The question is what comes first. If philosophy comes first, how can it beget many philosophies? Or be begat by egos?
These are confusions imposed by modern scholars to avoid the hard wzzork. The painful work! And also the absurdly rewarding work.
Isn’t replying to the same post twice, the same as not being tried for the same crime twice? i.e. expecting a different answer/outcome, but with no new information presented.
The group understood.
The group is sad, since a member of the group cannot step out from behind the podium, perhaps ashamed of the shape of its body. The particular shape. The group notices how this member stays in the clouds, safe in not being concrete, safe in not being quite clear, not diving into specific issues, staying in the role of lecturer to lectured, in meta-position, superposition. This wave that never becomes a particle, remaining gestural, vague, ephemeral…
but feeling no doubt pristine, untouchable, safe…and gifted.
But all true gifts much come into the specific grit of life or they are just fanstasy
signifying, if not nothing, then little.
Are you saying that there isn’t, and cannot be, variants of philosophy and ways of thinking?
Perhaps… if you are, then this is where the difference in male and female thought processing and thinking lies… the renowned ability to multi-task. 
The group inquires as to the details involved in this protest.
The group deplores this group answer as stereotyped prejudiced response. Obviously only what one is able to understand is meaningful. So, does the group turn away from what ever it doesn’t now understand? The group, one fears, is utterly lacking in philosophic sense.
Groups often deplore suggestions that their approach, whether habitual or newly prized or…, might be improved. The group has engaged in prejudiced responses itself and may not like when this is mirrored and here has perhaps turned away from what it does not understand or perhaps what seems to be a threat to its sense of its role.
The group appreciates the introduction of collective third person response.
The group thinks this adds something.
The group feels no need for this to change.
The group however learns more from the blend of abstraction and the concrete/particular.
That is where gifts shine or do not.
Groups are the plain’s best defence against philosophy or any challenge.
“There are no philosophies, only philosophers” - N
Meaning there is at this point only me.
Lol I agree on that that is the difference. But um… philosophy is love of wisdom. There are no different variants of love of wisdom. It is itself a variance.
What I think is the case with women is that they are able to think philosophy while they also think other things, multitrack. Not different philosophies! Thay would be like different combustions. The methods of achieving combustion may vary, but combustion is combustion.
They be just words to describe something. If we manipulate the meaning of the word based on grammar rather than on what the word describes, then the word no longer describes it accurately.
Language is a tool, not a law.
Since women can only think in multitrack, it is gentelmanly and proper to not apply the one track rigor one applies to men to them.
If most men had for a second to endure the multitrack thinking of a woman they would go insane. It is much harder for women.
We make up for it by putting our lives on the line. Only that puts us on par.
To put one’s life on the line is to acknowledge that there are other tracks, even if one isn’t aware of them at the moment.
Lives or pride. Which to a real man is the same.
Truth is less important to a woman. She already knows it.
This is why in early societies men belonged to women, and were happy to.
But then, you know, fear got the best of them and they came up with male head gods. Put the women in chains and began a cycle of rape that has lasted millenia.
Why is Zeus great? He is the first male head god to deem that women were to be seduced or belonged to rather than owned.
He was sneaky and decieving, but at least it was no longer rape.
What was Socrates? The first Greek to put forward that Zeus was fake and women should again be chained and raped.
Why are Catholics better than protestants?
Because they put more enfasis on the Father, who is Zeus, than on Jesus, who is Socrates.
Praytell, what gave you this wisdom about womans inner life?
I think you got it wrong - when all is well, a woman recognizes a man as the meaning of her existence.
But most men will never come close to mean this to any woman. So women will screw with them and make them feel like all they are worthy of being is cannon fodder.
The case of islam - no one is considered worthy by anyone except as a trophy-corpse to be carried through the streets.
What is Dionisus?
The idea that in the end a male pleases a female more than a female, and the question of what the male most pleasing to a female would be like.
Yeah well Im not in your objectivistic tradition.
I read: “Dionysos is the form in which I, P.I.R., see myself as most worthy, and thus most likely to be worthy in a womans eyes.”
Which by all means seems valid.