science together. One idea that permits wide-reaching science with difference-valuing at its core is the theory that we can create secondary and tertiary derivations from the vastly wide range of experience in the substance that makes science to alchemically make common overlapping sciences.

Message

Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6665
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Photon Relativity Paradox Fri Oct 11, 2013 2:49 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
This is entirely hypothetical, as it can not be recreated as an experiment.
And thus, keep in mind that paradox means apparent contradiction.

Say that two photons are rushing toward each other from opposite directions.
And coupled with each photon is a perspective.

With what speed does the perspective of either of the two photons perceive the other photon approaching?

How does that correlate with the fact that, from an observer neutral to both photons (exactly in the middle), the photons are closing the distance between each other at twice the speed of light?


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    James S Saint
    rational metaphysicist
    rational metaphysicist

Posts : 244
Join date : 2011-12-26

PostSubject: Re: Photon Relativity Paradox Fri Oct 11, 2013 9:58 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Fixed Cross wrote:
This is entirely hypothetical, as it can not be recreated as an experiment.
And thus, keep in mind that paradox means apparent contradiction.

Say that two photons are rushing toward each other from opposite directions.
And coupled with each photon is a perspective.

With what speed does the perspective of either of the two photons perceive the other photon approaching?

How does that correlate with the fact that, from an observer neutral to both photons (exactly in the middle), the photons are closing the distance between each other at twice the speed of light?
You might want to be careful pressing that issue. You can get banned off of most science sites if you argue the case.

Their response is one of two things;
A) Faith for those just wise enough to go along in order to get along.
B) Obfuscation for those too insistent upon logic and reasoning (warning: this comes with “pestilence”; gadflies, harpies, and locusts)

Many years ago when I asked that same question, they couldn’t answer it without obfuscation. They actually have a seemingly valid answer to give, but they (physicists) don’t typically realize it. And their answer isn’t entirely valid, but is good enough for most heretics.

What you have proposed actually involves 3 perspectives, not merely 2. You are the picture frame and that is one perspective because everything else is moving relative to that frame. Then you have each of the moving objects because they are moving relative to each other as well as to you.

So what happens in common relativity theory is the realization that any time something is moving toward something else at c, that something else must necessarily be without depth, flat. As a photon approaches Earth, from the photon’s perspective, the Earth is a flat disk.

What that means is that the right most light speed object approaching you would measure no distance between you and the left most object. It would consider you and the left most object to be in the same location.

That perspective can lead to yet another paradox that they also can’t answer because it seems there are concerns in mathematics that they are not taught. I could both propose such a paradox and also answer it with proper math, but they apparently cannot.

That situation leads to me having to not get into that additional paradox because such would lead to its answer which would end up merely helping to disguise the fallacy of an incoherent theory, “assisting the devil to maintain his church”.

So my advice is to simply accept that no distance would be perceived by either object between you and the other object and leave it at that.

They are at war. So choose your side;
A) one of the winning sides
B) one of the losing sides
C) outside
D) inside-out; the tricky method of being inside, yet out.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5478
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Photon Relativity Paradox Sat Oct 12, 2013 12:40 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
I can look at this situation one of two ways. First, it seems possible that light has no perspective at all, that being without mass or structure, basically a non-self-value that is a pure “reflection” of the mathematical laws of nature/reality itself, a sufficient-to-itself quantity, a photon would not be aware of anything. Saying that a photon perceives or experiences therefore makes no sense. So two photons traveling relative to each other don’t experience or even constitute reference-frames at all. This seems to fit with c being constant, that it’s unaffected by other stuff going on-- either a photon exists and is at c, or it does not exist (has been absorbed into an atomic system). This also seems consistent with the fact that photons seem to slow down in mediums; mass creating “gravity” adds more “stuff” as distance through which the photon must pass, or be refracted/bounce around, therefore appearing to us to “slow down”.

Or, you could take the perspective that the distance between two photons is a measurement of information and had no actual substantial “existence”. We know from entanglement that “information” can “travel” instantaneously (I.e. faster than c), so if you think of the distance between two photons traveling toward or away from each other as changing at a rate of 2c this is not problematic because nothing is “actually” moving faster than c, rather it’s an issue of information without substance or force, the distance between the photons can increase or decrease at any rate regardless of c as the limit of velocity because the FACT of the distance between two photons is not a velocity or a “thing” at all.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6665
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Photon Relativity Paradox Sat Oct 12, 2013 11:25 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
The speed of light encapsulates each reference frame.
It’s like a membrane beyond which nothing within that frame shall pass.

From the reference frame of object A, the closer object B comes to light speed, the closer it comes to absolute gravity. If it would attain this, the two objects would not be able to move away from each other any longer.

Thus the nature of c as a limit holds together everything by gravity. It forces all mass which is of influence to other mass to forever remain of influence to it - it binds together all already-bound reference frames.

It is an ontological veil between this world and something which is only possible in terms that are impossible here. Possibly that is simply “nothing”, but I don’t think that’s the necessary conclusion.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    James S Saint
    rational metaphysicist
    rational metaphysicist

Posts : 244
Join date : 2011-12-26

PostSubject: Re: Photon Relativity Paradox Sat Oct 12, 2013 3:00 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Realize that an “observer photon” would experience it birth at the source and instantly smack into its destination no matter at what extreme distance that destination is or how long you thought it would take for it to get there.

Time doesn’t exist for the observer photon. His “time dilation” is zero. An infinite distance, from his perspective, is traversed in zero time. And that is why he cannot perceive distance at all. So nothing can be “coming toward him” because space has no dimensions.

Another tiny little devil in the theory. Cool
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6665
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Photon Relativity Paradox Sat Oct 12, 2013 3:24 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Let’s see - the change elapsing within the photon are infinitely slow compared to the change elapsing in the physical reference frame in which it has its cause and effect.

And 2 times zero is zero, yes, I think that solves it.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    James S Saint
    rational metaphysicist
    rational metaphysicist

Posts : 244
Join date : 2011-12-26

PostSubject: Re: Photon Relativity Paradox Sat Oct 12, 2013 7:58 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Fixed Cross wrote:
Let’s see - the change elapsing within the photon are infinitely slow compared to the change elapsing in the physical reference frame in which it has its cause and effect.

And 2 times zero is zero, yes, I think that solves it.
We can discuss the RM answer to all of this in private or over at ILP where I don’t have to wait so long for every button press. I can literally make 10 new posts there for every simple spelling edit correction here.

It involves a bit of math, but nothing you can’t handle. I don’t typically use their conventional math and physics symbols for a variety of reasons (I don’t even know most of them anymore), so I explain what I use. The math is really merely for detailed accuracy, seldom for conceptual understanding (and when they try it for that is when they get themselves all screwed up. They need to leave metaphysics to the pros).

The bottom line is that there is an indisputable (definitionally locked) propagation rate that provably cannot ever change. That rate constitutes an “ironclad” standard from which relative measurements can be calibrated. It forms a standard for “absolute time”.

The trick is then to form a device that compares that absolute immutable standard to local changes. I haven’t thought about all of that for years. It seems that it involved a tetrahedron arrangement with which to read and compare a change rate in all dimensions. Simple math then allows you to know, due to the differences, what speed you must be moving, and without measuring against anything else around, and then compensate your time clock based upon that speed. If I remember right (maybe not) the gravitational influence gets automatically compensated. I’ll have to figure all of that out again (usual for me… I forget more than I remember these days).

Something good about RM is that there can never be any paradoxes (except to those who misunderstood something).
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Imafungi
bowstring
bowstring

Posts : 48
Join date : 2014-01-22

PostSubject: Re: Photon Relativity Paradox Wed Jan 22, 2014 4:35 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Fixed Cross wrote:
This is entirely hypothetical, as it can not be recreated as an experiment.
And thus, keep in mind that paradox means apparent contradiction.

Say that two photons are rushing toward each other from opposite directions.
And coupled with each photon is a perspective.

With what speed does the perspective of either of the two photons perceive the other photon approaching?

How does that correlate with the fact that, from an observer neutral to both photons (exactly in the middle), the photons are closing the distance between each other at twice the speed of light?

The second part of your question; it doesnt matter that they are closing in to each other twice the speed of light, it still is true that the photons themselves are traveling the speed of light. If 2 cars were traveling 50 mph towards them, just because they are enclosing twice the speed of those cars doesnt mean the cars are traveling more then 50 mph.

First part of your question; I think is the same answer. Though the real answer may be they would never be able to perceive one another ( because perception is based off of the nature of light/photons), so they would need light to reflect off of them, which it cant, and then travel back to them, and by then they would already have collided.

Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6665
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: attempt at a scientific definition of value Sun Apr 08, 2012 2:21 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
The concept value within value ontology refers to that which constitutes the momentum of the entity’s self-sustaining through time. Value is incorporated in the particle as force that effectively counters, or harnesses against entropy. A particles self-valuing is the structure-in-time (path, circuitry) of its substance (energy, force, power to effect) in which other substance (energy, force, power to effect) is incorporated as increasing momentum of this structure-in-time. This structure in time is a constant in as far as it apprehends itself in terms of its own momentum, and these terms are its “values”. Its momentum is its “self-valuing”, the standard to its values. It persists in as far as it apprehends itself as necessary to itself, thereby necessary to its values.

As soon as it apprehends values separately from its own necessity to itself (self-valuing), it begins to disintegrate.

Value is directly translated into, or integrated as, momentum of the circular path of power to effect (thereby to empower) itself.

This power to effect and re-cause itself amounts also in power to cause change outside of itself.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Imafungi
    bowstring
    bowstring

Posts : 48
Join date : 2014-01-22

PostSubject: Re: attempt at a scientific definition of value Wed Jan 22, 2014 6:12 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
I dont think value is absolute, meaning beyond human, and a concrete ethereal hierarchy of unchangeable values. I think the closest absolute objective function of value is life itself. The healthy and stable functioning of a life that is the highest human value. The exceptions are of course things like, when a human who commits suicide could be said to have valued death (perhaps they would have valued life more if not for certain things in their environment that beyond their control became to much). The saying ‘one mans trash is another mans treasure’ comes to mind when thinking of the nature of value. One man may value porn and sex while another values abstinence. One may value alcohol while another does not. One may value experimenting with pain as a form of pleasure, one may value avoiding pain at all costs. So is your whole thing attempting to quantize and categorize thus creating the absolute objective mapping of human value systems, and what they lead to, what they truly provide, how the value of what they provide can be quantized? So to be able to say ‘this person is objectively wrong for valuing this or my values are more valuable then yours’? A main objective (whether they like it or not or would like to admit it or not) shared value of humans is money. This is how humans ensure their value of life, which I believe is the most valuable thing, so it is quite intuitive and obvious that money, the means in which that is accomplished is the most valuable thing. This leads to a very superficial discovery, in a sense discrediting intellectuality and suggesting ignorance is bliss, as long as you have money to provide your essentials and a healthy body there is nothing more you can truly hope for, or those are of the highest values, everything else that you may desire or do is just a form of entertainment, novelty, to see what we can see and do what we can do, exploring potentials in physicality and/or thought.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6665
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: attempt at a scientific definition of value Wed Jan 22, 2014 10:11 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Values are dictated by the subject, not the other way around. The highest value is the valuer, per definition. If there is no valuer, there can be no value.

Value ontology is the ontology of the valuer, which is the hub of the universe.

A value can be something that an atom requires to exist. It’s not a product of consciousness. Consciousness is a highly complex form of valuing.

Establishing objective value is the precise opposite of what VO does.

Life is not itself necessarily of value to the one who is living it. That is why people kill themselves. Life is a result of valuing. Life is valuing, and if it values itself, it will keep on living. But it will only value itself because it is a means to attain to certain values. There is no “will to live”: at the basis of life, life is a contingency of the will to attain values.

I realize that this is a deeply radical reversal of perspective.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Imafungi
    bowstring
    bowstring

Posts : 48
Join date : 2014-01-22

PostSubject: Re: attempt at a scientific definition of value Wed Jan 22, 2014 10:30 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Fixed Cross wrote:
Values are dictated by the subject, not the other way around. The highest value is the valuer, per definition. If there is no valuer, there can be no value.

Value ontology is the ontology of the valuer, which is the hub of the universe.

A value can be something that an atom requires to exist. It’s not a product of consciousness. Consciousness is a highly complex form of valuing.

Establishing objective value is the precise opposite of what VO does.

Life is not itself necessarily of value to the one who is living it. That is why people kill themselves. Life is a result of valuing. Life is valuing, and if it values itself, it will keep on living. But it will only value itself because it is a means to attain to certain values. There is no “will to live”: at the basis of life, life is a contingency of the will to attain values.

I realize that this is a deeply radical reversal of perspective.

First your opening line you state this " The highest value is the valuer, per definition. If there is no valuer, there can be no value."

which contradicts your last paragraph, right?
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6665
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: attempt at a scientific definition of value Tue Sep 23, 2014 8:27 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
No. The last paragraph says that if there is no value, the valuer will come to cease to exist. It say nothing about where there is no valuer.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides

Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6665
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: QM Double Slit Thu Oct 10, 2013 12:04 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
With the double slit experiment, you always hear: “an electron behaves both like a particle and a wave” or “an electron behaves now like a particle and then as a wave”. That’s misleadingly phrased.

When the electrons are quantized by influencing them from another frame of reference, their pattern of distribution is like that of particles, and if you do not influence them from this other spacetime frame, they distribute according to the logic of wavefunctions.

I think that the coherence of their arrival pattern is guaranteed only if their reference frame is left intact, when all that matters is the coherence between the charge of the source and the charge of the impact.

The electrons do not need to exist as such, they are only the transference of charge. If man insists on measuring this quantifyingly, the electrons which are actually measured as individual causal agents (detected) do not thereafter alter their quantized state. They have been brought into the context of another reference frame, and can not at the same time disregard this frame.

The pure frame involves only the charge (value) of the electron source, which is a turbulence, and its wavelike (highly interactive) distribution.

Analogical suggestion - value will distribute differently when it is quantized/monetized, then when it is distributed in a direct transaction, where the frame of reference is only the relation between giver and receiver. In this context we might say that “meaning” is left intact. I can imagine that this can be extrapolated to the quantum state, in the sense that, very broadly, “il n’y a pas de hors-texte” applies and the QM “weirdness” can be seen as a hermeneutical incompetence.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Fixed Cross
    Doric basterd
    Doric basterd
    avatar

Posts : 6665
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: QM Double Slit Thu Oct 10, 2013 12:58 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
I can’t grasp the math, but I grasp the logic of it, which seems implicit in relativity itself. We’ve established that c is the only constant which is present in all measurements. All measurements are based on this constancy.

The electrons are measured (experience to be present, affecting) by being exposed to c as relative to reference frame of the observer. Their behavior is thus bent to the measure of the observer, which is to say that they are, at that moment, electrons. We are necessarily measuring the electrons that apply to c as it is from our frame of reference, which means a distribution that is physically logical. But if this reference frame is not involved, there is no necessity for peak-quantity to appear as a click in a frame of reference, but simply the possibility of light from any frame of reference.

And equally as gravity is curved, the peaking and declining functions on the screen are representations of potentiating optimizations, self-accumulative (content to the second power), climaxing and silencing. The behavior of undetected electricity the behavior of potential itself reacting to itself. As soon as potential becomes manifest, it ceases to exist as part of the field it arose from. Similarly souls are born into matter and die into the Bitter Sea.

It leaves me wondering - what is the contradiction between relativity and QM?


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Fixed Cross
    Doric basterd
    Doric basterd
    avatar

Posts : 6665
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: QM Double Slit Thu Oct 10, 2013 1:22 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
“Nature herself doesn’t know where the electron will go”.

  • the electron as self-valuing will move in accordance to its context (its own valuing; direction-response-continuum), the electron as valued in terms of observer will go in accordance with the observers context.

Prediction without measurement is implicit, prediction with measurement is distribution.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Fixed Cross
    Doric basterd
    Doric basterd
    avatar

Posts : 6665
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: QM Double Slit Thu Oct 10, 2013 1:48 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
It’s only the nature of experimenting, not the nature of nature, that produces these anomalies.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Defenders of the Earth
    Tower
    Tower
    avatar

Posts : 5478
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: QM Double Slit Thu Oct 10, 2013 2:42 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Yes I’ve read this before, it represents a thus-far insurmountable obstacle for experimental method in these instances, the fact that the experimental design itself is somehow setting up a “resonance” or “circuit” that is actually influencing/creating the anomalies. This has a name, but I can’t remember it at the moment.

If quanta/light, “photons”, are minimal valuing then they must take on the nature of that through which they move, they must be secondary values OR value-less to such a medium-frame. c would be an example of valuelessness of light with respect to another frame, to certain properties of a frame; double slit would be an example of absolute secondary value-assumption to another frame, to certain properties of a frame (namely, the experimental setup).


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5478
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: QM Double Slit Thu Oct 10, 2013 2:45 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Therefore in the case of these experiments we get a strong-precise valuing (the human experimenting) encountering either an absolute self-value (e.g. c) or an absolute no-self-value (e.g. wave collapse, double slit anomalies). But this interesting question of how this interaction takes place and is even possible aside, what determines the difference between either absolute self-valuing of “light” or absolute no-self-valuing of “light”?


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6665
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: QM Double Slit Fri Oct 11, 2013 12:08 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
In philosophers terms, will to power.

The photons or electrons (I’ll use photons here) moving through the slits are influenced by whatever material is calibrated to ‘make sense of them’ (hit them to draw specific energy from them) at the slits.

You can’t measure the quanta at the slits without actually having something collide with them. The calibration of that ‘hit’ is set in terms of the experimenters reference frame.

It’s important to note that only if they are successfully manipulated so as to affect the observer at the slits, then they are observed as quanta with sufficient individual momentum to behave as particles.

If the emitted measuring energy is so weak (emitting photons or whatever at too great intervals) as to miss a quantum, then the quantum does not behave accordingly to being influenced as a quantum.

It’s very literal value ontological logic at work.

The how of this is implicit in the a priori definition of the required outcome. So we can pull a philosophers trick and reverse the phrasing of the conclusion of the experiment: The influence is only sufficient to disturb the interference pattern if it manages to quantize the light.

Light appears to not be “made of photons” per se, rather, photons are the minimal form in which light is measured as a unit.

A photon is the epistemic unit of light.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Imafungi
    bowstring
    bowstring

Posts : 48
Join date : 2014-01-22

PostSubject: Re: QM Double Slit Wed Jan 22, 2014 5:45 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Fixed Cross wrote:

It leaves me wondering - what is the contradiction between relativity and QM?

The contradiction, has to do with gravity, its more of an undiscovered successful bridging of the two then a contradiction because I believe they are both successful in their own arenas, General relativity being a description of the macro phenomenon of gravity down to a certain small point, and QM being the descriptions of the most micro fundamentality of what the universe is made of. The problem, though it is posited Gravitons exist (which would be the particle of the gravity field, as Photons are the particle of the EM field) the problem is they cant experimentally access gravitons though I believe they are trying and have been. Because to discover the details of the particles of matter of nature we smash them together and observe their characteristics in scattering, This is more difficult to do in an effort to search for and grasp gravities physical essence because I think it has something to do with gravities physical essence being space itself, and what happens is we just create mini black holes…But I only know relative generalities about this topic so you would probably be better off asking google.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6665
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: QM Double Slit Tue Sep 23, 2014 8:37 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Imafungi wrote:
Fixed Cross wrote:

It leaves me wondering - what is the contradiction between relativity and QM?

The contradiction, has to do with gravity, its more of an undiscovered successful bridging of the two then a contradiction because I believe they are both successful in their own arenas, General relativity being a description of the macro phenomenon of gravity down to a certain small point, and QM being the descriptions of the most micro fundamentality of what the universe is made of. The problem, though it is posited Gravitons exist (which would be the particle of the gravity field, as Photons are the particle of the EM field) the problem is they cant experimentally access gravitons though I believe they are trying and have been. Because to discover the details of the particles of matter of nature we smash them together and observe their characteristics in scattering, This is more difficult to do in an effort to search for and grasp gravities physical essence because I think it has something to do with gravities physical essence being space itself, and what happens is we just create mini black holes…But I only know relative generalities about this topic so you would probably be better off asking google.

This sounds plausible - it is like modern science to insist that gravity, which is the very manifestation of coherence and structuring, has itself ‘particles’ separate of the particles that ‘have’, are gravity.

Would Einsteins formula of mass and energy not be made into an irrelevancy by the existence of a particular gravity-carrier?

m = (e/c^2) + ‘gravitons’…

Message

Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5478
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Magnetic fields Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:37 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
How do they work? I’ve been reading a lot of science lately and only describes what magnets and magnetic fields are, in terms of using various descriptions and definitions involving how atoms rotate so to point in the same direction. But it does not actually explain magnetism at all.

I want to know what these “magnetic lines of force” literally are. And I can’t seem to find any explanations, only descriptions.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
James S Saint
rational metaphysicist
rational metaphysicist

Posts : 244
Join date : 2011-12-26

PostSubject: Re: Magnetic fields Thu Oct 10, 2013 3:13 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
A magnetic field is merely a changing electric field. The “magnetic lines of force” are merely a method for trying to display how much the electric field is changing in that space.

The magnetic field is an “electric current” void of the electrons themselves.

Additionally, the electric field is the “electric potential”. A potential is not a physical entity, rather merely a measure of a situation. But a changing potential is what physical reality is made of. Thus the magnetic field is the “stuff of physical reality”. After finally learning more about physics and getting it straight in his mind, Feynman announced that he wished that he had never heard of the electric field. And yet without the field of potential, there can be no field of change in potential. Without the electric field, there can be no magnetic field.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5478
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Magnetic fields Thu Oct 10, 2013 9:21 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Explain, “The magnetic field is an “electric current” void of the electrons themselves”, in light of the fact that electricity is the flow of electrons.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
James S Saint
rational metaphysicist
rational metaphysicist

Posts : 244
Join date : 2011-12-26

PostSubject: Re: Magnetic fields Fri Oct 11, 2013 1:37 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Capable wrote:
Explain, “The magnetic field is an “electric current” void of the electrons themselves”, in light of the fact that electricity is the flow of electrons.
Electricity is a flow of Charge (aka “potential”), originally thought to be stemming merely from electrons. But then it was discovered that electrons are merely the electric field congested at one point. People argue about why it congests, but no one argues that it isn’t literally made of electromagnetic energy and nothing else.

When electric current flows through a wire, the electrons are prevalent, but they merely represent how much electric charge, “electric potential energy” is flowing. Once a charge is in motion, it is referred to as “kinetic energy” rather than “potential energy”. Either way, the current flows due to the difference in potential between two points. As the circuit attempts to balance that difference, electrons (bits of congested EM) rush between the points.

The issue is merely that any changing or moving electric field is what is called a “magnetic field”. When there are no electrons to flow in the attempt to balance a difference in potential, any changing that can be accomplished is done merely by the field itself without little bits of congested, concentrated charge, “electrons”.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Parodites
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 757
Join date : 2011-12-11

PostSubject: Re: Magnetic fields Sat Oct 12, 2013 2:26 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
A magnetic field operates the same way all fields operate. The concept of field itself is very important, seeing as that is all there is. Realize that non-composite sub-atomic particles are perfectly identical. Two electrons do not just look the same, two photons do not just look the same, they are the same. As identical as two number 3s. In accordance with the fundamental principle of Aristotelian logic, that A is A, electron is electron. There is only “one” electron, the localization of the omnipresent electron-field (electromagnetic tensor) which extends throughout the matrix of space time. When that field’s effect is localized in a single point within space time, it has been quantized. It’s quanta is the electron. When it is localized in this manner it displays a particle effect in a single location, when it is not localized then it displays a wave effect, hence particle-wave duality. This same thing works with all non-composite particles; photons, bosons, etc. Even when we push or pull on something, we are experiencing electromagnetism due to inter-molecular forces. The magnetic dipole moments are not aligned in most materials, they’re random, and thus the magnetic field is zero; the dipoles are aligned in several materials though, like the magnets we put on fridges, (because the magnet on the fridge has unpaired electrons and all electrons cancel one another one when paired) and thus they produce a positively valued magnetic field that we can readily perceive. The centripetal force is either increased or decreased on electrons depending on the direction of their orbit, when exposed to a magnetic field (most fields are of zero value.) They will either be pulled away or drawn further into the nucleus of the corresponding atom. But we don’t understand any of the forces of nature at their most fundamental level, because we understand them only as separate forces now.

In asking about why the electromagnetic force operates as it does, you are basically asking why electrons have the spin and charge property they do, because that force is just a mathematical description of how the electrons align and interact with one another. There are many theories. Perhaps by absorbing the virtual photons generated in the electric field, the electrons also absorb some of the angular momentum of the photons and are endowed in this manner with a particular spin and charge.


A sik þau trûðu

Nisus ait, “Dine hunc ardorem mentibus addunt,
Euryale, an sua cuique deus fit dira cupido?”

Have the gods set this ruling passion in my heart,
or does each man’s furious passion become his god?

  • Virgil.

It is not opium which makes me work but its absence, and in order for me to feel its absence it must
from time to time be present.-- Antonin Artaud
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
Imafungi
bowstring
bowstring

Posts : 48
Join date : 2014-01-22

PostSubject: Re: Magnetic fields Wed Jan 22, 2014 4:54 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Parodites wrote:

In asking about why the electromagnetic force operates as it does, you are basically asking why electrons have the spin and charge property they do, because that force is just a mathematical description of how the electrons align and interact with one another. There are many theories. Perhaps by absorbing the virtual photons generated in the electric field, the electrons also absorb some of the angular momentum of the photons and are endowed in this manner with a particular spin and charge.

So is the EM field a physical (as in, existent entity of some kind) thing which exists throughout all space, and ‘the field lines’, although not exactly as we depict them (like a perfect rope that connects to the electron) are existent in some manner? If there is nothing like them, why is there the need to evoke them? There needs to be an actual medium which distributes the force, EM radiation, electric and magnetic fields, as to avoid ‘spooky action at a distance’. The tricky problem is in physicality and reality, how many points of EM field is connected to an electron, and how come EM radiation is distributed or caused to exist from the acceleration of an electron in a 2d plane type of way as an outwardly expanding ring of wave, and not as an outwardly expanding 3d sphere of wave. What does this say about the medium of EM field?

My personal thought is that magnetism (2 magnets naturally drawing towards one another without physically touching one another) must be similar to the principles of displacement of medium as gravity. The big clue we have, is that the difference between magnets and non magnets, are the shared direction of spin the electrons are orientated in, in a magnet. I think it must have to do with the way in which the collective electrons distort the surrounding EM field, so that when N pole to N pole, and S pole to S pole configurations, the electrons collective spin is causing the fields to be created in a way similar way to two rowboats facing one another rowing backwards, placed front to front, will repel away from one another, (severely lacking analogy but worth something possibly). N pole to S pole, S pole to N pole, the disturbances of the surrounding field due to collective electron spinning of the field, compel the collective material to follow the past of least resistance, which results in the connecting of ends, in turn creating a larger magnet, adding to the collective of mutual spin. This is very similar to how gravity works, as the moon takes the path of least resistance as the earth has distorted the local medium of space, instead of the moon traveling past earths swirled distortion, it is compelled to ride its wake.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6665
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Magnetic fields Tue Sep 23, 2014 9:04 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
The idea of spooky action at a distance is based on the superstition that matter consists of discrete blocks of some hard substance on a background, or rather plateau of Medium, aethir, god-field. First of all this is rather silly in itself as this Medium begs the same question all over again. On what ground is this Medium predicated? What is the ground to the ground? Infinite regress, as with all sciences proposed finalities.

Second, the substance is EM and gravity. This is what particles are. Their manifestation is the force they represent.The coherence of these particles as force-standards and mediators is their being. What else is there to define, describe or identify them? Nothing.

In a similar vein, such people have asked:
‘What is the essential waterness behind water? Which non- water makes the water so watery?’
It does not occur that ‘things’ as we designate them contain within our notion of their being, their being and thus their nature, which includes their ground.

Science is always looking for groundless grounds that ground all the rest which is taken to be purely contingent and of no existential integrity. Its eazy enough to interpret this yearning; men who live without the faintest clue that they exist by their own nature, unaware that they have a nature, that they are what nature has now become. Men who see themselves as separate of the universe, looking in on it from the outside. With all due respect, autists and idiots.

Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5478
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Scientific methodology and its limits Sun Sep 20, 2015 5:50 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Law of large numbers and attribution bias, in combination with what is almost always a huge and inevitably lack of information and data we might call totalizing, are able to call into question almost everything. These two ‘laws’ of scientific thought can only be refuted positively, by actual and adequate demonstration of proof by exhausting all other possibilities of explanation. Since astrology was brought up let’s apply the laws to it.

Astrological events that correspond to earthly or psychological events or patterns can either be seen as evidence for the truth of astrological significances or for the fact that we attribute meaning where we are looking for it, retroactively, and that there are statistically-speaking enough “significant events” in any scope of history to where we might imagine it is inevitable that certain patterns or alignments might emerge. Another big problem is that even if we note very consistent and surprising patterns these can still be “wished away” by appeal to the law of large numbers by saying that no matter the startlingness of the coincidence it’s statistically given that such coincidences would happen in a universe, world, and history as extensive and deep as ours. And further that we are attuned to attribute meaning to such coincidences far more than to the far more numerous moments we might point to where no such coincidence obtains.

I personally have suspended judgment on astrology and on most “supernatural” phenomena, I find it very difficult to state an opinion one way or another on these sort of things, because firstly I’ve had my own strange experiences but none approaching anything like giving me a sense of undeniable certainty about larger significances thereof, and also because philosophically-speaking our reason is able to accommodate either view: reason can either affirm or deny such things or the possibility or likelihood or unlikelihood of such things, there doesn’t seem to be any real ground or basis for bringing those two different kinds of views together to verify one and refute the other. At best it usually happens that some “philosopher” or scientist ends up arguing with a layman or religious person, each throwing out their own manner of psychological need and rationally-gravitating methodologies given the kinds of experiences and thought-patterns they’ve each been accustomed to-- not much objective, actual philosophy, or irrefutable data for either position is offered.

So anyway I’m just interested here in outlining the basic situation as it relates to all this. I see the only thing I can state with certainty is that either position can assert a strong certainty in its defense, and thus I can also be certain that the dilemma represents a true problem, one that cannot be resolved by merely retreating into our respective positions and our own “certainties”, no matter if these really are incontrovertibly certain to us.

Common ground is needed. This is very difficult to conceive, given the logical problems I mentioned here (attribution bias, law of large numbers, relative/psychological certainties, and a lack of overwhelmingly certain and objective data-experience).


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6665
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Scientific methodology and its limits Sun Sep 20, 2015 7:04 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
I’ve often casually proven astrology to be true by predictions of what a chart would look like given some characteristics. I’ve done it in the other thread, conjuring up people I was sure to have oppositions. It’s not up for question for me any more than gravity is - but it sees at first equally inexplicable.

As a general but accurate rule, the only people who do not believe in astrology are those who haven’t seriously looked into it. I’ve seen the transformation in everyone I confronted with his chart. I’ve learned not to do this anymore as it is oppressive; but neither as I think Hume has a point that we don’t know for certain if the sun is going to come up, do I feel there is a point to doubt astrology when the empirical evidence is as overwhelming as it is for the gravitational constant.

All you have to do is measure it, but you do have to do that.

But indeed it is hard to explain this in terms of what we already know - but given that man still knows virtually nothing, it’s not surprising to me that the more we come to know, by the philosophical work of our friends and ourselves, the less strange or unlikely it becomes that we are products of more than just configurations of molecules on Earth, that we actually stand as in the center of a cosmos; that our being is far too subtle to not be influenced by the cosmic majesty of order, which was fleshed out as the argument for possibility itself.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Fixed Cross
    Doric basterd
    Doric basterd
    avatar

Posts : 6665
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Scientific methodology and its limits Sun Sep 20, 2015 7:18 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
I get it, I feel it even - it is ugly compared to philosophy - it shouldn’t go near it - it feels arbitrary.

But it’s one hard motherfucking fact of life we’re gonna have to get realistic about.

Not that it’s arbitrary, but that it is the opposite. Today, I have gone a long way to explaining it based on Parodites’ conception of the origin of the mind - as the re-anchoring of beings in the world, in coherence, in being, after the instincts had been ‘threshed’ by the self-analyzing being; the ‘empty mind’, or the chaotic firstborn-mind opened itself up to the cosmos as a gaping wound to receive any possible ointment of constancy. And this is still the way that shamans rip open the fabric of causality to the spontaneous dance of the soul under the sky in which the connection between the two is the actual being. This is why the lightning is the symbol of divinity - the coherence of our mind reflects the discharge of cosmic order into the vacuous proto-consciousness represented by the threshing floor, where the wills of the gods bundle to play with man.


" The strong do what they can do and the weak accept what they have to accept. "

  • Thucydides
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile Send private message Send e-mail Online
    Pezer
    builder
    builder
    avatar

Posts : 2190
Join date : 2011-11-15
Location : deep caverns in caves

PostSubject: Re: Scientific methodology and its limits Sun Sep 20, 2015 7:45 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Common ground. I think it is somewhere in chemistry. Astrology is alchemical, as is science. Lack of information and bias: does value ontology not predict them? Value. Science doesn’t seek value, it seems to me to give value depth, practicality. To apply huge maths to intuitions by relating evidences. This problem of not being able to achieve a totality points to that we have not allowed science to run wild, a separation between psychological need and independent, ideal potency which is not possible as absolute. Rather philosophy waits at the other end.

Yes, I think science’s lack is the obsession on absolute rather than specific. The principle is what concerns us.

Capable’s post seems simple, but each turning point has already been examined in other posts. Reason.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Pezer
builder
builder
avatar

Posts : 2190
Join date : 2011-11-15
Location : deep caverns in caves

PostSubject: Re: Scientific methodology and its limits Sun Sep 20, 2015 8:15 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
I think I’m wrong about chemistry.

Common ground will not come that easy.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Pezer
builder
builder
avatar

Posts : 2190
Join date : 2011-11-15
Location : deep caverns in caves

PostSubject: Re: Scientific methodology and its limits Sun Sep 20, 2015 8:21 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
About astrology, I will say that it is an opposite of supernatural. I is very much chemical, dealing with gravity and light… It could be said to be the effective result of that which any science aspires to as the highest degree of inter-relation.

The ultimate reference for animality. But this is all very anti-philosophical. I will need more space of space and of mind to get back to this. Let it be recorded that philosophy has not yet engulfed science.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fixed Cross
Doric basterd
Doric basterd
avatar

Posts : 6665
Join date : 2011-11-09
Location : the black ships

PostSubject: Re: Scientific methodology and its limits Sun Sep 20, 2015 9:06 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
I wrote this post an hour or so ago on an empty stomach. I’ve eaten lentil soup with sausage now.

The status of the argument is as follows:

under scrutiny is astrology.

Note: I can’t allow any relation of this field with the term ‘supernatural’ or any other phenomena falling under that term, this is a specific field of inquiry and relates to fields that are vague only in the sense of having a vague understanding of it. It is ruthlessly exact and there is no room for doubt about the consistency of influences.

It is a culturally imposed superstition that leads people to doubt astrology. All serious cultures take it seriously, because you can not tae calculated risks without it and you can not build greatness without a lot of good fortune.
They called the farao’s the cosmic architects. It’s a field of knowledge that leads to long term power. If anything it’s the actual gift of Prometheus; fore-sight. That this is often deadly is the reason astrology is shunned, but for a philosopher this fear is not quite as well founded as it is for people with lesser inclinations to know themselves. In all western wars serious astrologers are consulted, and newspapers print ‘horoscopes’ that prescribe events based on sun signs, which is impossible, it is very clear why astrology is discredited, but it is not clear why it is working so well. Again; my best argument is the one I’ve given today - the moment that being had disconnected the instincts from each other, man stood erect; the moment man stood erect he was crowned by the heavens. As the earthly causal chain was broken, the celestial one was forged. The moment in between is the great possibility that Parodites’ philosophy describes and thereby opens up for ‘use’, and this moment underlies all consciousness. Astrology functions as a particular set of laws on the field of the daemonic formative process, but it is no less adequate to the phenomenology of human fate as physics is to the phenomenology of falling objects. This absurd consistency is why I make such a point of it. It’s not that it’s merely interesting, it’s rather that it is an entire field of exact knowledge that is disregarded with this mere disregarding as grounds for the conclusion that it isn’t proven to work. Yes, it is proven. It’s been proven to work a long, long time ago and never not been proven since. It’s only not been clear at all how it works. But the same goes for gravity, and a lot of things of which we only now that it works. The actual, historical reason man started disbelieving astrology is that he started believing in the Bible which forbids it. I’ sure took Newton a while to get people to believe that such exactitude of prediction could be possible, before he could get them to actually test out his laws. Now the effective terms of astrology are not less exact than the terms of mass, but our words for our own states of being are slightly less exact. Astrologers therefore prefer to work with the astrological names wherever they can. They are by far the most exact terms we have for “human being”.

Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5478
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Also on affluence and justice Wed Sep 30, 2015 4:51 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
What too is interesting is how technology and machines generally add more time into our lives by replacing work with “magic” (non-work), by making some dumb machine do it. Innovation was quite slow for a long time not only because of a natural exponential growth curve of progress but also because the affluent didn’t have much need or really any need for technology and progress; they only required that a general level not exist which they themselves could not refashion into a system that kept themselves in the top. But the average person strives for more time and space, like all good Being, and thus even in the deep heart of the wealthy there are seeds of “curiosity” that sometimes, as in the case of men of genius, flower up. After all one eventually gets bored of all that time and space.

Men are trying to push up toward their estranged justice with thei technologies while the elite try to tighten control and keep themselves ahead of the curve. That’s why things like the federal reserve exist, as circuits in the social machine acting as control mechanisms. Like a class of priests we have today’s “experts” as media, scientific, political or pop culture figures (interesting the new Pope is trying to be all of these at once… there is still a powerful lust in the Catholic soul) who act as gatekeepers to keep the rest out, capitalism being the genius device of realizing one doesn’t need absolute control or even very much control at all, that it’s more effective to cede control and keep a small bit out of view. It is important to note that if the elite or affluence classes are pushing for development and technology it is only as a reaction to development and technology that is somewhat out of their own hands. Everyone is fighting an unconscious arms race to be on top of the dung pile or at least as high up as possible. “One big anthill society” or however Valery put it.

Affluence doesn’t really justify anything, except on some metaphysical level, which doesn’t matter anyway except probably to the affluent themselves. Since communism in all its possible forms is a failure we will continue with consumer society becoming more “nice” over time, niceness that only exists to compel more forced compliance by undercutting possibility to state one’s objections. Like if you make the jails nice enough maybe people will choose to live there.

Anyway, I predict the seemingly endless upward spike in technological innovation and scientific development is going to stop. If only because the upper will gain measures success against the lower through increased Christian subtleties and economic tricks, like in Rome we simply won’t care anymore but to stare at the screens, and whatever geopolitical, environmental or economic situations unfold in the coming century to “cause” scientific progress to stall on a global scale will not in fact be causes at all, but only will be outward excuses and images that mask the deeper reality. It is almost impossible to imagine scientific progress stalling like that since research and application are like capital, they flow wherever there is least resistance and most profit, and because application especially represents nation-state and cultural power. So what does it require for it to arrest? “Peace”.

Message

Pezer
builder
builder
avatar

Posts : 2190
Join date : 2011-11-15
Location : deep caverns in caves

PostSubject: A Thought on The Consequences of Negativity as Science Sun Oct 04, 2015 5:24 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Science - Concience
Or in Spanish
Ciencia - Conciencia - ser - ecencia

When we find a reason to drop everything and chase the void, we must know that there is nothing waiting on the other side. We must put it there ourselves: the void will simply spit us back out with the drive that took us to it being the only thing left from it.

This is hard… Say a little girl in a satanic feast. She uses the ritual to free herself from the magic of life: what magic of life is waiting on the zenith to take with her back to life?

This is the building nature of humans. If we don’t put something there for negativity to seize, it will seize whatever the fuck the random bestial drives that took us to the something wanting nothing want and thus dissipate inmediately into a disappointing return to the same somethings, the same consciousness that had already overcome this bestiality.

Negativity as method demands that nothing be thought to await. Magic requires a landing point: this is where the negative science comes in. It neglects its origins at the risk of negating whatever brand new effects it can and will effectively produce. This method has the ability to make an ever climbing ladder for consciousnes.

Consciousness negatively: what isn’t there? All the things that are there have to be traced back to a point where they weren’t there, and then something joyful can be produced from other negative inquiries that reveal things which can serve the drives of consciousness as discovered by negative regression. Parodites, meet Nietzsche.

Last edited by Pezer on Sun Oct 04, 2015 5:43 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Pezer
builder
builder
avatar

Posts : 2190
Join date : 2011-11-15
Location : deep caverns in caves

PostSubject: Re: A Thought on The Consequences of Negativity as Science Sun Oct 04, 2015 5:38 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
This is very fucking hard, forgive the chaotic style and blinding mistakes.

Negativity is a kind of absolute reversal of life, a benjamin button kind of trip. We see ourselves coming from death onto life, words and abstractions are more real the more abstract they are, and more abstract the more rooted in concrete life: concrete life in reverse, but forward at the same time.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Pezer
builder
builder
avatar

Posts : 2190
Join date : 2011-11-15
Location : deep caverns in caves

PostSubject: Re: A Thought on The Consequences of Negativity as Science Sun Oct 04, 2015 5:40 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
So, the more something sounds like life, the more it leads to death, and the more it sounds like death (say… Homer), the more it leads to life.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Pezer
builder
builder
avatar

Posts : 2190
Join date : 2011-11-15
Location : deep caverns in caves

PostSubject: Re: A Thought on The Consequences of Negativity as Science Sun Oct 04, 2015 6:28 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Full disclosure because this idea is as dangerous as it is powerful: it came to me while half awakening from a half sleep, fully formed and beautifully concrete, and dissolved as I hurried to get it down.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5478
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: A Thought on The Consequences of Negativity as Science Sun Oct 04, 2015 7:48 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
I remember being focused a lot on the insight that philosophy is death, this was about a year and a half ago. These realizations come to us in strange ways. Only by following the impossible track will we ever know that we have arrived at something certain, and then only in relation to that whole scope against which and precisely not in terms of which we acted. So, do that enough times over a wide enough scope of experiences and ideas, and one begins to build up a picture of what makes the most sense, if only because one has already therefore verified so much that doesn’t make sense, then subjected all that negative verification to overlap of cross-analysis and seat that analysis firmly in the most sure world we know-- ourselves, our own experiences.

But as you say this leads through death. I don’t know how I made it through and out the other side, well I do know but I’m not gong to say. But every man who wants truth must fortify himself “unconsciously” and allow himself o be held by those worlds as render health not possible, but needed. Then the task becomes either to continue in pure truth or to act out truth in the world. Maybe both are possible at the same time but even if so one must retain absolute, categorical priority over the other. And I don’t really know too well on what basis one makes these choices, only that they are made.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Pezer
builder
builder
avatar

Posts : 2190
Join date : 2011-11-15
Location : deep caverns in caves

PostSubject: Re: A Thought on The Consequences of Negativity as Science Sun Oct 04, 2015 7:58 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
In any case my insight here, if one can be discerned, is that there are numberless such threshholds. Negativity is in fact the only real basis of building.

Nietzsche was deeply negativistic, and it was thus that he produced such a life affirming thing as will to power. To come out of Nietzsche unscathed, one must dare one’s self to be as negative in every respect of one’s life: the whys and the wherefores, dug into like an oil rig in Texas. Or turn it back on him, as I see Sawelios and Parodites have done, which inevitably blows back into one’s life. Perhaps more violently and effectively, but less personally. I see philosophy as a deeply personal thing, which comunal aim is only to allow others the same level of personal depth and allow for a higher level of discourse. So, I need them as much as they need me. Maybe this is the line you are talking about, the choice: to be deep or to dig depth. I don’t see it as a choice, but as two sides of a comunal striving: the violent, creative side is the same thing as the personal side.

Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5478
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Relativity and magnetism Mon Jun 20, 2016 9:37 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Electrons move in a copper wire. The electrons are negative charges, the wire is made up of positive charges (because the electrons in the wire are now free-floating within the wire as the “electrical current”). The electrons move at a very high velocity and so are subject to Relativity: from the point of view of the wire the electrons are length-contracted in the direction of their motion, which means that per unit of wire there is an increase in density of negative charges of the electrical current, due to length contraction of those elections resulting in more electrons per unit of wire. This creates a charge imbalance between the current (negative) and the wire (positive). Note that this also works if you look at the frame of reference of the electrons, which from their own vantage are stationary and the wire is moving: the wire is positively charged and so experiences length contraction from the perspective of the electrons, therefore the positive charges of the wire are compressed together creating a charge imbalance of more positive charges per unit of negative charges. It is this charge imbalance or differential that produces the electromagnetic effect, and is the same no matter if you take the frame of reference of the electrons or the wire.

So Relativity is the reason why a free flow of moving electrons in a wire creates an electromagnetic effect. The “magnetic” aspect is the electrostatic force between positive and negative particles: electrons in other nearby objects to the wire will be drawn to the net positive charge of the wire, since the electrons in other objects share a reference frame with the electrons in the wire (they are all moving at the same speed) and therefore experience the wire as net positively charged. Protons in other nearby objects also share a reference frame with the protons in the wire, therefore the protons in nearby objects experience the electrons in the wire as net negatively charged, and will attract to them. In any case, objects near the wire will attract to the wire.

Any objects made of protons and electrons will feel some attraction to the wire with electrons flowing in side it. But many objects seem to have no net attraction to the wire, whereas certain metals do. In most objects the molecules are stuck in place in such a way that the strength of the chemical bonds between molecules is stronger than the pull of the electrostatic attraction, especially since the molecules are not lined up and thus the electric field of each atom tends to cancel out the field of another atom. So the potential to be attracted to the wire doesnt extend beyond the scope of the individual atoms or molecules really. In metal, the molecules are all lined up in geometric rows, so the electrons are all in sync with each other. Being in sync in this way means they do not cancel out each other’s charged directions, and can add up to larger potential scope of being drawn to the wire.

Electrons in the wire do not move at the speed of light, but the “charge” or force of the moving electrons does move at the speed of light. The example I found was of a long tube stuffed with golf balls: if you push a new golf ball in one end then a ball will pop out of the other end; the balls themselves are not moving at nearly the same speed as is the “force” that moves along the entire tube since the ball pops out the end at the same moment that you push the new ball in the other end (because the tube can only hold X number of balls). Electrons are the same way.

Moving electrons in the wire carry a physical force, so that when they are made to impact something they pass on some of that force in the form of a “voltage”. Electronics work because the electron flows in copper wires are imparting physical force that can be used to do things.

Next I will work to connect electrostatic attraction and repulsion to self-valuing and to the pure logical view that philosophy must take in order to describe occurrences in physics. All physical phenomena must be described and understood first in terms of pure logic, which I think Value Ontology can help with. Also Parodites’ Daemonic and the excess are logical understandings that can help construct a true explanation for physical events and laws. We are probably a ways away from such a complete explanation, but now we at least know the direction in which to progress toward it.

endyDarling
arrow
arrow
avatar

Posts : 341
Join date : 2016-06-18
Location : @home

PostSubject: Value: Intrinsic, Contingent, Both/Neither? Wed Jun 22, 2016 4:31 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
“Barbara Herrnstein Smith (born 1932) is an American literary critic and theorist, best known for her work Contingencies of Value: Alternative Perspectives for Critical Theory.”-Wikipedia

What is the “nature” of value? Is value obvious? Where does value fit into the framework of logic? In other words, is it predictable?

“val·ue
ˈvalyo͞o/Submit
noun
plural noun: values
1.
the regard that something is held to deserve; the importance, worth, or usefulness of something.
“your support is of great value”
synonyms: worth, usefulness, advantage, benefit, gain, profit, good, help, merit, helpfulness, avail; More
2.
a person’s principles or standards of behavior; one’s judgment of what is important in life.
“they internalize their parents’ rules and values”
synonyms: principles, ethics, moral code, morals, standards, code of behavior
“society’s values are passed on to us as children”
verb
3rd person present: values
1.
estimate the monetary worth of (something).
“his estate was valued at $45,000”
synonyms: evaluate, assess, estimate, appraise, price, put/set a price on
“his estate was valued at $345,000”
2.
consider (someone or something) to be important or beneficial; have a high opinion of.
“she had come to value her privacy and independence”
synonyms: think highly of, have a high opinion of, hold in high regard, rate highly, esteem, set (great) store by, put stock in, appreciate, respect; More”-Google

Message

WendyDarling
arrow
arrow
avatar

Posts : 341
Join date : 2016-06-18
Location : @home

PostSubject: Sciences Failings: Is Philosophy Responsible? Wed Jun 22, 2016 5:03 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
1.) Science has become a numbers game, a game of probability, which kills possibilities.

2.) Science only considers potential within the confines of applied logic and the precedent of established scientific structures.

3.) Dynamism is unorthodox, therefore discounted by established, authoritarian sciences.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5478
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Sciences Failings: Is Philosophy Responsible? Wed Jun 22, 2016 3:54 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Science is a method more than anything, and methods are inclusive and exclusive, and become used for purposes beyond their mandate: for example scientific method is used to discount anything that scientific method hasn’t bothered to apply itself to, or cannot apply itself to, thus becomes a principle of preemptive exemption and denial, a psychological function. But before science this principle was thriving under religion and doxa, so science has done a little good at pushing back those two.

Science has always resisted the real progress that appears within science; as you said, it basically sticks to what it already thinks it knows. Empirical method pays lip service to openness to possibilities but without philosophy it cannot see how its own program reproduces a certain kind of closed consciousness. But I would take science over religion most days.

Science is simply a servant to philosophy, which means to human being and to truth. Yet since philosophy has been slowly killing itself and making itself irrelevant in the world, science has come to think of itself as master to no one. And since science cannot operate without a master, it simply became mastered by capital-- as scientific rationality, technological reason, materialism, positivism, utilitarianism. Again, I would still take these over religion, but really they are just a more modern form of religion; a form that is at least slightly improving on its original substance, usually in spite of itself.

Maybe philosophy will assert itself and science will regain its soul. If it does, human being would be freed. But philosophy’s task has become much larger: not simply one city-state, one culture or one nation anymore, but the whole earth is its proper object and context now. To this end it would cultivate many means into the depths of the earth, even non-philosophical means-- just as philosophy cultivated itself through and as its antithesis of religion, it is doing so again through and as science. All it may take is one man to seize the reigns once the ground has been sown. Philosophy will make the global scientific-political apparatus respond to a truth-status. This is inevitable, because time only moves in one direction.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
WendyDarling
arrow
arrow
avatar

Posts : 341
Join date : 2016-06-18
Location : @home

PostSubject: Re: Sciences Failings: Is Philosophy Responsible? Wed Jun 22, 2016 6:17 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Shared understanding is a precious commodity it seems. Thought my words had lost their English-ness and were being read as if spoken in tongues or something.

So we are agreed that philosophy has dropped the ball? And science must be checked and perhaps checkmated in which case a complete overhaul of its methodology. Logic as it stands now is aggregious, but trying to pinpoint the crux of the problem will be plaguesome. Prepare for loads of questions. Will you give me your best definition of logic formal and then its applied structures and let me pick it apart? To me, it’s limiting in its nature.

Philosophy has to broaden it’s horizons. If I can re-interpret and redefine logic, will that help?

“Maybe philosophy will assert itself and science will regain its soul. If it does, human being would be freed. But philosophy’s task has become much larger: not simply one city-state, one culture or one nation anymore, but the whole earth is its proper object and context now. To this end it would cultivate many means into the depths of the earth, even non-philosophical means-- just as philosophy cultivated itself through and as its antithesis of religion, it is doing so again through and as science. All it may take is one man to seize the reigns once the ground has been sown. Philosophy will make the global scientific-political apparatus respond to a truth-status. This is inevitable, because time only moves in one direction.”-C

Everything above has romanticism and sexism all over it. Science having a soul is news to me. What does “human being would be freed” mean? By all means start a thread for this undertaking over in Logic.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Defenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5478
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Re: Sciences Failings: Is Philosophy Responsible? Thu Jun 23, 2016 3:00 am Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Human being is enslaved to its illusions and to its need for illusions, to what is sometimes called false consciousness, or what I usually call psychopathology. Religion, politics, science are all domains in which this pathology appears and exerts a regulating, necessary influence: it is important to grasp that every being must struggle up through falsity and untruth in order to reach beyond these and to attain to truth, clarity, sanity and reality, and only what we have born within ourselves and overcome within and as what we are is ever understood, to paraphrase something Parodites wrote once. Truth is a process, reality is a process, these are not givens.

For human being to be freed would mean for it to cast aside not only illusions/falsities but also the need for these. The entire history of human thought and culture is this gradual progress of overcoming illusions and the need for them. So philosophy needs to be asking in what sense does human being need illusions and falsities? This requires direct examination of illusions and falsities within science, religion, politics and economics, ethics, philosophy of mind, and just about anywhere pertinent to human consciousness and the world. A real philosophy jumps right in and starts doing the dirty work. This “dirty work” is what you’re going to find on this site here.

Yes science has a soul, every established human discipline or methodology had a soul, its being an abstraction and extension of human being generally, and a condensation of and collapse around particular aspects of human being. We equate ourselves with our experiences, and the more so when these experiences are methodological and rooted in the phenomenology of being striving upward upon the existential climb of consciousness. The soul of science is tempered by other soul-elements not commonly associated to science, namely those relevant to philosophy or to shared existential-social subjectivity. The tendency for science to trend into materialism, reduction, positivism and technological rationality (think the Holocaust, for example, the scientific program of nationalism qua genocide and racism) has been well noted many times (see my signature quote also).

efenders of the Earth
Tower
Tower
avatar

Posts : 5478
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : Freedom

PostSubject: Money as value-void Fri Jul 22, 2016 12:45 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Money does not exist. Money is ‘frozen’ value: values are created and exchanged for money, which money in turn is then used to exchange for more values.

Step 1: Values are created, then get transacted to someplace other than their creation-point. The value moves somewhere else, leaving a “value vacuum” behind it. That vacuum is filled in temporarily by money.

Step 2: That money that filled in the vacuum is then pushed out to cause new external values to flow into the vacuum, thus filling it again.

Values themselves are not money, nor is money value, or even valuable. Money is the stand-in for the transactable nature of values. Money is a placeholder, like the “0” in mathematics. “0” is not a number, but a placeholder for orders of magnitude. Money acts like this, although there is an imperfect relation between money as placeholder and the values-vacuums it attempts to temporarily fill; namely, the eventual values that come to fill the vacuum are usually not a perfect match for the values that left and originally caused the vacuum. Also, vacuums overlap, and change all the time, and are nebulous.

Marx and Adam Smith noticed that values are either used or exchanged (use value or exchange value). A value is “used” when it is exchanged for something one wants, a direct values transaction without the need for money; a value is exchanged when it is simply traded out for a value-vacuum into which some quantity of money comes. I would re-interpret Marx’s terms in so far as the only time values are truly “exchanged” is when it is for money, and any other time there is a value-to-value exchange this is technically use value going on.

Surplus value is what happens when values are put to use to create more value than was originally there. This happens traditionally in labor, where workers create values that pile up and eventually contribute to enough values-exchanges to where new additional values are acquired, and/or these created values are exported from the value-creating point in order to produce a huge value-vacuum into which money flows. Surplus value is also created with increases in efficiency, in technology, and in acquiring new resources, since these things either refine the value-making process or reach out and grab values-to-be that were laying around and not yet converted into true (human) value for use or exchange.

Bottom line: money does not exist. Only values exist. We think money exists only because we already know that values exist.


“Be clever, Ariadne! …
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? …
I am your labyrinth …”. -N

“Cause I’m just a man… flesh and venom.” -Cowboy Troy
Back to top Go down
View user profile Send private message Send e-mail
Sisyphus
Path
Path

Posts : 1647
Join date : 2016-08-06
Location : Florida

PostSubject: Re: Money as value-void Wed Aug 10, 2016 12:04 pm Reply with quote Edit/Delete this post Delete this post View IP address of poster
Your point is well taken but I’m still not going to give you my money.