Women cannot be "Strong" and VICTIMS at the same time...

Urwrong you sound like you have mommy issues with all that cringey fantasizing about “strong noble” women. It’s also homosexual, wanting women to be like men. Nobility is exclusive to men. Women are the sex that evolved to submit to whomever they perceive as most dominant and have their holes filled with cock. While you’re fantasizing how they’re pure and strong and noble they’re fantasizing about having a 10 inch cock shoved in their mouth.

The solution isn’t to try and make women more like men, like you and other feminists try to.

He’s right, no woman could, for example, write a post as noble as this one by thatsnot. Nor one with as much insight into women.

:slight_smile:

Yes, great strategy too. To lower the object of their desire in value so they feel they deserve it, in the meantime agreeing with lowering themselves in value by desiring what they define as a piece of trash. So smart.
Other guys take anther approach. They’ll admire a woman and still act like they deserve her, so the woman concludes that they think very highly of themselves.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nevOM8RZB90[/youtube]

True. Women can’t even live up to the low standards that I’ve set for them.

And sadly, that does work. Probably not so often in thatsnot’s crass form, but thinking like that and having that attitude actually seems to be a good game. What a sad state of affairs. I

I just flipped between this and Ecmandu’s thread about all women being evil. There seem to be a number of people of both sexes who take such a dim view of the opposite sex life must be hell.

It must be a relief to have finally given up finding love.

I’m not talking about love, imbecile. I was responding to you and talking about nobility - the low standards I set with my post.

Sure, I got that you were talking about nobility. And when doing that you talked about what women were like. And then you made it clear that even then you were not judging women, in general, harshly enough. One can deduce things from those statements. You must know, given what you think about women in general, that certain things are not possible.

Plus our form of love was actually invented as a nobility, by the folks from Languedoc.

I think Donald Trumps daughter is noble in the extreme. She lives for her Fathers House and is the jewel in it. And her fathers house is now America and thus the West. I agree not many women are anywhere near that class.

Yes I noticed this as well. I would see ads and commercials saying “We are Strong”. And women fighting punching bags, talking about how strong women are. Yet the music in the background, was always feminist sounding piano music. And there was a cognitive disconnect. Strength is supposed to be shown not told. Strong people don’t have to convince you they are strong. They don’t care about whether you believe they are strong. They just drive past you with their loud rock and roll music. And I heard no rock and roll in any of these commercials.

Good points,

Strength is about Pride. If a father cannot be proud of his daughters then women have no Pride, and thus no Power. Most western women are prideless. Their fathers are ashamed of them. Ivanka Trump is a great example of daughters worth being Proud about. Beautiful, classy, intelligent, and won’t bend to cowardly and lesser men. Can you imagine Ivanka Trump as “helpless victim”? Nope, me neither.

The “Feminist” movement is anti-woman and anti-strength. Feminism is pro-weakness. Feminism wants women to be victims, and prideless. Because Feminists want to remove Pride, remove Patriarchy, the source of strength of powerful women.

I can appreciate the value of family loyalty, but when it comes to public office, advancing family members regardless of experience boils down to nepotism (favoritism). Which is a form of corruption.

Even the Ottomans practiced a more open form of meritocracy. Many ex-slaves, on the account of their own personal merit, rose to positions of status, such as great generals/admirals, and even Grand Viziers:
corndancer.com/fritze/reform … _home.html

(of course there was some hostility between the local hereditary nobility and the ambitious but promising commoners, but the road to power was equally open to both - and it was based on merit. …Would Ottomans have been as successful if their ruling was strictly dynastic?)

She may be noble, but his comments about her body and what he would do if she wasn’t his daughter are less so.

On the contrary, disloyalty against family and favoring strangers over your own kin, is corrupt.

USA is moving from Democrazy to Royalist (kin-first).

No faggot horde, I stated a few plain truths about female nature, “piece of trash” is your judgment of these truths because you’re used to lying to yourself and imagining women have some qualities they don’t actually have so you can justify putting them on a pedestal and admiring them. You despise what women actually are so much you have to replace it with a fantasy.

Same as I said to faggot horde, it only seems “dim” to you because you’ve grown accustomed to comfortable lies. And yeah there is no love, what a tragedy, right? Did you know unicorns don’t exist too.

Ah, but a reality in which unicorns don’t exist must be so “dim”. Since I called it dim it automatically makes it not true, meaning I can go back to my comfortable faggot delusions.

Oh yeah Ivanka Trump is very noble. Nothing more noble than a feminist whored out by her father to an effeminate Jew for marriage.

Name 3 noble American women.

Should a public servant put the interests of his own family over the interests of the public he is supposed to serve? As far as I know, the public elected Trump, not “his friends and family”.

(The founding fathers must be rolling in their graves)

i.imgur.com/kCyoeCP.jpg

azquotes.com/picture-quotes … -35-63.jpg