There isn't really a muse thread.

and falling further behind

Guess the fear of falling masks an antidote: comic relief: but what if per chance the mask drops, literally as in ancient Greece? Can that coincide with an analysis of what lies below it?(the mask)? Is that what the birth of tragedy is all about? The shared but unknown depth of which it is said, not to individually look into?

Underground travelers must loose some of the fear, all of it would drop to the fears of the jungle, and perhaps leave to unimaginable terrors.

Perhaps it is myst, ery, clouds; fog, and sum sunny day will come along.

myst from Angel tears

Living in eternal sun

Liquid rays , laughing

flipside, ain’t much fun either. FI.

And what of masks? The notion of an authentic self political party is rather nutty. I really have so much I should be a republican. And I an’t what a democrat has become.

I think taxes are little more and can be so much less then the contribution made for the environment in play to make money. Advantage is a creation. Those who reap it should pay for it because they didn’t create the condition. Society, culture and government did.
It really fucks with my head from a human rights perspective but I can understand it from an evolutionary perspective. Are values cultural or genetic, or a mix

The notion that living on this planet for any amount of time provides presumption should be questioned.

Masks, taxes & presumptions

Masks are a cover for the presumptive projection of taxing others for the construction of the ‘authentic self’.

Such constructions are a matter of a very long time, and fear of uncovering, leads to a surge of subliminal forces, its forming a crucial , short term solution.

Imploding the above two , creates public sentiment , even contrary to previous holding.

I do wonder. At times.

Then I consider what it is to be sane. And one finds they are that line. Give a little to much to counter that and balance is precarious.

Good news, still on the line.

If a fish; I’d rather be off the hook.

And then the depth: :: :looking back at you

and then you’re on line again with more slack

and you realize you caught yourself again.

Thanks for reminding me.

Debate as polar is difficult to get use to. More like a plane than a line. More like a volume than a shape.

Not sure if debating a volume in terms of it’s edges leads to a meaningful analysis.

I really suck at debate

That Hume prefigured that argument sowed the seeds for existential doubtful reduction into simplicity is itself a test for a clarity which emulated their very effects, which then were easy to repress, or, contrary, appearing in the guise of freedom.

Such transforms are at times necessary for the elimination of conscious guilt and its suppression into surreliasm. , including those from the world of dreams.

This necessity is a product of political pressures, brought again through abrogation of threatening by darker doubles using politics in a variable quantitative sense. Its ultimate source consists in sympathetic kindness. The other side brings mallebility into the realm of possible critical states approaching self defeating and chaotic panic. and chaos.

Political foes must come to some terms of agreement if, they be to survive, even at the point of apparent collusion.

On the other hand, honesty and fidelity needs to flourish, in such unlikely situation.

Mallebility is what I understand You are alluding to, as the apparent reduction from the volume through the linear. That this is possible , butunlikely in the average person, for such a person would not be able to tolerate it. Its like reversal of prpgressip from the linear to the identifiable process without all the missed steps along the way.

Back@,

WTF mate? Bro? Fellow_planateer? Universe_Co-habitent?

What story shall we weave today?

Thought game.

IF this (inclusive) experience is about the assurance of life and its ability to evolve, presumably to better survive, then…

Which is the best species among us to carry life forward?

.its always the man in the middle, who not only proves inviolate, but foreseeable.

Such a man can test the reality of his being within such parameters, when its no longer the process of him being chosen by constituency, but rather it is his choice of what constitutes him.

And what can be his constitution ? To be able to be intra/inter specie.

Sloths… for the meek shall inherit the earth.

Meno, I do not agree with the criticism of your intelligence. Depth, breadth, and sensitivity, and an always “full” sort of constitution are the colors I see on the horizon. Bravo. I appreciate your prose. Thanks you.

MagsJ, a pleasant surprise, thanks you for gracing these digs. Sloths, they are an interesting choice. Someone I became quite fond of sparing with was fond of the expression “slow and steady wins the race” That does involve a sort of meekness. Not so much for winning but for the steadiness in process.

Thanks all through I wonder about very deeply hidden irony. The best are indistinguishable and opaque.

For that reason the safest is to lie low and assume one can never really know.

For me, its not purely a matter of intelligence but a strange way of apprehension as perhaps Rudolf Steiner would have it. This stretch perhaps is supported by unusual phenomena generated at a point of intersection.

Some doubt this but the focus on it bring probability closer to certainty.

And I can’t help thinking that You are beginning to suspect the defining mode of slippage from reason to its contrary.

Pls. Don’t let it bother You.

i admit it that your post is really sound asuming. hehe…