Certainly real,
You didn’t answer my question, but for now it’s neither here nor there. I proved that there are subjective states god has no access to. Mine’s demonstrable, yours is not. Omniscience is a flawed premise. You even state yourself that none of us can be this, so it’s unfalsifiable by your own definition, but I did falsify omniscience by what we can all demonstrate. I don’t think you truly understand …
It is a PROOF that god has NEVER known what it’s like to not know something, but we have, and in an infinite cosmos, there are an infinite number of subjective states that god has 0% access to. This means that a human can judge a human better than god.
But… I’m going to blow your mind further …
Before I do, I need to say this!
To say that a perfect being planned all of this, and we should just accept it, is actually a really scary way to look at life, as in sadistic and psychopathic (“you don’t know, this is going to hurt, but it’s NECESSARILY for the BEST”). NO MEANS NO !!! There’s no other philosophy to be had there. Now you’re coming off as a serious creep. That’s your argument against omnibenevolence? Ouch man, psychopath cult leader vibes here.
Here’s what’s going to blow your mind:
Something that comes from something else came from nothing at all. Even if god does it.
I gave you a proof earlier and you ignored it.
If god knows every reason why god does what god does, and all of those reasons are internal, then god knows nothing about why there’s an external to act upon, which means there’s no otherness in existence.
This causes a state called logical Catatonia where the being in question cannot perceive existence.
Additionally, you confuse, “all the knowledge of existence is in existence”. With the statement, existence knows all the knowledge in existence.
You’re taking existence outside of itself, which you yourself said is impossible.