What I mean when i say “state” is simply an understanding among all individuals, that if any 2 of us gang up against the rest (as in marriage), or many against the rest – if master/slave disorder is spotted – that will be contained by others.
(and all are “police” in this limited sense and apart from that, it’s Crowley’s “do as thou wilt” (without coming in the way of others who’re also similarly free, which will be facilitated by all; there is no specific police etc., that’s just a forerunner of corruption)
Because nobody is supposed to psychologically dominate susceptible people, all are supposed to be individualistic, and if some are doing this, it is a common threat to all.
And then, some structure is needed to uphold economic policy, but even that should be open/broadcasted to all eyes…
But nothing much of a state apart from this seems to be justifiable…
Maybe i shouldn’t use the term state but a contract. What we need is a new universal constitution on these lines. The American founding fathers made a start, nobody’s ever continued on it.