I don’t, because what makes it an issue in sports isn’t an issue in bathrooms. As I said above, biology is quite salient in the sports arena, because sports are designed as physical competition that require participants to push their bodies to the limits. To see the difference, consider performance enhancing drugs, which are an issue in sports but not an issue in bathroom use. No one things we should be testing for performance enhancing drugs before people use a particular bathroom or have separate juicer bathrooms, because the ways in which performance enhancing drugs affect sports aren’t salient in bathrooms. That’s essentially the same thing that’s happening with transwomen in women’s sports: there’s a credible claim that their participation undermines the leveling intention of having sex-specific sports. But that isn’t an issue in bathroom usage.
All humans lines, all of us, originate in Africa. Even non-sapiens humans evolved in Africa and migrated out, and modern humans definitely evolved in Africa and migrated out. You may not have looked back far enough, but all your ancestors ultimately descend from black people in Africa.
You’re black, Wendy.
I think this claim is likely to be question-begging. Your definition of psychologically male is based on the psychology of people who have XY chromosomes. So even if someone’s brain and behavior strongly correlate with people with XX chromosomes, I’d expect you to say that their brain and behavior are male by definition. By such definition, where every person with XY chromosomes is male, and the sex of all traits of a person are judged by that person’s chromosomes, your claim is true by definition, it’s just a tautology. But that’s just begging the question.
If instead we look at the distribution of behavior and brain structure across people with different sets of chromosomes, I would expect to see two clusters roughly corresponding to social sex, and I would also expect to see significant overlap between the clusters, and people with different sets of chromosomes represented in both clusters. And that’s what we see.
Still waiting for you to clarify how you think this supports your position.
I think this is a case-by-case issue. In some places, political affiliations or religions or beliefs about vaccines might be seen as super important, and in other places not so much. Probably at very liberal colleges, trans status is seen as less significant than Republican status.
And consent is kind of always given under false assumptions, it matters a lot what those assumptions are. If the assumptions are “the guy in the mask is my boyfriend”, then there’s an issue of consent. If it’s “the guy at the bar is a millionaire”, we usually don’t recognize a lack of consent. I don’t think this question is easy or cut and dry on any issue.
If you really identified that way, you wouldn’t be asking me to do it for you.